Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives May 30 2015

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Consensual review[edit]

File:Big_Sur_May_2011_panorama.jpg[edit]

  • Nomination Panorama of Big Sur, California. --King of Hearts 06:27, 25 May 2015 (UTC)
  • Promotion
  •  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 08:55, 25 May 2015 (UTC)
    There are steps in the horizon (see full resolution). I don´t know, if this is important for QI. So let´s ask the others. --Milseburg 12:48, 26 May 2015 (UTC)
    @Milseburg: Could you clarify whether you meant for this to be a comment or an oppose? I checked and the 16-bit TIFF on my computer does not have posterization. When converted to 8-bit JPEG, even at highest quality, the posterization appears, so unless I upload a 100+ MB file (which is discouraged on Commons) there's no way around the issue. Anyways I don't think it is very visible. --King of Hearts 00:47, 27 May 2015 (UTC)
  •  Support Probably Milseburg found the "steps" marked by me. I think, they are ineglible regarding the rather high resolution and the naturally low contrast in that areas. -- Smial 11:30, 27 May 2015 (UTC)
    • Smial marked what I mean. Thank you. I think, it´s a removable little stitching-problem. --Milseburg 11:41, 27 May 2015 (UTC)
  • Fixed --King of Hearts 01:49, 28 May 2015 (UTC)
  •  Support Better now. --Milseburg 12:18, 28 May 2015 (UTC)
  •  Support Good quality. --Hockei 19:46, 28 May 2015 (UTC)
Total: 4 support (excluding the nominator), 0 oppose → Promoted   --Hubertl 05:07, 29 May 2015 (UTC)

File:Central_Park_New_York_May_2015_006.jpg[edit]

  • Nomination Midtown skyline from Central Park. --King of Hearts 02:13, 21 May 2015 (UTC)
  • Promotion
  •  Oppose Upper half shows blurry leaves, lower half is sharp. --Lucasbosch 07:41, 21 May 2015 (UTC)
  •  Comment @Lucasbosch: : Is it sharp enough at 6 MP? I don't see any significant unsharpness at this resolution. --King of Hearts 01:26, 22 May 2015 (UTC)
  •  weak from my side --Hubertl 07:24, 22 May 2015 (UTC)
  •  Support --Ralf Roletschek 08:22, 23 May 2015 (UTC)
Total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promoted   --Hubertl 05:02, 29 May 2015 (UTC)