Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives May 26 2022

• 
  • Nomination Kamperveen, view (over the IJssel) on Wilsum. (St Lambertus Church)
    --Agnes Monkelbaan 04:25, 24 May 2022 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 04:30, 24 May 2022 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Scheersluis in Kamperveen. Lock complex in the Reevediep. (sound system.)
    --Agnes Monkelbaan 04:25, 24 May 2022 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 04:30, 24 May 2022 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Boardwalk in Venner Moor near Senden, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany --XRay 03:48, 24 May 2022 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:08, 24 May 2022 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Moor waters in the Venner Moor near Senden, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany --XRay 03:48, 24 May 2022 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:08, 24 May 2022 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Glass artwork “L’Or” (René Blättermann, 2022) as a door in the Tree of Jesse portal of the St Lamberti Church in Münster, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany --XRay 03:48, 24 May 2022 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:06, 24 May 2022 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Dandelions on a fallow field (Bügelmanns Reit) in Hausdülmen, Dülmen, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany --XRay 03:48, 24 May 2022 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:06, 24 May 2022 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Spider web at the weir of the Umflut of the Heubach in Hausdülmen, Dülmen, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany --XRay 03:48, 24 May 2022 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:06, 24 May 2022 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Milestone at the Wurzenpass road in Tschau, Arnoldstein, Carinthia, Austria -- Johann Jaritz 02:28, 24 May 2022 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --XRay 03:47, 24 May 2022 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Milestone at the Wurzenpass road in Tschau, Arnoldstein, Carinthia, Austria -- Johann Jaritz 02:28, 24 May 2022 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Tagooty 03:19, 24 May 2022 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Subsidiary church Saint Oswald with cemetery in Tschau, Arnoldstein, Carinthia, Austria -- Johann Jaritz 02:28, 24 May 2022 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --XRay 03:47, 24 May 2022 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination The D. Maria II National Theatre on the north side of Rossio Square, Lisbon. by User:Felix König --Ezarate 22:55, 23 May 2022 (UTC)
  • Decline  Oppose Nice composition but not sharp enough and looks overexposed. No exif data but looks like a cellphone pic. -- Ikan Kekek 03:21, 24 May 2022 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Medieval tower "Stumpfer Turm" near Morbach, Germany. --Palauenc05 22:06, 23 May 2022 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Steindy 23:09, 23 May 2022 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Grossostheim, Sattelberg, spring area --KaiBorgeest 21:19, 23 May 2022 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:29, 24 May 2022 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Mercedes-Benz G-Class (Rothmans) in Stuttgart.--Alexander-93 21:04, 23 May 2022 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 00:13, 24 May 2022 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Porsche 924 in the Porsche-Museum Stuttgart.--Alexander-93 21:04, 23 May 2022 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 00:13, 24 May 2022 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Traku Street in Vilnius, Lithuania. (by BigHead) --Pofka 20:03, 23 May 2022 (UTC)
  • Decline  Oppose Barely over the absolute minimum size but too small for this kind of photo and a little noisy. -- Ikan Kekek 03:24, 24 May 2022 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Mercedes-AMG A 45 S 4MATIC+ in Stuttgart.--Alexander-93 16:41, 23 May 2022 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Peulle 19:17, 23 May 2022 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Ford Bronco Outer Banks in Stuttgart.--Alexander-93 16:41, 23 May 2022 (UTC)
  • Promotion Useable quality -- Spurzem 17:38, 23 May 2022 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Figure niche at Hauptstraße 57 in Niederkirchen bei Deidesheim, second half of the 18th century
    --F. Riedelio 16:23, 23 May 2022 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Steindy 23:11, 23 May 2022 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Corn mignonette (Reseda phyteuma) --Robert Flogaus-Faust 11:32, 23 May 2022 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Ermell 20:37, 23 May 2022 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Arianta arbustorum on the Taraxacum flower: macro shot taken in the Ropsha Forest, Leningrad Oblast, RussiaThis image won the 1st prize worldwide in Wiki Loves Earth 2021. By User:Black Cherry Spb --Rodrigo.Argenton 10:22, 23 May 2022 (UTC)
  • Promotion A bit grainy but good enough --Hangman'sDeath 10:55, 23 May 2022 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination parque nacional no estado brasileiro de Minas Gerais By User:Robsondig --Rodrigo.Argenton 10:20, 23 May 2022 (UTC)
  • Decline  Oppose Interesting image, but very dark and otherwise very noisy. -- Ikan Kekek 03:27, 24 May 2022 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Christian Fuchs with his son at the celebration for the successful qualification for the European Championship. --Steindy 09:29, 23 May 2022 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support Good quality. --Palauenc05 22:04, 23 May 2022 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Ponds near Bösenbechhofen, aerial view --Ermell 08:17, 23 May 2022 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 16:42, 23 May 2022 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Flower of the garlic mustard flower --Ermell 08:17, 23 May 2022 (UTC)
  • Promotion Awesome. -- Ikan Kekek 09:19, 23 May 2022 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Kieferndorf aerial view --Ermell 08:17, 23 May 2022 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 16:40, 23 May 2022 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Federal motorway 3 near Höchstadt an der Aisch --Ermell 08:17, 23 May 2022 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Steindy 09:14, 23 May 2022 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Federal motorway 3 near Höchstadt an der Aisch --Ermell 08:17, 23 May 2022 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Steindy 09:14, 23 May 2022 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Golden rain (Laburnum anagyroides) --Ввласенко 07:37, 23 May 2022 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Ermell 20:35, 23 May 2022 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Close wing Mud puddling activity of Papilio paradoxa (Zinken, 1831) - Great Blue Mime. (by Atanu Bose Photography) --Atudu 06:54, 23 May 2022 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --George Chernilevsky 07:28, 23 May 2022 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Edgar Wallace plaque --Mike Peel 06:44, 23 May 2022 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Steindy 09:16, 23 May 2022 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Site of the Mitre tavern --Mike Peel 06:44, 23 May 2022 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Steindy 09:16, 23 May 2022 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Farm, Pavé des Bois-Blancs 17, in Bondues, France --Velvet 06:36, 23 May 2022 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --George Chernilevsky 06:38, 23 May 2022 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Farm, Pavé des Bois-Blancs 15, in Bondues, France --Velvet 06:34, 23 May 2022 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --George Chernilevsky 06:38, 23 May 2022 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Box stand in the Münsterwald near Venwegen, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany. --Llez 05:56, 23 May 2022 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 06:20, 23 May 2022 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Box stand in the Münsterwald near Venwegen, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany --Llez 05:56, 23 May 2022 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 06:20, 23 May 2022 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Biorhiza pallida in a Quercus robur. Focus stack of 20 photos.
    --Famberhorst 05:26, 23 May 2022 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 05:27, 23 May 2022 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Gandaki river by Knipptang --UnpetitproleX 21:32, 22 May 2022 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Velvet 07:10, 23 May 2022 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Hatu Peak by Wittystef --UnpetitproleX 21:22, 22 May 2022 (UTC)
  • Decline Too dark and lacking in detail, IMO. --Peulle 11:05, 23 May 2022 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Volkswagen Santana in Stuttgart.--Alexander-93 20:10, 22 May 2022 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Velvet 07:10, 23 May 2022 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination View from Petersberg at the parish church Saint Bartholomew and the main square in Friesach, municipality Friesach, district Sankt Veit an der Glan, Carinthia, Austria. Photo by User:Thomas Wozniak --Mosbatho 18:57, 22 May 2022 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Velvet 07:10, 23 May 2022 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Natura 2000 protected area with IDThis image won the 3rd prize worldwide in Wiki Loves Earth 2021. By User:Nojos88 --Rodrigo.Argenton 17:23, 22 May 2022 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Mike Peel 06:49, 23 May 2022 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Marcel Koller, teamchef of Austrian national team, after the qualification for the European championship. --Steindy 12:51, 22 May 2022 (UTC)
  • Decline Insufficient quality: the face is not sharp. Evidenced by the other image in the same continuous shot series which is sharp. --Peulle 11:07, 23 May 2022 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Marcel Koller, teamchef of Austrian national team, after the qualification for the European championship. --Steindy 12:51, 22 May 2022 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Peulle 11:07, 23 May 2022 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination “Palais du Film”, movie theater (cinema) from 1912 until 1974 in the rue Neuve in Charleroi. --Jmh2o 10:01, 22 May 2022 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Velvet 07:10, 23 May 2022 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Philippe de Comines kindergarten, former Jeanne Maillotte girls' school, Rue Victor Duruy, in Lille, France --Velvet 09:59, 22 May 2022 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Aristeas 05:56, 23 May 2022 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Rock speedwell (Veronica prostrata) --Robert Flogaus-Faust 18:27, 20 May 2022 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Steindy 23:13, 23 May 2022 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Ferrari Roma in Böblingen.--Alexander-93 17:21, 20 May 2022 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Comment. The image is to bright. -- Spurzem 20:14, 20 May 2022 (UTC)
     Done Uploaded a new version.--Alexander-93 11:47, 22 May 2022 (UTC)
    Better now -- Spurzem 12:18, 23 May 2022 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Building of the National Electricity Company of Kisangani in République démocratique du Congo (by Serge HD) --Adoscam 12:51, 20 May 2022 (UTC)
  • Promotion
    Needs perspective correction --Jakubhal 15:38, 20 May 2022 (UTC)  perspective correction done--Adoscam 08:42, 23 May 2022 (UTC)
     Support Thanks. Ok for me --Jakubhal 16:10, 23 May 2022 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Blacksmith at work by Gurdeepdali --UnpetitproleX 21:53, 19 May 2022 (UTC)
  • Decline
     Oppose out of focus, noisy --Ezarate 22:24, 23 May 2022 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: Pots drying by Gurdeepdali --UnpetitproleX 23:53, 17 May 2022 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination: "Fausse porte vraie cachette" : Fake door real hiding place. --Touam 19:49, 17 May 2022 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination: Victoria Falls, Zambia-Zimbabwe --Poco a poco 12:49, 17 May 2022 (UTC)
  • Review needed

Consensual review

File:VdA_ecole_archi_et_paysage_de_Lille.jpg

• Nomination Ecole Nationale Supérieure d'Architecture et de Paysage de Lille, in Villeneuve d'Ascq, France --Velvet 08:09, 20 May 2022 (UTC)
• Promotion
  The foreground should be cropped out a bit. --Ermell 13:33, 20 May 2022 (UTC)
   Oppose Yes to much forefround an the tree on the left side could be cut down. Position is not good. --Lodewicus de Honsvels 22:31, 20 May 2022 (UTC)
   Done Cropped version uploaded --Velvet 05:43, 21 May 2022 (UTC)
   Support I dsagree. Good enough for QI. --Steindy 19:47, 21 May 2022 (UTC)
•  Support Both versions are OK to me. -- Ikan Kekek 06:14, 22 May 2022 (UTC)
•  Support. What against the trees? -- Spurzem 11:07, 22 May 2022 (UTC)
•  Support IMO OK. --XRay 16:46, 22 May 2022 (UTC)
•  Support --Ermell 22:37, 22 May 2022 (UTC)

Total: 5 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promoted   --Peulle 08:55, 25 May 2022 (UTC)

File:Toyota_Aygo_X_1X7A0324.jpg

• Nomination Toyota Aygo X in Leonberg.--Alexander-93 16:52, 19 May 2022 (UTC)
  
• Decline
•  Oppose To many reflections on the car and position ot favourable here. --Lodewicus de Honsvels 22:08, 20 May 2022 (UTC)
•  Support I disagree. This is a QI by current standards.--Peulle 13:13, 21 May 2022 (UTC)

 Comment. Ich erinnere mich, dass Kollege Peulle sehr viel strengere Maßstäbe anlegte, zum Beispiel bei meinem Foto eines Jaguar E-Type in 2017. -- Spurzem (talk) 11:34, 22 May 2022 (UTC)

•  Oppose Snapshot. Sharp, but lacking any composition. --Smial 12:55, 22 May 2022 (UTC)

Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Declined   --Peulle 08:55, 25 May 2022 (UTC)

File:SC_Wiener_Neustadt_vs._SK_Austria_Klagenfurt_2015-10-20_(165).jpg

• Nomination Yellw card in football. --Steindy 17:07, 19 May 2022 (UTC)
• Decline
•  Support Good quality. --Ermell 19:36, 19 May 2022 (UTC)
•  Oppose Am I wrong or aren't there compresstion artefacts along the edges of the arm and cards? Can someone else take a look? --Peulle 13:12, 21 May 2022 (UTC)
•  Oppose Per Peulle. Lots of artifacts by sharpening and probably upscaling. Still rather low image resolution. --Smial 12:51, 22 May 2022 (UTC)

Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Declined   --Peulle 08:54, 25 May 2022 (UTC)

File:Malecón,_Puerto_Vallarta_(2014)_-_25.JPG

• Nomination The Rotunda by the Sea, Puerto Vallarta, Mexico --Another Believer 21:42, 16 May 2022 (UTC)
• Decline
  It looks like leaning out. A lot of noise, minor CAs and details low. Hopefully improvable. --XRay 05:21, 17 May 2022 (UTC)
   Support Good quality. Clear photo, background without anything/anyone. --Lodewicus de Honsvels 22:01, 20 May 2022 (UTC)
   Oppose It's not good to promote an image waiting for the response of the photographer. So I have to oppose. --XRay 05:53, 21 May 2022 (UTC)
•  Oppose CA, perspective, low detail probably due to diffraction. --Smial 12:47, 22 May 2022 (UTC)

Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Declined   --Peulle 08:54, 25 May 2022 (UTC)

File:SC_Wiener_Neustadt_vs._SK_Austria_Klagenfurt_2015-10-20_(136).jpg

• Nomination Mario Stefel, player of SC Wiener Neustadt. --Steindy 14:48, 14 May 2022 (UTC)
• Promotion
   Oppose Here the main part is missing. --Lodewicus de Honsvels 21:52, 20 May 2022 (UTC)
  Whats the "main part"? Let's other user hear. --Steindy 19:41, 21 May 2022 (UTC)
•  Weak support A bit noisy, but IMO a nice shot. --Robert Flogaus-Faust 09:22, 22 May 2022 (UTC)
•  Weak support Visible noise is often unavoidable in action photography and I much prefer some noise to excessive noise reduction, which very often results in a plastic-like appearance. The composition is really good in this case and the sharpness and lighting, considering the circumstances when it was taken, is also acceptable. Only the image resolution I find a bit sparse, I actually expect six MPixels with today's cameras. --Smial 10:12, 22 May 2022 (UTC)

Total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promoted   --Peulle 08:54, 25 May 2022 (UTC)

File:Red-eyed_vireo_with_food_in_Prospect_Park_(72717).jpg

• Nomination Red-eyed vireo with food in Prospect Park (Brooklyn, NY, USA) --Rhododendrites 19:03, 20 May 2022 (UTC)
• Promotion
•  Oppose Sharpness is not there when I zoom in. Sorry --Lodewicus de Honsvels 22:22, 20 May 2022 (UTC)
•  Support Right, but considering that its length is 12–13 cm per w:Red-eyed vireo, this photo is sharp enough at larger than life size, so I'd pass it. -- Ikan Kekek 02:19, 21 May 2022 (UTC)
•  Support IMO good enough. --XRay 07:43, 21 May 2022 (UTC)
•  Support Ok for me --Jakubhal 04:36, 22 May 2022 (UTC)

Total: 3 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promoted   --Peulle 08:53, 25 May 2022 (UTC)

File:Short-toed_treecreeper_(Certhia_brachydactyla_megarhynchos).jpg

• Nomination Short-toed treecreeper (Certhia brachydactyla megarhynchos) --Charlesjsharp 22:08, 19 May 2022 (UTC)
• Promotion
•  Support Good quality. --Ermell 19:24, 20 May 2022 (UTC)
•  Oppose Positon out of the middle. --Lodewicus de Honsvels 22:09, 20 May 2022 (UTC)
•  Support It is not necessary to have the bird in the middle. --XRay 05:56, 21 May 2022 (UTC)
•  Support per XRay. -- Ikan Kekek 19:27, 21 May 2022 (UTC)
•  Support The composition is pefectly fine -- Jakubhal 04:39, 22 May 2022 (UTC)

Total: 4 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promoted   --Peulle 08:53, 25 May 2022 (UTC)

File:Short-toed_treecreeper_(Certhia_brachydactyla_megarhynchos)_2.jpg

• Nomination Short-toed treecreeper (Certhia brachydactyla megarhynchos) --Charlesjsharp 22:08, 19 May 2022 (UTC)
• Promotion
•  Support Good quality. --Ermell 19:24, 20 May 2022 (UTC)
•  Oppose Positon out of the middle. --Lodewicus de Honsvels 22:09, 20 May 2022 (UTC)
•  Support It is not necessary to have the bird in the middle. --XRay 05:57, 21 May 2022 (UTC)
•  Support Good quality -- Jakubhal 04:40, 22 May 2022 (UTC)

Total: 3 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promoted   --Peulle 08:53, 25 May 2022 (UTC)

File:Pola_pod_Roztylicami,_województwo_świętokrzyskie,_20220515_0906_5932.jpg

• Nomination Fields near Roztylice, Świętokrzyskie Voivodeship --Jakubhal 03:46, 19 May 2022 (UTC)
• Promotion
•  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 03:59, 19 May 2022 (UTC)
•  Oppose Sharpness is not good and a path through grasland is nothing special. Sorry. --Lodewicus de Honsvels 21:40, 20 May 2022 (UTC)
•  Support Sharp enough for QI. (Special features are not an evaluation criterion.) --XRay 05:59, 21 May 2022 (UTC)
•  Support -- Spurzem 12:51, 21 May 2022 (UTC)
•  Support per XRay. -- Ikan Kekek 19:30, 21 May 2022 (UTC)
•  Support per XRay --Smial 00:00, 22 May 2022 (UTC)

Total: 5 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promoted   --Peulle 08:52, 25 May 2022 (UTC)

File:Dülmen,_Dernekamp,_Löwenzahn_--_2022_--_1322.jpg

• Nomination Fruit stand of the common dandelion (Taraxacum sect. Ruderalia) at a field path in the Bauerschaft Dülmen in Kirchspiel, Dülmen, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany --XRay 03:34, 19 May 2022 (UTC)
• Promotion
•  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 03:44, 19 May 2022 (UTC)
•  Oppose Only one of the two fruit stands has ful sharpness. Not ok for promotion. --Lodewicus de Honsvels 22:05, 20 May 2022 (UTC)

 Comment With Bokeh not everything is sharp. The main subject in the middle is sharp, the second one unsharp enough to see the distance to the first one. --XRay 05:51, 21 May 2022 (UTC)

•  Support One detailed dandelion head is enough. -- Ikan Kekek 19:32, 21 May 2022 (UTC)
•  Support Nice use of DOF and nice diagonal composition. Very nice lighting. --Smial 00:03, 22 May 2022 (UTC)
•  Support Per Smial -- Jakubhal 04:43, 22 May 2022 (UTC)

Total: 4 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promoted   --Peulle 08:52, 25 May 2022 (UTC)

File:Staw_w_Garbaczu,_województwo_świętokrzyskie,_20220515_0911_5938.jpg

• Nomination Pond in Garbacz, Świętokrzyskie Voivodeship --Jakubhal 18:40, 18 May 2022 (UTC)
• Promotion
•  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:40, 18 May 2022 (UTC)
•  Oppose Missing sharpness, the swan in the centre is blurry and composion is not so good. Sorry. --Lodewicus de Honsvels 21:45, 20 May 2022 (UTC)
•  Support IMO sharp enough. (More than that: It looks like a little bit oversharpened. But not necessary to modify.) --XRay 07:46, 21 May 2022 (UTC)
•  Support Good sharpness. Things in the distance don't have to be sharp. The composition is peaceful and perfectly OK; Lodewicus de Honsvels, be careful not to apply criteria better suited to com:fpc here. QIs don't have to have great compositions or be special. -- Ikan Kekek 19:35, 21 May 2022 (UTC)
•  Support per others. --Smial 00:06, 22 May 2022 (UTC)

Total: 4 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promoted   --Peulle 08:52, 25 May 2022 (UTC)

File:Germany_Rhineland-Palatinate_Trier_Hauptmarkt_NE.jpg

• Nomination St. Peter fountain and tower of St. Gangolf seen from NE in Trier, Germany --Virtual-Pano 10:51, 18 May 2022 (UTC)
• Promotion
•  Support Good quality. --Steindy 15:45, 18 May 2022 (UTC)
•  Oppose Photo name should be amended, as the fountain is cut off. The tower, photo size and sharpness are good. --Lodewicus de Honsvels 21:47, 20 May 2022 (UTC)
•  Support Crop is OK and I don't understand the issue with the filename. What's the problem? -- Ikan Kekek 19:38, 21 May 2022 (UTC)
•  Support Good quality -- Jakubhal 04:47, 22 May 2022 (UTC)

Total: 3 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promoted   --Peulle 08:51, 25 May 2022 (UTC)

File:Close_wing_posture_of_Appias_lyncida_(Cramer,1777)_-_Chocolate_Albatross_(Female).jpg

• Nomination Close wing posture of Appias lyncida (Cramer,1777) - Chocolate Albatross (Female). (by Atanu Bose Photography) --Atudu 07:45, 18 May 2022 (UTC)
• Decline
   Support Good quality. --Steindy 15:49, 18 May 2022 (UTC)
   Oppose Sharpness is not at the point where it should be in this photo. If I zomm in the point in the middle gets blurry. --Lodewicus de Honsvels 21:49, 20 May 2022 (UTC)
•  Oppose Rather low resolution, over-sharpened, but still blurred in detail. --Smial 00:10, 22 May 2022 (UTC)
•  Oppose Low level of detail -- Jakubhal 04:45, 22 May 2022 (UTC)

Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 3 oppose → Declined   --Peulle 10:36, 25 May 2022 (UTC)

File:Common_pear_(Pyrus_communis)_blooming.jpg

• Nomination Common pear (Pyrus communis) blooming --Ввласенко 05:50, 12 May 2022 (UTC)
• Promotion
•  Support Good quality. --Steindy 15:41, 20 May 2022 (UTC)
•  Oppose Position out of the middle. Sorry. --Lodewicus de Honsvels 21:57, 20 May 2022 (UTC)
•  Support Position out of the middle is OK. Otherwise the leaves would be cropped. --XRay 06:02, 21 May 2022 (UTC)
•  Support Nice composition. A centered blossom part wouldn't improve the image. --Zinnmann 11:11, 21 May 2022 (UTC)
•  Support Good composition. Why should the flowers are in the middle? -- Spurzem 13:14, 21 May 2022 (UTC)
•  Comment Very good quality but com:overcat. -- Ikan Kekek 19:40, 21 May 2022 (UTC)
  •  Done I agree -- Ввласенко 07:43, 22 May 2022 (UTC)

•  Support Thank you. -- Ikan Kekek 19:25, 22 May 2022 (UTC)

•  Support Good quality -- Jakubhal 04:54, 22 May 2022 (UTC)

Total: 6 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promoted   --Peulle 10:35, 25 May 2022 (UTC)