Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives May 25 2015

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Consensual review[edit]

File:Πάροδος Χανιά 8330 rt.jpg[edit]

  • Nomination Parodos (side-street) Kondylaki, Chania. --C messier 10:46, 22 May 2015 (UTC)
  • Promotion
  •  Support Good quality. --Isiwal 12:51, 22 May 2015 (UTC)
  •  Comment It's good, but there are some CAs. Please check the image.--XRay 14:44, 22 May 2015 (UTC)
  • ✓ Done --C messier 14:54, 22 May 2015 (UTC)
  •  Support Remembers me something ! Could you please denoise the sky a bit ? Thanks in advance.--Jebulon 10:25, 23 May 2015 (UTC)
  •  Support -- Spurzem 13:50, 23 May 2015 (UTC)
Total: 3 support (excluding the nominator), 0 oppose → Promoted   --Hubertl 10:13, 24 May 2015 (UTC)

File:Stadtmauer RE.jpg[edit]

  • Nomination Townwall of Recklinghausen --Nordenfan 12:53, 16 May 2015 (UTC)
  • Decline
  •  Support Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 20:44, 16 May 2015 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Sorry, I disagree again. Both sides leaning in. No QI for me. Although the QI-plaque is already there. --Milseburg 17:45, 18 May 2015 (UTC)
  •  Oppose The image needs perspective correction. But IMO a good correction isn't passable. --XRay 18:01, 19 May 2015 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Sorry, nice composition, but per XRay and CA in the tree --DKrieger 22:35, 19 May 2015 (UTC)
Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 3 oppose → Declined   --Hubertl 10:06, 24 May 2015 (UTC)

File:Minoan ewer archmus Heraklion.jpg[edit]

  • Nomination A minoan ewer, ca.1500 BCE, Archaeological Museum of Heraklion, Crete, Greece.--Jebulon 10:21, 15 May 2015 (UTC)
  • Decline
  •  Support Good quality -- Spurzem 11:58, 15 May 2015 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Not for me,DOF no good,the superior part is out of focus,ask to discuss me too and I would like a geocode, please (not a mandatory, I know).--Livioandronico2013 21:05, 15 May 2015 (UTC)
    • Typical revenge vote (read the quote). As the object is moving in the museum and not always as the same place, the geocode is included in the "institution template", created by me on purpose. Please be careful when reviewing, anyway more than when categorizing !! --Jebulon 08:51, 16 May 2015 (UTC)
  • It is not revenge, do not I have opposed all your photo only to those who do not consider QI, given that demand pinpoint accuracy then we do it your way. The rules apply to all or only some? If you want to be precise you have to be yourself! Clin Let's see if others will give me wrong then I am wrong, or not, this serves a community --Livioandronico2013 10:25, 16 May 2015 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Too low DoF, and at least one masking error. I'm also unsure if it's a good idea to use an artificial background, where it's structure is completely different from the noise of the photographed subject. I think, a neutral white or a neutral black background is more suitable. -- Smial 20:18, 18 May 2015 (UTC)
    • Please sign your vote. For now, it is not valid as anonymous votes are not allowed. Thanks.--Jebulon 19:28, 18 May 2015 (UTC)Thank you Smial (not for your vote, of course ! --Jebulon 20:38, 22 May 2015 (UTC)
      • BtW, Smial, where is the masking error, please ?--Jebulon 20:43, 22 May 2015 (UTC)
Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Declined   --Hubertl 10:08, 24 May 2015 (UTC)