Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives May 21 2016
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
-
- Nomination Oostvaardersplassen in the Netherlands. New nature at the bottom of the former Zuiderzee.
--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:24, 19 May 2016 (UTC) - Promotion Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 04:26, 19 May 2016 (UTC)
- Nomination Oostvaardersplassen in the Netherlands. New nature at the bottom of the former Zuiderzee.
-
- Nomination Patau, Sabah, Malaysia: Ant nest (abandoned) in a tree next to the Ranau-Tambunan road. --Cccefalon 04:09, 19 May 2016 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:30, 19 May 2016 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Babagon, Sabah: Babagon Dam, the biggest water catchment of Sabah built in 1997. --Cccefalon 04:08, 19 May 2016 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 04:25, 19 May 2016 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Schokker “Anita” on the Rhine (and bridge (Bundesstraße 67)) near Rees, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany --XRay 03:34, 19 May 2016 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:33, 19 May 2016 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Nature reserve “Westruper Heide” near Haltern am See, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany --XRay 03:34, 19 May 2016 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 04:24, 19 May 2016 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Statue Maria Immaculata at the alcove of the exterior apse wall of the parish church the Assumption, Premonstratensian monastery, Griffen, Carinthia, Austria --Johann Jaritz 02:43, 19 May 2016 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:27, 19 May 2016 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Mumbai: housing near Bandra railway station --A.Savin 01:11, 19 May 2016 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 02:50, 19 May 2016 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Mumbai: view in Sanjay Gandhi National Park from Kanheri Caves --A.Savin 01:11, 19 May 2016 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 02:50, 19 May 2016 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Katharina Stemberger --Tsui 00:47, 19 May 2016 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 02:48, 19 May 2016 (UTC)
-
- Nomination The Tegetthoff-Denkmal in Vienna was created by Carl Kundmann (Statues) und Carl von Hasenauer (architectural construction) and reminds at Wilhelm von Tegetthoff (1827-1871), Viceadmiral und Commander of the austrian resp. austrian-hungarian navy in the 1860th --Hubertl 00:00, 19 May 2016 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --A.Savin 01:06, 19 May 2016 (UTC)
-
- Nomination The Tegetthoff-Denkmal in Vienna was created by Carl Kundmann (Statues) und Carl von Hasenauer (architectural construction) and reminds at Wilhelm von Tegetthoff (1827-1871), Viceadmiral und Commander of the austrian resp. austrian-hungarian navy in the 1860th --Hubertl 00:00, 19 May 2016 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 00:03, 19 May 2016 (UTC)
-
- Nomination The Tegetthoff-Denkmal in Vienna was created by Carl Kundmann (Statues) und Carl von Hasenauer (architectural construction) and reminds at Wilhelm von Tegetthoff (1827-1871), Viceadmiral und Commander of the austrian resp. austrian-hungarian navy in the 1860th --Hubertl 00:00, 19 May 2016 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 02:46, 19 May 2016 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Medium Avant-corps of the Museum of Natural History, Vienna Days of creation, Artist: Alois Düll --Hubertl 00:00, 19 May 2016 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 00:03, 19 May 2016 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Medium Avant-corps of the Museum of Natural History, Vienna Days of creation, Artist: Alois Düll --Hubertl 00:00, 19 May 2016 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 00:03, 19 May 2016 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Azilal, Morocco by Marahlija --Reda benkhadra 23:10, 18 May 2016 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --A.Savin 01:05, 19 May 2016 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Dies ist ein Foto des Schutzgebietes mit der WDPA-ID --Nightflyer 22:12, 18 May 2016 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 23:24, 18 May 2016 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Dies ist ein Foto des Schutzgebietes mit der WDPA-ID --Nightflyer 22:12, 18 May 2016 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 23:24, 18 May 2016 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Dies ist ein Foto des Schutzgebietes mit der WDPA-ID --Nightflyer 22:12, 18 May 2016 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 23:24, 18 May 2016 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Irina Antonova, chief of the Pushkin Museum of Fine Arts in Moscow. --PereslavlFoto 21:06, 18 May 2016 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --A.Savin 01:03, 19 May 2016 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Tatiana Rychenkova receives a diploma for the museum project in Moscow. --PereslavlFoto 21:06, 18 May 2016 (UTC)
- Decline Not a work by a wikimedian --A.Savin 00:59, 19 May 2016 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Berkel Enschot-NL, roundabout with street art --Michielverbeek 20:52, 18 May 2016 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 22:10, 18 May 2016 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Cromvoirt-NL, former townhall --Michielverbeek 20:51, 18 May 2016 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 22:10, 18 May 2016 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Rosmalen-NL, street art Running Squares --Michielverbeek 20:47, 18 May 2016 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --A.Savin 00:58, 19 May 2016 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Sea lion (Zalophus californianus wollebaeki), Punta Pitt, San Cristobal island, Galapagos islands, Ecuador --Poco a poco 18:44, 18 May 2016 (UTC)
- Promotion GQ --Palauenc05 19:56, 18 May 2016 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Sleeping Lion, near San Cristobal Island, Galapagos Islands, Ecuador --Poco a poco 18:44, 18 May 2016 (UTC)
- Promotion Excellent composition - interesting contrast rock versus sky, only right from the rock it is a bit dissapointing (and this might be the position of the sun) --Michielverbeek 19:34, 18 May 2016 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Los Paredones, Nazca, Peru --Poco a poco 18:44, 18 May 2016 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 22:08, 18 May 2016 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Nazca Lines, Nazca, Peru --Poco a poco 18:44, 18 May 2016 (UTC)
- Promotion GQ --Palauenc05 19:57, 18 May 2016 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Belfry of Saints Peter and Paul church in Jurowce --Kroton 18:34, 18 May 2016 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Poco a poco 20:03, 18 May 2016 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Wayside shrine in Ayl, Germany. --Palauenc05 17:44, 18 May 2016 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Hubertl 18:07, 18 May 2016 (UTC)
-
- Nomination The backside of the Agii Apostoli church, Ancient Agora, Athens, Greece.--Jebulon 17:05, 18 May 2016 (UTC) Support Good focus to main object, good perspective --Michielverbeek 17:39, 18 May 2016 (UTC)
- Promotion
-
- Nomination Ancient greek perfume bottle in shape a a kneeling athlete, Ancient Agora Museum, Athens, Greece.--Jebulon 17:02, 18 May 2016 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Poco a poco 20:03, 18 May 2016 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Wooden bridge over waterway. Location, nature Beekdal Linde Bekhofplas in the Netherlands.
--Famberhorst 15:36, 18 May 2016 (UTC) - Promotion Good quality. --Basotxerri 15:46, 18 May 2016 (UTC)
- Nomination Wooden bridge over waterway. Location, nature Beekdal Linde Bekhofplas in the Netherlands.
-
- Nomination Look through. Location, nature Beekdal Linde Bekhofplas in the Netherlands.
--Famberhorst 15:36, 18 May 2016 (UTC) - Promotion Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 15:59, 18 May 2016 (UTC)
- Nomination Look through. Location, nature Beekdal Linde Bekhofplas in the Netherlands.
-
- Nomination Rose window of the Cathedral of Ourense, Galicia (Spain). --Lmbuga 15:00, 18 May 2016 (UTC)
- Promotion Shame about the shade, but good quality.--Famberhorst 15:51, 18 May 2016 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Bandstand in Ourense, Galicia (Spain). --Lmbuga 15:00, 18 May 2016 (UTC)
Slight tilt in ccw direction Poco a poco 20:05, 18 May 2016 (UTC) - Promotion Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 22:08, 18 May 2016 (UTC)
Done Thanks. (es) Enderezado conforme los edificios del fondo. El templete está torcido--Lmbuga 01:26, 19 May 2016 (UTC)
- Nomination Bandstand in Ourense, Galicia (Spain). --Lmbuga 15:00, 18 May 2016 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Arkhangelskoye. Vadim Zadorozhny’s Vehicle Museum. M3A1 Stuart --Alexxx1979 14:50, 18 May 2016 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Poco a poco 20:05, 18 May 2016 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Lauterbrunnental from Männlichen, Switzerland, 2012 August --Ximonic 11:43, 18 May 2016 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 11:48, 18 May 2016 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Summer night at Lyngen fjord, Troms, Norway, 2012 June --Ximonic 11:43, 18 May 2016 (UTC)
- Promotion Very good quality. --Johann Jaritz 11:46, 18 May 2016 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Roscheider Hof open air museum, Hunsrückweiler, Schuche Haus aus Roth --Berthold Werner 11:00, 18 May 2016 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 15:45, 18 May 2016 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Kopala Hotel and Caspian Restaurant. Rike Park. Tbilisi, Georgia. --Halavar 10:25, 18 May 2016 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 10:59, 18 May 2016 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Views from the Bridge of Peace on the Kura River and its surroundings. Tbilisi, Georgia. --Halavar 10:25, 18 May 2016 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Berthold Werner 11:23, 18 May 2016 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Scuola del Cristo in Cannaregio Venice. --Moroder 09:36, 18 May 2016 (UTC)
- Withdrawn Sorry, far too much noise and not enough sharpness. --Peulle 10:38, 18 May 2016 (UTC) I withdraw my nomination --Moroder 20:06, 18 May 2016 (UTC)
-
- Nomination 1 Wolności Square in Bardo 1 --Jacek Halicki 08:17, 18 May 2016 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 09:16, 18 May 2016 (UTC)
-
- Nomination 1 Wolności Square in Bardo 2 --Jacek Halicki 08:17, 18 May 2016 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 09:16, 18 May 2016 (UTC)
-
- Nomination 4 Wolności Square in Bardo --Jacek Halicki 08:17, 18 May 2016 (UTC)
- Promotion Looks good. --Peulle 08:51, 18 May 2016 (UTC)
-
- Nomination 27 Główna Street in Bardo 1 --Jacek Halicki 08:17, 18 May 2016 (UTC)
- Promotion OK. --A.Savin 00:44, 19 May 2016 (UTC)
-
- Nomination 27 Główna Street in Bardo 2 --Jacek Halicki 08:17, 18 May 2016 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 15:38, 18 May 2016 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Landscape with wind turbines in Paderborn-Benhausen, Germany. --Tsungam 08:07, 18 May 2016 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 08:22, 18 May 2016 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Station of the Cross at No.7 Seigelstein --Ermell 08:02, 18 May 2016 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 08:22, 18 May 2016 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Chapel below the Seigelstein --Ermell 08:02, 18 May 2016 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 08:22, 18 May 2016 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Convent of the Sisters of Sion, Jerusalem -jkb- 07:39, 18 May 2016 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 22:08, 18 May 2016 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Mahane Yehuda Market, Jerusalem -jkb- 07:39, 18 May 2016 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 22:08, 18 May 2016 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Altstadt von Hebron, Palästina --Ralf Roletschek 06:00, 18 May 2016 (UTC)
- Promotion Main object is sharp enough, but other parts might have been sharper. You have dealed quiet well with contrast differences Support --Michielverbeek 07:14, 18 May 2016 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Altstadt von Hebron, Palästina --Ralf Roletschek 06:00, 18 May 2016 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Hubertl 10:05, 18 May 2016 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Overgrown biotope. Location, nature Beekdal Linde Bekhofplas in the Netherlands.
--Famberhorst 05:37, 18 May 2016 (UTC) - Promotion Support Nice. Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 06:25, 18 May 2016 (UTC)
- Nomination Overgrown biotope. Location, nature Beekdal Linde Bekhofplas in the Netherlands.
-
- Nomination Minoritenkirche Vienna, Epitaph in the arcades on the southside --Hubertl 04:26, 18 May 2016 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 15:40, 18 May 2016 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Minoritenkirche Vienna, Epitaphs in the arcades on the southside --Hubertl 04:26, 18 May 2016 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality.--Famberhorst 05:38, 18 May 2016 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Nature reserve “Gagelbruch Borkenberge”, Lüdinghausen, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany --XRay 04:16, 18 May 2016 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 05:17, 18 May 2016 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Rhine near Rees, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany --XRay 04:16, 18 May 2016 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 05:17, 18 May 2016 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Nature reserve “Westruper Heide” near Haltern am See, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany --XRay 04:16, 18 May 2016 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Charming motive. Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 05:18, 18 May 2016 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Lido on lake Goggau in Goggau, Steuerberg, Carinthia, Austria --Johann Jaritz 03:19, 18 May 2016 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality. --XRay 05:04, 18 May 2016 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Charles Oberthür's Lepidoptera collections - holarctic ecozone (by EdouardHue). Kruusamägi 22:30, 17 May 2016 (UTC)
- Promotion Good enough for QI. --Peulle 08:17, 18 May 2016 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Charles Oberthür's Lepidoptera collections - afrotropical ecozone (by EdouardHue). Kruusamägi 22:30, 17 May 2016 (UTC)
- Promotion Looks all right. Good for QI. --Peulle 08:17, 18 May 2016 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Benjamin Bellot bei der Aufstiegsfeier von RB Leipzig 2016 --Wikijunkie 20:15, 17 May 2016 (UTC)
- Decline Oppose Insufficient quality. Sorry. Resolution too low, unsharp. --XRay 05:47, 18 May 2016 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Terrence Boyd bei der Aufstiegsfeier RB Leipzig 2016 --Wikijunkie 20:15, 17 May 2016 (UTC)
- Decline Oppose Underexposition, lack of detail, not sharp enough (see theeth), chromatic noise (see body), chromatic aberrations (see right shoulder or the top of the head). Fingers are disturbing IMO. A bit of noise--Lmbuga 15:44, 18 May 2016 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Burrard Bridge, Vancouver, Canada --Xicotencatl 18:27, 17 May 2016 (UTC)
- Promotion Bridge does not seem to be completely horizontal, but good for me.--Famberhorst 05:42, 18 May 2016 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Dormition Abbey in Jerusalem --Ralf Roletschek 11:28, 17 May 2016 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Berthold Werner 12:01, 17 May 2016 (UTC)
Oppose Tilted CW little bit. Also, sky needs denoising. Both problems can be easly fixed. --Halavar 12:38, 17 May 2016 (UTC) Done sky denoised. The image looks like a problem, that's true - but it is exactly straight. --Ralf Roletschek 16:26, 17 May 2016 (UTC)
Support OK. Can pass as QI (but I still think, that with fixed tilt image would be better) --Halavar 18:06, 17 May 2016 (UTC) lets discuss backside here? --Ralf Roletschek 19:10, 17 May 2016 (UTC)
First I also thought it's tilted but it is straight. --Berthold Werner 10:48, 18 May 2016 (UTC)
-
- Nomination The Drammen fjord seen from Løkkeberg park. --Peulle 21:22, 16 May 2016 (UTC)
- Decline Not sharp enough for QI. --Palauenc05 20:06, 18 May 2016 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Cultural heritage monument in Fulda --Verum 19:10, 15 May 2016 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 22:11, 18 May 2016 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Haredi prayer with tefilin in front of Western wall, Jerusalem, Israel --ProtoplasmaKid 21:04, 15 May 2016 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 22:11, 18 May 2016 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Headshot of an American bison ♂ (Bison bison bison) in Lamar Valley, Yellowstone National Park --Frank Schulenburg 23:17, 14 May 2016 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 22:13, 18 May 2016 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Huge lime near Teuchatz in the LSG "Franconian Switzerland - Veldenstein Forest" --Ermell 09:54, 14 May 2016 (UTC)
- Promotion The atmosphere is wonderful but it is too noisy. Could you fix that? --ElBute 09:58, 14 May 2016 (UTC) Comment
It´s quite strong fog and not noise.--Ermell 19:50, 14 May 2016 (UTC) Comment Maybe you're right. I'm not used to shoot through fog. I'd like some more opinions. --ElBute 07:39, 15 May 2016 (UTC) Done
I did reduce some noise and hope it might be o.k. like this.--Ermell 12:20, 18 May 2016 (UTC) Support Much better now. Good work. --ElBute 17:11, 18 May 2016 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Town place in Aracena. Huelva, Andalusia, Spain --Basotxerri 09:35, 14 May 2016 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 22:13, 18 May 2016 (UTC)
-
- Nomination: Vintage LED street light in Linares de la Sierra. Huelva, Andalusia, Spain --Basotxerri 18:09, 12 May 2016 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination: Akhtala Monastery. Akhtala, Lori Province, Armenia. --Halavar 10:24, 12 May 2016 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination: Gavit. Haghpat Monastery. Haghpat, Lori Province, Armenia. --Halavar 10:24, 12 May 2016 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination: Haghpat Monastery. Haghpat, Lori Province, Armenia. --Halavar 10:24, 12 May 2016 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination: Sophia Charlotte of Hannover, bust in Summer Garden, Saint-Petersburg --Reda Kerbouche 05:21, 12 May 2016 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination Moses Montefiore Windmill, Jerusalem --Ralf Roletschek 15:35, 10 May 2016 (UTC)
- Promotion Comment Dust spots. Fix it, fix it, fix it! :) --Peulle 14:02, 13 May 2016 (UTC) ok, i fix it tomorrow. --Ralf Roletschek 19:45, 15 May 2016 (UTC) Done --Ralf Roletschek 07:32, 17 May 2016 (UTC) Support OK for QI. --Peulle 12:02, 18 May 2016 (UTC)
Consensual review[edit]
File:Eiche beim Wasserhochbehälter (03).jpg[edit]
- Nomination Water supply building in the Rhön --Verum 19:10, 15 May 2016 (UTC)
- Decline
- Comment Needs perspective correction. Rather noisy, especially in the dark parts, perhaps not satisfyingly fixable? --Basotxerri 08:20, 16 May 2016 (UTC)
- Comment Better? --Verum 13:30, 17 May 2016 (UTC)
- Oppose Sorry, for my taste that dark wall show too much noise. To be sure, I would like to hear some other opinions. The perspective is much better now, though. --Basotxerri 18:59, 17 May 2016 (UTC)
- Comment as I already told you, Verum: Check your monitor! It seems, you are using your notebook. But even these kind of displays are able to configure. --Hubertl 05:35, 18 May 2016 (UTC)
- Oppose Sky colour looks unnatural blue --Michielverbeek 06:55, 18 May 2016 (UTC)
File:Land Rover Range Rover Evoque Convertible 2016 - rear.jpg[edit]
- Nomination Range Rover Evoque Convertible --DeFacto 23:10, 14 May 2016 (UTC)
- Decline
- Oppose manipulated number plate --Ralf Roletschek 19:42, 15 May 2016 (UTC)
- Comment I'd like other views as to how to obscure private number plates because I believe they should be kept private for courtesy reasons. DeFacto 19:55, 15 May 2016 (UTC)
- There is no reason to manipulate and deface the photos. --Ralf Roletschek 14:22, 16 May 2016 (UTC)
- There is a reason - it is respect for the privacy of the vehicle owner. DeFacto 17:41, 16 May 2016 (UTC)
- There is no reason to manipulate and deface the photos. --Ralf Roletschek 14:22, 16 May 2016 (UTC)
- Support Good picture for QI. @DeFacto: Don't worry, our friend Ralf has two frequent behaviours: he supports, by principle, all pictures needing a perspective correction (he refuses to correct his own production, saying "I don't distort my photos"), and he opposes the pictures where are shown blurred, blanked, obscured faces or car plates. This is "to make a point", he was told about, but he doesn't care. But apart of that, he is a good guy (and a good photographer!).--Jebulon 00:15, 17 May 2016 (UTC)
- There are two posts, sorry, in german: [1] and [2]. Yes, in my eyes is a picture with a blanked number plate no QI. --Ralf Roletschek 22:09, 16 May 2016 (UTC)
- Oppose per Ralf Roletschek. No need to manipulate the registration plate! --Alchemist-hp 07:00, 17 May 2016 (UTC)
- Comment, @Alchemist-hp and Ralf Roletschek: Number plate cloning is a big problem in the UK. I always obscure the number plates on images of private vehicles to reduce the risk of cloning and to protect privacy, as a courtesy to the owner. Please reconsider your positions on this. DeFacto 06:06, 18 May 2016 (UTC)
- You can change the number. But the blank is unacceptable. It makes the picture unnecessarily ugly and contradicts the truth at first glance. --Ralf Roletschek 08:18, 18 May 2016 (UTC)
File:Bose QuietComfort 25 Acoustic Noise Cancelling Headphones.jpg[edit]
- Nomination Bose QuietComfort 25 Acoustic Noise Cancelling Headphones --Florian Fuchs 12:27, 14 May 2016 (UTC)
- Decline
- OpposeSorry, looks overprocessed --A.Savin 14:22, 14 May 2016 (UTC)
- Question @A.Savin: : Which part looks overprocessed? I did not change any colours. All I did was some focus stacking to make the DOF greater, make the background transparent, and slightly increase the clarity. --Florian Fuchs 15:47, 14 May 2016 (UTC)
{{s}} It looks good to me, sharp, natural, no noise, no distortions, colours and WB OK. Is there some defect I do not see? --Basotxerri 08:45, 15 May 2016 (UTC)
- Comment I mean that the separation is actually unnecessary and make it all look unnatural and also there are some remains of the original background visible, if you look at the edges of the pads --A.Savin 15:05, 15 May 2016 (UTC)
- Comment OK, A.Savin, you are right. These defects have been too subtle for me but now I've seen them. Thank you. --Basotxerri 06:59, 16 May 2016 (UTC)
- Question @A.Savin: : Could you mark the areas with remains of the original background in my picture, please? I can't see any. I made the background transparent so the picture could be used for all purposes. This is quite common for this type of pictures. --Florian Fuchs 17:09, 15 May 2016 (UTC)
- Comment I added some annotations. There are abrupt changes from sharp to unsharp (too few frames been stacked). The two cutout flaws can easily be fixed, the sharpness issues less so I’m afraid. --Kreuzschnabel 06:15, 16 May 2016 (UTC)
- Comment Thank you very much for the annotations! I corrected the mistakes and uploaded a new version. --Florian Fuchs 09:48, 16 May 2016 (UTC)
- Comment OK, A.Savin, you are right. These defects have been too subtle for me but now I've seen them. Thank you. --Basotxerri 06:59, 16 May 2016 (UTC)
- Comment I mean that the separation is actually unnecessary and make it all look unnatural and also there are some remains of the original background visible, if you look at the edges of the pads --A.Savin 15:05, 15 May 2016 (UTC)
- Question @A.Savin: : Which part looks overprocessed? I did not change any colours. All I did was some focus stacking to make the DOF greater, make the background transparent, and slightly increase the clarity. --Florian Fuchs 15:47, 14 May 2016 (UTC)
File:Valle_de_la_Luna,_San_Pedro_de_Atacama,_Chile,_2016-02-01,_DD_182-184_HDR.JPG[edit]
- Nomination Valle de la Luna, San Pedro de Atacama, Chile --Poco a poco 16:22, 13 May 2016 (UTC)
- Promotion
- Oppose Sorry, not a QI for me - too much noise, and the man looks painted in (see notes). --Peulle 16:32, 13 May 2016 (UTC)
- Support I disagree --Jacek Halicki 16:59, 13 May 2016 (UTC)
- Comment True, not the sharpest, but given the size and with a bit of denoising should be ok now Poco a poco 17:47, 13 May 2016 (UTC)
- Support Fine 4 me. --Palauenc05 18:12, 13 May 2016 (UTC)
- Support Looks good to me, too. --Basotxerri 20:56, 13 May 2016 (UTC)
- Oppose Absolutely a beautiful composition, but unfortunately too noisy --Michielverbeek 22:54, 15 May 2016 (UTC)
- Support Good. The size to be QI is 2 megapixels. Do you see this image with two megapixels?--Lmbuga 15:56, 16 May 2016 (UTC)
- Comment In my opinion, all the images with 45-50 megapixels are QI--Lmbuga 15:58, 16 May 2016 (UTC)
- Quality images candidates will eventually be an absurd situation, a renewal is necessary IMO--Lmbuga 16:02, 16 May 2016 (UTC)
- es: (no estoy seguro de haber dicho lo que quiero, lo repito en español) El tamaño para que una foto pueda ser considerada imagen de calidad es de 2 megapíxeles. Una imagen de 50 megapíxeles deberá ser, salvo incompentencia suma por parte del fotógrafo o por ser mal juzgada, QI. Los parámetros para juzgar de hace cinco o diez años no se ajustan al mundo actual. Si "QI candidates" no evoluciona, no cambia, no solicita, muere. Seguir solicitando fotos de dos megapíxeles es lo mismo que esperar lentamente la muerte del proyecto, pero solamente es mi opinión.--Lmbuga 16:09, 16 May 2016 (UTC)
- I agree with you, Lmbuga, we are accepting pictures as small as 2 MPx but argue about a bit of noise in pictures with 50 MPx. It does not really match together, and I don't think that the solution is to downsample Poco a poco 20:36, 17 May 2016 (UTC)
- You're right, Poco a poco --Lmbuga 15:09, 18 May 2016 (UTC)
- (es) Pienso que ya se habrá empezado a considerar QI fotos de móbiles. No me extraña: con el punto de partida de 2 megapixels, 8 es una barbaridad aunque no se trate de una buena foto: Hay que actualizar QIC.--Lmbuga 15:20, 18 May 2016 (UTC)
- (es)Gracias. Si opino en este espacio es porque es el de tu foto. No me siento con cabida en otro lado. Gracias--Lmbuga 15:31, 18 May 2016 (UTC)
- CommentI tried to understand the discussion per google translate. The 2-mpixel hard limit should be kept for difficult situations in photography, e.g. macro shots of moving objects, where focus stacking is impossible, or wild life shots, where strong crop is necessary, as not everyone owns a f5.6/800mm lens. Those famous "easy-to-take" photos should have 4 MPix as a minimum. This is also possible with old DSLR which have 6 MPixel sensors. Regarding those DSLR with 36 or 50 MPix: especially the Canon is rather noisy compared to the cameras with the 36 MPix Sony sensor, but this is whining on a high level (de:Jammern auf hohem Niveau), because below ISO800 the results are still ok. Another aspect of high resolution sensors is, that many lenses have not really sufficient resolution. So a lens that gives nice, pixelsharp shots used at 8 or 12 MPix appears unsharp at 36 or 50 MPix. Some participants here do not take this into account. Next point: Diffraction can be noticeable already at f/8 with a full format sensor with 50 MPixels, but sometimes you need f/16. The sharpness of high resolution shots should therefore not be judged by pixel peeping, because there are inevitable physical limits. -- Smial 09:11, 20 May 2016 (UTC)
- (es)Gracias. Si opino en este espacio es porque es el de tu foto. No me siento con cabida en otro lado. Gracias--Lmbuga 15:31, 18 May 2016 (UTC)
- (es) Pienso que ya se habrá empezado a considerar QI fotos de móbiles. No me extraña: con el punto de partida de 2 megapixels, 8 es una barbaridad aunque no se trate de una buena foto: Hay que actualizar QIC.--Lmbuga 15:20, 18 May 2016 (UTC)
- You're right, Poco a poco --Lmbuga 15:09, 18 May 2016 (UTC)
- I agree with you, Lmbuga, we are accepting pictures as small as 2 MPx but argue about a bit of noise in pictures with 50 MPx. It does not really match together, and I don't think that the solution is to downsample Poco a poco 20:36, 17 May 2016 (UTC)
- es: (no estoy seguro de haber dicho lo que quiero, lo repito en español) El tamaño para que una foto pueda ser considerada imagen de calidad es de 2 megapíxeles. Una imagen de 50 megapíxeles deberá ser, salvo incompentencia suma por parte del fotógrafo o por ser mal juzgada, QI. Los parámetros para juzgar de hace cinco o diez años no se ajustan al mundo actual. Si "QI candidates" no evoluciona, no cambia, no solicita, muere. Seguir solicitando fotos de dos megapíxeles es lo mismo que esperar lentamente la muerte del proyecto, pero solamente es mi opinión.--Lmbuga 16:09, 16 May 2016 (UTC)
- Quality images candidates will eventually be an absurd situation, a renewal is necessary IMO--Lmbuga 16:02, 16 May 2016 (UTC)
- Comment In my opinion, all the images with 45-50 megapixels are QI--Lmbuga 15:58, 16 May 2016 (UTC)
- Support --Ralf Roletschek 16:13, 16 May 2016 (UTC)
- Support --Alchemist-hp 20:29, 17 May 2016 (UTC)
File:Plaques_on_Church_of_the_Saviour_on_the_Blood.JPG[edit]
- Nomination Plaques on Church of the Saviour on the Blood of Saint-Petersburg in Russia --Reda Kerbouche 05:21, 12 May 2016 (UTC)
- Promotion
{{s}} Good quality.--Hubertl 07:27, 12 May 2016 (UTC) - Comment IMO perspective (bottom) should be fixed. --XRay 08:44, 12 May 2016 (UTC)
- i will correct all this.--Reda Kerbouche 06:35, 13 May 2016 (UTC)
- Done.--Reda Kerbouche 07:35, 13 May 2016 (UTC)
- Not done see notes! --Hubertl 19:59, 13 May 2016 (UTC)
- Hi, Hubertl I upload a new maybe correct version.--Reda Kerbouche 08:29, 16 May 2016 (UTC)
- Oppose Bad clarity and contrast. Not QI IMO--Lmbuga 16:49, 16 May 2016 (UTC)
- Support it´s ok now for me. --Hubertl 20:07, 16 May 2016 (UTC)
- Support OK --A.Savin 19:00, 18 May 2016 (UTC)
- A translation would help...--Jebulon 22:22, 20 May 2016 (UTC)