Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives May 20 2022

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
  • * Nomination Kampen, Molenbrug (suspended cable-stayed bridge) over the IJssel. (southeast side) --Agnes Monkelbaan 04:26, 18 May 2022 (UTC) * Promotion  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:38, 18 May 2022 (UTC)
  • * Nomination Building at Kanzleistraße 6 in Bayreuth, Bavaria, Germany. --Tournasol7 04:08, 18 May 2022 (UTC) * Promotion  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:16, 18 May 2022 (UTC)
    • Nomination Building at Kanzleistraße 6 in Bayreuth, Bavaria, Germany. --Tournasol7 04:08, 18 May 2022 (UTC)
    • Promotion  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:16, 18 May 2022 (UTC)
  • * Nomination Building at Kanzleistraße 9 in Bayreuth, Bavaria, Germany. --Tournasol7 04:08, 18 May 2022 (UTC) * Promotion  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:22, 18 May 2022 (UTC)
    • Nomination Building at Kanzleistraße 9 in Bayreuth, Bavaria, Germany. --Tournasol7 04:08, 18 May 2022 (UTC)
    • Promotion  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:22, 18 May 2022 (UTC)
  • * Nomination Neues Schloss in Bayreuth, Bavaria, Germany. --Tournasol7 04:08, 18 May 2022 (UTC) * Promotion  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:24, 18 May 2022 (UTC)
    • Nomination Neues Schloss in Bayreuth, Bavaria, Germany. --Tournasol7 04:08, 18 May 2022 (UTC)
    • Promotion  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:24, 18 May 2022 (UTC)
  • * Nomination Building at Kanzleistrasse 7 in Bayreuth, Bavaria, Germany. --Tournasol7 04:08, 18 May 2022 (UTC) * Promotion  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:16, 18 May 2022 (UTC)
    • Nomination Building at Kanzleistrasse 7 in Bayreuth, Bavaria, Germany. --Tournasol7 04:08, 18 May 2022 (UTC)
    • Promotion  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:16, 18 May 2022 (UTC)
  • * Nomination Building at Kanzleistraße 11 in Bayreuth, Bavaria, Germany. --Tournasol7 04:08, 18 May 2022 (UTC) * Promotion  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:16, 18 May 2022 (UTC)
    • Nomination Building at Kanzleistraße 11 in Bayreuth, Bavaria, Germany. --Tournasol7 04:08, 18 May 2022 (UTC)
    • Promotion  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:16, 18 May 2022 (UTC)
  • * Nomination Row of trees (near the border with the district of Coesfeld) in Haltern am See, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany --XRay 03:47, 18 May 2022 (UTC) * Promotion  Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 04:10, 18 May 2022 (UTC)
    • Nomination Row of trees (near the border with the district of Coesfeld) in Haltern am See, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany --XRay 03:47, 18 May 2022 (UTC)
    • Promotion
       Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 04:10, 18 May 2022 (UTC)
  • * Nomination Nature reserve “Hohemarkenbusch” near Haltern am See, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany --XRay 03:47, 18 May 2022 (UTC) * Promotion  Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 04:10, 18 May 2022 (UTC)
    • Nomination Nature reserve “Hohemarkenbusch” near Haltern am See, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany --XRay 03:47, 18 May 2022 (UTC)
    • Promotion
       Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 04:10, 18 May 2022 (UTC)
  • * Nomination Boardwalk in Venner Moor near Senden, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany --XRay 03:47, 18 May 2022 (UTC) * Promotion  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:15, 18 May 2022 (UTC)
    • Nomination Boardwalk in Venner Moor near Senden, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany --XRay 03:47, 18 May 2022 (UTC)
    • Promotion  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:15, 18 May 2022 (UTC)
  • * Nomination Dülmen horse (mare with foal) in Merfelder Bruch, Merfeld, Dülmen, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany --XRay 03:47, 18 May 2022 (UTC) * Promotion  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:15, 18 May 2022 (UTC)
    • Nomination Dülmen horse (mare with foal) in Merfelder Bruch, Merfeld, Dülmen, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany --XRay 03:47, 18 May 2022 (UTC)
    • Promotion  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:15, 18 May 2022 (UTC)
  • * Nomination Dülmen horse (mare with foal) in Merfelder Bruch, Merfeld, Dülmen, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany --XRay 03:47, 18 May 2022 (UTC) * Promotion  Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 04:11, 18 May 2022 (UTC)
    • Nomination Dülmen horse (mare with foal) in Merfelder Bruch, Merfeld, Dülmen, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany --XRay 03:47, 18 May 2022 (UTC)
    • Promotion
       Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 04:11, 18 May 2022 (UTC)
  • * Nomination Archway building (chapter house) and Virgin Mary column on Domplatz #4, Maria Saal, Carinthia, Austria -- Johann Jaritz 02:28, 18 May 2022 (UTC) * Promotion  Support Good quality. --Tagooty 02:33, 18 May 2022 (UTC)
    • Nomination Archway building (chapter house) and Virgin Mary column on Domplatz #4, Maria Saal, Carinthia, Austria -- Johann Jaritz 02:28, 18 May 2022 (UTC)
    • Promotion
       Support Good quality. --Tagooty 02:33, 18 May 2022 (UTC)
  • * Nomination Statue of Saint Modest, apostle of Carantania, at the Collegiate parish and pilgrimage church Assumption of Mary Maria Saal, Carinthia, Austria -- Johann Jaritz 02:28, 18 May 2022 (UTC) * Promotion  Support Good quality. --XRay 03:49, 18 May 2022 (UTC)
    • Nomination Statue of Saint Modest, apostle of Carantania, at the Collegiate parish and pilgrimage church Assumption of Mary Maria Saal, Carinthia, Austria -- Johann Jaritz 02:28, 18 May 2022 (UTC)
    • Promotion
       Support Good quality. --XRay 03:49, 18 May 2022 (UTC)
  • * Nomination Baptismal font at the pilgrimage church Assumption of Mary, Maria Saal, Carinthia, Austria -- Johann Jaritz 02:28, 18 May 2022 (UTC) * Promotion  Support Good quality. --XRay 03:49, 18 May 2022 (UTC)
    • Nomination Baptismal font at the pilgrimage church Assumption of Mary, Maria Saal, Carinthia, Austria -- Johann Jaritz 02:28, 18 May 2022 (UTC)
    • Promotion
       Support Good quality. --XRay 03:49, 18 May 2022 (UTC)
  • * Nomination Wrought iron cross at the mortuary on Domplatz #6, Maria Saal, Carinthia, Austria -- Johann Jaritz 02:28, 18 May 2022 (UTC) * Promotion  Support Good quality. --Tagooty 02:33, 18 May 2022 (UTC)
    • Nomination Wrought iron cross at the mortuary on Domplatz #6, Maria Saal, Carinthia, Austria -- Johann Jaritz 02:28, 18 May 2022 (UTC)
    • Promotion
       Support Good quality. --Tagooty 02:33, 18 May 2022 (UTC)
  • * Nomination Sanctuary of the Holy Sepulchre at the charnel house on Domplatz #6, Maria Saal, Carinthia, Austria -- Johann Jaritz 02:28, 18 May 2022 (UTC) * Promotion  Support Good quality. --XRay 03:49, 18 May 2022 (UTC)
    • Nomination Sanctuary of the Holy Sepulchre at the charnel house on Domplatz #6, Maria Saal, Carinthia, Austria -- Johann Jaritz 02:28, 18 May 2022 (UTC)
    • Promotion
       Support Good quality. --XRay 03:49, 18 May 2022 (UTC)
  • * Nomination Matheran Monsoon season by Knipptang --UnpetitproleX 23:16, 17 May 2022 (UTC) * Promotion Good quality. -- Ikan Kekek 23:46, 17 May 2022 (UTC)
  • * Nomination Matheran Dry season by Knipptang --UnpetitproleX 23:16, 17 May 2022 (UTC) * Promotion Good quality. Good nominations. -- Ikan Kekek 23:48, 17 May 2022 (UTC)
    • Nomination Matheran Dry season by Knipptang --UnpetitproleX 23:16, 17 May 2022 (UTC)
    • Promotion Good quality. Good nominations. -- Ikan Kekek 23:48, 17 May 2022 (UTC)
  • * Nomination Sculptures on right hand side of main gate to Church of our lady in Trier, Germany --Virtual-Pano 22:22, 17 May 2022 (UTC) * Promotion  Support Good quality. --Steindy 22:34, 17 May 2022 (UTC)
    • Nomination Sculptures on right hand side of main gate to Church of our lady in Trier, Germany --Virtual-Pano 22:22, 17 May 2022 (UTC)
    • Promotion
       Support Good quality. --Steindy 22:34, 17 May 2022 (UTC)
  • * Nomination Portal to Church of our lady in Trier, Germany --Virtual-Pano 22:22, 17 May 2022 (UTC) * Promotion  Support Good quality. --Steindy 22:34, 17 May 2022 (UTC)
    • Nomination Portal to Church of our lady in Trier, Germany --Virtual-Pano 22:22, 17 May 2022 (UTC)
    • Promotion
       Support Good quality. --Steindy 22:34, 17 May 2022 (UTC)
  • * Nomination Portal to cathedral information centre in Trier, Germany --Virtual-Pano 22:22, 17 May 2022 (UTC) * Promotion  Support Good quality. --Steindy 22:35, 17 May 2022 (UTC)
    • Nomination Portal to cathedral information centre in Trier, Germany --Virtual-Pano 22:22, 17 May 2022 (UTC)
    • Promotion
       Support Good quality. --Steindy 22:35, 17 May 2022 (UTC)
  • * Nomination St Mary's winged altar - Severus's church - dated 1510 presumably by Saalfelder workshop- Erfurt - Thuringia - Germany --Virtual-Pano 22:22, 17 May 2022 (UTC) * Promotion  Support Good quality. --Steindy 22:35, 17 May 2022 (UTC)
    • Nomination St Mary's winged altar - Severus's church - dated 1510 presumably by Saalfelder workshop- Erfurt - Thuringia - Germany --Virtual-Pano 22:22, 17 May 2022 (UTC)
    • Promotion
       Support Good quality. --Steindy 22:35, 17 May 2022 (UTC)
  • * Nomination Solbjørn mountain during snow showers in Lofoten, Norway --Ximonic 19:23, 17 May 2022 (UTC) * Promotion  Support Good quality. --Ermell 19:39, 17 May 2022 (UTC)
    • Nomination Solbjørn mountain during snow showers in Lofoten, Norway --Ximonic 19:23, 17 May 2022 (UTC)
    • Promotion
       Support Good quality. --Ermell 19:39, 17 May 2022 (UTC)
  • * Nomination Deutsche Post postbox in Eppenreuth, Hof, Germany. --PantheraLeo1359531 17:25, 17 May 2022 (UTC) * Promotion Good quality. --Peulle 17:38, 17 May 2022 (UTC)
    • Nomination Deutsche Post postbox in Eppenreuth, Hof, Germany. --PantheraLeo1359531 17:25, 17 May 2022 (UTC)
    • Promotion Good quality. --Peulle 17:38, 17 May 2022 (UTC)
  • * Nomination Road and nature near Eppenreuth, Hof, Germany. --PantheraLeo1359531 17:21, 17 May 2022 (UTC) * Promotion  Support Good quality. --Virtual-Pano 19:10, 17 May 2022 (UTC)
    • Nomination Road and nature near Eppenreuth, Hof, Germany. --PantheraLeo1359531 17:21, 17 May 2022 (UTC)
    • Promotion
       Support Good quality. --Virtual-Pano 19:10, 17 May 2022 (UTC)
  • * Nomination Gurudongmar Lake by Ajain0729 --UnpetitproleX 17:08, 17 May 2022 (UTC) * Decline I'm going to let someone else judge the overall quality, but the dark dust spot in the upper right quadrant must be fixed, or this can't pass. -- Ikan Kekek 17:14, 17 May 2022 (UTC)  Oppose blown highlight and overprocessed look (with or without dust) --Virtual-Pano 18:34, 17 May 2022 (UTC)
    • Nomination Gurudongmar Lake by Ajain0729 --UnpetitproleX 17:08, 17 May 2022 (UTC)
    • Decline I'm going to let someone else judge the overall quality, but the dark dust spot in the upper right quadrant must be fixed, or this can't pass. -- Ikan Kekek 17:14, 17 May 2022 (UTC)
       Oppose blown highlight and overprocessed look (with or without dust) --Virtual-Pano 18:34, 17 May 2022 (UTC)
  • * Nomination Passing storm cloud, Rzuchów, Świętokrzyskie Voivodeship --Jakubhal 17:04, 17 May 2022 (UTC) * Promotion Nice. -- Ikan Kekek 17:11, 17 May 2022 (UTC)
    • Nomination Passing storm cloud, Rzuchów, Świętokrzyskie Voivodeship --Jakubhal 17:04, 17 May 2022 (UTC)
    • Promotion Nice. -- Ikan Kekek 17:11, 17 May 2022 (UTC)
  • * Nomination Ruszków village with Church of Saint Stanislaus in the middle, Świętokrzyskie Voivodeship --Jakubhal 17:04, 17 May 2022 (UTC) * Promotion Very nice. -- Ikan Kekek 19:22, 17 May 2022 (UTC)
    • Nomination Ruszków village with Church of Saint Stanislaus in the middle, Świętokrzyskie Voivodeship --Jakubhal 17:04, 17 May 2022 (UTC)
    • Promotion Very nice. -- Ikan Kekek 19:22, 17 May 2022 (UTC)
  • * Nomination Seine affluents Ferrary Petit Palais.jpg (by Jastrow) --Sebring12Hrs 17:02, 17 May 2022 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 17:05, 17 May 2022 (UTC) * Promotion {{{2}}}
    • Nomination Seine affluents Ferrary Petit Palais.jpg (by Jastrow) --Sebring12Hrs 17:02, 17 May 2022 (UTC)
       Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 17:05, 17 May 2022 (UTC)
    • Promotion {{{2}}}
  • * Nomination Quatre saisons Convers Petit Palais.jpg (by Jastrow) --Sebring12Hrs 17:02, 17 May 2022 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 17:06, 17 May 2022 (UTC) * Promotion {{{2}}}
    • Nomination Quatre saisons Convers Petit Palais.jpg (by Jastrow) --Sebring12Hrs 17:02, 17 May 2022 (UTC)
       Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 17:06, 17 May 2022 (UTC)
    • Promotion {{{2}}}
  • * Nomination Mercedes-Benz Citan in Leonberg.--Alexander-93 17:00, 17 May 2022 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 17:06, 17 May 2022 (UTC) * Promotion {{{2}}}
    • Nomination Mercedes-Benz Citan in Leonberg.--Alexander-93 17:00, 17 May 2022 (UTC)
       Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 17:06, 17 May 2022 (UTC)
    • Promotion {{{2}}}
  • * Nomination Ironworks gate Petit Palais (by Jastrow) --Sebring12Hrs 17:00, 17 May 2022 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --Virtual-Pano 22:24, 17 May 2022 (UTC) * Promotion {{{2}}}
    • Nomination Ironworks gate Petit Palais (by Jastrow) --Sebring12Hrs 17:00, 17 May 2022 (UTC)
       Support Good quality. --Virtual-Pano 22:24, 17 May 2022 (UTC)
    • Promotion {{{2}}}
  • * Nomination Lantern dome Petit Palais (by Jastrow) --Sebring12Hrs 16:45, 17 May 2022 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 17:07, 17 May 2022 (UTC) * Promotion {{{2}}}
    • Nomination Lantern dome Petit Palais (by Jastrow) --Sebring12Hrs 16:45, 17 May 2022 (UTC)
       Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 17:07, 17 May 2022 (UTC)
    • Promotion {{{2}}}
  • * Nomination Aerial view with a drone of the Swiss Thur river as it flows into the Rhine (by Parpan05) --Aimarekin 15:42, 17 May 2022 (UTC) * Decline  Oppose Quite noisy, especially river on the left and hills in the distance --Jakubhal 17:09, 17 May 2022 (UTC)
    • Nomination Aerial view with a drone of the Swiss Thur river as it flows into the Rhine (by Parpan05) --Aimarekin 15:42, 17 May 2022 (UTC)
    • Decline
       Oppose Quite noisy, especially river on the left and hills in the distance --Jakubhal 17:09, 17 May 2022 (UTC)
  • * Nomination Panoramic view from the Jenner in the Berchtesgaden Alps --Milseburg 15:06, 17 May 2022 (UTC) * Promotion  Support Vwe< good quality. --Steindy 15:35, 17 May 2022 (UTC)
    • Nomination Panoramic view from the Jenner in the Berchtesgaden Alps --Milseburg 15:06, 17 May 2022 (UTC)
    • Promotion
       Support Vwe< good quality. --Steindy 15:35, 17 May 2022 (UTC)
  • * Nomination Wittelsbach memorial stone in Hof, Germany. --PantheraLeo1359531 13:40, 17 May 2022 (UTC) * Promotion  Support Good quality. --Steindy 15:27, 17 May 2022 (UTC)
    • Nomination Wittelsbach memorial stone in Hof, Germany. --PantheraLeo1359531 13:40, 17 May 2022 (UTC)
    • Promotion
       Support Good quality. --Steindy 15:27, 17 May 2022 (UTC)
  • * Nomination Barracks Auschwitz ll (Birkenau), Poland --Poco a poco 12:49, 17 May 2022 (UTC) * Decline  Oppose I think the perspective is a bit wonky - the barracks are too close in and make me dizzy when I enlarge the image --Aimarekin 15:46, 17 May 2022 (UTC)
    • Nomination Barracks Auschwitz ll (Birkenau), Poland --Poco a poco 12:49, 17 May 2022 (UTC)
    • Decline
       Oppose I think the perspective is a bit wonky - the barracks are too close in and make me dizzy when I enlarge the image --Aimarekin 15:46, 17 May 2022 (UTC)
  • * Nomination St. Jakob church, Bergen, Norway --Poco a poco 12:49, 17 May 2022 (UTC) * Promotion  Support Good quality. --Steindy 15:22, 17 May 2022 (UTC)
    • Nomination St. Jakob church, Bergen, Norway --Poco a poco 12:49, 17 May 2022 (UTC)
    • Promotion
       Support Good quality. --Steindy 15:22, 17 May 2022 (UTC)
  • * Nomination Roman Catholic church of Shepherds Field Chapel, Bethlehem, Palestine --Poco a poco 12:49, 17 May 2022 (UTC) * Promotion  Support Good quality. --Steindy 15:22, 17 May 2022 (UTC)
    • Nomination Roman Catholic church of Shepherds Field Chapel, Bethlehem, Palestine --Poco a poco 12:49, 17 May 2022 (UTC)
    • Promotion
       Support Good quality. --Steindy 15:22, 17 May 2022 (UTC)
  • * Nomination Hoover Dam, Nevada-Arizona, USA --Poco a poco 12:49, 17 May 2022 (UTC) * Promotion  Support Good quality. --Steindy 15:22, 17 May 2022 (UTC)
    • Nomination Hoover Dam, Nevada-Arizona, USA --Poco a poco 12:49, 17 May 2022 (UTC)
    • Promotion
       Support Good quality. --Steindy 15:22, 17 May 2022 (UTC)
  • * Nomination Gravestone of the church of San Pedro Fiz of O Incio, Galicia. --Lmbuga 10:14, 17 May 2022 (UTC) * Promotion  Support Good quality. --Steindy 15:24, 17 May 2022 (UTC)
    • Nomination Gravestone of the church of San Pedro Fiz of O Incio, Galicia. --Lmbuga 10:14, 17 May 2022 (UTC)
    • Promotion
       Support Good quality. --Steindy 15:24, 17 May 2022 (UTC)
  • * Nomination Sebastian Gishamer, footballreferee of Austria. --Steindy 10:10, 17 May 2022 (UTC) * Promotion Good quality. --Peulle 11:04, 17 May 2022 (UTC)
    • Nomination Sebastian Gishamer, footballreferee of Austria. --Steindy 10:10, 17 May 2022 (UTC)
    • Promotion Good quality. --Peulle 11:04, 17 May 2022 (UTC)
  • * Nomination Sebastian Gishamer, footballreferee of Austria. --Steindy 10:10, 17 May 2022 (UTC) * Promotion  Support Good quality. --Palauenc05 11:12, 17 May 2022 (UTC)
    • Nomination Sebastian Gishamer, footballreferee of Austria. --Steindy 10:10, 17 May 2022 (UTC)
    • Promotion  Support Good quality. --Palauenc05 11:12, 17 May 2022 (UTC)
  • * Nomination Sebastian Gishamer, footballreferee of Austria. --Steindy 10:10, 17 May 2022 (UTC) * Promotion  Support Good quality. --NightWolf1223 03:21, 18 May 2022 (UTC)
    • Nomination Sebastian Gishamer, footballreferee of Austria. --Steindy 10:10, 17 May 2022 (UTC)
    • Promotion
       Support Good quality. --NightWolf1223 03:21, 18 May 2022 (UTC)
  • * Nomination Sebastian Gishamer, footballreferee of Austria. --Steindy 10:10, 17 May 2022 (UTC) * Promotion  Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 17:10, 17 May 2022 (UTC)
    • Nomination Sebastian Gishamer, footballreferee of Austria. --Steindy 10:10, 17 May 2022 (UTC)
    • Promotion
       Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 17:10, 17 May 2022 (UTC)
  • * Nomination Sebastian Gishamer, footballreferee of Austria. --Steindy 10:10, 17 May 2022 (UTC) * Promotion  Support Good quality. --Palauenc05 11:12, 17 May 2022 (UTC)
    • Nomination Sebastian Gishamer, footballreferee of Austria. --Steindy 10:10, 17 May 2022 (UTC)
    • Promotion  Support Good quality. --Palauenc05 11:12, 17 May 2022 (UTC)
  • * Nomination Plaque commemorating the victims of witch hunts at Simeonstift in Trier. --Palauenc05 07:57, 17 May 2022 (UTC) * Promotion  Support Good quality. --George Chernilevsky 08:42, 17 May 2022 (UTC)
    • Nomination Plaque commemorating the victims of witch hunts at Simeonstift in Trier. --Palauenc05 07:57, 17 May 2022 (UTC)
    • Promotion
       Support Good quality. --George Chernilevsky 08:42, 17 May 2022 (UTC)
  • * Nomination Row of workers'houses, Rue du Docteur Huart 49 to 61, Hellemmes-Lille, France --Velvet 07:05, 17 May 2022 (UTC) * Promotion  Support Good quality. --George Chernilevsky 08:42, 17 May 2022 (UTC)
    • Nomination Row of workers'houses, Rue du Docteur Huart 49 to 61, Hellemmes-Lille, France --Velvet 07:05, 17 May 2022 (UTC)
    • Promotion
       Support Good quality. --George Chernilevsky 08:42, 17 May 2022 (UTC)
  • * Nomination Art Deco houses, Impasse des Couvreurs 9 to 15, Hellemmes-Lille, France --Velvet 07:04, 17 May 2022 (UTC) * Promotion  Support Good quality. --George Chernilevsky 08:42, 17 May 2022 (UTC)
    • Nomination Art Deco houses, Impasse des Couvreurs 9 to 15, Hellemmes-Lille, France --Velvet 07:04, 17 May 2022 (UTC)
    • Promotion
       Support Good quality. --George Chernilevsky 08:42, 17 May 2022 (UTC)
  • * Nomination Cherry flowers (Prunus cerasus) --Ввласенко 06:46, 17 May 2022 (UTC) * Promotion Good quality. --Peulle 11:04, 17 May 2022 (UTC)
    • Nomination Cherry flowers (Prunus cerasus) --Ввласенко 06:46, 17 May 2022 (UTC)
    • Promotion Good quality. --Peulle 11:04, 17 May 2022 (UTC)
  • * Nomination Portal (1779) of former "Leyischer Hof" in Trier. --Palauenc05 06:49, 17 May 2022 (UTC) * Promotion  Support Good quality. --Steindy 10:11, 17 May 2022 (UTC)
    • Nomination Portal (1779) of former "Leyischer Hof" in Trier. --Palauenc05 06:49, 17 May 2022 (UTC)
    • Promotion
       Support Good quality. --Steindy 10:11, 17 May 2022 (UTC)
  • * Nomination Right valve of a Leafy jewel box clam, Chama macerophylla --Llez 05:56, 17 May 2022 (UTC) * Promotion  Support Good quality. --Palauenc05 06:58, 17 May 2022 (UTC)
    • Nomination Right valve of a Leafy jewel box clam, Chama macerophylla --Llez 05:56, 17 May 2022 (UTC)
    • Promotion  Support Good quality. --Palauenc05 06:58, 17 May 2022 (UTC)
  • * Nomination Martyred intellectuals' memorial plaque, Rajshahi University. --RockyMasum 05:35, 17 May 2022 (UTC) * Promotion Good quality --Llez 05:57, 17 May 2022 (UTC)  Comment Borderline QI to me, but please nominate at COM:VIC. -- Ikan Kekek 09:25, 17 May 2022 (UTC)
    • Nomination Martyred intellectuals' memorial plaque, Rajshahi University. --RockyMasum 05:35, 17 May 2022 (UTC)
    • Promotion Good quality --Llez 05:57, 17 May 2022 (UTC)
       Comment Borderline QI to me, but please nominate at COM:VIC. -- Ikan Kekek 09:25, 17 May 2022 (UTC)
  • * Nomination Ford Focus Turnier Active (Facelift) in Leonberg.--Alexander-93 21:38, 16 May 2022 (UTC) * Promotion  Support Good quality. --Velvet 07:22, 17 May 2022 (UTC)
    • Nomination Ford Focus Turnier Active (Facelift) in Leonberg.--Alexander-93 21:38, 16 May 2022 (UTC)
    • Promotion
       Support Good quality. --Velvet 07:22, 17 May 2022 (UTC)
  • * Nomination Mitsubishi Pajero Sport in Stuttgart.--Alexander-93 21:38, 16 May 2022 (UTC) * Promotion  Support Good quality. --Velvet 07:22, 17 May 2022 (UTC)
    • Nomination Mitsubishi Pajero Sport in Stuttgart.--Alexander-93 21:38, 16 May 2022 (UTC)
    • Promotion
       Support Good quality. --Velvet 07:22, 17 May 2022 (UTC)
  • * Nomination Vilnius Old Town. (by BigHead) Pofka 21:20, 16 May 2022 (UTC) * Promotion  Support Good quality. --aismallard 13:40, 17 May 2022 (UTC)
    • Nomination Vilnius Old Town. (by BigHead) Pofka 21:20, 16 May 2022 (UTC)
    • Promotion
       Support Good quality. --aismallard 13:40, 17 May 2022 (UTC)
  • * Nomination Alessandro Bonci's Opera house at Cesena --Terragio67 19:20, 16 May 2022 (UTC) * Decline  Oppose Poor details. Cellphone pic? -- Ikan Kekek 20:14, 16 May 2022 (UTC) Reply: Hello Ikan, I used a new 4k action camera, but it's great only when the sun is behind me. Thanks for your time. --Terragio67 20:07, 17 May 2022 (UTC)  Comment I understand. Thanks for your reply. -- Ikan Kekek 23:52, 17 May 2022 (UTC)
    • Nomination Alessandro Bonci's Opera house at Cesena --Terragio67 19:20, 16 May 2022 (UTC)
    • Decline  Oppose Poor details. Cellphone pic? -- Ikan Kekek 20:14, 16 May 2022 (UTC)
      Reply: Hello Ikan, I used a new 4k action camera, but it's great only when the sun is behind me. Thanks for your time. --Terragio67 20:07, 17 May 2022 (UTC)
       Comment I understand. Thanks for your reply. -- Ikan Kekek 23:52, 17 May 2022 (UTC)
  • * Nomination Synychynskyi Reserve, Ukraine. By User:Balkhovitin --IamMM 18:37, 16 May 2022 (UTC) * Promotion  Support Good quality. --Velvet 07:22, 17 May 2022 (UTC)
    • Nomination Synychynskyi Reserve, Ukraine. By User:Balkhovitin --IamMM 18:37, 16 May 2022 (UTC)
    • Promotion
       Support Good quality. --Velvet 07:22, 17 May 2022 (UTC)
  • * Nomination Bryde's whale with tern, gulf of Thailand. By User:Chainfoto --IamMM 18:37, 16 May 2022 (UTC) * Promotion  Support Good quality. --Velvet 07:22, 17 May 2022 (UTC)
    • Nomination Bryde's whale with tern, gulf of Thailand. By User:Chainfoto --IamMM 18:37, 16 May 2022 (UTC)
    • Promotion
       Support Good quality. --Velvet 07:22, 17 May 2022 (UTC)
  • * Nomination Blooming cherry (Prunus cerasus ) --Ввласенко 13:14, 16 May 2022 (UTC) * Promotion  Support Good quality. --Velvet 07:22, 17 May 2022 (UTC)
    • Nomination Blooming cherry (Prunus cerasus ) --Ввласенко 13:14, 16 May 2022 (UTC)
    • Promotion
       Support Good quality. --Velvet 07:22, 17 May 2022 (UTC)
  • * Nomination Outlook from the viewpoint Knopfmacherfelsen in the Upper Danube Nature Park --Milseburg 12:36, 16 May 2022 (UTC) * Promotion  Support Good quality. --Velvet 07:22, 17 May 2022 (UTC)
  • * Nomination Sebastian Gishamer, footballreferee of Austria. --Steindy 11:03, 16 May 2022 (UTC) * Promotion  Support Good quality. --Palauenc05 07:01, 17 May 2022 (UTC)
    • Nomination Sebastian Gishamer, footballreferee of Austria. --Steindy 11:03, 16 May 2022 (UTC)
    • Promotion  Support Good quality. --Palauenc05 07:01, 17 May 2022 (UTC)
  • * Nomination Scraper works pasta. --PROPOLI87 11:52, 15 May 2022 (UTC) * Decline  Oppose Underexposed, white balance is off --NightWolf1223 15:39, 17 May 2022 (UTC)
    • Nomination Scraper works pasta. --PROPOLI87 11:52, 15 May 2022 (UTC)
    • Decline
       Oppose Underexposed, white balance is off --NightWolf1223 15:39, 17 May 2022 (UTC)
  • * Nomination Lupinus sp. flowers, Cordillera Blanca, Peru --Cbrescia 05:04, 12 May 2022 (UTC) * Promotion  Support Good quality. --aismallard 13:53, 17 May 2022 (UTC)
    • Nomination Lupinus sp. flowers, Cordillera Blanca, Peru --Cbrescia 05:04, 12 May 2022 (UTC)
    • Promotion
       Support Good quality. --aismallard 13:53, 17 May 2022 (UTC)
  • * Nomination: Balakiyem Takougnadi (SC Wiener Neustadt, left) folowed by Mirnes Becirovic (SK Austria Klagenfurt). --Steindy 00:15, 12 May 2022 (UTC) * * Review needed
    • Nomination: Balakiyem Takougnadi (SC Wiener Neustadt, left) folowed by Mirnes Becirovic (SK Austria Klagenfurt). --Steindy 00:15, 12 May 2022 (UTC)
    • Review needed
  • * Nomination: Stanford sexual assault awareness month --Suiren2022 20:48, 11 May 2022 (UTC) * Review Perspective correction needed. Also, I'm not sure about the colours... is this oversaturated?--Peulle 21:18, 11 May 2022 (UTC)
    • Nomination: Stanford sexual assault awareness month --Suiren2022 20:48, 11 May 2022 (UTC)
    • Review Perspective correction needed. Also, I'm not sure about the colours... is this oversaturated?--Peulle 21:18, 11 May 2022 (UTC)
  • * Nomination: a helicopter above New Stanford Hospital in the evening --Suiren2022 20:48, 11 May 2022 (UTC) * Review At the very least a perspective correction is needed.--Peulle 21:22, 11 May 2022 (UTC)
    • Nomination: a helicopter above New Stanford Hospital in the evening --Suiren2022 20:48, 11 May 2022 (UTC)
    • Review At the very least a perspective correction is needed.--Peulle 21:22, 11 May 2022 (UTC)
  • * Nomination: Landscape protection area Wiesbaden, Maaraue seen from Mainz --KaiBorgeest 20:31, 11 May 2022 (UTC) * * Review needed
    • Nomination: Landscape protection area Wiesbaden, Maaraue seen from Mainz --KaiBorgeest 20:31, 11 May 2022 (UTC)
    • Review needed
  • * Nomination: Günter Kreissl, manager of SC Wiener Neustadt. --Steindy 16:57, 11 May 2022 (UTC) * * Review needed
    • Nomination: Günter Kreissl, manager of SC Wiener Neustadt. --Steindy 16:57, 11 May 2022 (UTC)
    • Review needed
  • * Nomination French Route nationale 66 (RN 66) in Remiremont, Vosges. --Mathieu Kappler 15:49, 11 May 2022 (UTC) * Promotion  Support Good quality. --Ermell 10:23, 17 May 2022 (UTC)
    • Nomination French Route nationale 66 (RN 66) in Remiremont, Vosges. --Mathieu Kappler 15:49, 11 May 2022 (UTC)
    • Promotion
       Support Good quality. --Ermell 10:23, 17 May 2022 (UTC)
  • * Nomination: Sharada Peeth by Template:Haroon117 --UnpetitproleX 14:01, 11 May 2022 (UTC) * * Review needed
  • * Nomination: Covered bridges and cathedral from the Vauban dam in Strasbourg (Bas-Rhin, France). --Gzen92 13:30, 11 May 2022 (UTC) * * Review needed
    • Nomination: Covered bridges and cathedral from the Vauban dam in Strasbourg (Bas-Rhin, France). --Gzen92 13:30, 11 May 2022 (UTC)
    • Review needed
  • * Nomination: Leh from Shanti stupa by Jparande --UnpetitproleX 13:25, 11 May 2022 (UTC) * * Review needed
  • * Nomination: Soccer, women's international match, Germany - Chile: game ball by adidas. By --Stepro 01:31, 11 May 2022 (UTC) * Review Tilted --Poco a poco 18:30, 11 May 2022 (UTC)
    • Nomination: Soccer, women's international match, Germany - Chile: game ball by adidas. By --Stepro 01:31, 11 May 2022 (UTC)
    • Review
      Tilted --Poco a poco 18:30, 11 May 2022 (UTC)
  • * Nomination: Flower of a Pink Rock-Rose (Cistus creticus) at Kap Aerostatos --Kritzolina 19:03, 10 May 2022 (UTC) * Review Considering that these flowers are 4.5–5 cm in diameter per w:Cistus creticus, the flower is sharp enough, but is there any way to increase the sharpness of the insects? Also, could you find out what species or at least genus of insects these are? -- Ikan Kekek 21:30, 10 May 2022 (UTC) I added information about the insects. Unfortunately I am not really good at photo editing, so not able to increase the sharpness. --Kritzolina 20:04, 11 May 2022 (UTC)
    • Nomination: Flower of a Pink Rock-Rose (Cistus creticus) at Kap Aerostatos --Kritzolina 19:03, 10 May 2022 (UTC)
    • Review Considering that these flowers are 4.5–5 cm in diameter per w:Cistus creticus, the flower is sharp enough, but is there any way to increase the sharpness of the insects? Also, could you find out what species or at least genus of insects these are? -- Ikan Kekek 21:30, 10 May 2022 (UTC)
      I added information about the insects. Unfortunately I am not really good at photo editing, so not able to increase the sharpness. --Kritzolina 20:04, 11 May 2022 (UTC)
  • * Nomination Ciucaș Mountains, Prahova County, Romania. --Kallerna 10:22, 9 May 2022 (UTC) * Promotion  Support Good quality. --Ermell 13:03, 17 May 2022 (UTC)
    • Nomination Ciucaș Mountains, Prahova County, Romania. --Kallerna 10:22, 9 May 2022 (UTC)
    • Promotion
       Support Good quality. --Ermell 13:03, 17 May 2022 (UTC)
  • * Nomination Ciucaș Mountains, Prahova County, Romania. --Kallerna 10:22, 9 May 2022 (UTC) * Promotion  Support Snow on the far right seems blown, but overall good quality for me. --Domob 17:10, 17 May 2022 (UTC)
    • Nomination Ciucaș Mountains, Prahova County, Romania. --Kallerna 10:22, 9 May 2022 (UTC)
    • Promotion
       Support Snow on the far right seems blown, but overall good quality for me. --Domob 17:10, 17 May 2022 (UTC)
  • * Nomination Ciucaș Mountains, Prahova County, Romania. --Kallerna 10:22, 9 May 2022 (UTC) * Promotion A bit hazy for my taste but overall good quality. --Milseburg 15:17, 17 May 2022 (UTC)
    • Nomination Ciucaș Mountains, Prahova County, Romania. --Kallerna 10:22, 9 May 2022 (UTC)
    • Promotion A bit hazy for my taste but overall good quality. --Milseburg 15:17, 17 May 2022 (UTC)
  • * Nomination: Оранжерея Большая каменная, Вешняки, Восточный округ, Москва Large stone greenhouse Fragment --Ulaisaeva 15:11, 3 May 2022 (UTC) * Review reduce highlights if possible --Ezarate 23:29, 11 May 2022 (UTC)
    • Nomination: Оранжерея Большая каменная, Вешняки, Восточный округ, Москва Large stone greenhouse Fragment --Ulaisaeva 15:11, 3 May 2022 (UTC)
    • Review
      reduce highlights if possible --Ezarate 23:29, 11 May 2022 (UTC)
  • * Nomination Stairs_inside_the_Castle_of_Populonia_Piombino.--_PROPOLI87_15:32,_27_April_2022_(UTC)PROPOLI87PROPOLI87_15:32,_27_April_2022_(UTC)_13:00,_26_April_2022(UTC)* DonePROPOLI87_15:34,_27_April_2022_(UTC)PROPOLI87PROPOLI87_15:34,_27_April_2022_(UTC) I withdraw my nominationsince_the_photo_is_not_judged_and_has_been_here_for_quite_some_time,_I_make_things_easier_by_withdrawing_the_applicationPROPOLI87_09:27,_16_May_2022_(UTC)PROPOLI87PROPOLI87_09:27,_16_May_2022_(UTC) * Withdrawn  Comment @PROPOLI87: IMO it's difficult. What's "done"? What's about the signature? It looks a little bit chaotic. The image itself: Color noise and a touch of JPEG artifacts or missing sharpness and categorization improvable. --XRay 10:18, 16 May 2022 (UTC)and it is for this chaos, since the bot has not archived the file, better than I withdraw.PROPOLI87 12:13, 16 May 2022 (UTC)PROPOLI87PROPOLI87 12:13, 16 May 2022 (UTC)  Comment Just a hint: The bot has problems identifying your signature. It wouldn't become easier with all the Underscores. Please have a look to your signature. And if you like to withdraw your nomination please change /Nomination to /Withdrawn additional to using the template {{Withdraw}}. --XRay 05:26, 17 May 2022 (UTC) I withdraw my nominationPROPOLI87 13:14, 17 May 2022 (UTC)PROPOLI87PROPOLI87 13:14, 17 May 2022 (UTC)
    • Nomination Stairs_inside_the_Castle_of_Populonia_Piombino.--_PROPOLI87_15:32,_27_April_2022_(UTC)PROPOLI87PROPOLI87_15:32,_27_April_2022_(UTC)_13:00,_26_April_2022(UTC)*✓ DonePROPOLI87_15:34,_27_April_2022_(UTC)PROPOLI87PROPOLI87_15:34,_27_April_2022_(UTC) I withdraw my nominationsince_the_photo_is_not_judged_and_has_been_here_for_quite_some_time,_I_make_things_easier_by_withdrawing_the_applicationPROPOLI87_09:27,_16_May_2022_(UTC)PROPOLI87PROPOLI87_09:27,_16_May_2022_(UTC)
    • Withdrawn  Comment @PROPOLI87: IMO it's difficult. What's "done"? What's about the signature? It looks a little bit chaotic. The image itself: Color noise and a touch of JPEG artifacts or missing sharpness and categorization improvable. --XRay 10:18, 16 May 2022 (UTC)and it is for this chaos, since the bot has not archived the file, better than I withdraw.PROPOLI87 12:13, 16 May 2022 (UTC)PROPOLI87PROPOLI87 12:13, 16 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
       Comment Just a hint: The bot has problems identifying your signature. It wouldn't become easier with all the Underscores. Please have a look to your signature. And if you like to withdraw your nomination please change /Nomination to /Withdrawn additional to using the template {{Withdraw}}. --XRay 05:26, 17 May 2022 (UTC) I withdraw my nominationPROPOLI87 13:14, 17 May 2022 (UTC)PROPOLI87PROPOLI87 13:14, 17 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Consensual review[edit]

File:Yellow_underwing_(Thyas_coronata)_2.jpg[edit]

  • Nomination Yellow underwing (Thyas coronata) --Charlesjsharp 19:24, 13 May 2022 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Oppose The tips of both wings are blurred and the left antenna is cropped. --Steindy 22:46, 13 May 2022 (UTC)
     Support Valid objections, but good enough to me. -- Ikan Kekek 05:45, 14 May 2022 (UTC)
    Careless crop. New version with full antenna uploaded. Charlesjsharp 08:38, 14 May 2022 (UTC)
  •  Weak support Good enough for QI. --Tagooty 03:18, 16 May 2022 (UTC)
Total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promoted   --Robert Flogaus-Faust 17:31, 19 May 2022 (UTC)

File:Bulgarian_dish_02.jpg[edit]

  • Nomination Salad served in a Bulgarian restaurant --Kritzolina 20:19, 10 May 2022 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support Well done. -- Ikan Kekek 21:32, 10 May 2022 (UTC)
    “Bulgarian salad” is insufficient documentation to be useful in Commons going forward. Overall the image looks muddy and dull and should be lightened to look more appetizing. The ingredients should be identified in the image description. If this salad is a specific Bulgaria delicacy like a Shopska salad‎, it should be identified and categorized as such. --GRDN711 22:33, 11 May 2022 (UTC)
     Comment You may not change the status from "Promotion" to "Nomination". If you want to oppose and change the status to "Discuss," go ahead. -- Ikan Kekek 03:13, 12 May 2022 (UTC)
    Hello Ikan. Sorry, I did not change the status; it was the QIVoter app. As the issues I raised were fixable, I added a comment for the nominator to address. Apparently, when you comment after a support vote has been received, the QIVoter app turns the status back to nominated (blue). Will add this further comment and see if the same thing happens. --GRDN711 18:40, 12 May 2022 (UTC)
     Comment The status returned to nominated, so I put it back. --GRDN711 18:44, 12 May 2022 (UTC)
     Comment That's a really unfortunate bug. Where should the problem be reported? -- Ikan Kekek 21:03, 12 May 2022 (UTC)
     Comment Yes, Tagooty reported it on the discussion page and I added a further note. --GRDN711 16:58, 13 May 2022 (UTC)
     Oppose Per COM:QIC and to be useful in Commons going forward, image should be lightened (a little fill-in flash would have been helpful). In image description, ingredients should be identified and if this salad is a specific Bulgaria delicacy, it should be identified and categorized as such. --GRDN711 16:17, 14 May 2022 (UTC)
    •  Comment If rotated slightly CCW, I would support this image. Fill-in flash destroys any food photography in the vast majority of cases. In fact, every photograph, unless the direct flash is used deliberately to achieve a special creative effect. The photo shown is absolutely not underexposed. At most, one could find fault with the fact that the middle image tones could be raised a little (via s-curving), but I don't consider that to be absolutely necessary. --Smial 11:08, 16 May 2022 (UTC)
  •  Support Gut genug. Man kann sich auch totdiskutieren. --Smial 11:54, 16 May 2022 (UTC)
  •  Support Good enough. --Robert Flogaus-Faust 20:17, 16 May 2022 (UTC)
  •  Comment Agree that s-curve post-processing would raise and separate the muddy middle tones, but this has not been done. Why not?
A further and bigger issue is COM:QIC Image Page Requirements (4) - “Quality images shall have a meaningful file name, be properly categorized and have an accurate description on the file page in one or more languages. It is preferred, but not mandatory, to include an English description.”
I did not eat this salad at a Bulgarian restaurant and no idea what it is. I know that without a clear identification of what is presented in this food dish, it has no future being used for anything. Adding a QI rating is a distinction that will not help it from collecting digital dust at Commons. Again, why not add an accurate description of the dish in the image description? --GRDN711 15:47, 17 May 2022 (UTC)
 Comment So you're suggesting that food photography can only become QI in the future if the cooking recipe is included? --Smial 09:27, 19 May 2022 (UTC)
 Comment You are overstating what I am asking for. I am saying that without identification of what is being viewed in this food image, it will have little utility at Commons going forward.
QI review will not accept anyone's pet bird unless the complete classification of species, sub-species, common names and location are given. Per COM:QIC (4), the ingredients of this salad be identified so that a viewer can determine if it has some utility for their project? Further, how would a QI rating help this image gain any further use if you cannot determine what it is? --GRDN711 17:32, 19 May 2022 (UTC)
Total: 3 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promoted   --Robert Flogaus-Faust 17:33, 19 May 2022 (UTC)

File:St_Saturnin_church_in_Camburat_(3).jpg[edit]

  • Nomination Saint Saturnin of Toulouse church in Camburat, Lot, France. --Tournasol7 03:22, 2 May 2022 (UTC)
  • Promotion
    Useful if the Description indicates which part of the church is depicted, the angle of view, etc. --Tagooty 03:35, 2 May 2022 (UTC)
    the position of the photographer determines it --Tournasol7 03:51, 2 May 2022 (UTC)
    The filename and Description imply the full church. The image is a specific part of the church. Potential users search based on text keywords. --Tagooty 02:22, 4 May 2022 (UTC)
    Each photo contains information about the photographer's position. The user can easily find out from which side the photo was taken. --Tournasol7 05:14, 6 May 2022 (UTC)
  •  Question Why don't you just put the word "tower" in your file description?
 Question Or something like "viewed from west (north,east,south,elsewhere)"? --Smial 11:58, 16 May 2022 (UTC)
  •  Support Good quality. --Sebring12Hrs 05:28, 10 May 2022 (UTC)
  •  Support -- Johann Jaritz 06:13, 12 May 2022 (UTC)
  •  Oppose As per COM:QIC "Quality images shall have a meaningful file name, be properly categorized and have an accurate description on the file page in one or more languages. It is preferred, but not mandatory, to include an English description." This image does not comply. If the description is made accurate, I'll support. --Tagooty 03:24, 16 May 2022 (UTC)
  •  Oppose per Tagooty. I think Tagooty has raised an important point there. I think the reference to the Exif as the only indication of the location is not very friendly to subsequent users. --Smial 12:08, 16 May 2022 (UTC)
  •  Comment Please let's be kind to each other. While I'm very fond of detailed image descriptions, in this case, I do not really miss anything essential. Here, there is a nice series of eight images which allow anybody who loves architecture to "walk" around (half of) the church (assisted by Wikimap). So, I find it much more deplorable that there are no images showing the North and the East side (and the interior). – As I "read" the images (without having done any additional research), the church seems to have a complex history. The medieval building seems to have been oriented to the East (i.e. with the tower and the main entrance in the West, and the apse in the East). In the 19th (or early 20th) century, the church seems to have gotten too small, so a new part was attached on the South side, and the main altar was moved to the North end. That way, the old church was turned into the transept of the new one. – That is (if my understanding is correct), the image shows the SW corner of the new part (in the foreground), the South side of the old nave which equals the South side of what now is the transept, and the narrow side of the tower aka. the side-view of the old facade. – Would this be sufficiently detailed to give you a headache? ;-) – I would be willing to simply say it's self-explaining that we're looking at the tower. -- Martinus KE 14:10, 16 May 2022 (UTC)
  •  Support Good quality. Name and description are sufficient in my opinion. --Robert Flogaus-Faust 20:27, 16 May 2022 (UTC)
Total: 3 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Promoted   --Robert Flogaus-Faust 21:09, 19 May 2022 (UTC)

File:Rainbow_Lorikeet_eating_Grevillea.jpg[edit]

  • Nomination: Rainbow Lorikeet looking into distance while sitting on Grevillea --Dimitrijemat 22:24, 8 May 2022 (UTC)
  • Review
     Oppose Not sharp enough and too noisy, sorry. --Steindy 22:47, 8 May 2022 (UTC)
  •  SupportI disagree. Yes, a bit noisy due to the shooting conditions, but fortunately nothing was broken by excessive denoising, and the image sharpness is really more than adequate considering that the full sensor resolution is available and nothing was downscaled. --Smial 11:20, 9 May 2022 (UTC)
  •  Support A bit noisy, but good for QI --Charlesjsharp 13:05, 9 May 2022 (UTC)
  •  Support -- Johann Jaritz 05:05, 10 May 2022 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Bad crop, low DOF, noisy. --Kallerna 13:22, 10 May 2022 (UTC)
  •  Oppose The bird is OK but the blurry plant is distracting. -- Ikan Kekek 03:55, 11 May 2022 (UTC)
    •  Comment If I understand correctly, this is the flower or fruit that the bird is eating from? Then it is part of the composition. --Smial 05:56, 16 May 2022 (UTC)
  •  Comment There is no crop "Kallerna", if you bothered to check the sensor resolution of my camera and checked the exif you would see it was taken at max resolution --Dimitrijemat 11:26, 12 May 2022 (UTC)
  • Exactly. Re-crop would be needed. --Kallerna 13:56, 12 May 2022 (UTC)
Total: 3 support (excluding the nominator), 3 oppose → Inconclusive result after 8 consensual review days   --Robert Flogaus-Faust 21:06, 19 May 2022 (UTC)

File:Ming_Maoling_Tomb.jpg[edit]

  • Nomination: The Maoling mausoleum where the Chenghua emperor was buried. --Charlie fong 05:50, 1 May 2022 (UTC)
  • Review
  •  Support Good quality. Perhaps you could add a few more categories if there are suitable ones. --Domob 13:12, 9 May 2022 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Contrast and sharpness may be fixed before approved --Ezarate 23:02, 9 May 2022 (UTC)
Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Inconclusive result after 8 consensual review days   --Robert Flogaus-Faust 21:08, 19 May 2022 (UTC)
Retrieved from "https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Commons:Quality_images_candidates/Archives_May_20_2022&oldid=657416341"