Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives May 19 2016

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Consensual review[edit]

File:Greek National Museum - large vessel.JPG[edit]

  • Nomination A large vessel in the Greek national archaeology museum. --Peulle 14:26, 13 May 2016 (UTC)
  • Decline
  •  Support Could have been a little sharper, but good enough for me.--Famberhorst 15:39, 13 May 2016 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Sorry, not yet a QI. Could be, but after a correction of the tilt and the slight pincushion distortion. The base should be straight, and strictly horizontal. The description, and the categorization should be more specific. Please see the catalogue of the NAMA.--Jebulon 15:59, 13 May 2016 (UTC)
    • @Jebulon: Thanks for your comments; I'm afraid I don't have access to the catalogue, I was only visiting as a tourist.
    • @Peulle: So did I ! But one can find the catalogue online --Jebulon 19:23, 16 May 2016 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Even as a tourist one may be able to describe what one sees in a museum. --Palauenc05 21:27, 14 May 2016 (UTC)
    •  Comment My advice: just always take a picture of the plaque ! Very useful.--Jebulon 20:44, 16 May 2016 (UTC)
    •  Comment Thanks, I'll remember that. :) (and no, I couldn't find that manual online)
Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Declined   --Hubertl 05:25, 18 May 2016 (UTC)

File:Abeille_-_Winnie_l'ourson_-_20150805_17h48_(11022).jpg[edit]

  • Nomination Bee in Winnie the Pooh at the Disney Magic On Parade in Disneyland Paris. -- Medium69 19:27, 9 May 2016 (UTC)
  • Decline
  •  Support Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 22:08, 9 May 2016 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Bad bottom crop. --C messier 09:44, 11 May 2016 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Per C messier. I am wondering, if the many declined foot crops do not ring a bell at you, Medium69. Such issues fall among the compositional mistakes that often can be observed with unskilled camera owners. However, I am sure, that you can do better. --Cccefalon 08:35, 12 May 2016 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Bad bottom crop, my vote is also opposed.--Peulle 18:18, 12 May 2016 (UTC)
  •  Support still a good quality pic --Sujalajus 19:36, 13 May 2016 (UTC)
  •  Oppose no, not a good quality pic. See bottom crop.--Hubertl 20:01, 13 May 2016 (UTC)
  •  Oppose This crop is a no-go for me Poco a poco 08:26, 15 May 2016 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Even if the rest is technically good, cut-off feet ruin an image like this. Severe compositional flaw. --Kreuzschnabel 06:07, 16 May 2016 (UTC)
Total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 6 oppose → Declined   --Hubertl 05:24, 18 May 2016 (UTC)

File:Personnage_Disney_-_Le_Roi_lion_-_20150805_17h48_(11031).jpg[edit]

  • Nomination Disney character depicting Lion King at the Disney Magic On Parade at Disneyland Paris. -- Medium69 19:27, 9 May 2016 (UTC)
  • Decline
  •  Support Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 22:08, 9 May 2016 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Bad bottom crop IMHO. 11032 has a better crop. --C messier 09:47, 11 May 2016 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Please see my comment at the other photo. --Cccefalon 08:37, 12 May 2016 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Bad crop. --Peulle 18:19, 12 May 2016 (UTC)
  •  Support still a good quality pic --Sujalajus 19:37, 13 May 2016 (UTC)
  •  Oppose This crop is a no-go for me Poco a poco 08:25, 15 May 2016 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Even if the rest is technically good, cut-off feet ruin an image like this. Severe compositional flaw. --Kreuzschnabel 06:08, 16 May 2016 (UTC)
Total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 5 oppose → Declined   --Hubertl 05:23, 18 May 2016 (UTC)

File:20160430_Śnieżka_5404.jpg[edit]

  • Nomination Approach to Śnieżka in Giant Mountains --Jakubhal 21:03, 7 May 2016 (UTC)
  • Decline
  •  Support Good quality. --Archi38 21:18, 7 May 2016 (UTC)
  •  Oppose I disagree - lots of chromatic aberrations and big parts are blurred --A.Savin 01:55, 8 May 2016 (UTC)
  •  Oppose I also think it's not quite sharp enough.--Peulle 15:27, 8 May 2016 (UTC)
  •  Oppose - niestety, dość wyraźne CA --Pudelek 10:42, 9 May 2016 (UTC)
  •  Question @Jakubhal: do you have a RAW? --Ralf Roleček 20:40, 9 May 2016 (UTC)
  • No, not for this one. --Jakubhal 11:10, 10 May 2016 (UTC)
  • pity with a RAW would have been sure to save the still. A beautiful photo. I'll try to fix it, but will be difficult. --Ralf Roletschek 20:05, 10 May 2016 (UTC)
  •  Support --Ralf Roletschek 20:13, 10 May 2016 (UTC) I have upload a new version, I hope this is better so? @A.Savin: @Pudelek: @Peulle: vote strike as co-author --Ralf Roletschek 19:17, 17 May 2016 (UTC)
  • a week  Support. It is an excellent composition. My eyes are going to the man and girl in red jeackets, but a higher f-value might have been better. It is also still not really sharp but in this case just good enogh for Q1 --Michielverbeek 07:15, 11 May 2016 (UTC)
  •  Support Fine 4 me. --Palauenc05 21:36, 14 May 2016 (UTC)
  • @Ralf Roletschek: Being co-author of the latest version, you are not entitled to vote for it IMHO. Idea and composition are fine but  Oppose from me for overall lack of detail, and of sharpness towards the edges. A bit overexposed too (red channel on clothes, snow in background). --Kreuzschnabel 06:05, 16 May 2016 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Lots of chromatic aberrations and big parts are blurred. Per others--Lmbuga 15:49, 16 May 2016 (UTC)
Total: 3 support (excluding the nominator), 5 oppose → Declined   --A.Savin 18:59, 18 May 2016 (UTC)