Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives May 14 2015

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Consensual review[edit]

File:Bergamo_Palazzo_Provincia.jpg[edit]

  • Nomination Palace of the Province of Bergamo --Moroder 17:55, 5 May 2015 (UTC)
  • Promotion
  •  Oppose Perspective overcorrected. --Gzzz 21:28, 8 May 2015 (UTC)
    •  Comment I disagree, where? --Moroder 23:23, 8 May 2015 (UTC)
      •  Comment What do you mean, Gzzz? Tilt/Shift-Correction? --Hubertl 07:28, 9 May 2015 (UTC)
  •  Opposebad crop e.g. car cutted --Denkmalhelfer 09:44, 9 May 2015 (UTC) Sockpuppet Poco a poco 20:08, 10 May 2015 (UTC)
    •  Comment I asked the owner to move the car but he didn't want to--Moroder 11:54, 9 May 2015 (UTC)

* Ausgleichsstimme  Support für Getrolle --Ralf Roletschek 11:00, 9 May 2015 (UTC)

  •  Support My comment has to be understood as a neutralizing the negative vote here --Derzno 14:29, 9 May 2015 (UTC)
  •  Comment do you be here to discuss picture or about me? For your first comments you should focus on true pictures --Denkmalhelfer 16:54, 9 May 2015 (UTC)
  •  Support perspective IMO ok.--Hubertl 16:35, 10 May 2015 (UTC)
  •  Comment I checked with Photoshop : the pillars and collumns really go outward up ! like an inverted triangle... --Gzzz 18:48, 10 May 2015 (UTC)
  •  Support Good quality.- Perspective is allright with RawTherapee.--PIERRE ANDRE LECLERCQ 13:20, 11 May 2015 (UTC)
    • ✓ Done fixed verticals on the right side --Moroder 13:32, 11 May 2015 (UTC)
Total: 3 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promoted   --Hubertl 08:21, 13 May 2015 (UTC)

File:Trier_Christuskirche_BW_2014-09-20_12-48-39.jpg[edit]

  • Nomination Trier, Christuskirche, bell tower --Berthold Werner 06:08, 5 May 2015 (UTC)
  • Decline
  •  Support looks fine for QI --Denkmalhelfer 10:20, 5 May 2015 (UTC) Sockpuppet Poco a poco 20:13, 10 May 2015 (UTC)
  •  Oppose I disagree, the perspective correction - especially in this case - is a little bit to much of the good. You are losing the spatial aspects. But third opinion appreciated! Would give a PRO when corrected.--Hubertl 10:46, 5 May 2015 (UTC)
  •  Oppose I also think that perspective correction is a bit overdone. I know it's vertical now, but it doesn't look so natural. --Kadellar 15:41, 5 May 2015 (UTC)
  •  Oppose zu stark verzerrt --Ralf Roletschek 18:14, 8 May 2015 (UTC)
Total: 0 support (excluding the nominator), 3 oppose → Declined   --Hubertl 08:22, 13 May 2015 (UTC)