Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives May 13 2022

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Consensual review

[edit]

File:Pörtschach_Winklern_10.-Oktober-Straße_67_Apfelblüte_Jonagold_24042015_2611.jpg

[edit]

  • Nomination Jonagold blossom, Pörtschach, Carinthia, Austria -- Johann Jaritz 02:31, 9 May 2022 (UTC)
  • Promotion
  •  Support Good quality. --XRay 03:39, 9 May 2022 (UTC)
  • I disagree. Compared to today's other two Pötschach-candidates, this image strikes me as slightly overexposed, and it has washed-out highlights with no detail in areas important to the image. --Smial 11:04, 9 May 2022 (UTC)
    ✓ Done @Smial: Thanks for your review. I fixed the washed-out highlights. —- Johann Jaritz 11:48, 9 May 2022 (UTC)
  •  Support Enough details for me! -- Ikan Kekek 07:05, 10 May 2022 (UTC)
  •  Support Good now. --Smial 08:33, 10 May 2022 (UTC)
Total: 3 support (excluding the nominator), 0 oppose → Promoted   as fixed and unopposed.--Peulle 07:21, 12 May 2022 (UTC)

File:Shikara_-_Sukhna_Lake_-_Chandigarh_2016-08-07_8992.JPG

[edit]

  • Nomination: Shikara in Sukhna Lake by Gangulybiswarup --UnpetitproleX 18:02, 3 May 2022 (UTC)
  • Review
  •  Oppose I don't think this is sharp enough, sorry. --Peulle 22:26, 3 May 2022 (UTC)
  • Thanks for that, but with this digital sharpening it just looks overprocessed. Looking at the man with the oar especially, I don't think this is salvageable.--Peulle 09:54, 4 May 2022 (UTC)
  • {{o}} Overprocessed. I would support the original version. It's somewhat soft in full resolution, but could be printed to A4 size in acceptable quality. Other images here that are scaled down to 2.5 MPixels are also supported. At 2.5 MPixels, the photo above would be more than sharp enough. --Smial 15:52, 5 May 2022 (UTC)
 Support Ok. --Smial 18:50, 6 May 2022 (UTC)
  •  Support Good image, sharp enough and not overprocessed. -- Spurzem 08:33, 8 May 2022 (UTC)
  •  Oppose I think its sharpness is mediocre and not really good. -- Ikan Kekek 15:11, 8 May 2022 (UTC)
Total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Inconclusive result after 8 consensual review days   --Peulle 06:32, 12 May 2022 (UTC)