Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives May 08 2015

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Consensual review[edit]

File:2014_Kłodzko,_kościół_Wniebowzięcia_NMP_21.jpg[edit]

  • Nomination Church of the Assumption in Kłodzko 1 --Jacek Halicki 08:20, 29 April 2015 (UTC)
  • Promotion
  •  Support Good quality. Ciekawa kompozycja. --Albertus teolog 14:54, 29 April 2015 (UTC)
  •  Oppose it is too drak for me --Denkmalhelfer 12:46, 30 April 2015 (UTC)
  •  Support Good quality.--PIERRE ANDRE LECLERCQ 16:19, 3 May 2015 (UTC)
  •  Support --Ralf Roletschek 22:29, 5 May 2015 (UTC)
Total: 3 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promoted   --Hubertl 12:37, 7 May 2015 (UTC)

File:2015 04 08 014 35mm camera Fuji Fujica Compact S.jpg[edit]

  • Nomination Kleinbildkamera Fuji Fujica Compact S/35mm camera Fuji Fujica Compact S --F. Riedelio 06:55, 13 April 2015 (UTC)

 Comment I'm not very fond of these vertical lines specially on the left --Moroder 06:46, 21 April 2015 (UTC)
✓ New version Vertical lines corrected. --F. Riedelio 09:54, 22 April 2015 (UTC)

  • Promotion
  •  Support Good quality. --Moroder 22:09, 24 April 2015 (UTC)
  •  Comment IMHO, It is distorted now, F. Riedelio is it possible to photograph it again from a more face-on position? --C messier 14:26, 26 April 2015 (UTC)
  •  Comment Uploaded a new corrected version which I would like to  Support. -- Smial 10:52, 29 April 2015 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Left vertical lines are tilted, sorry (see note). It is a studio picture: The background color is not appropriate, it resembles too. Could you take a better picture with white background?--Lmbuga 17:12, 29 April 2015 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Per Lmbuga,not accetable for this kind of works --Σπάρτακος 18:39, 2 May 2015 (UTC)
  •  weak support -- Good enough although the crop is too tight. Alvesgaspar 15:11, 3 May 2015 (UTC)
  •  weak support slightly tilted but QI.--PIERRE ANDRE LECLERCQ 21:36, 4 May 2015 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Tight crop. --Jebulon 14:24, 5 May 2015 (UTC)
Total: 4 support (excluding the nominator), 3 oppose → Promoted   --Hubertl 12:38, 7 May 2015 (UTC)

File:Viooltje (Viola cornuta), Locatie, Tuinreservaat Jonker vallei 02.jpg[edit]

  • Nomination Viola cornuta, Location, Tuinreservaat Jonker vallei.
    Famberhorst 04:43, 21 April 2015 (UTC)
  • Decline
  •  Oppose DOF a tick too shallow. Besides. Please fix the description. --Tobias "ToMar" Maier 10:33, 21 April 2015 (UTC)
  •  Support I think, for a non studio work it is well done. The center is sharp. This is whats possible with f/13. --Hubertl 15:23, 21 April 2015 (UTC)
  •  Comment Dust spot (see note) is disturbing IMO. F/13, but the DOF is a bit sparse to be QI IMO. Personal opinion: I don't know if it has too much contrast or if it is oversaturated. I don't like the red halo of the yellow edge (see note)--Lmbuga 16:27, 24 April 2015 (UTC)
    ✓ Done Dust Spot and edge removed.--Famberhorst 17:27, 25 April 2015 (UTC)
  •  Support --Palauenc05 10:11, 26 April 2015 (UTC)
  •  Oppose I agree that Dof is too shallow. All petals should be sharp. I don't like the distracting backgroud either. Alvesgaspar 11:37, 26 April 2015 (UTC)
  •  Oppose As Alvesgaspar.--Jebulon 14:21, 5 May 2015 (UTC)
Total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 3 oppose → Declined   --Hubertl 12:39, 7 May 2015 (UTC)