Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives May 07 2015

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Consensual review[edit]

File:Monumento_a_Jaime_I_El_Conquistador,_Valencia,_España,_2014-06-29,_DD_11.JPG[edit]

  • Nomination Monument to James I the Conqueror, Valencia, Spain --Poco a poco 17:13, 27 April 2015 (UTC)
  • Promotion
  •  Comment this picture seems stretched in two different directions. This result can´t be the original perspective. See notes.--Hubertl 18:07, 27 April 2015 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Sorry, the new version does´nt convince me really. See notes. Third opinion appreciated. --Hubertl 22:15, 30 April 2015 (UTC)
Total: 3 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promoted   --Hubertl 13:34, 6 May 2015 (UTC)

File:Edersee 01 und Schloss Waldeck.jpg[edit]

  • Nomination Edersee with Castle Waldeck in the background --Derzno 10:36, 24 April 2015 (UTC)
  • Promotion
  •  Comment Es fehlt die englische Beschreibung auf der Bildseite. Die deutsche verstehe ich nicht, da kein Staudamm zu sehen ist. --Milseburg 14:48, 25 April 2015 (UTC)
  • ✓ Done Added missing information in english and changed german text either --Derzno 16:16, 25 April 2015 (UTC)
  •  Support o.K. for me now. --Milseburg 11:00, 30 April 2015 (UTC)
  •  Oppose disagree, blow out ship and not sharp at all --Denkmalhelfer 12:29, 30 April 2015 (UTC)
  •  Support good for QI --Hubertl 17:55, 3 May 2015 (UTC)
  •  Support --Ralf Roletschek 18:06, 3 May 2015 (UTC)
  •  Support good quality .--PIERRE ANDRE LECLERCQ 10:00, 4 May 2015 (UTC)
Total: 4 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promoted   --Hubertl 07:33, 6 May 2015 (UTC)

File:Tere schoonheid van de Camellia × williamsii 'Jury's Yellow' bloem. Locatie, Tuinreservaat Jonker vallei 05.jpg[edit]

  • Nomination Delicate beauty of the Camellia × williamsii 'Jury's Yellow' flower. Location. Garden sanctuary JonkerValley.
    Famberhorst 15:39, 28 April 2015 (UTC)
  • Promotion
  •  Support Good quality. Even when the background is pretty dark, But the subject is the rosa. --Hubertl 16:29, 28 April 2015 (UTC)
  •  Oppose... which is really too dark too (for my taste). I ask for a discussion, please.--Jebulon 16:49, 28 April 2015 (UTC)...which is a camelia, not a rosa...--Jebulon 16:54, 28 April 2015 (UTC)
  •  Support Yes,sure...is a few dark but good for QI in my opinion --Livioandronico2013 20:21, 28 April 2015 (UTC)
  •  Supportlooks good. --Denkmalhelfer 12:23, 30 April 2015 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Fine, but underexposed. Should be brightened. --Kadellar 01:09, 3 May 2015 (UTC)
  •  Supportlooks good.--PIERRE ANDRE LECLERCQ 08:56, 3 May 2015 (UTC)
Total: 4 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Promoted   --Hubertl 07:32, 6 May 2015 (UTC) (UTC)

File:Πρόσοψη αρχαιολογικού μουσείου Αθηνών 8616.jpg[edit]

  • Nomination Facade of the National Archaeological Museum of Athens --C messier 12:30, 27 April 2015 (UTC)
  • Promotion
  •  Support Good quality. --Bgag 13:55, 27 April 2015 (UTC)
  •  Oppose My graal !Clin But looks hazy, lack of crispness. And the sky is too noisy IMO. I ask for a discussion, please.--Jebulon 14:08, 27 April 2015 (UTC)
  •  Oppose colour noise --Denkmalhelfer 15:44, 28 April 2015 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Per jeb --Livioandronico2013 20:34, 28 April 2015 (UTC)
  • ✓ Denoised and added some contrast but I see no lack with sharpness. --C messier 07:17, 30 April 2015 (UTC)
  •  Support ok now.--Hubertl 08:19, 30 April 2015 (UTC)
  •  Support I don't see any problem. I only miss some flowers at the foreground. --Kadellar 01:03, 3 May 2015 (UTC)
  •  Support Can't see any chroma noise -- Alvesgaspar 15:14, 3 May 2015 (UTC)
  •  Support --Ralf Roletschek 18:09, 3 May 2015 (UTC)
  •  Support .--PIERRE ANDRE LECLERCQ 10:06, 4 May 2015 (UTC)
Total: 6 support (excluding the nominator), 3 oppose → Promoted   --Hubertl 13:35, 6 May 2015 (UTC)

File:Great_Egret_during_mating_season_at_Smith_Oaks_Sanctuary,_High_Island.jpg[edit]

  • Nomination Great egret (Ardea alba) during mating season at Smith Oaks Sanctuary, High Island --Frank Schulenburg 03:45, 26 April 2015 (UTC)
  • Promotion
  •  Support Good quality. --Uoaei1 05:21, 26 April 2015 (UTC)
  •  Oppose The head is not very sharp and the white feathers are overblown. --Charlesjsharp 14:18, 26 April 2015 (UTC)
  •  Comment No problem with the sharpness. Too tight at bottom (paws are cropped). Little chromatic aberration (see the edges of the white head)?--Lmbuga 13:36, 27 April 2015 (UTC)
  •  Support Good 4 me. --Palauenc05 21:32, 28 April 2015 (UTC)
  •  Oppose See above (paws are cropped, minor CAs IMO) and feathers are a bit overexposed--Lmbuga 17:24, 29 April 2015 (UTC)
  •  Comment Thank you so much for the helpful feedback. I really appreciate it. I reworked the image and uploaded a new version. Sorry for uploading a version with the bird's feet cut off. I should have been more careful. Thanks again, --Frank Schulenburg 13:21, 30 April 2015 (UTC)
  •  Support Excellent picture, all the faults mentioned above are minor imo. Alvesgaspar 14:11, 3 May 2015 (UTC)
  •  Support Good quality. --Hockei 08:00, 4 May 2015 (UTC)
  •  Support Good quality, nice pic.--PIERRE ANDRE LECLERCQ 21:34, 4 May 2015 (UTC)

* Support Good picture... same vote as for FP ! Gzzz 19:53, 6 May 2015 (UTC)

Total: 5 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Promoted   --Hubertl 15:02, 6 May 2015 (UTC)

File:Κηφισιά Πλάτανος 7863.jpg[edit]

  • Nomination The centre of Kifissia, Attica, Greece. --C messier 16:40, 15 April 2015 (UTC)
  •  Comment There are really many problems. its leaning in (on the right side more than left) that means, it tilted too, additionally the lack of contrast. I can´t imagine, that this is just haze. What shall we do, C.? --Hubertl 15:55, 21 April 2015 (UTC)
  • I can fix the low contrast issue, but are you sure that it is leaning in? I checked them again and they were IMHO, fine. --C messier 11:05, 22 April 2015 (UTC)
  •  Comment With PS, I would stretch the upper left corner a bit. There are so many lines, even the doors are not straight to others, and the lantern is skewed. Have a try. --Hubertl 12:53, 23 April 2015 (UTC)
  •  Oppose see comment from Hubertl --Denkmalhelfer 17:08, 24 April 2015 (UTC)
    ✓ Done Thank you Hubertl for your review, I had overcorrected tilt. --C messier 12:56, 26 April 2015 (UTC)
  • Promotion
  •  Support sufficient good work.--Hubertl 22:04, 26 April 2015 (UTC)
  • weak  Support Just barely acceptable --Σπάρτακος 18:37, 2 May 2015 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Poor light, building seems to be falling. Alvesgaspar 15:08, 3 May 2015 (UTC)
  • weak  Support good shoot by a rainy day.--PIERRE ANDRE LECLERCQ 14:22, 4 May 2015 (UTC)
Total: 3 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Promoted   --Hubertl 00:02, 5 May 2015 (UTC)