Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives March 2009

• 
  • Nomination El Gouna, Egypt: Abu Tig Marina. -- MJJR 21:25, 28 March 2009 (UTC)
  • Promotion nice colours --Böhringer 21:40, 28 March 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination El Gouna (Egypt): kitesurfing on the Red Sea. -- MJJR 22:03, 27 March 2009 (UTC)
  • Promotion coole szene --Böhringer 19:05, 28 March 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination cablecarstation at the summit of the Wendelstein --Simonizer 23:23, 22 March 2009 (UTC)
  • Promotion It's ok for me. Meets the QI criteria --High Contrast 07:52, 29 March 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Gegenüberstellung --Böhringer 21:23, 27 March 2009 (UTC)
  • Promotion nett und nützlich --Mbdortmund 21:34, 27 March 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Dirce Beauty (Colobura dirce) --Richard Bartz 19:54, 27 March 2009 (UTC)
  • Promotion einwandfrei --Böhringer 21:15, 27 March 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Oxalis pes-caprae. --MathKnight 13:07, 27 March 2009 (UTC)
  • Decline I was going to promote this picture before seing it in full size. Composition is very good but image quality is poor, due to extensive noise and artifacts. Probably a camera's fault -- Alvesgaspar 17:07, 27 March 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Transparency tile. -- carol 23:05, 26 March 2009 (UTC)
  • Decline Boring: too greyish. Maybe with a little yellow?... Alvesgaspar 17:49, 27 March 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Pavillon am Bodensee --Böhringer 13:53, 26 March 2009 (UTC)
  • Promotion Nice composition and atmosphere. -- MJJR 22:13, 27 March 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: A Class 221 passes through Parson Street railway station. Mattbuck 21:02, 21 March 2009 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination: A Class 143 at Bedminster railway station. Mattbuck 20:53, 21 March 2009 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination: Bust of Joseph Fourier. --Eusebius 17:16, 21 March 2009 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination: Rocca Maggiore, Assisi, Italy ;-) --Berthold Werner 16:32, 21 March 2009 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination Embankment --Nevit 22:19, 26 March 2009 (UTC)
  • Decline Blurry and noisy. The non-moving parts are unsharp. --Eusebius 09:36, 27 March 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Gazania rigens var. rigens Gaertn. (Clumping Gazania) -- Pro2 20:31, 26 March 2009 (UTC)
  • Promotion good --Mbdortmund 01:40, 27 March 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Eichhörnchen im Herbstlaub --Dellex 15:53, 26 March 2009 (UTC)
  • Promotion Meets QI-requirements --Mbdortmund 01:39, 27 March 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination The old elephant house of the Tierpark Hellabrunn in Munich --High Contrast 10:54, 26 March 2009 (UTC)
  • Promotion good --Pudelek 20:42, 26 March 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Neon music sign --Nevit 21:59, 24 March 2009 (UTC)
  • Promotion OK for me -- Alvesgaspar 08:49, 27 March 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: inside the Cathedral of Saint Basil in Moscow, Russia. Shot in Raw, tone-mapped as HDR --Alejo2083 21:30, 20 March 2009 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination: Bahai World Center in Haifa, Israel. --MathKnight 19:21, 20 March 2009 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination Rhabdomiris striatellus --Richard Bartz 01:10, 26 March 2009 (UTC)
  • Promotion Correct exposure and details. --ComputerHotline 06:57, 26 March 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Human hair closeup --Nevit 20:58, 25 March 2009 (UTC)
  • Decline  Done I put it in a more specific category. --Notyourbroom 21:14, 25 March 2009 (UTC) - Not the best depiction of human hair. Few hairs, poor lighting -- Alvesgaspar 00:13, 26 March 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Portrait of a wall lizard (Podarcis muralis) -- Alvesgaspar 14:54, 25 March 2009 (UTC)
  • Promotion I like that only head of the lizard is sharp. Very good!--Mbz1 15:30, 25 March 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Old bedroom in Salbert fortifications. --ComputerHotline 13:26, 25 March 2009 (UTC)
  • Promotion Correct composition, good enough quality -- Alvesgaspar 00:15, 26 March 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Panoramics of Switzerland, Rehetobel --Böhringer 12:42, 25 March 2009 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality image of a beautiful place.--Mbz1 15:30, 25 March 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Tachina fly (Gonia capitata) feeding honey --Richard Bartz 02:41, 25 March 2009 (UTC)
  • Promotion Feeding on honey? Or is this a fly that makes honey?-- carol 03:23, 25 March 2009 (UTC) You're a native speaker, what is the corect translation ? Feed on honey ? --Richard Bartz 12:44, 25 March 2009 (UTC) ---- Correct exposure and details. --ComputerHotline 13:24, 25 March 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Les Bans (3,669 m), north face, France. Yann 23:06, 24 March 2009 (UTC)
  • Decline Nice composition, poor quality. Notice the jpeg artifacts in the darker areas -- Alvesgaspar 00:18, 26 March 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Adonis microcarpa. --MathKnight 19:18, 22 March 2009 (UTC)
  • Decline Fuzzy and noisy. --ComputerHotline 13:28, 25 March 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: Silene laciniata by Stickpen. Nom by Lycaon 08:07, 20 March 2009 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination: Dortmund, Signal Iduna Park, stairs --Mbdortmund 23:42, 19 March 2009 (UTC)
  • Review  Comment slightly distorted. --Eusebius 11:45, 20 March 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: Dortmund, Graffiti ----Mbdortmund 21:35, 19 March 2009 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination: Dortmund, Signal Iduna Park ----Mbdortmund 21:35, 19 March 2009 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination: Dortmund, Signal Iduna Park ----Mbdortmund 21:35, 19 March 2009 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination: Sundown in Austria near the river Inn --High Contrast 13:51, 19 March 2009 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination Beautiful Demoiselle (Calopteryx virgo) --Richard Bartz 14:46, 24 March 2009 (UTC)
  • Promotion "Beautiful" you said. No doubt it is!--Mbz1 19:59, 24 March 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: Fishhook cactus or Ferocactus gracilis by Stickpen -- carol 23:30, 18 March 2009 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination Crab spider (Xysticus sp) --Richard Bartz 19:12, 23 March 2009 (UTC)
  • Promotion Wonderful. But, what is meant by a species name of sp? I have found reference to the species spasskyi, sphericus, and spiethi in this genus. --Notyourbroom 01:13, 24 March 2009 (UTC) sp. or spec. means that only the genus can be identified --Richard Bartz 01:24, 24 March 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Kotelnicheskaya (one of Stalin's Skyscrapers in Moscow). Tone-mapped HDR (created from a Raw shot) --Alejo2083 21:47, 22 March 2009 (UTC)
  • Decline I quite like it in thumbnail, but I have to decline on technical grounds - it's blurry and there are several areas of overexposure. Mattbuck 18:24, 23 March 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Port cranes in Berlin. --High Contrast 20:31, 22 March 2009 (UTC)
  • Decline Tilted (assuming buildings are vertical). Mattbuck 18:55, 23 March 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination A tower block in Bristol. Mattbuck 21:00, 21 March 2009 (UTC)
  • Decline I can't see the point in the composition, and the building is a bit noisy. --Eusebius 19:27, 23 March 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Panning pic of Mercedes-Benz C-Class --AngMoKio 21:34, 20 March 2009 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good enough --Richard Bartz 19:17, 23 March 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: Gas station in Turčianske Teplice, Slovakia --Pudelek 14:10, 17 March 2009 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination: Icicle in Żywiec Beskids. February, late afternoon --Pudelek 14:10, 17 March 2009 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination: Strečno - footbridge over Váh river, Slovakia --Pudelek 14:10, 17 March 2009 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination: Turčianske Teplice (Stubnyafürdő, Bad Stuben), Slovakia. Blue bath.--Pudelek 14:10, 17 March 2009 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination Paddy fields and mountains in the northeast of China.--Charlie fong 13:45, 15 March 2009 (UTC)
  • Decline Image seems everywhere too blue. Chromatic Aberr. on mountain edges. Quality diminishing/reducing and quite annoying color problem in the gradients of sky/clouds (much too aggressive of manipulation via Picassa?). Species of rice and location of field missing from description and placement in gallery or category here at commons. -- carol 19:02, 23 March 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination the "Wendelsteinkircherl" at the summit of the Wendelstein --Simonizer 22:57, 22 March 2009 (UTC)
  • Promotion a' good composition --Böhringer 12:01, 23 March 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Two Common rudd --Yotcmdr 18:54, 22 March 2009 (UTC)
  • Decline The lighting isn't quite right for this; the image should focus on just one subject; and the grass background is distracting, with blades of grass occluding both fish to some extent. --Notyourbroom 03:19, 23 March 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Candles --Nevit 17:28, 22 March 2009 (UTC)
  • Promotion nice shot --AngMoKio 17:39, 22 March 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Don't shut the door, the Blount will do it. --Eusebius 15:47, 22 March 2009 (UTC)
  • Promotion Crooked grain, straight sign. -- carol 06:17, 23 March 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Rose window in Basilica di San Francesco in Assisi --Berthold Werner 15:24, 22 March 2009 (UTC)
  • Promotion well done --AngMoKio 16:09, 22 March 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Annunciation window in Chartres cathedral. --Eusebius 13:41, 22 March 2009 (UTC)
  • Promotion This looks good enough for a promotion to me and gets my weak  Support. However, I feel like the perspective is still very slightly off, even with your digital correction. Scrolling from the bottom of the image to the top, the sides of the window appear to pinch inward slightly. This is really not my area of expertise, though. I'll leave it to you whether it needs further correction, but I wanted to bring the issue to your (and other editors') attention. --Notyourbroom 16:43, 22 March 2009 (UTC)
    Honestly I'm unable to do better. I think that with the modifications I've done, I've already made the walls slightly more rectilign (if not perfectly vertical) than they actually are. --Eusebius 18:42, 22 March 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Ebrach Abbey, Rose window, exterior --Berthold Werner 18:10, 19 March 2009 (UTC)
  • Promotion well done --AngMoKio 16:12, 22 March 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: The Shrine of the Book, Jerusalem --Berthold Werner 14:02, 16 March 2009 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination Beer-brewing bubbles --Specious 22:32, 21 March 2009 (UTC)
  • Promotion OK for me. A more macro view would have been interesting. --Eusebius 10:58, 22 March 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Rocca Maggiore, Assisi, Italy --Berthold Werner 15:44, 21 March 2009 (UTC)
  • Decline Many parts underexposed thus too dark --AngMoKio 16:01, 21 March 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Zebra, Allwetterzoo Münster --Pro2 22:03, 20 March 2009 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Request Not identified. Lycaon 22:04, 20 March 2009 (UTC) Better now? Pro2 13:43, 21 March 2009 (UTC)
    Almost ;-). Just the scientific name and the category and I'll promote. Lycaon 13:45, 21 March 2009 (UTC)
    Fixed. Lycaon 16:28, 21 March 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination USB 2.0 PCI Card. ----Harke 21:23, 20 March 2009 (UTC)
  • Decline Too noisy on the dark parts. --Eusebius 10:53, 22 March 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Dortmund, Signal Iduna Park ----Mbdortmund 21:35, 19 March 2009 (UTC)
  • Decline Unclear composition/subject, a bit noisy (probably not too much). --Eusebius 10:51, 22 March 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Aeonium dodrantale. --Opuntia (nom. by Rocket000)
  • Promotion good --Böhringer 22:19, 16 March 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Chassis à molette du Bois du Cazier Marcinelle --Lviatour (nom. by Rocket000)
  • Promotion very good --Böhringer 22:19, 16 March 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination A Barclays Pinsentry --78.86.168.41 22:35, 20 March 2009 (UTC)
  • Promotion Looks fine to me. --Notyourbroom 07:47, 21 March 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Vegetables Nevit 22:04, 20 March 2009 (UTC)
  • Decline The green pepper is lighting up red!!. Lycaon 22:05, 20 March 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Detail of a fountain in Grenoble. --Eusebius 08:48, 13 March 2009 (UTC)
  • Promotion Quality pic. Lycaon 22:09, 20 March 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: Secretory pathway diagram Pbroks13 17:56, 12 March 2009 (UTC)
  • Review
     Comment I think the background color might not be the best, but more importantly, the cell membrane should be included because this diagram does not show where the transport vesicles exiting the distal golgi apparatus go. --PieCam 15:16, 14 March 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Basilika Ottobeuren --High Contrast 22:11, 19 March 2009 (UTC)
  • Decline Camera not in the nave axis (therefore perspective looks strange), somebody's arm is in the frame in the foreground. --Eusebius 11:43, 20 March 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Oriental Pearl Tower (created by Shizhao) --D-Kuru 14:59, 19 March 2009 (UTC)
  • Decline Very noisy. --Coyau 16:18, 19 March 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Outdoor trash can --Specious 23:42, 15 March 2009 (UTC)
  • Promotion Sharp picture. Makes me think of R2D2+LSD. --Coyau 16:49, 17 March 2009 (UTC)
    Funny comment Coyay, made me smile. Thanks. Oh, and the pic is OK. --Siipikarja 08:39, 20 March 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Chevrolet S-10 --Specious 07:13, 15 March 2009 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Comment I don't care for the extra space, which is distractingly busy from the pan effect; why not crop it? Thegreenj 03:37, 18 March 2009 (UTC)
    Better? --Specious 20:36, 18 March 2009 (UTC)
    Definitely, although it might be worth experimenting with longer shutter speeds for a cleaner background. Thegreenj 01:29, 20 March 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Golden Crescent Moon --Dcubillas 06:30, 15 March 2009 (UTC)
  • Decline Strange colours, strange change over from sky to moon, noisy sky --Berthold Werner 13:05, 19 March 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Mount Rainier panorama --Wsiegmund 19:51, 13 March 2009 (UTC)
  • Promotion  oppose for now At least 8 dust spots and a bad crop (see bottom-left corner). --Eusebius 21:47, 16 March 2009 (UTC)
     Comment Loaded corrected image over flawed one; thank you. --Wsiegmund 05:03, 17 March 2009 (UTC)
     Comment You should crop a little more on the left, there's a little black triangle remaining. --Eusebius 08:06, 17 March 2009 (UTC)
     Comment Losslessly cropped per suggestion; thank you. --Wsiegmund 17:09, 17 March 2009 (UTC)
     Support I think it is ok. --Eusebius 11:36, 20 March 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: Winter in Żywiec Beskids. February, late afternoon --Pudelek 15:13, 13 March 2009 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination: Winter in Żywiec Beskids. February, late afternoon --Pudelek15:13, 13 March 2009 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination Jetty in Kota kinabalu --Dcubillas 06:39, 12 March 2009 (UTC)
  • Decline I don't like the point of view, the composition, the framing/crop (especially the left side), and the distortion (see the water horizon). --Eusebius 11:32, 20 March 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Sax Forstegg (112 Pics Panoramics) --Böhringer 20:36, 18 March 2009 (UTC)
  • Promotion very good! --Pudelek 21:26, 18 March 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: Willard Straight Hall at Cornell University. --Notyourbroom 04:22, 13 March 2009 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination The church of Christ the Saviour in Moscow (Russia) --Alejo2083 00:09, 14 March 2009 (UTC)
  • Promotion Borderline sharpness and noise; I can forgive those given the good composition and high resolution. Thegreenj 16:54, 18 March 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: 2009 Chunyun period,Scene of the Beijing West Railway Station,China.--Charlie fong 14:33, 12 March 2009 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination Dynastes neptunus female -- Thegreenj 03:29, 18 March 2009 (UTC)
  • Promotion a bit of noise in the background but very good details on the main subject --Mbdortmund 10:53, 18 March 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Sunrise in Constanta,Romania --Moise Nicu 14:51, 16 March 2009 (UTC)
  • Decline Very unsharp, very noisy. --Coyau 16:54, 17 March 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Aeonium leucobleferum. --Opuntia (nom. by Rocket000)
  • Promotion Looks good, sharp subject, nice blur in background, good colors. --Coyau 16:44, 17 March 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: Flying buttresses of Chartres cathedral. --Eusebius 10:18, 12 March 2009 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination: Kids on the Kota Kinabalu waterfront -- Dcubillas 07:21, 12 March 2009 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination: St. Anna church in Jerusalem --Berthold Werner 07:16, 12 March 2009 (UTC)
  • Review * Oppose Declined for now.  QuestionCan you get rid of the CA (auf Deutsch) in the foliage on the right of the image? Please sign your vote.
• 
  • Nomination: Tower of the Old Keep in Nantes castle. --Eusebius 14:54, 11 March 2009 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination: Intrados of the porte Saint-Denis, Paris. --Coyau 23:11, 9 March 2009 (UTC)
  • Review  Comment A bit noisy for my taste. --Eusebius 13:56, 11 March 2009 (UTC)  Info A little denoised. --Coyau 20:27, 11 March 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: Dortmund, Germany, Mahnmal Bittermark, memorial for the german resistants --Mbdortmund 13:58, 7 March 2009 (UTC)
  • Review Note: don't we have a licence problem on these images? It is not obvious to me that the sculpture in the public domain, and I do not see why this would be a case of FoP, which entails that the copyright on the sculpture propagates to the photographs. Rama 09:18, 11 March 2009 (UTC) The sculpture is FoP concerning German Rights --Mbdortmund 12:37, 11 March 2009 (UTC)
    Yes, apparently correct, though the term "panorama" is extremely ill-suited here. Rama 12:41, 11 March 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: The Cathedral of the Holy Wisdom of God in Harbin,China -- Charlie fong 05:40, 19 March 2007 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination: Buildings in zhongguancun,Beijing -- Charlie fong 05:37, 19 March 2007 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination: The headquarters of PetroChina,outside of dongzhimen,Beijing -- Charlie fong 05:27, 19 March 2007 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination: The peak of xiangshan mountain,Beijing. --Charlie fong 13:15, 18 March 2007 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination Analogmultimeter --Harke 19:23, 16 March 2009 (UTC)
  • Promotion looks good --Mbdortmund 20:13, 16 March 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: Two entries of undergrounds footway. --ComputerHotline 12:50, 10 March 2009 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination: Winter in Żywiec Beskids, late afternoon. Wooden house near Lasek mount, Poland --Pudelek 12:20, 10 March 2009 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination: Synagogue in Liptovský Mikuláš, Slovakia --Pudelek 12:20, 10 March 2009 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination: Dungeon of Chillon castel --Rama 23:18, 9 March 2009 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination: Reproduction of a Middle Age reliquary at Chillon castel --Rama 23:18, 9 March 2009 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination Ice hockey player Erik Karlsson.--High Contrast 16:35, 15 March 2009 (UTC)
  • Promotion good --Mbdortmund 23:20, 15 March 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination the view of State key laboratory in Jilinuniversity ，China.--Charlie fong 13:40, 15 March 2009 (UTC)
  • Promotion Composition is not ideal - could do without cutting off the nearside of the circular area (fountain?), or going half through a tree on the right, but overall I'm compelled to promote it as it's technically very good. Mattbuck 00:26, 16 March 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Alpine hut of Aiguilles d'Arves, Savoie, France. Yann 16:56, 14 March 2009 (UTC)
  • Decline Too much noise --Dcubillas 14:42, 15 March 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Les Bans, massif des Écrins, France. Yann 17:19, 14 March 2009 (UTC)
  • Decline Too much noise --Dcubillas 14:42, 15 March 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Poa pratensis --Pro2 12:26, 14 March 2009 (UTC)
  • Decline The grass at the front is out of focus, and in the way, and the flower itself is also out of focus. Mattbuck 13:08, 15 March 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: California Brown Pelican --Nehrams2020 22:02, 2 March 2009 (UTC)
  • Review The background is distracting, but I don't know if it's a that big problem. --Henrik 21:01, 3 March 2009 (UTC) Comment: I wondered about that but wasn't sure. --Nehrams2020 22:53, 3 March 2009 (UTC)
    Ditto. It's QI, apart from the background. Mattbuck 23:19, 3 March 2009 (UTC)
    I agree, the DOF is good though, and the background though busy is nicely out of focus. I'm on the fence about this one too. --PieCam 02:48, 10 March 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination DECstation 5000/200 exposed. Adamantios 14:57, 14 March 2009 (UTC)
  • Decline Significant barrel distortion, background removal not so nice, could probably be sharper. Sorry! --Eusebius 15:10, 14 March 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination The A.D. White House at Cornell University. --Notyourbroom 20:08, 11 March 2009 (UTC)
  • Decline strong distortion --Mbdortmund 00:23, 15 March 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: Behind the locked gates of the Swan Valley Nyungah Community Gnangarra 15:49, 8 March 2009 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination: Sunrise over Milwaukee Harbor. Dori 23:19, 7 March 2009 (UTC)
  • Review  Comment Beautiful picture, but a bit noisy in the clouds. --Eusebius 16:01, 8 March 2009 (UTC) Yes, that's true. I couldn't get rid of the noise without losing a lot of detail. This was shot with an L lens at ISO 100, it was the best the camera could do under the conditions. Dori 19:04, 8 March 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Diagram of a cigarette Pbroks13 17:46, 13 March 2009 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Very good... *inhale*. --Siipikarja 01:18, 14 March 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Mazda Protegé --Specious 07:28, 13 March 2009 (UTC)
  • Promotion well executed panning shot --AngMoKio 16:42, 13 March 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination A blue British Shorthair cat. --Nicole-Koehler 20:33, 11 March 2009 (UTC)
  • Decline Cute, but I decline on composition grounds due to the ears being cut off. Mattbuck 13:48, 13 March 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: A loupe. Adamantios 22:53, 7 March 2009 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination: Dortmund, Germany, Mahnmal Bittermark, memorial for the german resistants --Mbdortmund 13:58, 7 March 2009 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination: Dortmund, coal mine Gneisenau --Mbdortmund 13:58, 7 March 2009 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination: Ibis user:roo72 -- roo72 21:50, 7 March 2009 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination Parson Street railway station. (Renom after unassessed.) Mattbuck 13:34, 6 March 2009 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good composition with train, platforms, stairs to street level and two unidentifiable users; resolution and clarity meet criteria; exposure and lighting are good with no distracting shadows. --Wsiegmund 01:46, 14 March 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: Clock tower by night - Banská Bystrica (Besztercebánya, Neusohl), Slovakia. --Pudelek 14:34, 27 February 2009 (UTC)
  • Review perspective should be corrected --Mbdortmund 16:27, 7 March 2009 (UTC)  Comment - In my opinion perspective is ok - tower is oryginally tilted --Pudelek 20:31, 7 March 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Sage Chapel at Cornell University. --Notyourbroom 04:26, 13 March 2009 (UTC)
  • Decline Sky is very cyan in the left part of the picture. --Eusebius 10:52, 13 March 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Statues of the west portal of Strasbourg's cathedral. Unassessed QI in january--Coyau 17:43, 12 March 2009 (UTC)
  • Promotion Great, I don't see any problems. --Notyourbroom 18:40, 12 March 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Statues of the west portal of Strasbourg's cathedral. Unassessed QI in january--Coyau 17:43, 12 March 2009 (UTC)
  • Promotion Great, I don't see any problems. --Notyourbroom 18:40, 12 March 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Swifts flying around the Sabah State Mosque minaret --Dcubillas 06:39, 12 March 2009 (UTC)
  • Promotion because of the details and colours a little distortion and tilt seems to be acceptable for me. --Mbdortmund 13:04, 12 March 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination The fountains in Millennium Square, Bristol. (renom as previously unassessed. again.) Mattbuck 12:56, 3 March 2009 (UTC)
  • Decline the centralised composition and background along with the cutoff reflection are distracting form the strcuture Gnangarra 23:13, 12 March 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Mandarin duck (Aix galericulata). --Richard Bartz 23:05, 11 March 2009 (UTC))
  • Promotion Very strong images; I move for promotion despite their less-than-ideal resolution. Photographer confirmed these are the highest-resolution versions available due to the fact that they are crops of larger images. --Notyourbroom 13:37, 12 March 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Carrion Crow (Corvus corone). --Richard Bartz 23:05, 11 March 2009 (UTC))
  • Promotion Very strong images; I move for promotion despite their less-than-ideal resolution. Photographer confirmed these are the highest-resolution versions available due to the fact that they are crops of larger images. --Notyourbroom 13:37, 12 March 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: Detail of a hôtel particulier in Dijon. --Eusebius 10:31, 7 March 2009 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination Pharyngeal jaws of moray eels Pbroks13 21:59, 2 March 2009 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Comment You schould try to make this SVG valid. See http://validator.w3.org/ --Coyau 21:47, 3 March 2009 (UTC)  Info I'm sorry, I have no clue how to do that. Pbroks13 19:05, 4 March 2009 (UTC)  Info It should be no problem, since it is valid, but the w3c-validator does not know the namespace, and should ignore it. --Niabot 21:24, 10 March 2009 (UTC) So it seems to be OK for me --Mbdortmund 13:08, 12 March 2009 (UTC) Anyway, it is valid now. --Coyau 20:59, 12 March 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Renaissance door of the Neurath's house in Alsfeld --Mylius 02:47, 11 March 2009 (UTC)
  • Promotion OK --Mbdortmund 12:34, 11 March 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Munich - Olympiaturm. --High Contrast 23:22, 10 March 2009 (UTC)
  • Decline strongly tilted --Mbdortmund 12:35, 11 March 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Roofs and windows of a building of Nantes castle. --Eusebius 12:50, 10 March 2009 (UTC)
  • Promotion This is not a very exciting or flashy image, but it is crisp, and you picked a good time of day and shooting angle to capture this subject. --Notyourbroom 23:25, 11 March 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Winter in Żywiec Beskids, late afternoon. Wooden house near Lasek mount, Poland --Pudelek 12:20, 10 March 2009 (UTC)
  • Promotion Nice composition, no noise, virtually no CA, and you did not oversaturate the colors of the house. --Notyourbroom 17:41, 11 March 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Sunrise in Ko Samui --Pro2 20:52, 9 March 2009 (UTC)
  • Decline not from Wikipedia? --Mbdortmund 21:48, 10 March 2009 (UTC)
     Oppose Apparently not eligible. --Eusebius 13:50, 11 March 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination SFF8484 connector. Adamantios 22:53, 7 March 2009 (UTC)
  • Promotion Looks great to me. --Notyourbroom 23:10, 11 March 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Burg Schnellenberg, Attendorn, Germany by Mbdortmund
  • Promotion Extremely reluctant promotion, because the foreground branches are distractingly out of focus and there is some mild CA here and there where object contrast against the sky. The composition and texturing is beautiful enough, though, that it carries the image through. Notyourbroom 17:57, 11 March 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination St. Johannes Baptist, Attendorn, Deutschland by Mbdortmund
  • Decline The composition is very crowded and the perspective feels awkwardly flat. The rows of buildings are not parallel and do not point directly toward the church. Depending on where you look in the image, the church appears to be nearer or farther away, and this is distracting. Notyourbroom 17:57, 11 March 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: Jasná Ski Resort. Old chairlift --Pudelek 20:43, 5 March 2009 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination: Jasná Ski Resort, Slovakia. Chairlift to Rovná Hoľa --Pudelek 20:43, 5 March 2009 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination Yellow "carpet" of Oxalis pes-caprae in Weizmann Institute of Science. --MathKnight 18:18, 4 March 2009 (UTC)
  • Decline The image is too noisy and blurry overall, and the foreground is distractingly out of focus. --Notyourbroom 23:14, 11 March 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Raphanus raphanistrum. --MathKnight 20:11, 3 March 2009 (UTC)
  • Promotion a deeper plane of focus might have been nicer, the detail on the petals is beautiful in this image though. -- carol 21:12, 11 March 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Arax Mittelformatkamera by Johann H. Addicks --Mbdortmund 13:52, 7 March 2009 (UTC)
  • Decline  Comment Quality is ok but I'm really not a fan of the composition/framing (with part of the belt out, and something in the top right corner). --Eusebius 23:13, 7 March 2009 (UTC)
    Decline based on composition. Edge of table(?) in the top left and the cutoff belt do not help make a good image. Also the positioning of the camera and shot angle have it too close to the edge that it's looking out of, leading the eye out of the image without seeing most of it. Better would be with it in the top-left 1/3 looking in the same direction or a lower shot angle- Peripitus 03:32, 11 March 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Strelitzia reginae. Roo72 11:41, 10 March 2009 (UTC)
  • Decline Large amounts of the flower are blown on at least one colour channel giving it an odd texture and the wide aperture (wide open it looks like) has left quite a lot of it out of focus - Peripitus 11:52, 10 March 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Anne Frank House, Amsterdam --Massimo Catarinella 00:55, 9 March 2009 (UTC)
  • Promotion Clean photo. Wasn't she living in the backyard house? --Coyau 16:35, 9 March 2009 (UTC) Yes, that is were they tried to hide and succeeded doing so for a couple of years. This (photo) is the part of the house, in which the offices and warehouse of here father were located and through which you could enter the "achterhuis". --Massimo Catarinella 17:06, 9 March 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Cooling towers of the power plant Gelsenkirchen-Scholven --High Contrast 09:13, 8 March 2009 (UTC)
  • Promotion I really like the composition here - seemingly endless cooling towers leading you off into the distance and this industry looming over a secluded garden - Peripitus 11:43, 10 March 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: Banská Bystrica - Námestie SNP by night --Pudelek 22:15, 3 March 2009 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination: The fountains in Millennium Square, Bristol. (renom as previously unassessed). Mattbuck 12:56, 3 March 2009 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination Juvenile Rhipidura leucophrys -- Peripitus 03:08, 2 March 2009 (UTC)
  • Promotion QI requirements all fullfilled. Would have the "wow" perhaps for FPC if his face was not in the shade. -- carol 16:47, 9 March 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: Daphne mezereum --Richard Bartz 23:25, 24 February 2009 (UTC)
  • Review  Comment Good quality, but the DOF is very narrow... I'd like to have all the flowers in focus. Also, I'm not enthusiast about the centred composition here. --Eusebius 13:58, 3 March 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Murnauer Moos --Richard Bartz 02:56, 9 March 2009 (UTC)
  • Promotion high quality, good composition --AngMoKio 10:19, 9 March 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Dortmund, Germany, Mahnmal Bittermark, memorial for the german resistants --Mbdortmund 13:58, 7 March 2009 (UTC)
  • Promotion OK for me (I don't really like the composition of other pics in the set). --Eusebius 15:59, 8 March 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination A photographer capturing a sunrise. Dori 23:19, 7 March 2009 (UTC)
  • Promotion nice colours and composition --Mbdortmund 00:29, 8 March 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination wollte zum Hofbräuhaus aber... --Böhringer 21:33, 7 March 2009 (UTC)
  • Promotion erstaunliche Details --Mbdortmund 00:27, 8 March 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Sigma 8mm f/3.5 EX DG lens --High Contrast 20:40, 7 March 2009 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good enough for me. The light bulb right over the subject's lens is probably not a perfect choice. --Eusebius 23:11, 7 March 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination A trumpet mouthpiece. --Eusebius 16:11, 7 March 2009 (UTC)
  • Promotion Looks good. --Coyau 16:47, 7 March 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Canon 85mm prime by User:Fir0002 --Mbdortmund 13:58, 7 March 2009 (UTC)
  • Decline Below size limit. --Eusebius 23:08, 7 March 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Bee in apple blossom by User:Fir0002 --Mbdortmund 13:58, 7 March 2009 (UTC)
  • Discussion wauu --Böhringer 21:36, 7 March 2009 (UTC), sorry, but 1.6MP is clearly below the guidelines. And the only reason for that is downsampling and refusal to upload full size images. That is not a mitigating reason.
• 
  • Nomination Northern rosace of Chartres cathedral. --Eusebius 13:54, 7 March 2009 (UTC)
  • Promotion Very nice --Böhringer 21:40, 7 March 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Anopheles gambiae Mosquito by Muhammad Mahdi Karim --Mbdortmund 13:46, 7 March 2009 (UTC)
  • Decline Below size limit, that's probably why he hasn't nominated it. --Eusebius 23:05, 7 March 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Computer heatsink --D-Kuru 11:30, 7 March 2009 (UTC)
  • Decline A bit noisy for a studio shot, crop not satisfying (would like to see the whole thing in frame). --Eusebius 23:02, 7 March 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Zeche Gneisenau Dortmund ba user:smial --Mbdortmund 22:26, 6 March 2009 (UTC))
  • Promotion Interesting. Meets the criteria. --High Contrast 21:49, 7 March 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Tower and "pazo" of San Miguel das Penas. Galicia --Lansbricae 11:57, 6 March 2009 (UTC)
  • Decline Looks overprocessed (denoising?). --Eusebius 23:00, 7 March 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Organ of Grenoble cathedral. --Eusebius 11:12, 5 March 2009 (UTC)
  • Promotion OK considering the difficult light --Mbdortmund 14:13, 7 March 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination André Guignard --Rama 15:00, 4 March 2009 (UTC)
  • Promotion A bit noisy due to the lighting conditions, but good portrait focus. --Eusebius 23:15, 7 March 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Clock tower in Banská Bystrica (Besztercebánya, Neusohl), Slovakia. --Pudelek 14:34, 27 February 2009 (UTC)
  • Promotion right side of the tower slightly tilted to the left --Mbdortmund 19:37, 27 February 2009 (UTC) Comment tower is tilted --Pudelek 20:06, 27 February 2009 (UTC) found it in the article --Mbdortmund 00:35, 8 March 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Sir Tim Bernes-Lee, -- 22:24, 6 March 2009 (UTC)
  • Decline Decline unless flickr uploader is a Commons user. Mattbuck 00:32, 7 March 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Turtle, 22:24, 6 March 2009 (UTC)
  • Decline Decline unless flickr uploader is a Commons user. Mattbuck 00:32, 7 March 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Alfajor, 22:24, 6 March 2009 (UTC)
  • Decline Decline unless flickr uploader is a Commons user. Mattbuck 00:32, 7 March 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Classical guitar, 22:24, 6 March 2009 (UTC)
  • Decline Decline unless flickr uploader is a Commons user. Mattbuck 00:32, 7 March 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Cashew nuts, 22:24, 6 March 2009 (UTC)
  • Decline Decline unless flickr uploader is a Commons user. Mattbuck 00:32, 7 March 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Walnuts, -- 22:24, 6 March 2009 (UTC)
  • Decline Decline unless flickr uploader is a Commons user. Mattbuck 00:32, 7 March 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Botles of olive oil, -- Rodrigo.Argenton 20:29, 6 March 2009 (UTC)
  • Decline Decline unless flickr uploader is a Declineuser. Mattbuck 00:32, 7 March 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination A fursuiter on the beach--Garfieldairlines 15:30, 6 March 2009 (UTC)
  • Decline
     Support A bit dark, but has enough quality to be used commercially. →Diti the penguin — 17:26, 6 March 2009 (UTC)
     Oppose unless "Chorca" is a Commons user. --Eusebius 17:35, 6 March 2009 (UTC)
    Ineligible. Lycaon 20:11, 6 March 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: Sõpruse Bridge, Tartu --WikedKentaur 09:52, 1 March 2009 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination: Allianz Arena by night --Richard Bartz 23:25, 24 February 2009 (UTC)
  • Review The image seems to be tilted slightly to the left. --Henrik 14:18, 28 February 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Taraxacum sect. Ruderalia --Böhringer 22:17, 5 March 2009 (UTC)
  • Promotion eindrucksvoll --Mbdortmund 22:47, 5 March 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination The Danube in Regensburg --High Contrast 19:30, 2 March 2009 (UTC)
  • Decline There's a pb with the plants on the right side. --Eusebius 10:28, 6 March 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: A small black fly of the Bibioniidae familiy (Dilophus febrilis) -- Alvesgaspar 11:58, 28 February 2009 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination Flowers and buds of a Camellia japonica tree -- Alvesgaspar 11:56, 28 February 2009 (UTC)
  • Decline Flowers unsharp. --Eusebius 10:24, 6 March 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination A stilt bug -- Alvesgaspar 11:54, 28 February 2009 (UTC)
  • Decline Too few of it in focus for me. --Eusebius 10:23, 6 March 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: Barbican at City Castle, Banská Bystrica, Slovakia --Pudelek 14:34, 27 February 2009 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination: Mercedes-Benz CLK DTM --AngMoKio 12:34, 27 February 2009 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination Wheel clamp on a Hummer. --Specious 03:47, 27 February 2009 (UTC)
  • Promotion Why not. --Eusebius 10:22, 6 March 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination CoA at the old courthouse in Grenoble. --Eusebius 11:12, 5 March 2009 (UTC)
  • Promotion good sharpness --Pudelek 11:35, 5 March 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Bell tower from the Breisacher Stephansmünster --Niabot 15:18, 4 March 2009 (UTC)
  • Promotion hypsch --Mbdortmund 22:49, 4 March 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination A panoramic view of the Soča river near Bovec, NW Slovenija --Yerpo 08:04, 4 March 2009 (UTC)
  • Promotion nice composition --Mbdortmund 22:51, 4 March 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Wooden articular church in Svätý Kríž, Slovakia --Pudelek 22:15, 3 March 2009 (UTC)
  • Promotion Looks good. --Coyau 15:16, 4 March 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Granaries in Grudziądz, Poland. --Kosiarz-PL 19:36, 2 March 2009 (UTC)
  • Promotion good photo --Pudelek 12:13, 4 March 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination The sea at Porto Covo, west coast of Portugal -- Alvesgaspar 11:49, 28 February 2009 (UTC)
  • Promotion Atmosphere --Pudelek 12:16, 4 March 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Flying buttresses of the apse of Chartres cathedral. --Eusebius 09:20, 28 February 2009 (UTC)
  • Decline Angle does not show the buttresses that well and has created a distorting perspective, also I think that the lighting does not flatter the subject - Peripitus 11:24, 5 March 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Palindromic door in Grenoble. --Eusebius 09:20, 28 February 2009 (UTC)
  • Promotion Attractive and well formed image - Peripitus 11:21, 5 March 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: Detail of a fountain in Grenoble. --Eusebius 21:01, 26 February 2009 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination Svätý Kríž - wooden gate near articular church --Pudelek 22:15, 3 March 2009 (UTC)
  • Promotion OK (could use less DOF though imo). --Coyau 11:34, 4 March 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Closeup shot of a Mainboard. --Baccharus 00:15, 3 March 2009 (UTC)
  • Decline Some of the taller components (the capacitors and the PCI slots) are out of focus--PieCam 02:22, 4 March 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Haflinger --Böhringer 21:50, 2 March 2009 (UTC)
  • Promotion Total wieherliches Bild --Richard Bartz 13:29, 3 March 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Fort Du Guesclin, Britanny, France --High Contrast 15:42, 2 March 2009 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good --Richard Bartz 13:31, 3 March 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination A Dandelion in Krzesiny, Poznan, Poland --Pytak 18:31, 2 March 2009 (UTC)
  • Decline Too much contrast: overexposed subject and underexposed background. --Coyau 12:48, 3 March 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination House of Skulls, Sabah, Borneo --Dcubillas 09:57, 2 March 2009 (UTC)
  • Decline I don't think it shows the subject (the skulls) very well. I.e. you can't see that the skulls are, in fact, skulls. --Henrik 21:05, 3 March 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination A panorama of Val Thorens --Henrik 10:31, 28 February 2009 (UTC)
  • Promotion Acceptable --Richard Bartz 13:35, 3 March 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: A monoski. --Eusebius 11:49, 26 February 2009 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination: Jerusalem, View from the roof of the Austrian Hospice towards the Dome of the Rock --Berthold Werner 18:56, 25 February 2009 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination: Stream in Enäjärvi, Pori, Finland. --kallerna 13:47, 25 February 2009 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination Parson Street railway station in Bristol. Mattbuck 18:51, 22 February 2009 (UTC)
  • Promotion Under expossed image --PieCam 13:50, 25 February 2009 (UTC)
     Support Good enough for me (could be sharper though). --Eusebius 13:46, 3 March 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: 158955 at Parson Street railway station in Bristol. Mattbuck 18:51, 22 February 2009 (UTC)
  • Review Under expossed image --PieCam 13:50, 25 February 2009 (UTC)
    
    I've now lightened this quite considerably. Mattbuck 22:14, 25 February 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination 143619 at Parson Street railway station in Bristol. Mattbuck 18:51, 22 February 2009 (UTC)
  • Decline Under expossed image --PieCam 13:50, 25 February 2009 (UTC)
     Oppose Too noisy for my taste. --Eusebius 13:44, 3 March 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Mhorr Gazelle (Gazella dama mhorr) ----Ltshears 17:20, 2 March 2009 (UTC)
  • Promotion Awesome detail and focus. --Pytak 18:59, 2 March 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination White Stork (Ciconia ciconia) ---- --Ltshears 17:34, 2 March 2009 (UTC)
  • Promotion Nice contrast and sharpness. --Pytak 18:49, 2 March 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Petronas Twin Towers at Night --Dcubillas 10:00, 2 March 2009 (UTC)
  • Decline lack of sharpness --High Contrast 17:20, 2 March 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Church St Francis Xavier in Banská Bystrica (Besztercebánya, Neusohl), Slovakia. --Pudelek 14:34, 27 February 2009 (UTC)
  • Promotion good details, nice atmosphere --Mbdortmund 19:29, 2 March 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: Eurocopter AS 350 --Böhringer 22:29, 24 February 2009 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination Three Crosses Square in Warsaw --Sfu 20:25, 22 February 2009 (UTC)
  • Promotion nice --Pudelek 19:40, 2 March 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination View of Wettin Castle with Saale River --High Contrast 21:38, 28 February 2009 (UTC)
  • Promotion nice composition --Mbdortmund 17:54, 1 March 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: Red (medium) ski slope in Park Snow Donovaly, Slovakia --Pudelek 12:03, 24 February 2009 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination: Chairlift in Park Snow Donovaly, Slovakia --Pudelek 12:03, 24 February 2009 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination: Salt mounds at the crack of dawn. Peripitus 03:31, 23 February 2009 (UTC)
  • Review  Comment - Would be better if some sky was cropped out, so that it's more or less equal real and reflection. Mattbuck 18:43, 23 February 2009 (UTC)
    I avoided that to prevent having the water line to close to the image's middle as that rarely looks good - Peripitus 01:37, 24 February 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Amanita muscaria showing raspberry topping sprinkled with dobs of cream and dark chocolate crumbs (fairy food) --Tony Wills 09:48, 1 March 2009 (UTC)
  • Promotion Acceptable for QI. Lycaon 10:06, 1 March 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Flowers and buds of a Crocus sp. (any help with the species?)-- Alvesgaspar 11:52, 28 February 2009 (UTC)
  • Promotion It live up to the QI Guidelines. --Henrik 14:14, 28 February 2009 (UTC)
    It is not a Crocus but a Freesia. Lycaon 22:08, 28 February 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: Change of plumage between winter and summer on a Larus ridibundus. Zil 08:43, 23 February 2009 (UTC)
  • Review Should IMHO been rotated a bit to the right and cropped --Mbdortmund 10:13, 23 February 2009 (UTC  Comment The metal bar was not horizontal, bird will be head downif I tilt it. Zil 11:21, 23 February 2009 (UTC))
• 
  • Nomination: Fountains in Millennium Square, Bristol. Mattbuck 22:42, 22 February 2009 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination: Apartments houses neigourhood in Żelechów, Poland --Sfu 22:26, 22 February 2009 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination: Female Mallard --Pro2 16:23, 22 February 2009 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination: Cyphel (Minuartia sedoides) at Gornergrat, Switzerland. -- Lycaon 13:17, 22 February 2009 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination Bregenzerwaldgebirge --Böhringer 21:52, 27 February 2009 (UTC)
  • Promotion Absolutely beautiful. Mattbuck 22:44, 27 February 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination A view of Cedar Rapids, Iowa, during the flood of June 2008. Not the greatest picture but not reproducible, either. --Golbez 21:15, 27 February 2009 (UTC)
  • Decline unsharp Abigor 21:55, 27 February 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Another view of downtown Cedar Rapids, Iowa, during the flood of June 2008. --Golbez 21:16, 27 February 2009 (UTC)
  • Decline I don't like the composition - I'm sure it was unavoidable due to being in a car, but the barrier really gets in the way. I also think it's at a bit of an angle. Mattbuck 22:42, 27 February 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Doorknob of buddhist temple --AngMoKio 12:34, 27 February 2009 (UTC)
  • Promotion goood quality --Mbdortmund 19:41, 27 February 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Mercedes-Benz prototype --AngMoKio 12:34, 27 February 2009 (UTC)
  • Promotion gekauft --Böhringer 21:55, 27 February 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Two in the fog --Böhringer 21:10, 26 February 2009 (UTC)
  • Promotion I count at least five, but I like it, so I'll forgive that. Mattbuck 22:40, 27 February 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Chiang Kai-Shek memorial in Taipei, Taiwan --AngMoKio 09:27, 25 February 2009 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good picture, exposure, and detail. The location (geotag coordinates) should be added before it becomes QI though.--PieCam 13:41, 25 February 2009 (UTC)--PieCam 21:50, 27 February 2009 (UTC)
     Done--AngMoKio 14:19, 25 February 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Statue of Brother Marie-Victorin --Phil13 00:24, 25 February 2009 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good enough for me. --Eusebius 08:06, 28 February 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Euphorbia cyparissias --Richard Bartz 23:25, 24 February 2009 (UTC)
  • Promotion Nice lighting, sharp, good composition and DOF. --PieCam 13:27, 27 February 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Illustration of Jhum - a form of shifting cultivation practiced by indigenous tribes in North-east India. Prashanthns 19:09, 23 February 2009 (UTC)
  • Decline Insufficient resolution (< 1 Mpixels)--PieCam 13:23, 27 February 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination A traffic cone in some mud on the River Avon in Bristol. Mattbuck 22:29, 22 February 2009 (UTC)
  • Promotion Promotion before local download is complete -- no noise in thumbnail, excellent composition, meets all QI requirements while also fullfilling the non-requirement of being interesting. -- carol 12:22, 27 February 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Fruit stall in Sabah --Dcubillas 02:57, 27 February 2009 (UTC)
  • Decline cropped person, lack of details --Mbdortmund 06:06, 27 February 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Makeshift jetty in borneo --Dcubillas 02:50, 27 February 2009 (UTC)
  • Promotion meets QI-requirements --Mbdortmund 06:06, 27 February 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination A bent stepladder and bricked-up doorway on the Feeder Canal in Bristol. Please note that this image is upright as best I can tell (door frame is vertical), so any tilt is the building itself. Mattbuck 22:40, 25 February 2009 (UTC)
  • Decline Nice colors, great composition but lack of sharpness. --Coyau 16:26, 26 February 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Sunset north sea, dorum -- Pro2 14:34, 25 February 2009 (UTC)
  • Promotion looks a bit oversharpened to me, composition is great --Mbdortmund 15:30, 25 February 2009 (UTC) Now better? -- Pro2 14:28, 26 February 2009 (UTC) good --Mbdortmund 00:11, 27 February 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination haliaeetus leucocephalus airborne--AngMoKio 21:58, 24 February 2009 (UTC)
  • Promotion Perhaps the wings are not perfectly sharp, but the general aspect of the picture, the lighting and the timing of the shooting largely compensate it for me. I like it a lot. --Eusebius 21:30, 26 February 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Chandelier --Massimo Catarinella 17:47, 24 February 2009 (UTC)
  • Promotion Looks pretty good to me. No obvious photographer in the brass reflections. --Eusebius 21:23, 26 February 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Earth auger. --Specious 04:44, 24 February 2009 (UTC)
  • Decline Not sharp enough. --Coyau 16:23, 26 February 2009 (UTC)

Consensual review

File:Bristol MMB «27 Canons Marsh.jpg

• Nomination A building on the Bristol harbourside. Mattbuck 00:14, 23 February 2009 (UTC)
• Promotion
•  Support Imho, ok on the technical side. I like the composition. Zil 10:03, 23 February 2009 (UTC)
•  Oppose Tilt(!) and lots of CA. Lycaon 20:06, 23 February 2009 (UTC)
•  Comment It's meant to be at an angle. The building looks positively boring upright. Mattbuck 21:29, 23 February 2009 (UTC)
•  Comment Of course ;-) tilt was jokingly, but the CA is too real, sorry. Lycaon 06:05, 24 February 2009 (UTC)
•  Question CA? Mattbuck 12:34, 24 February 2009 (UTC)
•  Comment CA means Chromatic aberration --Coyau 12:55, 24 February 2009 (UTC)
•  Question - anyone else going to comment? Mattbuck 12:33, 2 March 2009 (UTC)
•  Support - There is quite a bit of CA goin on, sure, but it isn't -that- bad, overall I think the image has nice contrast and detail, and tilting was a right idea, I hate all those boring straight-angled pics ;] greets, --Pytak (talk) 19:15, 2 March 2009 (UTC)

Running total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promote?   Eusebius 09:55, 5 March 2009 (UTC)

File:NYPDManhattanNewYorkCity.jpg

• Nomination N.Y.P.D. Crown Victoria --Massimo Catarinella 17:41, 27 February 2009 (UTC)
• Decline
•  Oppose Some parts of the car are OE, some others are UE. What did you do with Adobe Phososhop? --Coyau 12:11, 28 February 2009 (UTC)
  • Plus colors are oversaturated and look fake. --Coyau 17:00, 2 March 2009 (UTC)
•  Comment Sorry, but this picture is definitely a QI. It was even made a QI a couple days ago until I uploaded a new version. --Massimo Catarinella 11:37, 1 March 2009 (UTC)
  • What do you mean, it has been reviewed already? when, and why renominate? --Eusebius 07:00, 3 March 2009 (UTC)
    • I've renominated this version, because the white balance of the other one was off. --Massimo Catarinella 16:12, 3 March 2009 (UTC)

Running total: 0 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Decline?   Eusebius 07:18, 6 March 2009 (UTC)

File:Watermelon Transaction.jpg

• Nomination In a KK market, Sabah, Malaysia --Dcubillas 09:52, 2 March 2009 (UTC)
• Decline
•  Comment Very noisy. kallerna 14:42, 2 March 2009 (UTC)
•  Oppose Too much noise. --Eusebius 10:26, 6 March 2009 (UTC)
•  Comment too much noise? compared to what? a day shot at base ISO? its a spontaneous shot in a poorly lit market at night... for what it is, I think the image quality (noise level) is more than acceptable. Dcubillas

  I agree on the difficult conditions but I maintain my oppose on the resulting image, it is both noisy and unsharp. Sorry! --Eusebius 20:10, 7 March 2009 (UTC)

Running total: 0 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Decline?   Eusebius 12:02, 9 March 2009 (UTC)

File:CoteDeGraniteRose2.jpg

• Nomination Pink granit coast, Britanny, France --High Contrast 15:42, 2 March 2009 (UTC)
• Decline
•  temporary oppose Tilt (cw) on the right side, otherwise a great picture. Can you fix it ? --Richard Bartz 13:39, 3 March 2009 (UTC)
•  Oppose I have seen clearer/cleaner images of this coastline. --Herbythyme 13:53, 5 March 2009 (UTC)
•  Comment I think quality is ok, I would support with tilt correction. --Eusebius 07:20, 6 March 2009 (UTC)

Running total: 0 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Decline?   Eusebius 12:02, 9 March 2009 (UTC)

File:Blesk.jpg

• Nomination: Lightning strikes a tower. --Jonathunder 04:14, 27 February 2009 (UTC)
• Review
  
•  Support Awesome !!! --ComputerHotline 13:06, 27 February 2009 (UTC)
•  Oppose Many dust spots, they should be removed. --Eusebius 21:35, 27 February 2009 (UTC)

Running total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose -> draw --Eusebius 12:01, 9 March 2009 (UTC)

File:Silene nutans (flowers).jpg

• Nomination: Nottingham Catchfly (Silene nutans) near to Saas Fee, Switzerland. -- Lycaon 08:14, 12 February 2009 (UTC)
• Review
•  Oppose Compression artifacts, DOF problem --Twdragon 19:16, 21 February 2009 (UTC)
•  Comment Perhaps not enough space on left. --Siipikarja 00:40, 17 February 2009 (UTC)
•  Comment Compression artefacts are completely absent, DOF is shallow on purpose (one flower). Lycaon 13:26, 22 February 2009 (UTC)
•  Support Obvious QI. Should probably not completely fail at FPC, even. -- carol (talk) 10:09, 23 February 2009 (UTC)
•  Comment I don't really like the top-left flower: it's neither completely in focus nor clearly intended to be out of focus. --Carnildo 20:38, 23 February 2009 (UTC)
  •  Comment My thoughts exactly. --Siipikarja 21:46, 23 February 2009 (UTC)
•  Support Good picture, DOF works for me. --Eusebius 21:05, 26 February 2009 (UTC)
•  Oppose If only one flower is the subject of this image (as DOF and comment above suggest), then there is a composition problem, it should be more tightly cropped to emphasise the subject, with only sufficient out of focus background as is needed to show context. --Tony Wills 10:40, 27 February 2009 (UTC)
•  Oppose I agree with Tony Wills, the depth of field or composition would have been fine, but the combination of the shallow DOF and the other flowers just out of focus is distracting. --PieCam 13:20, 27 February 2009 (UTC)
•  Support I agree with Eusebius --Estrilda 00:15, 1 March 2009 (UTC)

Running total: 3 support (excluding the nominator), 3 oppose -> draw --Eusebius 12:00, 9 March 2009 (UTC)

File:Veľká Fatra - panorama-czysta.jpg

• Nomination Panorama of Veľká Fatra from Park Snow Donovaly, Slovakia --Pudelek 12:03, 24 February 2009 (UTC)
• Promotion
  
•  Comment The annotations spoil the image. Upload a version without. --Henrik 14:23, 28 February 2009 (UTC)
•  Info ok - now it's version without anntotations (and with correct description) --Pudelek 21:19, 1 March 2009 (UTC)
•  Comment Maybe {{Overlay legend}} useful? --Tony Wills 11:27, 2 March 2009 (UTC)
•  Comment - now it is still too difficult for me --Pudelek 12:13, 2 March 2009 (UTC)
•  Support IMHO OK --Mbdortmund 16:23, 9 March 2009 (UTC)

Running total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 0 oppose → Promote?   Eusebius 10:15, 12 March 2009 (UTC)

File:NYC_CentralStation_amk.jpg

• Nomination: Busy central station, NYC --AngMoKio 22:16, 26 February 2009 (UTC)
• Review
•  Support Very nice picture, nice motion blur and reasonably sharp picture. Despite the somewhat blown central window, very good exposure under very dificult circumstances.--PieCam 02:55, 27 February 2009 (UTC)
•  Oppose Tilt CCW. Lycaon 22:10, 28 February 2009 (UTC)
•  Comment I somehow agree with you....but i think it is not a tilt. It is a barrel distortion - and so far i didnt find the right way to fix such problems. --AngMoKio 22:23, 2 March 2009 (UTC)

Running total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose -> draw --Eusebius 10:14, 12 March 2009 (UTC)

File:Thomas Bresson - Couple-lib-r-8 (by).jpg

• Nomination: Sympetrum sanguineum sexual intercourse --ComputerHotline 08:54, 18 February 2009 (UTC)
• Review
•  Support Macro and action.--Mbz1 01:12, 19 February 2009 (UTC)
•  Oppose Overexposed BG, lack of sharpness. Lycaon 20:49, 19 February 2009 (UTC)
•  Neutral I think an over exposed background is quite acceptable, as is an out of focus background. It is the exposure of the subject which is important. I also think sharpness of the subject is quite sufficient. But I would question the cropping, too much distracting background, especially top right corner. --Tony Wills 10:51, 27 February 2009 (UTC)
•  Oppose lack of sharpness --High Contrast 09:21, 2 March 2009 (UTC)
•  Support not so bad, so it is difficult to make a picture --Böhringer 16:25, 4 March 2009 (UTC)

Running total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose -> draw --Eusebius 10:12, 12 March 2009 (UTC)

File:TV station on Chopok.jpg

• Nomination TV station on Chopok, Slovakia --Pudelek 19:38, 8 March 2009 (UTC)
• Promotion
•  Oppose The image is underexposed, the snow should be much closer to white--PieCam 00:03, 10 March 2009 (UTC)
•  Info new version --Pudelek 11:59, 10 March 2009 (UTC)
  •  Support Quite nice now, the geolocation data should ge added though. --PieCam 04:35, 13 March 2009 (UTC)
•  Support --Notyourbroom 05:11, 12 March 2009 (UTC)

Running total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 0 oppose → Promote?   Eusebius 14:07, 14 March 2009 (UTC)

File:Jasná Ski Resort - skilift on Chopok.JPG

• Nomination Jasná Ski Resort. Skilift on Chopok --Pudelek 20:43, 5 March 2009 (UTC)
• Promotion
•  Oppose - Too dark. --Eusebius 10:34, 6 March 2009 (UTC)
•  Support - I've brightened up the image, and I think it's good enough for QI. Mattbuck 13:45, 6 March 2009 (UTC)

  About brightness, yes. I remove my opposition but I attract your attention on the slight posterization induced by the processing... Could be a problem. --Eusebius 14:02, 6 March 2009 (UTC)

•  Oppose CCW tilt. Lycaon 20:09, 6 March 2009 (UTC)
•  Comment snow a little blue --Mbdortmund 23:22, 6 March 2009 (UTC)
•  Support I find it very interesting. Nice composition and technically ok --High Contrast 14:58, 10 March 2009 (UTC)
•  Support ala High Contrast --Böhringer 11:35, 12 March 2009 (UTC)

Running total: 3 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promote?   Eusebius 14:06, 14 March 2009 (UTC)

File:Confucius_temple_Kaohsiung_amk.jpg

• Nomination Confucius Temple, Kaohsiung, Taiwan --AngMoKio 21:35, 12 March 2009 (UTC)
• Decline
•  Oppose The sky is over-exposed --Alejo2083 11:48, 13 March 2009 (UTC)
  Sorry but the sky is not overexposed --AngMoKio 13:03, 13 March 2009 (UTC)
•  Oppose The sky is too light and appears to be overexposed. The details in the sky are washed out. Otherwise the picture is nice. --Siipikarja 17:38, 13 March 2009 (UTC)
  • where there are no details in real there cant be any in the picture...the sky simply was light grey. --AngMoKio 19:31, 13 March 2009 (UTC)
    • Then it was just an unfortunate day to take the photograph. --Siipikarja 15:38, 15 March 2009 (UTC)
      • well it seems so....though I don't have a problem with the sky at all as it is far away from being white and thus disturbing. But that is just my opinion... --AngMoKio 16:31, 15 March 2009 (UTC)
        • All in all, it's a shame that the sky is what it is because otherwise the picture is great. Have you tried reducing the brightness of the sky using an brightness/contrast adjustment layer and a gradient layer mask? --Siipikarja 19:14, 15 March 2009 (UTC)
•  Info I double-checked on both Gimp and Photoshop: the histogram is definitely over-exposed (mainly the blue channel) --Alejo2083 00:09, 14 March 2009 (UTC)
  • I know that...still it is not a white/overexposed thus disturbing sky. It was a grey and dizzy sky and that's what the picture shows there were no details that could be visible or are lost. Might be that the sky seems too "boring" next to a colourful building, but there simply was no blue sky. --AngMoKio 00:34, 14 March 2009 (UTC)
  • I think even if the sky is not 255 on the histogram, it can be over-exposed if it is distractingly bright, which is the case in this image IMHO. As AngMoKio said, the sky was grey, not white.--PieCam 15:06, 14 March 2009 (UTC)

Running total: 0 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Decline?   Eusebius 11:02, 17 March 2009 (UTC)

File:Alsfeld-Rathaus und Suedseite des Marktplatzes.jpg

• Nomination Marketplace in Alsfeld with the famous late-gothic town hall --Mylius 02:47, 11 March 2009 (UTC)
• Decline
  
•  Strong support. This is a wonderful example of a low-ISO, long-exposure shot. I was expecting a noisy, grainy mess when I saw the thumbnail, but I was very pleasantly surprised by the cleanness of the full-resolution version. Please sign your comment.
•  Oppose perspective, distortion --Pudelek 08:20, 12 March 2009 (UTC)
•  Oppose Per Pudelek. --Eusebius (talk) 08:45, 13 March 2009 (UTC)

Running total: 0 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Decline?   Eusebius 11:02, 17 March 2009 (UTC)

File:Thomas_Bresson_-_Fort-monceau-1_(by).jpg

• Nomination Monceau fortifications (court). --ComputerHotline 12:50, 10 March 2009 (UTC)
• Decline
•  Comment Pictures must have been created by a Wikimedian in order to be eligible for QI status. This means that pictures from, for example, Flickr are ineligible. This is flickr image, so nomination is invalid. --High Contrast 20:02, 10 March 2009 (UTC)
•  Info I am the photographer. I put my image on Flickr AND on Commons. --ComputerHotline 09:16, 11 March 2009 (UTC)
•  Question Does your Flickr gallery get more activity after the nomination of one of the images which points to it here? -- carol 00:26, 12 March 2009 (UTC)
•  Info No. --ComputerHotline 08:18, 13 March 2009 (UTC)
•  Oppose Composition and angle do not reveal enough context. Jonathunder 14:02, 14 March 2009 (UTC)
•  Oppose as per Jonathunder --PieCam 17:34, 14 March 2009 (UTC)

Running total: 0 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Decline?   Eusebius 11:01, 17 March 2009 (UTC)

File:Chopok - old chairlift1.jpg

• Nomination: Chopok, Slovakia. Old chairlift - excluded from use --Pudelek 19:38, 8 March 2009 (UTC)
• Review
   Support Very cool --Böhringer 21:20, 8 March 2009 (UTC)
   Oppose The image is underexposed, the snow should be much closer to white--PieCam 00:03, 10 March 2009 (UTC)

Running total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose -> draw --Eusebius 11:00, 17 March 2009 (UTC)

File:Whiteface Mountain from Lake Placid Airport.JPG

• Nomination Whiteface Mountain from Lake Placid --High Contrast 09:13, 4 March 2009 (UTC)
• Decline * Image quality is probably there -- will the real photographer show themselves. More interestingly, this is the image history and its example of bots and humans not interacting very well. -- carol 22:30, 11 March 2009 (UTC)
•  Question Why the "discuss" status? Your comment is the only one, is it a support?? Image shouldn't be in CR. --Eusebius 08:38, 13 March 2009 (UTC)

A more than fair question. The image and the nomination provide a few problems which are not obvious in the thumbnail and not addressed in QI requirements.

1. Licensed with attribution required but no attribution was given in the nomination.
2. Image page contains bot spam about needing the categories checked and the categories weren't very good.[1]

While discussing if the image page here should be upto commons standards before being considered to be QI is probably best discussed on the QIC talk page, an example is right here for participants to express opinions of. "Discuss" was the word I put in place of "Nomination" here. -- carol (talk) 18:26, 13 March 2009 (UTC)

•  Oppose Good in thumbnail, insufficient quality in full size: severe lack of details. Lycaon 14:32, 16 March 2009 (UTC)

Running total: 0 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Decline?   Eusebius 11:28, 20 March 2009 (UTC)

File:African Lion Panthera leo Male Pittsburgh 2800px adjusted.jpg

• Nomination African Lion Panthera leo Male by Ram-Man --Mbdortmund 13:46, 7 March 2009 (UTC)
• Decline
•  Support Very nice. --PieCam 14:43, 7 March 2009 (UTC)
•  Oppose Impressive picture, but strong CA on the legs. --Eusebius 16:12, 7 March 2009 (UTC)
•  Info A lion stand in the snow?--Charlie fong 13:55, 15 March 2009 (UTC)
•  Support Nice composition, good exposure and sharp. TimVickers 04:16, 17 March 2009 (UTC)

And pretty strong CA. Am I the only one to see them? --Eusebius 08:07, 17 March 2009 (UTC)

•  Oppose Heh, not even "pretty" CA. More like "Significant Quality Reducing CA" around legs. -- carol (talk) 15:20, 17 March 2009 (UTC)
•  Oppose Did somebody mention The CA on the legs? Lycaon 15:27, 17 March 2009 (UTC)

Running total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 3 oppose → Decline?   Eusebius 11:27, 20 March 2009 (UTC)

File:Moon from Lac De Monteynard- Avignonet edit1.jpg

• Nomination The Moon from Lac De Monteynard Avignonet.The image was taken by User:Herbythyme.--Mbz1 18:35, 15 March 2009 (UTC)
• Promotion
•  Oppose Tree on the right is distracting. --Eusebius 11:37, 20 March 2009 (UTC)

  Thank you,Eusebius. The tree is gone.--Mbz1 17:47, 20 March 2009 (UTC)

•  Comment Colours look strange on the blueish hill in the middle ground. --Eusebius 18:00, 20 March 2009 (UTC)
• You mean, where the lake is?--Mbz1 18:05, 20 March 2009 (UTC)
• The hill above the lake, yes. --Eusebius 19:09, 20 March 2009 (UTC)
• The sun had gone off there a while before so that is how it looked!--Herbythyme 19:44, 20 March 2009 (UTC)
• I'm very sure that the image is accurate representation of the way the hills looked. I'm not sure at this point, if I should post process it to remove the blueish color, but may I please ask you te let me know what do you think? Thank you.--Mbz1 21:03, 20 March 2009 (UTC)
• The general colour is accurate, that's not my point. I think there might be some kind of chroma noise near the top of this hill, but I'm not really sure (and it's not worth an oppose for me). --Eusebius 21:34, 20 March 2009 (UTC)
• I tried to get rid of this. May I please ask you to take another look,Eusebius? Maybe now you find it worth to promote it? :) Thank you.--Mbz1 22:01, 20 March 2009 (UTC)

I'd rather support the non-denoised version (if you care to revert), it shows better details on the hill's skyline. Noise on this part is probably acceptable. --Eusebius 21:11, 21 March 2009 (UTC)

Done, Thank you.--Mbz1 01:49, 22 March 2009 (UTC)

•  Support At last. --Eusebius 07:55, 22 March 2009 (UTC)

Running total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 0 oppose → Promote?   Eusebius 11:10, 24 March 2009 (UTC)

File:Hoge_der_Aa2.jpg

• Nomination Canal, Groningen, the Netherlands --Wenkbrauwalbatros 22:56, 16 March 2009 (UTC)
• Promotion
   Oppose Strong CA in the sky, could be geotagged, plus not extremely sharp. --Coyau 21:34, 17 March 2009 (UTC)
   Support Don't agree. I find the quality sufficient for QI. Lycaon 22:38, 18 March 2009 (UTC)
   Support the picture is OK --Mbdortmund 23:31, 18 March 2009 (UTC)
   Support agree with supporters --AngMoKio 16:04, 21 March 2009 (UTC)

Running total: 3 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promote?   Eusebius 11:10, 24 March 2009 (UTC)

File:Nízke Tatry in winter.JPG

• Nomination: Nízke Tatry (Low Tatras) in winter. View from ski trial (Jasna Ski Area) --Pudelek 19:38, 8 March 2009 (UTC)
• Review
•  Oppose The image is underexposed, the snow should be much closer to white--PieCam 00:03, 10 March 2009 (UTC)
•  Info new version --Pudelek 11:59, 10 March 2009 (UTC)
  •  Neutral I think the exposure and contrast are perfect, but I'm not crazy about the composition. Should include geolocation data--PieCam 04:38, 13 March 2009 (UTC)
•  Info + location --Pudelek 13:39, 17 March 2009 (UTC)

Running total: 0 support (excluding the nominator), 0 oppose -> draw --Eusebius 11:48, 25 March 2009 (UTC)

File:Cornell Bailey Hall March09.jpg

• Nomination Bailey Hall at Cornell University. --Notyourbroom 02:03, 25 March 2009 (UTC)
• Promotion ...

• sorry, tilted --Mbdortmund 06:09, 25 March 2009 (UTC)
•  Question Which way do you perceive it to be tilted? Before submitting, I fixed a 0.2 degree tilt using the measure tool in Photoshop and tried to be absolutely as precise as possible. It's something I've already worked on for this shot, which is why I'm curious; either I did it wrong or there's an optical illusion. --Notyourbroom 13:37, 25 March 2009 (UTC)
• IMO it should be rotared CCW, but if the image was checked, I'm ready to  Support. It is a good image.--Mbz1 17:42, 25 March 2009 (UTC)
•  Comment Ok, because looking at the bottom of the steps, I would have thought it needed a bit of CW rotation, if anything. Maybe the horizontals are just slightly distorted. It's a rather wide-angle shot. --Notyourbroom 21:21, 25 March 2009 (UTC)
• I tried to measure the upper edges of the building and PS says that it should be rotated 0,24° to the left. I thought it would be more, perhaps of the wide angle distortion, sorry. --Mbdortmund 21:38, 25 March 2009 (UTC)
•  Done Please see this derivative image. I marked three lines I measured, and next to the lines, I marked how much Photoshop would have needed to rotate the image to make it level along those lines. As you can see, there is a small discrepancy between the higher and lower parts of the image, but the middle is almost perfect. Thus, I'd argue it's as straight as practically possible. --Notyourbroom 22:05, 25 March 2009 (UTC)
•  CommentAs the lines show, the image is keystoned with the left side larger than the right. That's what's giving the impression of being tilted. You can fix this by doing a perspective correction. --Carnildo 22:19, 25 March 2009 (UTC)
•  Done I did my best to distort the geometry to make all of the lines straight. Try loading new, old in different tabs and flipping between the two. --Notyourbroom 18:55, 26 March 2009 (UTC)
•  QuestionReally difficult choice, which is your candidate? --Mbdortmund 01:36, 27 March 2009 (UTC)
•  InfoWell, I uploaded the new version on top of the old version, so I suppose that makes it the candidate for consideration now. I have no plan to revert to the old one. :) --Notyourbroom 04:55, 27 March 2009 (UTC)

 Support difficult to get it better --Mbdortmund 19:40, 27 March 2009 (UTC)

Running total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 0 oppose → Promote?   Lycaon 21:29, 29 March 2009 (UTC)

File:Aberystwyth castle edit1.jpg

• Nomination Aberystwyth Castle by user:Herbythyme --Mbz1 04:56, 24 March 2009 (UTC)
• Decline
• Overexposed sky. --Eusebius 11:13, 24 March 2009 (UTC)
•  Question Any better? Thank you.--Mbz1 15:34, 24 March 2009 (UTC)
•  Comment Looks better at least. Isn't it tilted to the left? It's difficult to spot for sure. --Eusebius 09:33, 25 March 2009 (UTC)
•  Oppose Lots of chroma noise (e.g. in the stones and in the grass right). Also some CA. Lycaon 10:05, 25 March 2009 (UTC)
•  Info Uploaded corrected version.--Mbz1 15:23, 25 March 2009 (UTC)
•  Comment Didn't really work, did it? Look at the sky above the castle now, and at the fields to the right. Lycaon 19:32, 25 March 2009 (UTC)
•  Question I did. May I please ask you what should I be looking for? Is it noise again? Thank you.--Mbz1 20:29, 25 March 2009 (UTC)
•  Comment You may. Luminance noise in the sky, loss of detail (even posterization} and chroma noise in the fields. Lycaon 12:39, 26 March 2009 (UTC)

Thank you. The thing is that I do not see anything you're talking about, except maybe very minor loss of details at the top of the castle. I would appreciate very much, if somebody could take another look at the image. Maybe there's something wrong with my monitor. Eusebius,may I please ask you, if you see all the problems Hans is talking about? Thank you for your time.--Mbz1 15:15, 26 March 2009 (UTC)

Running total: 0 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Decline?   Lycaon 21:28, 29 March 2009 (UTC)

File:Au Lebernau.JPG

• Nomination Winter in Vorarlberg --Böhringer 22:18, 4 March 2009 (UTC)
• Promotion
•  Supportnice winter --Pudelek 15:59, 11 March 2009 (UTC)
•  Oppose I realize I always complain about this, and that the cameras never automatically expose these shots correctly, but the snow should be white (not clipped histogram white, but much furhter to the right). The shot is underexposed.--PieCam 01:09, 14 March 2009 (UTC)
•  Support Very good composition.--Mbz1 23:02, 18 March 2009 (UTC)
•  Oppose I like the image, but piecam is right. It is too underexposed. Pbroks13 17:17, 19 March 2009 (UTC)
•  Support - To me it is white enough -- Alvesgaspar 11:07, 26 March 2009 (UTC)
•  Support Seems to be OK --Mbdortmund 01:37, 27 March 2009 (UTC)

Running total: 4 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Promote?   Lycaon (talk) 21:29, 29 March 2009 (UTC)