Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives March 16 2020

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Consensual review[edit]

File:Marktbrunnen,_"Zum_steinenen_Trauben"_und_Gasthaus_"zur_Sonne"_in_Stein_am_Rhein.jpg[edit]

  • Nomination Market square fontaine in Stein am Rhein, Switzerland --JoachimKohler-HB 11:30, 10 March 2020 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support Good for me --PantheraLeo1359531 12:10, 10 March 2020 (UTC)
     Oppose To me, it could have been QI if you turn your camera up and right. Now the top crop is really tight and the right part of the fountain base is missing --Podzemnik 21:15, 11 March 2020 (UTC)
  •  Oppose - Beautiful scene, but the right crop is indeed disturbing. -- Ikan Kekek 06:05, 12 March 2020 (UTC)
  •  Support Beautiful and good quality. I can not see what should be bad or disturbing. -- Spurzem 16:24, 12 March 2020 (UTC)
  •  Support I am with Spurzem here. The base of the fountain is cropped, but it is a simple paving stone base and IMHO not of historic/artistic interest, so the crop is forgivable here. --Aristeas 08:58, 13 March 2020 (UTC)
  •  Support per Aristeas, though I would have prefered a different focus setting. --Smial 09:54, 13 March 2020 (UTC)
Total: 4 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Promoted   --Peulle 09:58, 15 March 2020 (UTC)

File:Dr._A._O._Fleisch-Strasse_1_in_Mammern.jpg[edit]

  • Nomination Old house in Mammern, Lake Constance --JoachimKohler-HB 11:30, 10 March 2020 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support Good quality. --Milseburg 12:53, 10 March 2020 (UTC)
     Oppose Sorry but I think that the top crop is just too tight --Podzemnik 21:15, 11 March 2020 (UTC)
  •  Support - Top crop indeed is not optimal, but the picture is good otherwise, so I'd allow it. -- Ikan Kekek 06:06, 12 March 2020 (UTC)
  •  Support per Ikan. --Aristeas 14:35, 12 March 2020 (UTC)
  •  Support -- Spurzem 16:28, 12 March 2020 (UTC)
  • Weak  Support. Good enough as it is, but there is some remains of CA at the chimney, and the image has generally slight oversharpening. Enhancements are possible. --Smial 09:41, 13 March 2020 (UTC)
Total: 4 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promoted   --Peulle 09:57, 15 March 2020 (UTC)

File:Drammen_flom_februar_2020_(22).jpg[edit]

  • Nomination: The Drammen river during the flood of February 2020.--Peulle 11:07, 4 March 2020 (UTC)
  • Review
     Support Good quality. --T.Bednarz 15:02, 4 March 2020 (UTC)
     Oppose Purple CA on the right side of buildings (see the note) that need to be removed. Also, photo needs more sharpening. --Halavar 15:05, 4 March 2020 (UTC)
Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Inconclusive result after 8 consensual review days XRay 06:30, 14 March 2020 (UTC)

File:Turkish_musican_play_with_zurna.jpg[edit]

  • Nomination Turkish musician performs folk music on zurna.--Biso 09:59, 9 March 2020 (UTC)
  • Decline
  •  Oppose I think the cut-off person in the background is disturbing, especially since there is room on the left. --Peulle 10:45, 9 March 2020 (UTC)
  •  Support The cut-off person is out of focus so that she does not disturb. Please discuss. -- Spurzem 15:31, 9 March 2020 (UTC)
  •  Oppose - The part of a man's head on the left bothers me even more. At least we see almost all of the woman's face. -- Ikan Kekek 08:14, 10 March 2020 (UTC)
  •  Support per Spurzem. A rather minor problem with the composition. The main character is very well portrayed. --Smial 15:39, 10 March 2020 (UTC)
  •  Support I understand the objections (about the cut-off persons), but when I first saw this photo, it didn’t bother me at all, I just thought that this was a good photo of the man with the zurna. So IMHO it is OK. Of course it would be easy to get rid at least of the part of a man’s head at the left – either by cropping the photo at the left, or by cloning out the head. --Aristeas 08:55, 11 March 2020 (UTC) I still think the composition is not so bad, but together with the CAs pointed out by MB-one there are too many flaws. It would be nice if the head at the left and the CAs would be fixed. --Aristeas 15:15, 12 March 2020 (UTC)
  •  Oppose per Ikan Kekek and CAs on his shirt. --MB-one 20:50, 11 March 2020 (UTC)
 Comment Ich habe schon hochgejubelte Bilder gesehen, total verzerrt, Personen im Hintergrund zwar ohne Gesichter, zahllose Lichtreflexe auf dem Hauptgegenstand, teilweise der Raum zu dunkel und teilweise zu hell. Hier aber führen kaum erkennbare CAs zu einem Kontra bzw. zur Ablehnung des Fotos. Ich verstehe die Maßstäbe, die hier angelegt werden, von Tag zu Tag weniger. -- Spurzem 16:36, 12 March 2020 (UTC)
Total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 3 oppose → Declined   --Peulle 09:56, 15 March 2020 (UTC)