Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives March 13 2022

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Consensual review[edit]

File:Yellow_wagtail_in_Nasirpur,_Patiala.jpg[edit]

  • Nomination Yellow wagtail in Nasirpur, Patiala. --Satdeep Gill 13:35, 10 March 2022 (UTC)
  • Decline

 Support Good quality. --Steindy 14:46, 10 March 2022 (UTC)
 Oppose less than 2MP --Charlesjsharp 16:29, 10 March 2022 (UTC)
 Oppose low quality and resolution --Milseburg 17:46, 10 March 2022 (UTC)

  •  Oppose Too small - speedy decline. -- Ikan Kekek 05:30, 11 March 2022 (UTC)

 Oppose as per Charles below below minimum image quality threshold --Virtual-Pano 00:33, 12 March 2022 (UTC)

Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 4 oppose → Declined   --C messier 20:50, 12 March 2022 (UTC)

File:Greater_flamingos_(Phoenicopterus_roseus)_resting.jpg[edit]

  • Nomination Greater flamingos (Phoenicopterus roseus) --Charlesjsharp 08:07, 8 March 2022 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality Lmbuga 13:02, 8 March 2022 (UTC)
     Oppose Not sharp enough, especially the 2 right flamingos. --Steindy 13:30, 8 March 2022 (UTC)
    A revenge vote yet again. The two birds on the right are not supposed to be in focus. The three on the left are in focus. See FPC. Charlesjsharp 20:32, 8 March 2022 (UTC)
    Only you make revenge ratings. Or can you show me just one photo of me that you have rated positively? But be glad that other users rate your photos positively despite the blurring. So my oppose doesn't matter anyway. --Steindy 09:16, 9 March 2022 (UTC)
  •  Support Good quality. -- Ikan Kekek 07:13, 9 March 2022 (UTC)
  •  Support ok in my view --Imehling 07:16, 9 March 2022 (UTC)
Total: 3 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promoted   --Virtual-Pano (talk) 09:55, 12 March 2022 (UTC)