Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives March 07 2021

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
  • * Nomination Werzer establishment, "Kursaal", on Hauptstrasse #216, Pörtschach, Carinthia, Austria -- Johann Jaritz 03:43, 5 March 2021 (UTC) * Promotion Good quality. --Bgag 04:26, 5 March 2021 (UTC)
    • Nomination Werzer establishment, "Kursaal", on Hauptstrasse #216, Pörtschach, Carinthia, Austria -- Johann Jaritz 03:43, 5 March 2021 (UTC)
    • Promotion Good quality. --Bgag 04:26, 5 March 2021 (UTC)
  • * Nomination New apartment building «Weisses Rössl» on Hauptstrasse #205, Pörtschach, Carinthia, Austria -- Johann Jaritz 03:43, 5 March 2021 (UTC) * Promotion Good quality. --Bgag 04:26, 5 March 2021 (UTC)
    • Nomination New apartment building «Weisses Rössl» on Hauptstrasse #205, Pörtschach, Carinthia, Austria -- Johann Jaritz 03:43, 5 March 2021 (UTC)
    • Promotion Good quality. --Bgag 04:26, 5 March 2021 (UTC)
  • * Nomination Werzer`s Hotel Resort on Werzerpromenade #8, Pörtschach, Carinthia, Austria -- Johann Jaritz 03:43, 5 March 2021 (UTC) * Promotion Good quality. --Bgag 04:26, 5 March 2021 (UTC)
    • Nomination Werzer`s Hotel Resort on Werzerpromenade #8, Pörtschach, Carinthia, Austria -- Johann Jaritz 03:43, 5 March 2021 (UTC)
    • Promotion Good quality. --Bgag 04:26, 5 March 2021 (UTC)
  • * Nomination Footbridge across the Mühlbach on Werzerpromenade #10, Pörtschach, Carinthia, Austria -- Johann Jaritz 03:43, 5 March 2021 (UTC) * Promotion Good quality. --Bgag 04:26, 5 March 2021 (UTC)
    • Nomination Footbridge across the Mühlbach on Werzerpromenade #10, Pörtschach, Carinthia, Austria -- Johann Jaritz 03:43, 5 March 2021 (UTC)
    • Promotion Good quality. --Bgag 04:26, 5 March 2021 (UTC)
  • * Nomination West bay with Parkhotel, Pörtschach, Carinthia, Austria -- Johann Jaritz 03:43, 5 March 2021 (UTC) * Promotion Good quality. --Bgag 04:26, 5 March 2021 (UTC)
    • Nomination West bay with Parkhotel, Pörtschach, Carinthia, Austria -- Johann Jaritz 03:43, 5 March 2021 (UTC)
    • Promotion Good quality. --Bgag 04:26, 5 March 2021 (UTC)
  • * Nomination Silhouette of an island with a giant Samanea saman (rain tree) at sunrise, and white and grey clouds, in Don Det, Si Phan Don, Laos. --Basile Morin 03:05, 5 March 2021 (UTC) * Promotion  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 03:47, 5 March 2021 (UTC)
    • Nomination Silhouette of an island with a giant Samanea saman (rain tree) at sunrise, and white and grey clouds, in Don Det, Si Phan Don, Laos. --Basile Morin 03:05, 5 March 2021 (UTC)
    • Promotion  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 03:47, 5 March 2021 (UTC)
  • * Nomination Li Phi falls (Khone Phapeng) and leafless tree at blue hour with faint clouds, in Don Khon, Si Phan Don, Laos. --Basile Morin 03:05, 5 March 2021 (UTC) * Promotion  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 03:47, 5 March 2021 (UTC)
    • Nomination Li Phi falls (Khone Phapeng) and leafless tree at blue hour with faint clouds, in Don Khon, Si Phan Don, Laos. --Basile Morin 03:05, 5 March 2021 (UTC)
    • Promotion  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 03:47, 5 March 2021 (UTC)
  • * Nomination Sand colored calf trotting in the countryside of Don Det, Si Phan Don, Laos, at golden hour. --Basile Morin 03:05, 5 March 2021 (UTC) * Promotion  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 03:47, 5 March 2021 (UTC)
    • Nomination Sand colored calf trotting in the countryside of Don Det, Si Phan Don, Laos, at golden hour. --Basile Morin 03:05, 5 March 2021 (UTC)
    • Promotion  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 03:47, 5 March 2021 (UTC)
  • * Nomination Close-up photograph of a calf's head looking at the viewer, in Don Det, Si Phan Don, Laos. --Basile Morin 03:05, 5 March 2021 (UTC) * Promotion  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 03:47, 5 March 2021 (UTC)
    • Nomination Close-up photograph of a calf's head looking at the viewer, in Don Det, Si Phan Don, Laos. --Basile Morin 03:05, 5 March 2021 (UTC)
    • Promotion  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 03:47, 5 March 2021 (UTC)
  • * Nomination Close-up photograph of a Muscovy duck's head (Cairina moschata), at golden hour in Don Det, Si Phan Don, Laos. --Basile Morin 03:05, 5 March 2021 (UTC) * Promotion  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 03:47, 5 March 2021 (UTC)
    • Nomination Close-up photograph of a Muscovy duck's head (Cairina moschata), at golden hour in Don Det, Si Phan Don, Laos. --Basile Morin 03:05, 5 March 2021 (UTC)
    • Promotion  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 03:47, 5 March 2021 (UTC)
  • * Nomination Castillo San Felipe de Barajas, Cartagena, Colombia --Bgag 00:33, 5 March 2021 (UTC) * Promotion  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 03:45, 5 March 2021 (UTC)
    • Nomination Castillo San Felipe de Barajas, Cartagena, Colombia --Bgag 00:33, 5 March 2021 (UTC)
    • Promotion  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 03:45, 5 March 2021 (UTC)
  • * Nomination Castillo San Felipe de Barajas, Cartagena, Colombia --Bgag 00:33, 5 March 2021 (UTC) * Promotion  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 03:45, 5 March 2021 (UTC)
    • Nomination Castillo San Felipe de Barajas, Cartagena, Colombia --Bgag 00:33, 5 March 2021 (UTC)
    • Promotion  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 03:45, 5 March 2021 (UTC)
  • * Nomination Castillo San Felipe de Barajas, Cartagena, Colombia --Bgag 00:33, 5 March 2021 (UTC) * Promotion  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 03:45, 5 March 2021 (UTC)
    • Nomination Castillo San Felipe de Barajas, Cartagena, Colombia --Bgag 00:33, 5 March 2021 (UTC)
    • Promotion  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 03:45, 5 March 2021 (UTC)
  • * Nomination View of Cartagena from Convent of Santa Cruz de la Popa, Colombia --Bgag 00:33, 5 March 2021 (UTC) * Promotion  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 03:45, 5 March 2021 (UTC)
    • Nomination View of Cartagena from Convent of Santa Cruz de la Popa, Colombia --Bgag 00:33, 5 March 2021 (UTC)
    • Promotion  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 03:45, 5 March 2021 (UTC)
  • * Nomination Bastion of Santo Domingo‎, Cartagena, Colombia --Bgag 00:33, 5 March 2021 (UTC) * Promotion  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 03:45, 5 March 2021 (UTC)
    • Nomination Bastion of Santo Domingo‎, Cartagena, Colombia --Bgag 00:33, 5 March 2021 (UTC)
    • Promotion  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 03:45, 5 March 2021 (UTC)
  • * Nomination New Jersey National Guard Soldiers and Airmen from 1st Battalion, 114th Infantry Regiment, 508th Military Police Company, 108th Wing, and 177th Fighter Wing arrive near the Capitol to set up security positions in Washington, D.C., Jan. 12, 2021. --Sdkb 22:42, 4 March 2021 (UTC) * Decline  Oppose Sorry, but only the work of Wikimedians is eligible for QI. :/ Rhododendrites 00:17, 5 March 2021 (UTC)
    • Nomination New Jersey National Guard Soldiers and Airmen from 1st Battalion, 114th Infantry Regiment, 508th Military Police Company, 108th Wing, and 177th Fighter Wing arrive near the Capitol to set up security positions in Washington, D.C., Jan. 12, 2021. --Sdkb 22:42, 4 March 2021 (UTC)
    • Decline
       Oppose Sorry, but only the work of Wikimedians is eligible for QI. :/ Rhododendrites 00:17, 5 March 2021 (UTC)
  • * Nomination Distoleon tetragrammicus --Christian Ferrer 22:59, 4 March 2021 (UTC) * Promotion  Support Good quality. --Ermell 22:42, 4 March 2021 (UTC)
    • Nomination Distoleon tetragrammicus --Christian Ferrer 22:59, 4 March 2021 (UTC)
    • Promotion
       Support Good quality. --Ermell 22:42, 4 March 2021 (UTC)
  • * Nomination Wayside cross (19th century) near Freudenburg, Germany. --Palauenc05 21:37, 4 March 2021 (UTC) * Promotion Good quality. --A.Savin 21:42, 4 March 2021 (UTC)
    • Nomination Wayside cross (19th century) near Freudenburg, Germany. --Palauenc05 21:37, 4 March 2021 (UTC)
    • Promotion Good quality. --A.Savin 21:42, 4 March 2021 (UTC)
  • * Nomination Wayside shrine (18th century) in Freudenburg, Germany. --Palauenc05 21:37, 4 March 2021 (UTC) * Promotion  Support Good quality. --LexKurochkin 22:01, 4 March 2021 (UTC)
    • Nomination Wayside shrine (18th century) in Freudenburg, Germany. --Palauenc05 21:37, 4 March 2021 (UTC)
    • Promotion
       Support Good quality. --LexKurochkin 22:01, 4 March 2021 (UTC)
  • * Nomination Ships Organisator, M. Sespel and OM-349 near Bagration bridge on Moskva River --LexKurochkin 21:30, 4 March 2021 (UTC) * Promotion  Support Good quality. --Palauenc05 21:43, 4 March 2021 (UTC)
    • Nomination Ships Organisator, M. Sespel and OM-349 near Bagration bridge on Moskva River --LexKurochkin 21:30, 4 March 2021 (UTC)
    • Promotion  Support Good quality. --Palauenc05 21:43, 4 March 2021 (UTC)
  • * Nomination Eurasian jackdaw (Coloeus monedula). The photo was taken in Moscow, Russia on 2018 May 09 --LexKurochkin 21:07, 4 March 2021 (UTC) * Promotion  Support Small file but the bird is sharp enough in my opinion. -- Ikan Kekek 21:39, 4 March 2021 (UTC)
    • Nomination Eurasian jackdaw (Coloeus monedula). The photo was taken in Moscow, Russia on 2018 May 09 --LexKurochkin 21:07, 4 March 2021 (UTC)
    • Promotion  Support Small file but the bird is sharp enough in my opinion. -- Ikan Kekek 21:39, 4 March 2021 (UTC)
  • * Nomination A view of Tower 2000, Moskva river and Bagration Bridge --LexKurochkin 21:05, 4 March 2021 (UTC) * Promotion  Support Good quality. --Palauenc05 21:42, 4 March 2021 (UTC)
    • Nomination A view of Tower 2000, Moskva river and Bagration Bridge --LexKurochkin 21:05, 4 March 2021 (UTC)
    • Promotion  Support Good quality. --Palauenc05 21:42, 4 March 2021 (UTC)
  • * Nomination Byabäcken river valley in Sipoo --Ximonic 19:51, 4 March 2021 (UTC) * Promotion Good quality --Michielverbeek 20:23, 4 March 2021 (UTC)
    • Nomination Byabäcken river valley in Sipoo --Ximonic 19:51, 4 March 2021 (UTC)
    • Promotion Good quality --Michielverbeek 20:23, 4 March 2021 (UTC)
  • * Nomination Passenger seat onboard a Qatar Executive operated Gulfstream G650ER at EBACE 2019, Palexpo, Switzerland --MB-one 19:44, 4 March 2021 (UTC) * Promotion  Support Good quality. --Nefronus 20:15, 4 March 2021 (UTC)
    • Nomination Passenger seat onboard a Qatar Executive operated Gulfstream G650ER at EBACE 2019, Palexpo, Switzerland --MB-one 19:44, 4 March 2021 (UTC)
    • Promotion
       Support Good quality. --Nefronus 20:15, 4 March 2021 (UTC)
  • * Nomination male and female inflorescene of common hazel (Corylus avellana) --Nefronus 18:00, 4 March 2021 (UTC) * Promotion Good quality. --MB-one 19:44, 4 March 2021 (UTC)
    • Nomination male and female inflorescene of common hazel (Corylus avellana) --Nefronus 18:00, 4 March 2021 (UTC)
    • Promotion Good quality. --MB-one 19:44, 4 March 2021 (UTC)
  • * Nomination Protection of the Theotokos church in Chyrowa, Poland --Pudelek 17:42, 4 March 2021 (UTC) * Promotion  Support Good quality. --Christian Ferrer 23:06, 4 March 2021 (UTC)
    • Nomination Protection of the Theotokos church in Chyrowa, Poland --Pudelek 17:42, 4 March 2021 (UTC)
    • Promotion
       Support Good quality. --Christian Ferrer 23:06, 4 March 2021 (UTC)
  • * Nomination Church of the Assumption in Zadąbrowie, Poland --Pudelek 17:42, 4 March 2021 (UTC) * Promotion Good quality --Michielverbeek 18:15, 4 March 2021 (UTC)
    • Nomination Church of the Assumption in Zadąbrowie, Poland --Pudelek 17:42, 4 March 2021 (UTC)
    • Promotion Good quality --Michielverbeek 18:15, 4 March 2021 (UTC)
  • * Nomination Texture of tubes and cones already used in a laboratory in Benin --Adoscam 17:08, 4 March 2021 (UTC) * Promotion OK. --A.Savin 21:46, 4 March 2021 (UTC)
    • Nomination Texture of tubes and cones already used in a laboratory in Benin --Adoscam 17:08, 4 March 2021 (UTC)
    • Promotion OK. --A.Savin 21:46, 4 March 2021 (UTC)
  • * Nomination High detailed back view of a Seagate HDD. --PantheraLeo1359531 17:06, 4 March 2021 (UTC) * Promotion  Support Good quality. --Christian Ferrer 23:09, 4 March 2021 (UTC)
    • Nomination High detailed back view of a Seagate HDD. --PantheraLeo1359531 17:06, 4 March 2021 (UTC)
    • Promotion
       Support Good quality. --Christian Ferrer 23:09, 4 March 2021 (UTC)
  • * Nomination Gersfeld seen from the Großer Nallenberg --Milseburg 15:06, 4 March 2021 (UTC) * Promotion Ok --Pudelek 17:40, 4 March 2021 (UTC)
    • Nomination Gersfeld seen from the Großer Nallenberg --Milseburg 15:06, 4 March 2021 (UTC)
    • Promotion Ok --Pudelek 17:40, 4 March 2021 (UTC)
  • * Nomination Deutschland, Erden an der Mosel, Hauptstraße 60 --Berthold Werner 14:07, 4 March 2021 (UTC) * Promotion  Support Good quality. --Palauenc05 19:15, 4 March 2021 (UTC)
    • Nomination Deutschland, Erden an der Mosel, Hauptstraße 60 --Berthold Werner 14:07, 4 March 2021 (UTC)
    • Promotion  Support Good quality. --Palauenc05 19:15, 4 March 2021 (UTC)
  • * Nomination Mascarons on Terzi Lana Pelati Palace. --Moroder 12:55, 4 March 2021 (UTC) * Promotion Good quality. --Bgag 14:38, 4 March 2021 (UTC)
    • Nomination Mascarons on Terzi Lana Pelati Palace. --Moroder 12:55, 4 March 2021 (UTC)
    • Promotion Good quality. --Bgag 14:38, 4 March 2021 (UTC)
  • * Nomination Fenaroli Bettoni Cazzago palace. --Moroder 12:06, 4 March 2021 (UTC) * Promotion Good quality. --Berthold Werner 14:10, 4 March 2021 (UTC)
    • Nomination Fenaroli Bettoni Cazzago palace. --Moroder 12:06, 4 March 2021 (UTC)
    • Promotion Good quality. --Berthold Werner 14:10, 4 March 2021 (UTC)
  • * Nomination Dam on the Tsna river. Tambov, Russia. --Alexander Novikov 11:58, 4 March 2021 (UTC) * Promotion  Support Good quality. --Nefronus 18:05, 4 March 2021 (UTC)
    • Nomination Dam on the Tsna river. Tambov, Russia. --Alexander Novikov 11:58, 4 March 2021 (UTC)
    • Promotion
       Support Good quality. --Nefronus 18:05, 4 March 2021 (UTC)
  • * Nomination Dam on the Tsna river. Tambov, Russia. --Alexander Novikov 11:58, 4 March 2021 (UTC) * Promotion  Support Good quality. --Ermell 19:33, 4 March 2021 (UTC)
    • Nomination Dam on the Tsna river. Tambov, Russia. --Alexander Novikov 11:58, 4 March 2021 (UTC)
    • Promotion
       Support Good quality. --Ermell 19:33, 4 March 2021 (UTC)
  • * Nomination Dam on the Tsna river. Tambov, Russia. --Alexander Novikov 11:58, 4 March 2021 (UTC) * Decline  Oppose Sorry, nice picture but not enough in focus here. If the bird in flight were sharp, or if the background were sharper, it may be QI but only the female is sharp. --Rhododendrites 00:23, 5 March 2021 (UTC)
    • Nomination Dam on the Tsna river. Tambov, Russia. --Alexander Novikov 11:58, 4 March 2021 (UTC)
    • Decline
       Oppose Sorry, nice picture but not enough in focus here. If the bird in flight were sharp, or if the background were sharper, it may be QI but only the female is sharp. --Rhododendrites 00:23, 5 March 2021 (UTC)
  • * Nomination Mylgval Lake on Abishira-Akhuba Ridge, Karachay-Cherkessia, Western Caucasus. --Argenberg 11:55, 4 March 2021 (UTC) * Promotion Good quality. --Milseburg 15:08, 4 March 2021 (UTC)
    • Nomination Mylgval Lake on Abishira-Akhuba Ridge, Karachay-Cherkessia, Western Caucasus. --Argenberg 11:55, 4 March 2021 (UTC)
    • Promotion Good quality. --Milseburg 15:08, 4 March 2021 (UTC)
  • * Nomination Panoramic view of Moon Valley, Karachay-Cherkessia, Western Caucasus. --Argenberg 11:55, 4 March 2021 (UTC) * Promotion  Support Good quality. --Rhododendrites 00:22, 5 March 2021 (UTC)
    • Nomination Panoramic view of Moon Valley, Karachay-Cherkessia, Western Caucasus. --Argenberg 11:55, 4 March 2021 (UTC)
    • Promotion
       Support Good quality. --Rhododendrites 00:22, 5 March 2021 (UTC)
  • * Nomination Ceiling in the Terzi Lana Pelati Palace. --Moroder 11:16, 4 March 2021 (UTC) * Promotion  Support Good quality. --Ermell 19:39, 4 March 2021 (UTC)
    • Nomination Ceiling in the Terzi Lana Pelati Palace. --Moroder 11:16, 4 March 2021 (UTC)
    • Promotion
       Support Good quality. --Ermell 19:39, 4 March 2021 (UTC)
  • * Nomination Murat Özyaşar. By User:R.komorowski --Andrew J.Kurbiko 10:59, 4 March 2021 (UTC) * Promotion  Support Good quality. --Rhododendrites 00:24, 5 March 2021 (UTC)
  • * Nomination Hubert Klimko-Dobrzaniecki. By User:R.komorowski --Andrew J.Kurbiko 10:59, 4 March 2021 (UTC) * Promotion  Support Good quality. --Rhododendrites 00:24, 5 March 2021 (UTC)
  • * Nomination Ana Blandiana. By User:R.komorowski --Andrew J.Kurbiko 10:59, 4 March 2021 (UTC) * Promotion  Support Good quality. --Ermell 19:37, 4 March 2021 (UTC)
  • * Nomination Dariusz Sośnicki. By User:R.komorowski --Andrew J.Kurbiko 10:59, 4 March 2021 (UTC) * Promotion  Support Good quality. --Ermell 19:37, 4 March 2021 (UTC)
  • * Nomination Texture of tubes and cones already used in a laboratory in Benin --Adoscam 09:00, 4 March 2021 (UTC) * Promotion I notice you're using a Nikon camera now. That's working out much better than the cellphone. I consider this good quality, but you need to add at least one category for the laboratory waste, and maybe more than one. Do a search for appropriate categories, and post a reply when you've added some. Ikan Kekek 13:59, 4 March 2021 (UTC)  Comment I just added some categories. I hope it can be ok Thank you for your courage my new used device ------~~~~  Comment I agree with Category:Biomedical waste but not the other categories. If you added another category, I think it should be either more specific or something like "plastic waste" or "plastic medical devices", but don't create a category that doesn't exist; "Waste medical" doesn't work grammatically in English but I think it's an unnecessary category. -- Ikan Kekek 18:58, 4 March 2021 (UTC) Someby has already remove the catégorie "Waste medical" is it correct now?--~~~~  Support Yes, I'm OK with it now. -- Ikan Kekek 22:33, 4 March 2021 (UTC)
    • Nomination Texture of tubes and cones already used in a laboratory in Benin --Adoscam 09:00, 4 March 2021 (UTC)
    • Promotion I notice you're using a Nikon camera now. That's working out much better than the cellphone. I consider this good quality, but you need to add at least one category for the laboratory waste, and maybe more than one. Do a search for appropriate categories, and post a reply when you've added some. Ikan Kekek 13:59, 4 March 2021 (UTC)
       Comment I just added some categories. I hope it can be ok Thank you for your courage my new used device ------~~~~
       Comment I agree with Category:Biomedical waste but not the other categories. If you added another category, I think it should be either more specific or something like "plastic waste" or "plastic medical devices", but don't create a category that doesn't exist; "Waste medical" doesn't work grammatically in English but I think it's an unnecessary category. -- Ikan Kekek 18:58, 4 March 2021 (UTC) Someby has already remove the catégorie "Waste medical" is it correct now?--~~~~
       Support Yes, I'm OK with it now. -- Ikan Kekek 22:33, 4 March 2021 (UTC)
  • * Nomination Lampadaire devant la gare du Nord à Paris, le 17 juillet 2015 (by Lionel Allorge) --Sebring12Hrs 08:12, 4 March 2021 (UTC) * Promotion Good quality. --Berthold Werner 14:09, 4 March 2021 (UTC)
  • * Nomination 18th century house, Rue de Gand 14, Lille, France --Velvet 07:22, 4 March 2021 (UTC) * Promotion Good quality, but strong shadows --Michielverbeek 07:26, 4 March 2021 (UTC)
    • Nomination 18th century house, Rue de Gand 14, Lille, France --Velvet 07:22, 4 March 2021 (UTC)
    • Promotion Good quality, but strong shadows --Michielverbeek 07:26, 4 March 2021 (UTC)
  • * Nomination Put van Nederhorst in the fog. Children's Playground on the water. --Famberhorst 07:13, 4 March 2021 (UTC) * Promotion Good quality --Michielverbeek 07:24, 4 March 2021 (UTC)
    • Nomination Put van Nederhorst in the fog. Children's Playground on the water.
      --Famberhorst 07:13, 4 March 2021 (UTC)
    • Promotion Good quality --Michielverbeek 07:24, 4 March 2021 (UTC)
  • * Nomination Leptoptilos crumeniferus at Cologne Zoo --Ermell 06:58, 4 March 2021 (UTC) * Promotion  Support Good quality. --Palauenc05 21:55, 4 March 2021 (UTC)
    • Nomination Leptoptilos crumeniferus at Cologne Zoo --Ermell 06:58, 4 March 2021 (UTC)
    • Promotion  Support Good quality. --Palauenc05 21:55, 4 March 2021 (UTC)
  • * Nomination Pelicans (Pelecanus onocrotalus) at Cologne Zoo --Ermell 06:58, 4 March 2021 (UTC) * Promotion  Support Good quality. --Palauenc05 21:57, 4 March 2021 (UTC)
    • Nomination Pelicans (Pelecanus onocrotalus) at Cologne Zoo --Ermell 06:58, 4 March 2021 (UTC)
    • Promotion  Support Good quality. --Palauenc05 21:57, 4 March 2021 (UTC)
  • * Nomination Gargoyle at the Sakre Ceur Basilica on Mont Martre in Paris --Ermell 06:58, 4 March 2021 (UTC) * Promotion  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 07:15, 4 March 2021 (UTC)
    • Nomination Gargoyle at the Sakre Ceur Basilica on Mont Martre in Paris --Ermell 06:58, 4 March 2021 (UTC)
    • Promotion  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 07:15, 4 March 2021 (UTC)
  • * Nomination White stork in its nest on the north-west tower of the town wall in Seßlach --Ermell 06:58, 4 March 2021 (UTC) * Promotion  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 07:18, 4 March 2021 (UTC)
    • Nomination White stork in its nest on the north-west tower of the town wall in Seßlach --Ermell 06:58, 4 March 2021 (UTC)
    • Promotion  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 07:18, 4 March 2021 (UTC)
  • * Nomination View of Dole, Jura, France. --Tournasol7 06:17, 4 March 2021 (UTC) * Promotion Good quality --Michielverbeek 07:28, 4 March 2021 (UTC)
    • Nomination View of Dole, Jura, France. --Tournasol7 06:17, 4 March 2021 (UTC)
    • Promotion Good quality --Michielverbeek 07:28, 4 March 2021 (UTC)
  • * Nomination 20 rue Traversičre-du-Murot in Toul, Meurthe-et-Moselle, France. --Tournasol7 06:17, 4 March 2021 (UTC) * Promotion  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 07:19, 4 March 2021 (UTC)
    • Nomination 20 rue Traversičre-du-Murot in Toul, Meurthe-et-Moselle, France. --Tournasol7 06:17, 4 March 2021 (UTC)
    • Promotion  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 07:19, 4 March 2021 (UTC)
  • * Nomination Praia do Castelo do Queijo in Porto, Douro Litoral, Portugal. --Tournasol7 06:17, 4 March 2021 (UTC) * Promotion  Support Good quality. --Ermell 08:34, 4 March 2021 (UTC)
    • Nomination Praia do Castelo do Queijo in Porto, Douro Litoral, Portugal. --Tournasol7 06:17, 4 March 2021 (UTC)
    • Promotion
       Support Good quality. --Ermell 08:34, 4 March 2021 (UTC)
  • * Nomination 13 rue des Belles-Lunettes in Nevers, Ničvre, France . --Tournasol7 06:17, 4 March 2021 (UTC) * Promotion  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 07:16, 4 March 2021 (UTC)
    • Nomination 13 rue des Belles-Lunettes in Nevers, Ničvre, France . --Tournasol7 06:17, 4 March 2021 (UTC)
    • Promotion  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 07:16, 4 March 2021 (UTC)
  • * Nomination Pont de Valmale in Remoulins, Gard, France. --Tournasol7 06:17, 4 March 2021 (UTC) * Promotion  Support Good quality. --Ermell 08:35, 4 March 2021 (UTC)
    • Nomination Pont de Valmale in Remoulins, Gard, France. --Tournasol7 06:17, 4 March 2021 (UTC)
    • Promotion
       Support Good quality. --Ermell 08:35, 4 March 2021 (UTC)
  • * Nomination Northern control tower of the Iffezheim Lock, Germany --Llez 05:54, 4 March 2021 (UTC) * Promotion  Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 06:18, 4 March 2021 (UTC)
    • Nomination Northern control tower of the Iffezheim Lock, Germany --Llez 05:54, 4 March 2021 (UTC)
    • Promotion
       Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 06:18, 4 March 2021 (UTC)
  • * Nomination 5 Place Champollion in Figeac (by Tournasol7) --Sebring12Hrs 05:48, 4 March 2021 (UTC) * Promotion Good quality --Llez 05:56, 4 March 2021 (UTC)
    • Nomination 5 Place Champollion in Figeac (by Tournasol7) --Sebring12Hrs 05:48, 4 March 2021 (UTC)
    • Promotion Good quality --Llez 05:56, 4 March 2021 (UTC)
  • * Nomination This part of Koninklijke Houtvesterij Het Loo will no longer intervene. There is a natural process taking place for more biodiversity. --Agnes Monkelbaan 05:32, 4 March 2021 (UTC) * Promotion  Support Good quality. --XRay 05:45, 4 March 2021 (UTC)
    • Nomination This part of Koninklijke Houtvesterij Het Loo will no longer intervene. There is a natural process taking place for more biodiversity.
      --Agnes Monkelbaan 05:32, 4 March 2021 (UTC)
    • Promotion
       Support Good quality. --XRay 05:45, 4 March 2021 (UTC)
  • * Nomination Entrance building of the train station in Dülmen, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany --XRay 04:44, 4 March 2021 (UTC) * Promotion  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 05:01, 4 March 2021 (UTC)
    • Nomination Entrance building of the train station in Dülmen, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany --XRay 04:44, 4 March 2021 (UTC)
    • Promotion  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 05:01, 4 March 2021 (UTC)
  • * Nomination Westring in Dülmen, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany --XRay 04:44, 4 March 2021 (UTC) * Promotion  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 05:01, 4 March 2021 (UTC)
    • Nomination Westring in Dülmen, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany --XRay 04:44, 4 March 2021 (UTC)
    • Promotion  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 05:01, 4 March 2021 (UTC)
  • * Nomination The Cathedral of the Holy Trinity --Wilfredor 17:48, 3 March 2021 (UTC) * Promotion Good quality, but add a category for stained glass and describe what we're looking at (not only that it's stained glass, but where in the cathedral) in the file description. I'll wait for you to do similar work as needed on categories and descriptions before looking at any of the other photos in this series. -- Ikan Kekek 18:34, 3 March 2021 (UTC)  Done Please, let me know if its right. Thanks mate --Wilfredor 19:49, 3 March 2021 (UTC)  Comment Almost, but I still want to know where in the cathedral the stained glass is. Is it on a side (right or left)? At the apse? The left or right transept? Etc. -- Ikan Kekek 00:39, 4 March 2021 (UTC) its in the upper left back but it depends where you are looking, how I could describe it in the best way --Wilfredor 13:26, 4 March 2021 (UTC)  Comment You could just say where it is, if you're on the nave, facing toward the altar. -- Ikan Kekek 14:03, 4 March 2021 (UTC)  Done thanks --Wilfredor 16:33, 4 March 2021 (UTC)}  Support Great. Thanks. -- Ikan Kekek 02:02, 5 March 2021 (UTC)
    • Nomination The Cathedral of the Holy Trinity --Wilfredor 17:48, 3 March 2021 (UTC)
    • Promotion Good quality, but add a category for stained glass and describe what we're looking at (not only that it's stained glass, but where in the cathedral) in the file description. I'll wait for you to do similar work as needed on categories and descriptions before looking at any of the other photos in this series. -- Ikan Kekek 18:34, 3 March 2021 (UTC)
      ✓ Done Please, let me know if its right. Thanks mate --Wilfredor 19:49, 3 March 2021 (UTC)
       Comment Almost, but I still want to know where in the cathedral the stained glass is. Is it on a side (right or left)? At the apse? The left or right transept? Etc. -- Ikan Kekek 00:39, 4 March 2021 (UTC)
      its in the upper left back but it depends where you are looking, how I could describe it in the best way --Wilfredor 13:26, 4 March 2021 (UTC)
       Comment You could just say where it is, if you're on the nave, facing toward the altar. -- Ikan Kekek 14:03, 4 March 2021 (UTC)
      ✓ Done thanks --Wilfredor 16:33, 4 March 2021 (UTC)}
       Support Great. Thanks. -- Ikan Kekek 02:02, 5 March 2021 (UTC)
  • * Nomination Chapelle Notre-Dame-des-Malades de Mouvaux Hauts-de-France. --Pierre André Leclercq 15:23, 3 March 2021 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --Christian Ferrer 23:12, 4 March 2021 (UTC) * Promotion {{{2}}}
    • Nomination Chapelle Notre-Dame-des-Malades de Mouvaux Hauts-de-France. --Pierre André Leclercq 15:23, 3 March 2021 (UTC)
       Support Good quality. --Christian Ferrer 23:12, 4 March 2021 (UTC)
    • Promotion {{{2}}}
  • * Nomination Destruction area of Bahnhofstraße 10 with rubbish in the foreground. --PantheraLeo1359531 14:17, 3 March 2021 (UTC) * Promotion  Support Good quality. --LexKurochkin 21:35, 4 March 2021 (UTC)
    • Nomination Destruction area of Bahnhofstraße 10 with rubbish in the foreground. --PantheraLeo1359531 14:17, 3 March 2021 (UTC)
    • Promotion
       Support Good quality. --LexKurochkin 21:35, 4 March 2021 (UTC)
  • * Nomination Destruction area of Bahnhofstraße 10. --PantheraLeo1359531 14:11, 3 March 2021 (UTC) * Promotion  Support Good quality. --LexKurochkin 21:37, 4 March 2021 (UTC)
    • Nomination Destruction area of Bahnhofstraße 10. --PantheraLeo1359531 14:11, 3 March 2021 (UTC)
    • Promotion
       Support Good quality. --LexKurochkin 21:37, 4 March 2021 (UTC)
  • * Nomination Saint-Martin Church in Pfaffenheim (Haut-Rhin, France). --Gzen92 08:05, 3 March 2021 (UTC) * Promotion Good quality. --Milseburg 13:58, 4 March 2021 (UTC)
    • Nomination Saint-Martin Church in Pfaffenheim (Haut-Rhin, France). --Gzen92 08:05, 3 March 2021 (UTC)
    • Promotion Good quality. --Milseburg 13:58, 4 March 2021 (UTC)
  • * Nomination Hôtel Albouy at 4 Rue Cavalerie in Lodeve, Hérault, France. --Tournasol7 06:27, 3 March 2021 (UTC) * Promotion  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:31, 4 March 2021 (UTC)
    • Nomination Hôtel Albouy at 4 Rue Cavalerie in Lodeve, Hérault, France. --Tournasol7 06:27, 3 March 2021 (UTC)
    • Promotion  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:31, 4 March 2021 (UTC)
  • * Nomination Via dei Mille 21 church with bell tower in Brescia. --Moroder 21:58, 1 March 2021 (UTC) * Promotion Good quality, the right moment of the year to make this composition --Michielverbeek 07:30, 4 March 2021 (UTC)
    • Nomination Via dei Mille 21 church with bell tower in Brescia. --Moroder 21:58, 1 March 2021 (UTC)
    • Promotion Good quality, the right moment of the year to make this composition --Michielverbeek 07:30, 4 March 2021 (UTC)
  • * Nomination Westervoort-NL, bridge: the Westervoortse Brug --Michielverbeek 07:26, 1 March 2021 (UTC) * Promotion OK. --A.Savin 12:09, 4 March 2021 (UTC)
    • Nomination Westervoort-NL, bridge: the Westervoortse Brug --Michielverbeek 07:26, 1 March 2021 (UTC)
    • Promotion OK. --A.Savin 12:09, 4 March 2021 (UTC)
  • * Nomination African Daisy (Osteospermum) in Chico, California --Frank Schulenburg 21:47, 28 February 2021 (UTC) * Promotion  Support Good quality. --XRay 11:24, 4 March 2021 (UTC)
    • Nomination African Daisy (Osteospermum) in Chico, California --Frank Schulenburg 21:47, 28 February 2021 (UTC)
    • Promotion
       Support Good quality. --XRay 11:24, 4 March 2021 (UTC)
  • * Nomination Sapla Cattar (by Pinu Rahman) --Nafiur Rahman 2:06, 27 February 2021 (UTC) * Decline  Oppose Insufficient quality. --A.Savin 12:00, 4 March 2021 (UTC)
    • Nomination Sapla Cattar (by Pinu Rahman) --Nafiur Rahman 2:06, 27 February 2021 (UTC)
    • Decline  Oppose Insufficient quality. --A.Savin 12:00, 4 March 2021 (UTC)
  • * Nomination Petit Temple des Ursulines in Nîmes, Gard, France. (By Tournasol7) --Sebring12Hrs 12:13, 25 February 2021 (UTC) * Promotion Good quality. --Moroder 11:24, 4 March 2021 (UTC)
    • Nomination Petit Temple des Ursulines in Nîmes, Gard, France. (By Tournasol7) --Sebring12Hrs 12:13, 25 February 2021 (UTC)
    • Promotion Good quality. --Moroder 11:24, 4 March 2021 (UTC)
  • * Nomination Vienna metro bridge designed by Otto Wagner --Jacek79 19:52, 24 February 2021 (UTC) * Decline  Oppose Sorry, IMO not sharp enough. --XRay 05:52, 4 March 2021 (UTC)
    • Nomination Vienna metro bridge designed by Otto Wagner --Jacek79 19:52, 24 February 2021 (UTC)
    • Decline
       Oppose Sorry, IMO not sharp enough. --XRay 05:52, 4 March 2021 (UTC)

Consensual review[edit]

File:Höchstadt-Schloss-Tür-20180501-RM-170536.jpg[edit]

  • Nomination Door to the courtyard of the castle in Höchstadt an der Aisch --Ermell 07:42, 1 March 2021 (UTC)
  • Promotion
  •  Support Good quality. --Aristeas 08:47, 1 March 2021 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Overexposed for me --MIGORMCZ 21:09, 1 March 2021 (UTC)
  •  Support IMO there is no large areas without details, so it is rather bright, but not overexposed. --LexKurochkin 06:15, 2 March 2021 (UTC)
  •  Support per others. -- Ikan Kekek 06:25, 2 March 2021 (UTC)
  •  Support per others.--Moroder 17:26, 2 March 2021 (UTC)
  •  Oppose per MIGORMCZ. Furthermore, the distorting wide-angle perspective is inappropriate. --Smial 10:42, 3 March 2021 (UTC)
    •  Comment I had some doubts about perspective and for rather long time looked at it both at full resolution and as a whole image, I am not sure that it is a perspective problem. The subject looks very old, damaged and possibly it was not ideally aligned from the very beginning of its long life. --LexKurochkin 14:22, 3 March 2021 (UTC)
  •  Support seems ok for QI Rhododendrites 04:12, 5 March 2021 (UTC)
Total: 5 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Promoted   --A.Savin 01:09, 7 March 2021 (UTC)

File:Viadukt_von_Chaumont.jpg[edit]

  • Nomination Viaduc de Chaumont, by Sadarama --Bobulous 16:50, 27 February 2021 (UTC)
  • Decline
  •  Oppose Sorry, but this looks overprocessed to me, especially in the green and dark areas. --PantheraLeo1359531 17:58, 27 February 2021 (UTC)
  •  Support There may be some areas of overprocessing, but overall, I think this is an awesome photo and a potential good FP, so it's worth a discussion and maybe some edits that would make it acceptable to PantheraLeo1359531. Would you like to try some, Bobulous? -- Ikan Kekek 02:28, 28 February 2021 (UTC)
  • @Sadarama: As this is your photo, could you please have a look at this discussion? Thank you, --Aristeas 09:15, 28 February 2021 (UTC)
  •  Comment Thanks, good catch. I had missed that this wasn't by Bobulous. -- Ikan Kekek 09:41, 28 February 2021 (UTC)
  •  Comment You are welcome. I spotted this only on a second glance, too ;–). --Aristeas 12:42, 28 February 2021 (UTC)
  •  Support I tend to criticize overprocessing, and I am quite sure, that technically this image is  Overprocessed, but in this particular case the processing created a kind of synthetic masterpiece of photography and digital art. I support it as it is and I would suggest @Sadarama: to make and upload new image with different file name, keeping this version as it is. Thank you! --LexKurochkin 11:07, 28 February 2021 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Too many unrealistic colors for me, sorry. --Sebring12Hrs (talk) 21:49, 28 February 2021 (UTC)
  •  Oppose It could possibly pass for art, but for a static architectural shot, the resolution is quite low, which combined with the massive over-sharpening and exaggerated tonemapping results in a massive pile of artifacts. Sorry, this is not a quality photo, but somehow something else entirely. --Smial 10:52, 3 March 2021 (UTC)
Total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 3 oppose → Declined   --A.Savin 01:08, 7 March 2021 (UTC)

File:Plantain_squirrel_eating.jpg[edit]

  • Nomination A plantain squirrel (Callosciurus notatus) eats while hanging upside-down on the bark of a tree. GerifalteDelSabana 16:56, 18 February 2021 (UTC)
  • Decline
  •  Oppose composiition, background, crop --Charlesjsharp 22:46, 22 February 2021 (UTC)
  • @Charlesjsharp: could you elaborate, please? Three vague words — properties of pictures — seem rather vacuous. GerifalteDelSabana 08:05, 23 February 2021 (UTC)
  •  Support I know Charles holds up very high standards and this is why I'm constantly trying to improve at animal shots. But back to topic: This a full resolution shot! However focus is a tiny bit of. The body is compositionally cut in half and the squirrel is slightly covered by the out-of-focus tree. On the other hand the composition almost focuses the viewer's attention on the head and cracking the nut. I guess stopping down the aperture would have helped with a bit more sharpness and especially depth of field. But introducing even more ISO noise. Did you already try to denoise a tiny bit e.g. with profiled-denoising? Despite these minor technical remarks, I think this photo is worthy of QI. --Etaped (talk) 11:41, 24 February 2021 (UTC)
  •  Oppose The background looks too noisy, the most of the body is not sharp enough. Sorry. On the other hand I do not see significant problems with crop and composition. --LexKurochkin 14:46, 24 February 2021 (UTC)
  •  Weak support I suggest denoising the background, but the general composition looks fine to me (compared to QI-standards). It's more clean and has a nicer bokeh than many other QI images of animals.Tesla - 💬 10:43, 25 February 2021 (UTC)
  •  Support per others. --Smial 11:17, 25 February 2021 (UTC)
  •  Support Sure, the background is distracting, but I think it's still a QI. Why? A lot of backgrounds with distracting bokeh balls and so forth pass, and the squirrel is sharp enough at its real size on my 13-inch monitor. -- Ikan Kekek 12:28, 25 February 2021 (UTC)
  •  Neutral Yes, the background is slightly noisy, but it is a very smooth and absolutely not distracting noise. Yes, the squirrel's body is out of focus, and the fur on its head is not 100% resolved at full resolution, but it is detailed enough to allow one to distinguish individual trees reflected in its eye. This image definitely has some inner values which simply require some maybe drastic measure. I thus humbly suggest cropping out both the background on the right and the out-of-focus bark on the left, and then whittling down even more to concentrate on head, paws, and whiskers, with half a bokeh circle remaining above its ear. As I really like such difficult-to-attain-in-the-wild squirrel images I tested a square crop. This makes a significant step towards quality image commendation and as such appeals nicely to me and surely also to others. Just try an image size of roughly 3000x3000 pixels and you and others will hopefully agree. -- Franz van Duns 22:12, 1 March 2021 (UTC)
  •  Oppose per LexKurochkin. --Fischer.H 08:43, 3 March 2021 (UTC)
  •  Weak oppose per LexKurochkin --Trougnouf 11:34, 4 March 2021 (UTC)
  •  Oppose per others. --Milseburg 22:20, 4 March 2021 (UTC)
Total: 4 support (excluding the nominator), 5 oppose → Declined   --A.Savin 01:07, 7 March 2021 (UTC)
Retrieved from "https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Commons:Quality_images_candidates/Archives_March_07_2021&oldid=871830107"