Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives June 27 2020

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Consensual review[edit]

File:Сад-сиренгарий_на_Щелковском_шоссе_33.jpg[edit]

  • Nomination Сирень обыкновенная. Сад-сиренгарий на Щелковском шоссе, Москва --Ulaisaeva 09:15, 22 June 2020 (UTC)
  • Decline
  •  Support Good quality.--Horst J. Meuter 09:41, 22 June 2020 (UTC)
  •  Oppose I disagree, too much noise, lack of details --Berthold Werner 12:31, 22 June 2020 (UTC)
  •  Oppose for now. Sharpness is marginal, but the plant should be identified in the description and a category for it should be added. -- Ikan Kekek 06:29, 23 June 2020 (UTC)
  • in all the photos this is Syringa vulgaris this type. I signed all the photos in the description in two languages. why talk about me like that! ? I just don't know how to do it! нет идентификатора, и после нескольких попыток очевидно, что автор / номинант не заботится об этом-Poco A Poco объясните по человечески для новичков что такое идентификатор, где его указывать? откуда я могу это все знать? explain in a human way for beginners what is an identifier, where to specify it? how can I know all this? --Ulaisaeva
  • Против нет идентификатора, и после нескольких попыток очевидно, что автор / номинант не заботится об этом-Poco A Poco 20: 43, 23 июня 2020 года (UTC) зачем так говорить обо мне! ? я просто не знаю как это сделать! why talk about me like that! ? I just don't know how to do it! --Ulaisaeva
  •  Support Thank you for adding the category and the information in the description. I think enough of the photo is sharp along with a pleasant composition for it to be a Quality Image. I don't know if I posted anything that offended you, but if I did, I'm sorry. -- Ikan Kekek 05:44, 24 June 2020 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Unsharp in the foreground --Uoaei1 06:19, 24 June 2020 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Per Uoaei1, the area in focus should have been the top of the plant, not the middle, still, thank you for the ID! Poco a poco 10:00, 24 June 2020 (UTC)
Total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 3 oppose → Declined   --Seven Pandas 18:58, 26 June 2020 (UTC)

File:Chiesa_Santa_Maria_del_Patrocinio_interno_Brescia.jpg[edit]

  • Nomination Santa Maria del Patrocinio church in Brescia. --Moroder 21:16, 19 June 2020 (UTC)
  • Decline
  • The bottom area is unsharp. Is that fixable? --Ermell 22:03, 19 June 2020 (UTC)
  •  Comment Physical law makes it impossible to have all objects of a 3D space in phocus--Moroder 03:48, 21 June 2020 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Bottome is unsharp from post processing. The difference cannot be that stark --Ermell 14:26, 22 June 2020 (UTC)
  • I disagree --Moroder 03:12, 23 June 2020 (UTC)
  •  Oppose per Ermell, considering how the lower left looks compared to most of the rest of the picture. -- Ikan Kekek 06:37, 23 June 2020 (UTC)
  •  Oppose (for now) There's a hard edge between sharp and blurry areas even within the same plane of focus. Seems to be a post processing problem. Hopefully fixable. --MB-one 09:50, 23 June 2020 (UTC)
Total: 0 support (excluding the nominator), 3 oppose → Declined   --Seven Pandas 18:57, 26 June 2020 (UTC)

File:Dance_drama_as_"Hindu_Devi".jpg[edit]

  • Nomination Dance drama as "Hindu Devi"--Tiven2240 07:06, 20 June 2020 (UTC)
  • Promotion
  •  Oppose A very special photo. Unfortunatyely the f-value is too low and that's why the fingers are too unsharp for me for QI --Michielverbeek 07:12, 20 June 2020 (UTC)
  •  Support I disagree. The low DoF is justified in this shot, beacuse the focus (in every sense) is on the face. --MB-one 19:53, 20 June 2020 (UTC)
  •  Support per MB-one --Kritzolina 10:40, 21 June 2020 (UTC)
  •  Support per MB-one. I thought there were too many categories, though, and there might still be too many. Also, I wish the description described a little more. -- Ikan Kekek 11:23, 21 June 2020 (UTC)
  •  Support per MB-one --Jakubhal 17:25, 21 June 2020 (UTC)
  •  Support -- Spurzem 18:15, 24 June 2020 (UTC)
Total: 5 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promoted   --Seven Pandas 18:57, 26 June 2020 (UTC)

File:Чуйский_хребет,.jpg[edit]

  • Nomination Chuysky range, Altai mountains, Russia, the formation of clouds --Александр Рудный 12:57, 18 June 2020 (UTC)
  • Decline
  •  Support Good quality. --GRDN711 13:34, 18 June 2020 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Lots of noise --Poco a poco 19:35, 18 June 2020 (UTC)
  •  Question @ Poco Is that an oppose or a comment?
  • Yes, and oppose indeed, otherwise I wouldn't have labeld it for discussion in this section --Poco a poco 11:50, 19 June 2020 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Some areas have noise, the others are extensively NR'ed. --A.Savin 12:49, 22 June 2020 (UTC)
  •  Oppose per A.Savin. Overprocessed. Was there excessive use of masks, filters, copying tools and brushes? --Smial 10:19, 24 June 2020 (UTC)
Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 3 oppose → Declined   --Seven Pandas 18:55, 26 June 2020 (UTC)