Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives June 20 2014

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Consensual review[edit]

File:Wasp_July_2013-3.jpg[edit]

  • Nomination Paper wasp (Polistes dominula) on a Oxeye Daisy (Leucanthemum vulgare). By User:Alvesgaspar --Graphium 06:39, 10 June 2014 (UTC)
  • Decline
  •  OpposeDoF too shallow --Cccefalon 09:02, 10 June 2014 (UTC)
  •  CommentI beg to differ @Cccefalon: . The shallow DoF is just right to make the bee stand out as the subject of the photo. The yellow centre of the flower also stands out as part of the subject since the bee is feeding on it. The petals are not as important and no need to stand out. Per the "Focus and depth of field" section in [1], I would like to request a second opinion. --Graphium 16:08, 10 June 2014 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Bad light and too many blurred areas. --Archaeodontosaurus 05:46, 11 June 2014 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Colors are blunt due to light. --Siipikarja 11:22, 11 June 2014 (UTC)
Total: 0 support (excluding the nominator), 3 oppose → Declined Joydeep 08:10, 19 June 2014 (UTC)

File:2014_Bielice,_kościół_08.JPG[edit]

  • Nomination Saint Vincent church in Bielice --Jacek Halicki 22:44, 7 June 2014 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Oppose Parts of the wall are overexposed and thus details washed away. Building appears to be tilted to the right. The image would benefit from perspective correction. --Siipikarja 08:02, 10 June 2014 (UTC)
  •  Support Not need perspective corrections, the walls are straight --Christian Ferrer 17:08, 11 June 2014 (UTC)
  •  Support QI. --P e z i 14:27, 13 June 2014 (UTC)
  •  Support QI. --Steinsplitter 13:00, 14 June 2014 (UTC)
Total: 3 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promoted Joydeep 08:10, 19 June 2014 (UTC)

File:2014_Bielice,_kościół_05.JPG[edit]

  • Nomination Saint Vincent church in Bielice --Jacek Halicki 22:44, 7 June 2014 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 10:45, 8 June 2014 (UTC)
     Oppose Unbalanced composition, the subject is too much on the left. Also, wall details are overexposed. Jacek Halicki, you might want to try to lock the white balance to a brighter spot of the picture when shooting and then frame the subject using the locked white balance before taking the actual photo. This way you will end up with slightly underexposed images, but it's much easier to fix underexposure than overexposure in post processing. --Siipikarja 08:18, 10 June 2014 (UTC)
  •  Support QI --Christian Ferrer 17:07, 11 June 2014 (UTC)
  •  Support ql --Steinsplitter 11:13, 13 June 2014 (UTC)
Total: 3 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promoted Joydeep 08:09, 19 June 2014 (UTC)