Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives June 18 2020

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Consensual review[edit]

File:Calotropis_Gigantea_Plant.jpg[edit]

  • Nomination Calotropis gigantea is a species of Calotropis native to Cambodia, Indonesia, Malaysia, the Philippines,Thailand, Sri Lanka, India, China, Pakistan, Nepal, Booc Booc in Somalia and tropical Africa.--ShahadatHossain 15:05, 14 June 2020 (UTC)
  • Decline
  •  Support Good quality. --Kritzolina 19:29, 14 June 2020 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Some halos, including on the flower buds. Camera shake? -- Ikan Kekek 02:59, 15 June 2020 (UTC)
    •  Comment Possibly a sharpening algorithm running amok or a HDR function (from two shots) that did not work properly. That's too bad, because the photo is otherwise very neat for a mobile phone picture. --Smial 11:39, 16 June 2020 (UTC)
  •  Oppose I see it too.--Peulle 08:05, 15 June 2020 (UTC)
Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Declined   --Peulle 10:57, 17 June 2020 (UTC)

File:Amur falcon at Tengragiri .jpg[edit]

  • Nomination Amur falcon (Falco amurensis). By User:Touhid biplob --RockyMasum 15:30, 12 June 2020 (UTC)
  • Promotion
  •  Support Good quality. --Zcebeci 17:01, 12 June 2020 (UTC)
  •  Oppose for now - good quality though small, but inadequate categorization, and the filename needs to be more informative. -- Ikan Kekek 21:49, 12 June 2020 (UTC)
  •  Comment Category added and renamed.--RockyMasum 15:15, 13 June 2020 (UTC)
  • I guess the renaming didn't take yet. -- Ikan Kekek 18:49, 13 June 2020 (UTC)
  • Sorry. Now renaming done.--RockyMasum 01:32, 14 June 2020 (UTC)
  •  Support Good quality. -- Ikan Kekek 02:32, 14 June 2020 (UTC)
  •  Support --Palauenc05 08:19, 15 June 2020 (UTC)
Total: 3 support (excluding the nominator), 0 oppose → Promoted   --Peulle 10:56, 17 June 2020 (UTC)

File:West_facade_of_the_Trier_cathedral.jpg[edit]

  • Nomination Trier cathedral in Trier, Rhineland-Palatinate, Germany. --Tournasol7 06:09, 12 June 2020 (UTC)
  • Decline
  •  Support Good quality. --George Chernilevsky 06:27, 12 June 2020 (UTC)
  •  OpposeSorry Krzysztof, I like your photographs but this (of my home town cathedral) is too distorted and perhaps overprocessed. --Berthold Werner 14:05, 12 June 2020 (UTC)
  •  Oppose per B.W.--Peulle 08:06, 15 June 2020 (UTC)
Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Declined   --Peulle 10:55, 17 June 2020 (UTC)

File:Svantewit,_Ribnitz-Damgarten_(P1060544).jpg[edit]

  • Nomination tour boat "Svantewit" on Saaler Bodden --MB-one 07:13, 31 May 2020 (UTC)
  • Promotion
  • Big dust spots --Poco a poco 09:08, 31 May 2020 (UTC)
  • Found one, can you mark the others? --MB-one 10:11, 31 May 2020 (UTC)
  • ✓ Done --Poco a poco 12:43, 31 May 2020 (UTC)
  • Will remove the big spot on the upper right. However the marked area actually shows exhaust fumes of the vessel, not dustspots. --MB-one 10:41, 2 June 2020 (UTC)
  • ok --Poco a poco 09:49, 4 June 2020 (UTC)
  • ✓ Done dustspot removed --MB-one 19:00, 4 June 2020 (UTC)*With the new crop now vignetting is visible --Poco a poco 18:26, 5 June 2020 (UTC)
  • Thanks for the hint. Reapplied crop to remove vignette --MB-one 11:18, 6 June 2020 (UTC)
  •  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 17:37, 10 June 2020 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Still a bad crop, too high contrast. 90 % of the photo is just sky and water. --Kallerna 07:21, 12 June 2020 (UTC)
  •  Support Good quality, can be cropped, but IMO that's no reason to oppose. --Palauenc05 16:48, 14 June 2020 (UTC)
Total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promoted   --Peulle 10:55, 17 June 2020 (UTC)