Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives June 12 2023

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Consensual review[edit]

File:Porsche_911_Carrera_Turbo_Nr._1_in_the_Porsche-Museum_(2009)_IMG_7421.jpg[edit]

  • Nomination Porsche 911 Carrera Turbo Nr. 1 in the Porsche-Museum.--Alexander-93 21:07, 4 June 2023 (UTC)
  • Promotion
  •  Oppose DoF insufficient - info on the floor is not legible. --Tagooty 01:23, 5 June 2023 (UTC)
  •  Support. Good image. I think we should not overdo. Please discuss. -- Spurzem 17:10, 5 June 2023 (UTC)
  •  Support I don't see any problem here, may be the perspective isn't very good, but still ok imo. --Sebring12Hrs (talk)
  •  Support I don't understand the problem. Unreadable inscription due to the view angle? This is too strict a requirement for QI. Good quality --Jakubhal 10:33, 7 June 2023 (UTC)
  •  Support per others, especially Jakubhal. -- Ikan Kekek 23:22, 7 June 2023 (UTC)
  •  Weak support As far as I understand, @Tagooty: attracted our attention to the fact that info on the floor might be copyrighted (the problem is well known for museums and exhibitions). But in this particular case it is out of focus and mostly unreadable. So, the two problems eliminate each other. --LexKurochkin 07:57, 8 June 2023 (UTC)
Total: 5 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promoted   --Robert Flogaus-Faust 11:14, 11 June 2023 (UTC)

File:VW_ID._Buzz_Cargo_(LRM_20230526_091359-RR).jpg[edit]

  • Nomination VW ID. Buzz Cargo --MB-one 07:52, 4 June 2023 (UTC)
  • Decline
  •  Support Good quality. --Vasmar1 08:58, 4 June 2023 (UTC)
  •  Oppose. Very unfortunate lighting and unfavorable perspektive. No QI for me. Please discuss. -- Spurzem 12:06, 4 June 2023 (UTC)
  •  Oppose With Spurzem. --Augustgeyler 07:58, 5 June 2023 (UTC)
  •  Support The light isn't perfect but the image is sharp. Good enough for QI.--Peulle 08:48, 5 June 2023 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Agree with Spurzem and additionally overexposed sky --Jakubhal 16:16, 5 June 2023 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Per others. --Sebring12Hrs 17:12, 5 June 2023 (UTC)
  •  Comment The white balance seems off. Is it? -- Ikan Kekek 07:17, 6 June 2023 (UTC)
  •  Comment Thanks for the reviews. Fixed the white balance. The sky isn't overexposed (no clipping anywhere).
  •  Comment Before, the white balance looked too blue. Now, it looks too brown. -- Ikan Kekek 23:33, 7 June 2023 (UTC)
Brown or yellow, that's difficult to say. And it is too dark especially in the areal of front wheel. -- Spurzem 11:15, 8 June 2023 (UTC)
  •  Comment Again, thank you for the constructive feedback. I re-adjusted the WB and raised the shadows in the dark areas. There's nothing I can do now about the perspective, but IMHO, that isn't a problem anyways. --MB-one 12:50, 8 June 2023 (UTC)
  •  Support per Peulle --Sandro Halank 11:38, 11 June 2023 (UTC)
Total: 3 support (excluding the nominator), 4 oppose → Declined   --Sandro Halank 11:38, 11 June 2023 (UTC)