Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives June 09 2021

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Consensual review[edit]

File:20190414_Γέφυρα_Αλικιανού_1598.jpg[edit]

  • Nomination The stone arch bridge of Alikianos, over Keritis, after its collapse. --C messier 20:41, 31 May 2021 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --George Chernilevsky 05:41, 1 June 2021 (UTC)
     Oppose Irrelevant photo name. --Remontees 22:01, 1 June 2021 (UTC)
  •  Support Good photo, and there's no rule against naming a photo in Greek. -- Ikan Kekek 06:41, 2 June 2021 (UTC)
  •  Support --Aristeas 10:44, 2 June 2021 (UTC)
  •  Support per Ikan.--Peulle 15:06, 2 June 2021 (UTC)
  •  Support -- PsamatheM 09:21, 3 June 2021 (UTC)
  •  Support --Commonists 09:59, 5 June 2021 (UTC)
  •  Support --Jakubhal 11:46, 5 June 2021 (UTC)
Total: 7 support (excluding the nominator), 0 oppose → Promoted   --Robert Flogaus-Faust 12:22, 8 June 2021 (UTC)

File:Saline_Bad_Dürkheim_IMG_9876jpg.jpg[edit]

  • Nomination Bad Dürkheim, Michaelskapelle auf dem Michelsberg (115m) und Gradierwerk (Saline), Rheinland-Pfalz, Deutschland. --Fischer.H 17:42, 31 May 2021 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Jonadrews 14:04, 1 June 2021 (UTC)
     Oppose Underexposed. --Remontees 22:52, 1 June 2021 (UTC)
     Support Good composition and quality. --Tagooty 15:38, 2 June 2021 (UTC)
     Support Good composition and quality. -- PsamatheM 09:23, 3 June 2021 (UTC)
     Support Good composition and quality. --Commonists 10:00, 5 June 2021 (UTC)
Total: 4 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promoted   --Peulle 13:45, 8 June 2021 (UTC)

File:Put_van_Nederhorst_in_de_mist._28-02-2021._(d.j.b)_24.jpg[edit]

  • Nomination Put van Nederhorst in the fog. 2 birches on a lying birch trunk in the mist.
    --Famberhorst 06:19, 31 May 2021 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 06:21, 31 May 2021 (UTC)
     Oppose Branches to the right of the tree on the right appear to be cut off. --Remontees 22:51, 1 June 2021 (UTC)
  •  Support OK for me. This is probably the kind of motif in which some branches had to be cut off somewhere. -- Ikan Kekek 06:50, 2 June 2021 (UTC)
  •  Support A little bit noisy, but OK for QI. --XRay 08:14, 2 June 2021 (UTC)
  •  Support Per others -- Johann Jaritz 04:41, 4 June 2021 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Not QI for me. Appreciate the image idea but feel it does not illustrate the topic well. Foreground lacks detail. unsigned vote removed --XRay 17:28, 4 June 2021 (UTC)
  •  Support --Commonists 09:56, 5 June 2021 (UTC)
Total: 5 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promoted   --Peulle 13:45, 8 June 2021 (UTC)

File:Saint_Roch_church_in_Bladzim_05.jpg[edit]

  • Nomination Saint Roch church in Bladzim, Kuyavian-Pomeranian Voivodeship, Poland. --Tournasol7 05:39, 31 May 2021 (UTC)
  • Promotion
  •  Support Good quality. --Ermell 06:20, 31 May 2021 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Bad exposition and composition. --Remontees 22:08, 1 June 2021 (UTC)
  •  Support OK for QI. --XRay 08:16, 2 June 2021 (UTC)
  •  Support Fine for QI. If it were me I'd probably up the vibrance a bit (but without seeing the effects difficult to know if it would actually improve anything) --PsamatheM 09:29, 3 June 2021 (UTC)
  •  Support Remontees Ermell est l'un des meilleurs photographes ici, et vous le traitez comme un photographe du dimanche ? Incroyable. --Commonists 09:58, 5 June 2021 (UTC)
Total: 4 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promoted   --Peulle 13:44, 8 June 2021 (UTC)

File:Pfinztaler_Skulpturenweg_-_Grenzen_-_Rotraud_Hofmann.jpg[edit]

  • Nomination "Borders" by Rotraud Hofmann, turkish travertine; Pfinztal Sculpture Path, Pfinztal --Llez 04:17, 31 May 2021 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support Good quality.
     Oppose Poor exposure --Remontees 22:08, 1 June 2021 (UTC)
  •  Support Straightforwardly good quality, good representation of the subject. -- Ikan Kekek 06:53, 2 June 2021 (UTC)
  •  Support IMO good for QI. --XRay 08:17, 2 June 2021 (UTC)
  •  Support Good Quality --PsamatheM 09:30, 3 June 2021 (UTC)
  •  Support Per others -- Johann Jaritz 04:42, 4 June 2021 (UTC)
  •  Support --Commonists 10:00, 5 June 2021 (UTC)
Total: 6 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promoted   --Peulle 13:44, 8 June 2021 (UTC)

File:Gurk_Pisweg_Pfarrkirche_hl._Lambert_Schiff_26052021_1056.jpg[edit]

  • Nomination Nave of the parish church Saint Lambert in Pisweg, Gurk, Carinthia, Austria -- Johann Jaritz 02:46, 31 May 2021 (UTC)
  • Promotion
  •  Support Good quality. --XRay 03:15, 31 May 2021 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Poor composition. --Remontees 22:22, 1 June 2021 (UTC)
  •  Comment To focus on the nave, you might consider a square format cropping out the half clock on the tower. --Tagooty 15:44, 2 June 2021 (UTC)
  • ✓ Done @Tagooty: Thanks for your suggestion. I cropped the major part of the belltower out. —- Johann Jaritz 04:56, 4 June 2021 (UTC)
  •  Support Good quality. --Tagooty 14:10, 4 June 2021 (UTC)
  •  Support Good quality. --Knopik-som 05:49, 5 June 2021 (UTC)
  •  Support Good quality. --Commonists 10:01, 5 June 2021 (UTC)
  •  Support No problem here. -- Ikan Kekek 21:20, 5 June 2021 (UTC)
Total: 5 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promoted   --Peulle 13:43, 8 June 2021 (UTC)

File:Φορτέτσα_Ρεθύμνου_6520.jpg[edit]

  • Nomination Night view of Fortezza castle, Crete. --C messier 18:44, 30 May 2021 (UTC)
  • Promotion
  •  Support Dark but not too dark in my opinion and good quality. -- Ikan Kekek 20:47, 30 May 2021 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Too dark for me + irrelevant name. --Remontees 22:30, 1 June 2021 (UTC)
  •  Question "Fortezza Rethymnou" is an irrelevant name to you? -- Ikan Kekek 06:39, 2 June 2021 (UTC)
  •  Support Good night shot. --XRay 08:19, 2 June 2021 (UTC)
  •  Support At night it is usually dark, at least in Crete, but not only there. --Aristeas 10:35, 2 June 2021 (UTC)
  •  Support Good Quality --PsamatheM 09:33, 3 June 2021 (UTC)
  •  Support --Commonists 10:01, 5 June 2021 (UTC)
Total: 5 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promoted   --Peulle 13:43, 8 June 2021 (UTC)

File:Palazzo_della_Pantanella_in_Rome.jpg[edit]

  • Nomination Palazzo della Pantanella in Rome, Lazio, Italy. (By Krzysztof Golik) --Sebring12Hrs 09:03, 27 May 2021 (UTC)
  • Promotion
  •  Support Good quality. --F. Riedelio 07:09, 30 May 2021 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Poor exposure+a little bit tilted. --Remontees 22:14, 1 June 2021 (UTC)
  •  Support IMO OK. --XRay 08:26, 2 June 2021 (UTC)
  •  Support OK IMHO. --Aristeas 10:39, 2 June 2021 (UTC)
  •  Support Per Aristeas -- Johann Jaritz 06:27, 4 June 2021 (UTC)
  •  Support --Commonists 10:02, 5 June 2021 (UTC)
Total: 5 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promoted   --Peulle 13:42, 8 June 2021 (UTC)

File:Blick_auf_Stege_und_Gastwirtschaft_Untreusee_Hof_20210510_DSC09298.jpg[edit]

  • Nomination View of an inn and footbridges at lake Untreu, Hof, Germany. --PantheraLeo1359531 15:19, 26 May 2021 (UTC)
  • Promotion
  •  Support Good quality. --Moroder 03:09, 31 May 2021 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Underexposed. --Remontees 22:23, 1 June 2021 (UTC)
  •  Support Looks good to me. Whether it's underexposed probably depends on where other clouds may be in the sky, but I'll just judge what I'm looking at. -- Ikan Kekek 06:59, 2 June 2021 (UTC)
  •  Support IMO OK. --XRay 08:28, 2 June 2021 (UTC)
  •  Oppose per Remontees. Branches are also distracting from subject. --GRDN711 10:34, 4 June 2021 (UTC)
  •  Support --Commonists 10:02, 5 June 2021 (UTC)
Total: 4 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Promoted   --Peulle 13:40, 8 June 2021 (UTC)

File:Batalha_BW_2018-10-05_16-20-44.jpg[edit]

  • Nomination Portugal, Mosteiro da Batalha --Berthold Werner 12:50, 22 May 2021 (UTC)
  • Promotion
  •  Support Good quality. --Palauenc05 15:08, 22 May 2021 (UTC)
  •  Oppose I think this picture needs some cropping at the bottom --Imehling 15:11, 24 May 2021 (UTC)
  •  Weak support I agree that some cropping would be good, but the image is good enough. --Robert Flogaus-Faust 20:21, 2 June 2021 (UTC)
  •  Support--Commonists 10:03, 5 June 2021 (UTC)
Total: 3 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promoted   --Peulle 13:40, 8 June 2021 (UTC)