Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives June 03 2015

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Consensual review[edit]

File:Münster,_Hafen,_Verkehrsschild_--_2015_--_5906.jpg[edit]

  • Nomination Road sign in the port, Münster, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany --XRay 03:42, 23 May 2015 (UTC)
  • Promotion
  •  Support Barely QI: composition and light --Moroder 12:11, 28 May 2015 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Sorry but this is not QI. Chaos composition, overexposed upper left corner and underexposed rest of image --PetrVod 08:30, 29 May 2015 (UTC)
    • ✓ Fixed Thanks. IMO it's better now, but is it good enough?--XRay 11:04, 29 May 2015 (UTC)
  •  Support Of course the upper left corner is too bright but composition, colors and sharpness make it QI for me. -- Spurzem 18:48, 31 May 2015 (UTC)
Total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promoted   --Hubertl 11:03, 2 June 2015 (UTC)

File:Bolshoy_Zelenchuk_river.jpg[edit]

  • Nomination Bolshoy Zelenchuk at fall --Nino Verde 16:55, 25 May 2015 (UTC)
  • Promotion
  •  Comment The water at the bottom left looks like a pastel painting. Can you fix it? --C messier 17:03, 25 May 2015 (UTC)
    •  Comment It is motion blurred and sharpened. I can try, but it will become less artistic from my point of view --Nino Verde 17:21, 25 May 2015 (UTC)
      •  CommentIs it better now?--Nino Verde 17:48, 25 May 2015 (UTC)
  •  Support OK. --C messier 18:05, 25 May 2015 (UTC) Neutral Because in the current version has been raised the tone mapping and looks a bit like the dramatic tone filter from Olympus. --C messier 08:51, 26 May 2015 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Overprocessed IMO. Looks unnatural, please discuss.--Jebulon 19:44, 25 May 2015 (UTC)
    •  Comment What exact is unnatural from your point of view? --Nino Verde 05:53, 26 May 2015 (UTC)
  •  Comment The sky looks darker than the water reflecting it. -- Smial 12:07, 27 May 2015 (UTC)
  •  Support good image --Christian Ferrer 11:18, 26 May 2015 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Overprocessed. -- Smial 12:05, 27 May 2015 (UTC)
  •  Support A very good composition. The quality is much better than the first version for me. --Hockei 19:42, 28 May 2015 (UTC)
  •  Support A bit unnatural but very beautiful. -- Spurzem 18:59, 31 May 2015 (UTC)
Total: 3 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Promoted   --Hubertl 11:04, 2 June 2015 (UTC)