Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives June 02 2015

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Consensual review[edit]

File:Friedhofsmauer (Eppishausen) 02.JPG[edit]

  • Nomination Figure of Saint Michael in the cemetery wall and tower, Eppishausen, Landkreis Unterallgäu, Bavaria --Mogadir 06:06, 18 May 2015 (UTC)
  • Promotion
  •  Support OK, IMHO, given the angle of the camera. Maybe a bit more space needed to the right. --C messier 08:25, 25 May 2015 (UTC)
  • {o} Sorry, composition issue. Distortion could be acceptable, but it needs to be centered. By the way, what about the identification of the CoA ?--Jebulon 19:43, 26 May 2015 (UTC)
  •  Comment I centered the picture now. --Mogadir 04:57, 1 June 2015 (UTC)
  • OK, thanks. Better.--Jebulon 20:20, 1 June 2015 (UTC)
  •  Support QI for me. Good sharpness, good colors, appealing photographed. -- Spurzem 18:56, 31 May 2015 (UTC)
Total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 0 oppose → Promoted   --Hubertl 03:57, 2 June 2015 (UTC)

File:Solenoe_aerial.jpg[edit]

  • Nomination Вид с горы Куцай на Соленое озеро, Петровский район --Nino Verde 15:02, 25 May 2015 (UTC)
  • Promotion
  •  Support Wow! Good quality.--Johann Jaritz 16:01, 25 May 2015 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Horizon distorded. Dustspot in the top left part of the sky. To be corrected before promotion, please.--Jebulon 19:52, 25 May 2015 (UTC)
    •  Comment Ok, about dust point. Missed it. Do not understand what is wronmg with horizon, it should not be plain in case there are hills. --Nino Verde 05:54, 26 May 2015 (UTC)
  •  Comment distorion, if there is, is acceptable as there is no buildings here, however it seems tilted on left --Christian Ferrer 11:13, 26 May 2015 (UTC)
    •  Comment You can check trees, they are mostly vertical. I think, that tilt efect come from ground which is not flat. --Nino Verde 14:13, 26 May 2015 (UTC)
  •  Support Perhaps somewhat oversaturated, but all in all acceptable. -- Smial 12:02, 27 May 2015 (UTC)
  •  Support For me it is quite good. --Hockei 19:31, 28 May 2015 (UTC)
  •  Support Good quality. --PIERRE ANDRE LECLERCQ 14:39, 29 May 2015 (UTC)
Total: 4 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promoted   --Hubertl 03:58, 2 June 2015 (UTC)

File:Francois_Hollande_Carcassonne-1089.jpg[edit]

  • Nomination The President of the French Republic François Hollande, May 19, 2015 in Carcassonne. Aude - Languedoc Roussillon --Pablo029 14:59, 24 May 2015 (UTC)
  •  CommentVignetting very sharp in the right corner.--PIERRE ANDRE LECLERCQ 15:31, 24 May 2015 (UTC)
  • Decline
  •  Support QI imo. Vignetting not only caused by lens, also caused by uneven stage light. --Kadellar 14:41, 25 May 2015 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Not sharp enough IMO. A discussion is needed, please.--Jebulon 19:30, 25 May 2015 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Noisy background. If you clean noise - i'll support it. --Nino Verde 09:29, 27 May 2015 (UTC)
  •  Oppose I'm curious about colours. The face, but also the glasses, the eyes and the hair have a reddish tint, but the clothes and all other areas in that image do have not. Overprocessed, appears like hand-coloured. -- Smial 11:52, 27 May 2015 (UTC)
  •  Support Perfectly sharp if scaled down to a reasonable resolution for viewing. --King of Hearts 01:52, 28 May 2015 (UTC)
  •  Support From my point of wiev QI. Sharpness is sufficient and noise is low. --PetrVod 08:19, 29 May 2015 (UTC)
  •  Oppose The right side (of the picture) is very disturbing. --PIERRE ANDRE LECLERCQ 14:35, 29 May 2015 (UTC)
  •  Question IMO, the centered composition is a bit boring. Try a serious crop at right, you will see it looks better balanced with the flags at left. I should support if done.--Jebulon 19:56, 30 May 2015 (UTC)
Total: 3 support (excluding the nominator), 4 oppose → Declined   --Hubertl 04:00, 2 June 2015 (UTC)