Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives July 29 2022

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Consensual review

[edit]

File:Lampadaire_au_bord_du_lac_à_Genève.jpg

[edit]

  • Nomination Lampadaire au bord du lac à Genève --Wikibusters 14:42, 22 July 2022 (UTC)
  • Decline
  •  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 18:41, 22 July 2022 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Livio/Commonists --A.Savin 13:19, 23 July 2022 (UTC)
    •  Question What does it mean? I know livio only as a brand for salad oil. --Smial 09:20, 25 July 2022 (UTC)
      • Sorry. To be clear, the account "Wikibusters" is a sock of global locked Commonists, which is closely related to global locked Livioandronico2013. The nominations by the both are not welcome. Regards --A.Savin 11:17, 25 July 2022 (UTC)
  •  Support I think that investigation will yield its own results. We may not see more submissions from this user but it is irrelevant to the quality of this image which is good enough imo.  Oppose Actually it's leaning. --Trougnouf 13:18, 25 July 2022 (UTC)
  •  Oppose per above. -- Ikan Kekek 03:10, 26 July 2022 (UTC)
Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 3 oppose → Declined   --A.Savin 09:48, 28 July 2022 (UTC)

File:Hélicoptère_de_la_Gendarmerie_(Xonrupt-Longemer)_(3).jpg

[edit]

  • Nomination Gendarmerie helicopter in Xonrupt-Longemer (Vosges, France). --Gzen92 12:53, 19 July 2022 (UTC)
  • Promotion
  • Why is there a blurred tree behind the helicopter? --Romainbehar 18:12, 19 July 2022 (UTC)
  •  Support Looks like hot air and fumes from the exhaust outlet. QI for me --Jakubhal 18:54, 19 July 2022 (UTC)
  •  Support per Jakubhal. -- Ikan Kekek 03:27, 20 July 2022 (UTC)
  •  Support per Jakubhal. -- Smial 10:45, 20 July 2022 (UTC)
Hello Jakubhal, at first I thought about exhaust fumes too. But the helicopter's exhaust is much higher and I can't imagine hot air falling straight down. For me, the blur is inexplicable. Best regards -- Spurzem 14:34, 20 July 2022 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Per Spurzem. --Sebring12Hrs 14:44, 20 July 2022 (UTC)
    •  Comment Der Rotor bläst das anscheinend mit Macht nach unten. --Smial 15:03, 20 July 2022 (UTC)
  •  Support per Jakubhal. --MB-one 16:53, 20 July 2022 (UTC)
@Smial: Ich kann es mir nicht vorstellen, dass der Rotor die Abgase so gebündelt senkrecht nach unten treibt. Zumindest bei dem Eurocopter] werden sie waagerecht nach hinten rausgeblasen, was auch an der Verschmutzung zu sehen ist. Wir werden wahrscheinlich nicht herausfinden, woher die unscharfe Stelle im zu bewertenden Bild kommt. Viele Grüße -- Spurzem 18:36, 20 July 2022 (UTC)
hier https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ai72vtvJcCw bei 2:24 oder auch hier: https://media04.meinbezirk.at/article/2017/05/18/2/10377702_L.jpg ganz gut zu sehen -- Smial 23:07, 20 July 2022 (UTC)
  •  Support I assume it's all because of the downdraft caused by the rotor blades, where the hot air is forced downwards. It has to be. The only way to sharpen the tree again is to shut down the engine. A QI for me.--Ximonic 11:58, 21 July 2022 (UTC)
 Comment Hello @Romainbehar, Jakubhal, Ikan Kekek, Smial, Spurzem, Sebring12Hrs, MB-one, and Ximonic: I made a video of the helicopter landing (File:Hélicoptère de la Gendarmerie (Xonrupt-Longemer).ogg), then photos at vertical take-off. It is not the gases that go down but the helicopter that goes up. Gzen92 [discuter] 12:32, 22 July 2022 (UTC)
  • Good video. You can even see that the gas would probably try to go a little upwards too, but it can't get far up because of the strong drafts. (There is some blur even above the exhaust pipe.) So it mostly goes down, or slightly backwards, depending the movement. In anycase, it's a natural phenomenon, and not a photography related blur in anyway. --Ximonic 13:06, 22 July 2022 (UTC)
  •  Support Looks good to me. Thanks. Mike Peel 18:11, 23 July 2022 (UTC)
  •  Support There is something white near the bottom of the frame that is inconsequential but does detract from the helicopter. The image would be imrproved if this white spot disappeared. --GRDN711 13:22, 25 July 2022 (UTC)
Total: 7 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promoted   --A.Savin 09:47, 28 July 2022 (UTC)