Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives July 28 2021

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Consensual review[edit]

File:Église_Saint-Maurice_(Ebersmunster)_(4).jpg[edit]

  • Nomination Saint-Maurice Church in Ebersmunster (Bas-Rhin, France). --Gzen92 08:41, 21 July 2021 (UTC)
  • Decline
     Oppose Best version has been promoted, see File:Église Saint-Maurice (Ebersmunster) (3).jpg. This one's inferior to the promoted ones. --Hillopo2018 08:50, 21 July 2021 (UTC)
    I believe that we can name similar photos. Gzen92 12:20, 22 July 2021 (UTC)
  •  Comment Yeah, QIC isn't about which photo in a category is best; that's relevant to VIC. However, the sky is too noisy. Can you fix that problem? If not, I will oppose. -- Ikan Kekek 05:44, 23 July 2021 (UTC)
✓ Done Noise ok, I think it's better. Gzen92 15:01, 23 July 2021 (UTC)
Total: 0 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Declined   --Robert Flogaus-Faust 18:11, 27 July 2021 (UTC)

File:Église_Saint-Maurice_(Ebersmunster)_(6).jpg[edit]

  • Nomination Saint-Maurice Church in Ebersmunster (Bas-Rhin, France). --Gzen92 08:41, 21 July 2021 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Oppose Best version has been promoted, see File:Église Saint-Maurice (Ebersmunster) (3).jpg. This one's inferior to the promoted ones. --Hillopo2018 08:50, 21 July 2021 (UTC)
    I believe that we can name similar photos. Gzen92 12:20, 22 July 2021 (UTC)
  •  Comment Noisy sky like the others. -- Ikan Kekek 05:47, 23 July 2021 (UTC)
  •  Oppose IMO not sharp enough, especially the onion roofs. --F. Riedelio 16:02, 23 July 2021 (UTC)--F. Riedelio 15:58, 23 July 2021 (UTC)
✓ Done Noise ok, I think it's better. Gzen92 15:01, 23 July 2021 (UTC)
Total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promoted   --Robert Flogaus-Faust 18:10, 27 July 2021 (UTC)

File:Hausrotschwanz_IMG_4802.jpg[edit]

  • Nomination Hungriger Hausrotschwanz - Nachwuchs. --Fischer.H 08:57, 17 July 2021 (UTC)
  • Promotion sorry. The grass in the foreground stands out. --MaedaAkihiko 09:50, 21 July 2021 (UTC)
     Oppose Per above. --Nefronus 19:12, 22 July 2021 (UTC)
  •  Support Distracting foreground but good picture of the baby birds. -- Ikan Kekek 05:49, 23 July 2021 (UTC)
  •  Comment Should you be so close to the nest? Charlesjsharp 16:03, 23 July 2021 (UTC)
  •  Comment Some sense of location is usually helpful for images of bird species. If not GPS coordinates, can you add some further locaton information to the description? --GRDN711 22:34, 23 July 2021 (UTC)
  •  Support Good quality. --Steindy 00:25, 24 July 2021 (UTC)
  • ✓ Done --Fischer.H 15:18, 24 July 2021 (UTC)
  •  Support --GRDN711 21:47, 24 July 2021 (UTC)
Total: 3 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promoted   --Robert Flogaus-Faust 18:22, 27 July 2021 (UTC)

File:F-16_Demo_NAS_Ft_Worth_Air_Show_2016-1.jpg[edit]

  • Nomination A US Air Force F-16 Fighting Falcon taking off at NAS Ft Worth Air Show in 2016. --Balon Greyjoy 07:23, 15 July 2021 (UTC)
  • Decline
     Support Good quality. --Fernando.tassone 09:42, 15 July 2021 (UTC)
    Please remove the dust spots. --Nefronus 10:03, 15 July 2021 (UTC)
     Oppose Main parts are too dark; unfavourable exposure --Hillopo2018 08:12, 20 July 2021 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Not sharp enough. -- Ikan Kekek 09:10, 21 July 2021 (UTC)
  •  Oppose by Ikan Kekek --Robert Flogaus-Faust (talk) 17:51, 24 July 2021 (UTC)
  •  Comment I removed the vote by User:Hillopo2018 because this new user is not allowed to vote yet. --Robert Flogaus-Faust 14:35, 26 July 2021 (UTC)
Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Declined   --Robert Flogaus-Faust 18:04, 27 July 2021 (UTC)