Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives July 24 2022

• 
  • Nomination Muiden, Detail of Barracks Muiden. National monument. Northwest West side.
    --Agnes Monkelbaan 04:26, 22 July 2022 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --XRay 04:31, 22 July 2022 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Scheersluis in Kamperveen. Lock complex in the Reevediep. (sound system.)
    --Agnes Monkelbaan 04:26, 22 July 2022 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --XRay 04:31, 22 July 2022 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Saint Bartholomew church in Pegnitz, Bavaria, Germany. --Tournasol7 04:09, 22 July 2022 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:23, 22 July 2022 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Residenz in Ansbach, Bavaria, Germany. --Tournasol7 04:09, 22 July 2022 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --XRay 04:31, 22 July 2022 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Schaitbergerstraße 14 in Ansbach, Bavaria, Germany. --Tournasol7 04:09, 22 July 2022 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:22, 22 July 2022 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Capital in the Predigerkirche in Rottweil, Baden-W., Germany. --Tournasol7 04:09, 22 July 2022 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --XRay 04:31, 22 July 2022 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Schwarzes Tor in Rottweil, Baden-Württemberg, Germany. --Tournasol7 04:09, 22 July 2022 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:21, 22 July 2022 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Space Needle (north view) in Seattle, Washington, USA --XRay 03:47, 22 July 2022 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:19, 22 July 2022 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Grand Prismatic Spring, Yellowstone National Park, Wyoming, USA --XRay 03:47, 22 July 2022 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 04:11, 22 July 2022 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Skyscrapers seen from the waterfront, Seattle, Washington, USA --XRay 03:47, 22 July 2022 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 04:11, 22 July 2022 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Lamp on a house on Pike Street in Seattle, Washington, USA --XRay 03:47, 22 July 2022 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:37, 22 July 2022 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Lower Geyser Basin in the Yellowstone National Park, Wyoming, USA --XRay 03:47, 22 July 2022 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 04:11, 22 July 2022 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Residential building on Heinrich-von-Türlin-Straße #2 in Lind, Villach, Carinthia, Austria -- Johann Jaritz 02:18, 22 July 2022 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --XRay 03:48, 22 July 2022 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Window at the villa on Genotteallee #18 in Lind, Villach, Carinthia, Austria -- Johann Jaritz 02:18, 22 July 2022 (UTC)
  • Promotion
    Verticals and horizontals should be adjusted. Or is it real? --XRay 03:49, 22 July 2022 (UTC)
     Done @XRay: Thanks for your review. Horizontals and verticals were actualized. —- Johann Jaritz 04:45, 22 July 2022 (UTC)
     Support Good quality. --XRay 04:52, 22 July 2022 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Avant-corps of the residential building on Heinrich-von-Türlin-Straße #3b in Lind, Villach, Carinthia, Austria -- Johann Jaritz 02:18, 22 July 2022 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --XRay 03:48, 22 July 2022 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Villa on Heinrich-von-Türlin-Straße #5 in Lind, Villach, Carinthia, Austria -- Johann Jaritz 02:18, 22 July 2022 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --XRay 03:52, 22 July 2022 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Residential building on Kasmanhuberstraße #6 in Lind, Villach, Carinthia, Austria -- Johann Jaritz 02:18, 22 July 2022 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --XRay 03:52, 22 July 2022 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination High Point High School sign and building, Beltsville, MD --Lorax 01:33, 22 July 2022 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --XRay 03:52, 22 July 2022 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Brown argus (Aricia agestis) male --Charlesjsharp 18:06, 21 July 2022 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support Good quality. --IamMM 18:18, 21 July 2022 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Large skipper (Ochlodes sylvanus) male --Charlesjsharp 16:56, 21 July 2022 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 17:07, 21 July 2022 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Marbled fritillary (Brenthis daphne) --Charlesjsharp 16:56, 21 July 2022 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 17:07, 21 July 2022 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Large wall brown (Lasiommata maera) --Charlesjsharp 16:56, 21 July 2022 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 17:07, 21 July 2022 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Cirrus SR-22 on static display preview, EBACE 2018 --MB-one 16:28, 21 July 2022 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality --Michielverbeek 17:04, 21 July 2022 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Coral (Pocillopora verrucosa), Ras Muhammad National Park, Egypt --Poco a poco 15:44, 21 July 2022 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --MB-one 16:28, 21 July 2022 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Coral (Favia favus), Ras Muhammad National Park, Egypt --Poco a poco 15:44, 21 July 2022 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. -- Ikan Kekek 17:22, 21 July 2022 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Coral (Dipsastraea favus), Ras Muhammad National Park, Egypt --Poco a poco 15:44, 21 July 2022 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. -- Ikan Kekek 17:18, 21 July 2022 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Coral (Sarcophyton glaucum), Ras Muhammad National Park, Egypt --Poco a poco 15:44, 21 July 2022 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. -- Ikan Kekek 17:15, 21 July 2022 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Coral (Acropora hyacinthus), Ras Muhammad National Park, Egypt --Poco a poco 15:44, 21 July 2022 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support Good quality. --IamMM 18:18, 21 July 2022 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination The Lausenhof in Hof, Germany. --PantheraLeo1359531 13:23, 21 July 2022 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 16:02, 21 July 2022 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Torre-Presó, the former prison tower in Ullastret, Catalonia, Spain - the door --Kritzolina 11:15, 21 July 2022 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Prburley 14:05, 21 July 2022 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Stacked chairs for a restaurant in a street near the church of Palamós, Catalonia, Spain --Kritzolina 11:15, 21 July 2022 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 15:46, 21 July 2022 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination The Vaudricourt windmill, in the Musée de Plein Air, in Villeneuve d'Ascq, France --Velvet 10:43, 21 July 2022 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 15:45, 21 July 2022 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Natural monument Lederer Haufen, Danube, Mitterkirchen/Austria --Hans Koberger 07:31, 21 July 2022 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 15:46, 21 July 2022 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Natural monument Lederer Haufen, Danube, Mitterkirchen/Austria --Hans Koberger 07:31, 21 July 2022 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 15:51, 21 July 2022 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Road from Dürrbrunn to Kalteneggolsfeld --Ermell 07:30, 21 July 2022 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 15:51, 21 July 2022 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Aerial view of Kalteneggolsfeld --Ermell 07:30, 21 July 2022 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 09:39, 21 July 2022 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Aerial view of Kalteneggolsfeld --Ermell 07:30, 21 July 2022 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 15:51, 21 July 2022 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Aerial view of Engelhardsberg --Ermell 07:30, 21 July 2022 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 09:38, 21 July 2022 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination St. George's Catholic Chapel in Oberngrub --Ermell 07:30, 21 July 2022 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 09:36, 21 July 2022 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Hen and juveniles at the AGF farm in Rhinau (Bas-Rhin, France). --Gzen92 07:25, 21 July 2022 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 15:51, 21 July 2022 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Seed pods of a Rhinanthus. Focus stack of 39 photos.
    --Famberhorst 06:12, 21 July 2022 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Ermell 06:16, 21 July 2022 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Flower bud of a Heracleum (plant). Focus stack of 18 photos.
    --Famberhorst 06:12, 21 July 2022 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Ermell 06:16, 21 July 2022 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Left valve of a Blue mussel, Mytilus edulis --Llez 05:14, 21 July 2022 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 05:35, 21 July 2022 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Wooden sculpture of an eagle at the forest playground Forst, Germany --Llez 05:14, 21 July 2022 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality -- Spurzem 05:23, 21 July 2022 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination White storks, Animal and bird park Forst, Germany --Llez 05:14, 21 July 2022 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality -- Spurzem 05:21, 21 July 2022 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination White storks, Animal and bird park Forst, Germany --Llez 05:14, 21 July 2022 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality -- Spurzem 05:22, 21 July 2022 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Cockatiels, Animal and bird park Forst, Germany --Llez 05:14, 21 July 2022 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 05:34, 21 July 2022 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Harbour Centre in Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada --XRay 03:11, 21 July 2022 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Terragio67 04:08, 21 July 2022 (UTC)
     Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 04:10, 21 July 2022 (UTC)
     Question Wouldn't people usually ask for perspective correction for a photo that looks like this? If not, why not? I ask purely to understand more and don't plan on voting against this nomination. -- Ikan Kekek 05:01, 21 July 2022 (UTC)
    Reply:
    Hello Ikan, IMO it is convenient to adopt the three-point perspective for buildings such as towers, skyscrapers or similar, (especially when they are rounded) when viewed from low eye level. The evaluation of this perspective is not easy, because it is necessary to verify the position of three vanishing points positioned quite far from the main view. Maybe we can discuss it, although I double-checked the XRay's image and it looks great to me. --Terragio67 08:28, 21 July 2022 (UTC)
    @Ikan Kekek: The answer of Terragio67 actually says it all. A shot from this point of view would be completely distorted and unsightly with verticals. It would no longer look natural. Especially with the high houses and the shooting position, such a perspective looks more natural. For perpendiculars, you need more distance, which is often not possible, especially in cities. --XRay 13:47, 21 July 2022 (UTC)
    An addendum: Please see Three-point perspective --XRay 14:02, 21 July 2022 (UTC)
    Thanks, guys. I appreciate your explanations. -- Ikan Kekek 18:20, 21 July 2022 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination View of a swimming pool in hot springs of Federacion, Entre Ríos Province, Argentina --Ezarate 20:37, 20 July 2022 (UTC)
  • Promotion
    Are you sure it's a en:Hot spring? --Trougnouf
    Yes, I give you references in your talkpage --Ezarate 23:18, 20 July 2022 (UTC) 22:30, 20 July 2022 (UTC)
     Support Neat, thank you. Good quality. --Trougnouf 08:22, 21 July 2022 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Cow standing on a field in Chastre, Belgium --Trougnouf 19:51, 20 July 2022 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 16:05, 21 July 2022 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Mow Cop Castle --Mike Peel 19:27, 20 July 2022 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 16:05, 21 July 2022 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Bath white (Pontia edusa) --Charlesjsharp 16:46, 20 July 2022 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality --Llez 05:17, 21 July 2022 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Black-veined white (Aporia crataegi) --Charlesjsharp 16:46, 20 July 2022 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality --Llez 05:17, 21 July 2022 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Common brimsone (Gonepteryx rhamni) female --Charlesjsharp 16:46, 20 July 2022 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality --Llez 05:17, 21 July 2022 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Clouded apollo (Parnassius mnemosyne) --Charlesjsharp 16:46, 20 July 2022 (UTC)
  • Decline
     Oppose Eyes are not sharp. Sorry. --Ermell 20:35, 21 July 2022 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Mary Baker Eddy monument in Mount Auburn Cemetery --Rhododendrites 15:04, 20 July 2022 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 16:21, 21 July 2022 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Cylinder of a tuned BMW R69 S racing motorcycle with an open velocity stack. --Palauenc05 15:07, 20 July 2022 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 16:21, 21 July 2022 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Kebab King, Gdansk --MB-one 13:59, 20 July 2022 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 16:12, 21 July 2022 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination A church in Virginia --Nheyob 12:51, 20 July 2022 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 16:12, 21 July 2022 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: Palazzo gherardesca in Livorno, Italy --Sailko 20:31, 15 July 2022 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination: Rue Brugière (Dieulefit) en juillet 2022. By User:Benoît Prieur--Ezarate 20:23, 15 July 2022 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination: 3d aerial imaging demonstrator of DLR at ILA 2018 --MB-one 15:29, 15 July 2022 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination: Interboot 2020, Performance Marine 91 at Friedrichshafen --MB-one 15:29, 15 July 2022 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination: View of Avoriaz, Haute-Savoie, France. --Tournasol7 15:28, 15 July 2022 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination: Jutsa Mountain: 12 km south of Pyatigorsk, Foothill district, Stavropol Territory--AlixSaz 14:56, 15 July 2022 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination: Beshtau Mountain: Pyatigorsk, Stavropol Territory--AlixSaz 14:56, 15 July 2022 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination: Spessart in autumn, nature monument Bomigsee --KaiBorgeest 10:31, 15 July 2022 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination: Sheep in Hamburg --KaiBorgeest 10:29, 15 July 2022 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination: Mayor Éric Straumann in Colmar (Haut-Rhin, France). --Gzen92 05:13, 15 July 2022 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination: Flag of the 152nd RI in Colmar (Haut-Rhin, France). --Gzen92 05:13, 15 July 2022 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination Kantanagar Temple, Bangladesh. By User:Pinu Rahman --IamMM 10:32, 11 July 2022 (UTC)
  • Promotion This is not close to rectilinear, which might be OK except that it's clearly leaning more to the left than the right. I think it needs some additional editing to be a QI. -- Ikan Kekek 11:56, 11 July 2022 (UTC)
    I did not understand the problem you mentioned. It should be noted that this building has a tricky architecture in almost all angles, even from the front view. See Category:Kantanagar Temple. -- IamMM 20:00, 11 July 2022 (UTC)
     Comment I understand and did look at other pictures of it. What I'm saying is, if you look at the left outer wall, it slants quite a bit further than the right outer wall does. Does this temple really look like that, or is it a function of the angle? I think it's a function of the angle. -- Ikan Kekek 02:17, 12 July 2022 (UTC)
    I tried to make some changes, but unfortunately the final result was worse than this. Maybe aerial photographers have some ideas about this situation. -- IamMM 10:48, 12 July 2022 (UTC)
    I gave it a try. Maybe that's ok? --Ermell 19:55, 20 July 2022 (UTC)
     Support Thanks, Ermell. I like it. It does crop significantly, though, so I hope Pinu Rahman would be OK with it. Good quality. -- Ikan Kekek 18:17, 21 July 2022 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: Garages, Rue Robert Schumann, in Marcq-en-Barœul, France --Velvet 09:09, 8 July 2022 (UTC)
  • Review
    The prominent bollards and the shadow in the foreground are distracting to me. They do not add to the composition of the garages. Otherwise a good image. --Tagooty 10:42, 15 July 2022 (UTC)

Consensual review

File:Kowloon_Byewash_Reservoir_201707.jpg

• Nomination Kowloon Byewash Reservoir. By User:Wpcpey --Q28 06:47, 19 July 2022 (UTC)
• Decline  Support Good quality. --Kritzolina 10:31, 19 July 2022 (UTC)
   Oppose Below the size hard limit --Jakubhal 19:13, 19 July 2022 (UTC)
•  Oppose per Jakubhal. --MB-one 16:50, 20 July 2022 (UTC)

Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Declined   --MB-one 12:06, 23 July 2022 (UTC)

File:Zhenchenglou.JPG

• Nomination Zhenchenglou, a rotunda tulou in Yongding county, Fujian. By User:Gisling --Q28 06:47, 19 July 2022 (UTC)
• Decline
•  Support Good quality. --Kritzolina 10:31, 19 July 2022 (UTC)
  
•  Oppose For me it is too small for architecture picture. It's just 3 MP with little detail. --Jakubhal 19:11, 19 July 2022 (UTC)
•  Oppose per Jakubhal. However, it is amazing what photoshop has done with the really bad original. --Smial 07:50, 21 July 2022 (UTC)

Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Declined   --A.Savin 13:21, 23 July 2022 (UTC)

File:Lynk_&_Co_01_PHEV_1X7A0309.jpg

• Nomination Lynk & Co 01 PHEV in Böblingen.--Alexander-93 10:41, 16 July 2022 (UTC)
• Promotion  Oppose. No good quality because the upper part is too bright und the background is distracting. -- Spurzem 12:23, 16 July 2022 (UTC)
  I agree it's too bright, but perhaps that's an easy thing to fix? Disagree that the background is distracting. --Mike Peel 17:20, 16 July 2022 (UTC)
  I uploaded a new version.--Alexander-93 08:13, 17 July 2022 (UTC)
   Support the new version looks better. Thanks. Mike Peel 18:22, 17 July 2022 (UTC)

I'm amazed how low the requirements for QI of automobiles have become. -- Spurzem 13:26, 18 July 2022 (UTC)

•  Neutral I don't want to give a rating, but at least a comment. In my opinion, the background is too bumpy and lacks space around the car. That may also be personal taste. --XRay 15:49, 18 July 2022 (UTC)
•  Oppose per others. These parking lot images are all horrible, sorry. --Smial 16:09, 18 July 2022 (UTC)
•  Neutral it's overexposed (hopefully fixable).  Support Overexposure is fixed. The composition is not FP worthy but fine for QI. --MB-one (talk) 16:47, 20 July 2022 (UTC)--MB-one 11:32, 19 July 2022 (UTC)
•  Support by MB-one. --Robert Flogaus-Faust 21:23, 20 July 2022 (UTC)

Total: 3 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Promoted   --MB-one 12:05, 23 July 2022 (UTC)

File:Piazzale_Michelangelo_in_Florence.jpg

• Nomination Piazzale Michelangelo in Florence --Wikibusters 15:12, 11 July 2022 (UTC)
• Decline  Oppose Poor composition, too much asphalt --Sailko 19:49, 14 July 2022 (UTC))
  Now Sailko? Thank you --Wikibusters 22:25, 15 July 2022 (UTC)
   Support Big improvement and good quality. -- Ikan Kekek 02:23, 18 July 2022 (UTC)
  Poor composition, but completly in focus. I don't know... --Sebring12Hrs 05:27, 18 July 2022 (UTC)
•  Oppose Agree that this plaza is a challening subject but composition is crowded and tones are dull. --GRDN711 14:26, 19 July 2022 (UTC)
•  Oppose Poor composition. Too much empty sky. --Milseburg 13:06, 21 July 2022 (UTC)

Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 3 oppose → Declined   --A.Savin 13:20, 23 July 2022 (UTC)