Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives July 19 2023

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Consensual review[edit]

File:Close_wing_moisture_sucking_of_Graphium_nomius_(Esper,_1799)_-_Spot_Swordtail_WLB.jpg[edit]

  • Nomination Close wing moisture sucking of Graphium nomius (Esper, 1799) - Spot Swordtail WLB --Anitava Roy 13:57, 13 July 2023 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --多多123 15:43, 13 July 2023 (UTC)
     Oppose too soft for me --Charlesjsharp 21:23, 13 July 2023 (UTC)
     Support Good quality.--Luda.slominska 14:14, 15 July 2023 (UTC)
  •  Support Looks good to me. Mike Peel 19:48, 15 July 2023 (UTC)
Total: 3 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promoted   --Robert Flogaus-Faust 17:50, 18 July 2023 (UTC)

File:2023-06-26_Fussball,_Frauen,_Deutsche_Nationalmannschaft,_Media_Day_1DX_6344_by_Stepro.jpg[edit]

  • Nomination Women's soccer, German national team, Media Day: Melanie Leupolz. By --Stepro 12:28, 10 July 2023 (UTC)
  • Decline
  •  Support Good quality. --Ermell 12:52, 10 July 2023 (UTC)
  •  Comment Green CA on shoulders, fixable? --Mike Peel 00:04, 13 July 2023 (UTC)
  •  Comment Of course, photos with an open aperture in the blazing sun produce CA. These are mostly removed by software, but not completely. I don't want to distort the image with excessive editing and mess up the background. For me, the question is what to expect from such photos. Expecting a studio photo is unrealistic in my opinion and setting the (technical) expectations of a photo should always take into account the situation in which it was taken, in my opinion. --Stepro 18:24, 13 July 2023 (UTC)
  • You are not going to damage the image removing that CA. Is this anyhow a good portrait where the subject is closing her eyes? I  Oppose because of that. Poco a poco 18:51, 13 July 2023 (UTC)
  •  Oppose per User:Poco a poco and User:Mike Peel --Robert Flogaus-Faust 13:26, 15 July 2023 (UTC)
Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Declined   --Robert Flogaus-Faust 17:51, 18 July 2023 (UTC)

File:2023-06-26_Fussball,_Frauen,_Deutsche_Nationalmannschaft,_Media_Day_1DX_6335_by_Stepro.jpg[edit]

  • Nomination Women's soccer, German national team, Media Day: Klara Bühl. By --Stepro 12:28, 10 July 2023 (UTC)
  • Decline
  •  Support Good quality. --Ermell 12:52, 10 July 2023 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Green CA on shoulders, fixable? --Mike Peel 00:04, 13 July 2023 (UTC)
    •  Comment Of course, photos with an open aperture in the blazing sun produce CA. These are mostly removed by software, but not completely. I don't want to distort the image with excessive editing and mess up the background. For me, the question is what to expect from such photos. Expecting a studio photo is unrealistic in my opinion and setting the (technical) expectations of a photo should always take into account the situation in which it was taken, in my opinion. --Stepro 18:24, 13 July 2023 (UTC)
      •  Comment Lack of chromatic aberrations is part of the image guidelines. It's quite an easy fix, and I believe it will not "distort the image" if you do that skilfully --Jakubhal 06:01, 14 July 2023 (UTC)
  •  Oppose per User:Mike Peel --Robert Flogaus-Faust 13:29, 15 July 2023 (UTC)
Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Declined   --Robert Flogaus-Faust 17:52, 18 July 2023 (UTC)

File:Matka_Canyon_Skopje_3.jpg[edit]

  • Nomination Matka Canyon, Skopje. --Kallerna 15:55, 26 June 2023 (UTC)
  • Promotion
  •  Support Good quality. --F. Riedelio 06:18, 2 July 2023 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Unlucky crop (few space at the top and the bottom) --CherryX 18:37, 3 July 2023 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Gorgeous photo, but I have to agree with CherryX that the crop at the bottom is too tight, I'm sorry. ReneeWrites 08:19, 8 July 2023 (UTC)
  •  Weak support A bit more space at the top and the bottom would be nice, but I think it's ok for a QI. --Sandro Halank 17:15, 10 July 2023 (UTC)
  •  Weak support Per Sandro --Michielverbeek 05:25, 14 July 2023 (UTC)
  •  Comment The composition is OK to me, but is the white balance too blue? -- Ikan Kekek 13:52, 14 July 2023 (UTC)
  •  Support looks good to me.--Fabian Roudra Baroi 03:18, 15 July 2023 (UTC)
Total: 4 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Promoted   --Robert Flogaus-Faust 17:55, 18 July 2023 (UTC)

File:06_2023_Castello_di_Miramare_(Trieste)_IMG_7559.jpg[edit]

  • Nomination Mediterranean Sea at Trieste.--Alexander-93 06:24, 21 June 2023 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Question Too many blown-out areas. Fixable? --LexKurochkin 09:02, 25 June 2023 (UTC)
     Comment I uploaded a new version.--Alexander-93 12:55, 30 June 2023 (UTC)
     Support Good quality. --Grunpfnul 09:01, 2 July 2023 (UTC)
     Half done  Weak oppose Sorry, but let's discuss. --LexKurochkin 16:23, 2 July 2023 (UTC)
  •  Support. Nice image, sharp enough, good lighting, good colors. What should it be more for QI? I see no lack. -- Spurzem 18:52, 3 July 2023 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Nice image, but too low detail level. --Tournasol7 15:14, 5 July 2023 (UTC)
  •  Oppose per Tournasol7 --Sandro Halank 17:12, 10 July 2023 (UTC)
  •  Support Good enough for a decent A4 size print. I don't see what the photographer would have done wrong. Even though the lens used may not give as much detail as one that cost many thousands of $, at least the photo is cleanly finished, CA or distortions are not visible. At most, you could ask for a little less noise reduction. --Smial 10:27, 12 July 2023 (UTC)
  •  Support Borderline image for me, but tend to support --PantheraLeo1359531 12:24, 14 July 2023 (UTC)
  •  Oppose for now - please eliminate the dust spots in the upper center (unless they're really clouds) and smooth out the somewhat blotchy sky. -- Ikan Kekek 13:51, 14 July 2023 (UTC)
  •  Comment I eliminated the spots in a new version of the image.--Alexander-93 16:24, 14 July 2023 (UTC)
  •  Weak support acceptable --Fabian Roudra Baroi 03:15, 15 July 2023 (UTC)
Total: 5 support (excluding the nominator), 4 oppose → Promoted   --Robert Flogaus-Faust 17:54, 18 July 2023 (UTC)