Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives July 11 2015

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Consensual review[edit]

File:Tournoi_de_rugby_à_7_-_20141012_-_Genève_-_20.jpg[edit]

  • Nomination Tournoi de rugby à 7 - 20141012 - Genève --Pleclown 10:29, 24 June 2015 (UTC)
  • Promotion

 Comment IMO too much empty space at the right.--XRay 16:24, 29 June 2015 (UTC) Not done

  •  Oppose --Hubertl 08:55, 2 July 2015 (UTC)
  •  Support I disagree, IMHO composition is acceptable as it is. --C messier 10:29, 2 July 2015 (UTC)
  •  Oppose  Not done --Livioandronico2013 16:50, 2 July 2015 (UTC)
  •  Support "Too much empty space at the right"? Do you want them get crashed on the edge? Let the poor people breath. (no problem in cropping a bit from bottom though. Jkadavoor 05:49, 4 July 2015 (UTC)
  • But the trahscan at the right could be cropped out ... --XRay 12:29, 4 July 2015 (UTC)
  • Fair enough. It can be cropped or cloned out. :) Jkadavoor 12:45, 4 July 2015 (UTC)
  •  Support I also would prefer to get the trashcan disappear. But as its colour is harmonizing with the background, I see no reason for decline. --Cccefalon 05:45, 8 July 2015 (UTC)
Total: 3 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Promoted   --C messier 14:38, 10 July 2015 (UTC)

File:Core_Banks_-_fence_-_02.JPG[edit]

  • Nomination: Sand dune stabilization fence near Long Point Cabins at North Core Banks, North Carolina. By User:Jarekt --Jarekt 13:50, 30 June 2015 (UTC)
  • Review
  •  Oppose Looks like a random composition. I understand the idea, but I think the achievement is not good enough (Unfortunate crops). The rest (light, sharpness etc... is good. I oppose, but I wish other opinions, I think a discussion could be interesting.--Jebulon 15:35, 30 June 2015 (UTC)
  •  Comment  Support The quality is ok and this is the key criteria. I regard the fence and its wave shaped shadow on a grey sandy background as the main elements of the composition, which I would not qualify as random.--CHK46 16:48, 1 July 2015 (UTC)
  •  Comment I think it´s worth to discuss it. --Hubertl 17:06, 1 July 2015 (UTC)
  •  Support I think it succeeded to explain the topic sand dune stabilization so not a fully random composition. Crop: It looks unfortunate on top; but there will be a cut as the fence is long. Jkadavoor 05:59, 4 July 2015 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Too much magenta in the white. Also magenta with fringes top left and at the right side. After handling this issues, I would support. --Cccefalon 05:47, 8 July 2015 (UTC)
Total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Inconclusive result after 8 consensual review days   --C messier 14:33, 10 July 2015 (UTC)

File:10818 Λιθουανία 4Χ400 γυναικών.JPG[edit]

  • Nomination The Lithuanian team at 4x400 women's relay at 2015 European Team Championships First League. --C messier 16:42, 29 June 2015 (UTC)
  • Decline
  •  Opposesorry,too much noisy --Livioandronico2013 17:21, 29 June 2015 (UTC)
  •  Support I think the noise is acceptable here. At least, it needs a discussion, please.--Jebulon 21:34, 30 June 2015 (UTC)
  •  Comment Jebulon Je comprends que cela est votre ami, mais sommes sérieux ...--Livioandronico2013 18:01, 1 July 2015 (UTC)
    • Sorry, I don't understand when you try to write in "french", please explain your meaning in another language.--Jebulon 20:58, 1 July 2015 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Too much noise, lack of details --Σπάρτακος 19:42, 1 July 2015 (UTC)
  • Weak  Support. A bit noisy but a good photo, nice, sharp enough, good colors -- Spurzem 13:42, 2 July 2015 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Imo it's not noise, it's quite big compression artifacts. --Kadellar 09:47, 3 July 2015 (UTC)
  •  Support per Spurzem --Palauenc05 14:39, 3 July 2015 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Oversharpening artefacts in the faces. --Cccefalon 05:49, 8 July 2015 (UTC)
Total: 3 support (excluding the nominator), 4 oppose → Declined   --C messier 08:51, 10 July 2015 (UTC)

File:Lestes elatus female in Kadavoor.jpg[edit]

  • Nomination Lestes elatus, female --Jkadavoor 02:52, 27 June 2015 (UTC)
  • Decline
  •  Support Excellent --Moroder 20:09, 29 June 2015 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Sorry, but it is not sharp enough and too noisy. For me not QI. --Hockei 14:38, 30 June 2015 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Per Hockei --Σπάρτακος 19:43, 1 July 2015 (UTC)
  •  Support per Moroder --Palauenc05 14:37, 3 July 2015 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Sorry, but per Hockei--Jebulon 15:24, 7 July 2015 (UTC)
  •  Oppose per Hockei. --Cccefalon 05:50, 8 July 2015 (UTC)
Total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 4 oppose → Declined   --C messier 08:50, 10 July 2015 (UTC)