Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives July 09 2022

• 
  • Nomination HomeStreet Bank Headquarters, Seattle, Washington, USA --XRay 04:55, 7 July 2022 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:57, 7 July 2022 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Rainier Square Tower, Seattle, Washington, USA --XRay 04:55, 7 July 2022 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:57, 7 July 2022 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination E-scooter (from the provider Link) on Pike Street in Seattle, Washington, USA --XRay 04:55, 7 July 2022 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:57, 7 July 2022 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Pointe d'Angolon (2090 m) in commune of Morzine, Haute-Savoie, France. --Tournasol7 04:41, 7 July 2022 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:58, 7 July 2022 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Landscape in commune of Morzine (view from Avoriaz), Haute-Savoie, France. --Tournasol7 04:41, 7 July 2022 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:58, 7 July 2022 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Lac des Plagnes in commune of Abondance, Haute-Savoie, France. --Tournasol7 04:41, 7 July 2022 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:55, 7 July 2022 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Lac des Mines d'Or in commune of Morzine, Haute-Savoie, France. --Tournasol7 04:41, 7 July 2022 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:55, 7 July 2022 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Landscape in Massif du Giffre in Samoens, Haute-Savoie, France. --Tournasol7 04:41, 7 July 2022 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:55, 7 July 2022 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Groningen (city), Groningen railway station. North north west side.
    --Agnes Monkelbaan 04:24, 7 July 2022 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --XRay 04:26, 7 July 2022 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Muiden, Groote sea lock (southwest side
    --Agnes Monkelbaan 04:24, 7 July 2022 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --XRay 04:26, 7 July 2022 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Parish church Saint John the Baptist on Sankt Johanner Straße #26, Brückl, Carinthia, Austria -- Johann Jaritz 02:30, 7 July 2022 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:17, 7 July 2022 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Portal of the parish church Saint John the Baptist on Sankt Johanner Straße #26, Brückl, Carinthia, Austria -- Johann Jaritz 02:30, 7 July 2022 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --XRay 04:22, 7 July 2022 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Rectorie’s portal on Sankt Johanner Strasse #22, Brückl, Carinthia, Austria -- Johann Jaritz 02:30, 7 July 2022 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:19, 7 July 2022 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Apse of the parish church Saint John the Baptist on Sankt Johanner Straße #26, Brückl, Carinthia, Austria -- Johann Jaritz 02:30, 7 July 2022 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:18, 7 July 2022 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Crucifix at the parish church Saint John the Baptist on Sankt Johanner Straße #26, Brückl, Carinthia, Austria -- Johann Jaritz 02:30, 7 July 2022 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --XRay 04:22, 7 July 2022 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Cornus Kousa "Miss Sotomi" (Pink), at Berrington Hall --Mike Peel 21:33, 6 July 2022 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --XRay 04:27, 7 July 2022 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Greenhouse at Berrington Hall --Mike Peel 21:33, 6 July 2022 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. CAT Greenhouses is too general. There are more specific subCATs "by city" or "by country" etcetc. --Tagooty 01:19, 7 July 2022 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Berrington Hall --Mike Peel 21:33, 6 July 2022 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. Would be useful to add the view e.g. front facade in the Summary/Caption --Tagooty 01:19, 7 July 2022 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Building (1914), 9 place Kléber, Strasbourg. --Palauenc05 20:22, 6 July 2022 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. -- Ikan Kekek 02:29, 7 July 2022 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Church and a former Premonstratensian monastery in Hebdów - remote view from the opposite bank of the Vistula River --Jakubhal 17:50, 6 July 2022 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Ermell 19:48, 6 July 2022 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Church and a former Premonstratensian monastery in Hebdów - remote view from the opposite bank of the Vistula River --Jakubhal 17:50, 6 July 2022 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Ermell 19:48, 6 July 2022 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Church and a former Premonstratensian monastery in Hebdów - remote view from the opposite bank of the Vistula River --Jakubhal 17:50, 6 July 2022 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Ermell 19:48, 6 July 2022 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Base de plein --Wilfredor 14:23, 6 July 2022 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 17:51, 6 July 2022 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Sandspit on Torneträsk lake in Kiruna, Sweden --Ximonic 11:11, 6 July 2022 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Wilfredor 14:25, 6 July 2022 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Skerries on Hovdanvika, Flakstad, Norway --Ximonic 11:11, 6 July 2022 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Wilfredor 14:25, 6 July 2022 (UTC)
     Support So beautiful. --Q28 01:23, 7 July 2022 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Tidal sandbars by Middnattsolveien on Grunnførfjorden, Norway --Ximonic 11:11, 6 July 2022 (UTC)
  • Promotion Beautiful. -- Ikan Kekek 12:21, 6 July 2022 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Grovfjordveien road by Saltvatnet lake in Tjeldsund, Norway --Ximonic 11:11, 6 July 2022 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. -- Ikan Kekek 12:21, 6 July 2022 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Punkaharju esker in Savonlinna, Finland --Ximonic 11:11, 6 July 2022 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Wilfredor 14:25, 6 July 2022 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Jaguar E-Type --Ermell 08:24, 6 July 2022 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support Good quality. --IamMM 10:13, 6 July 2022 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination 1963 Chevrolet Impala --Ermell 08:24, 6 July 2022 (UTC)
  • Promotion Very good. -- Ikan Kekek 08:51, 6 July 2022 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Pontiac Trans Am --Ermell 08:24, 6 July 2022 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 17:54, 6 July 2022 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination VW Beetle --Ermell 08:24, 6 July 2022 (UTC)
  • Promotion Nice one. -- Ikan Kekek 08:49, 6 July 2022 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Saint-Georges Chapel, Elne, France. --Palauenc05 07:18, 6 July 2022 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --George Chernilevsky 07:24, 6 July 2022 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Black sea cucumber (Holothuria forskali), Arrábida Natural Park, Portugal --Poco a poco 06:09, 6 July 2022 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --George Chernilevsky 07:26, 6 July 2022 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Black scorpionfish (Scorpaena porcus), Arrábida Natural Park, Portugal --Poco a poco 06:09, 6 July 2022 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Ermell 08:35, 6 July 2022 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Ringneck blenny (Parablennius pilicornis), Arrábida Natural Park, Portugal --Poco a poco 06:09, 6 July 2022 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Ermell 08:35, 6 July 2022 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination European spiny lobster (Palinurus elephas), Arrábida Natural Park, Portugal --Poco a poco 06:09, 6 July 2022 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Ermell 08:35, 6 July 2022 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Red-mouthed goby (Gobius cruentatus), Arrábida Natural Park, Portugal --Poco a poco 06:09, 6 July 2022 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Wikibusters 08:31, 6 July 2022 (UTC)
     Support Good quality. --Ermell 08:35, 6 July 2022 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination European dodder (Cuscuta europaea) --Robert Flogaus-Faust 05:55, 6 July 2022 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 06:11, 6 July 2022 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Cross section of a human liver, taken at autopsy examination, showing multiple large pale tumor deposits. The tumor is an adenocarcinoma derived from a primary lesion in the body of the pancreas. By User:Haymanj --Q28 05:37, 6 July 2022 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 06:12, 6 July 2022 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Infructescence of guelder-roseEnglish: Keila, Estonia. By User:Iifar --Q28 05:37, 6 July 2022 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 06:12, 6 July 2022 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Salad Platter, By User:Fir0002 --Q28 05:37, 6 July 2022 (UTC)
  • Decline
     Oppose beautiful, but the size is smaller than 2 MP --George Chernilevsky 07:20, 6 July 2022 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Close up of grapes, By User:Fir0002 --Q28 05:37, 6 July 2022 (UTC)
  • Decline
    Detail is low an this user publishes his works with a CC-NC license --Poco a poco 06:11, 6 July 2022 (UTC)
     Oppose beautiful, but the size is smaller than 2 MP --George Chernilevsky 07:20, 6 July 2022 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Boat dock at the Kermeter waterside of the Upper Lake, Heimbach, Germany --Llez 05:11, 6 July 2022 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 05:21, 6 July 2022 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Building of the "Rurseeschifffahrt", Rurberg, Germany --Llez 05:11, 6 July 2022 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 05:21, 6 July 2022 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Portrait of a Peacock dance performer with makeup. The Peacock dance is performed by girls dressed as peacock during the harvest festival of Thai Pongal in the Indian states of Tamil Nadu and Kerala. Part of Winning images of Wiki Loves Folklore 2022. By User:TAPAS KUMAR HALDER --Tiven2240 04:05, 6 July 2022 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support Good quality. --IamMM 10:13, 6 July 2022 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Russian traditional costume during festival of folk instruments and songs "Pece Atanasovski" takes place every year in the village Dolneni, near Prilep, Macedonia. Part of Wiki Loves Folklore 2022. By User:Lenivongeleva --Tiven2240 04:05, 6 July 2022 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:26, 6 July 2022 (UTC)
     Question Since this is identified as a Russian traditional costume, isn't Category:Traditional clothing of North Macedonia incorrect? -- Ikan Kekek 08:57, 6 July 2022 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Shiva statue at CERN --Peacearth 00:46, 6 July 2022 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. -- Ikan Kekek 08:55, 6 July 2022 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Cambridge telescope --Mike Peel 21:02, 5 July 2022 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. -- Ikan Kekek 23:48, 5 July 2022 (UTC)
     Support So good. --Q28 01:23, 7 July 2022 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Cambridge telescope bogie --Mike Peel 21:02, 5 July 2022 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 06:15, 6 July 2022 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Knockin telescope focus cabin --Mike Peel 21:02, 5 July 2022 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality --Llez 05:15, 6 July 2022 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Wayfarers Arcade --Mike Peel 21:02, 5 July 2022 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality --Michielverbeek 05:13, 6 July 2022 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Tail fin of a Pilatus PC-12NG at EBACE 2018 --MB-one 20:25, 5 July 2022 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality --Llez 05:15, 6 July 2022 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Bridge of the Don Quijote in Hamburg 2019 --MB-one 20:25, 5 July 2022 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 06:15, 6 July 2022 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Basketball, Men, European Qualifiers, Germany - Poland: Werner Lechner, vice president DBB. By --Stepro 18:30, 5 July 2022 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 06:15, 6 July 2022 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Basketball, Men, European Qualifiers, Germany - Poland: mascot 'Bounce' of EuroBasket 2022. By --Stepro 18:30, 5 July 2022 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 06:16, 6 July 2022 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Basketball, Men, European Qualifiers, Germany - Poland: ING mascot. By --Stepro 18:30, 5 July 2022 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 06:16, 6 July 2022 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Rue Colonel-Arnaud-Beltrame à Montluel - panneau de la rue. --Benoît Prieur 16:03, 5 July 2022 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 06:16, 6 July 2022 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination ERF Gardner 120, R. & R. Limbert --Mike Peel 20:48, 4 July 2022 (UTC)
     Support Nice. --Watchduck 21:18, 6 July 2022 (UTC)
  • Promotion
• 
  • Nomination Red grasshawk (Neurothemis fluctuans) male --Charlesjsharp 08:32, 4 July 2022 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --George Chernilevsky 09:37, 4 July 2022 (UTC)
     Support 0 problem. --Q28 01:23, 7 July 2022 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Coral (Favia favus), Ras Muhammad National Park, Egypt --Poco a poco 06:32, 4 July 2022 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Ermell 07:54, 4 July 2022 (UTC)
     Support OK. --Q28 01:23, 7 July 2022 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: Intermediate egret (Ardea intermedia) and Mugger crocodile (Crocodylus palustris), Kabini Reservoir, Nagarhole, Karnataka --Tagooty 03:44, 1 July 2022 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination: centre culturel --Wilfredor 03:37, 1 July 2022 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination: The Basilica of Sainte-Anne --Wilfredor 03:37, 1 July 2022 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination: Mazda CX-5 Facelift ready for delivery in Böblingen.--Alexander-93 19:00, 30 June 2022 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination: Taraxacum --Ulaisaeva 18:49, 30 June 2022 (UTC)
  • Review
     Info Not Taraxacum; this could be some Tragopogon species. --Robert Flogaus-Faust 20:14, 30 June 2022 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: Late spider orchid (Ophrys holoserica) --Robert Flogaus-Faust 17:24, 30 June 2022 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination: Wart spurge (Euphorbia verrucosa) --Robert Flogaus-Faust 17:24, 30 June 2022 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination: Eurasian coot (Fulica atra) juvenile, Frederiksberg Gardens, Frederiksberg, Denmark --Jakubhal 15:52, 30 June 2022 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination: Microscopic images of Elodea canadensis. By User:KarlGaff --IamMM 14:43, 30 June 2022 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination: Cirsium vulgare --Ulaisaeva 13:24, 30 June 2022 (UTC)
  • Review needed

Consensual review

File:Yankee-Stretch_class_SSN.svg

• Nomination Silhouette of soviet Yankee Stretch class special purpose submarine (project 09774). KS-411 «Orenburg». --Mike1979 Russia 07:01, 28 June 2022 (UTC)
• Promotion
  As said, unappropriated IMHO to show now the Russian weaponry portfolio at this time --Poco a poco 07:38, 28 June 2022 (UTC)
  IMHO Your position is incorrect. Should I decline your fotos if they don't show the imperialist invasion? --Mike1979 Russia 07:58, 28 June 2022 (UTC)
  You maybe hurting the feelings of some reviewers with your campaign --Poco a poco 18:21, 28 June 2022 (UTC)
  IMHO It's not place for political discussion. Check me own work for compliance with the QI requirements, please. --Mike1979 Russia 06:47, 29 June 2022 (UTC)
   Support Good quality. Period. If you want to violate rules by opposing this for political reasons, I guess we'll have to have a discussion... -- Ikan Kekek 09:08, 2 July 2022 (UTC)
  I didn't oppose for political reason, and I wouldn't have. BUT nominating pictures like this during that imperial invasion ongoing on and, as you Ikan Kerek well know, having at least one member of this community who has lost a very close person, doesn't really speak for the nominator. From this user I had expected a bit more of understanding and that he/she nominates these images in the future, not now. Far from showing understanding I consider this noms a provocation. This nom is in my eyes has a proof that some people are heartless. That's my opinion and period. Poco a poco 16:46, 3 July 2022 (UTC)
   Comment Russian military equipment is in the news and needs coverage on Wikipedia, etc. When Ukraine destroys one of these with a missile, don't we want to know what it looked like, how big it was, etc.? -- Ikan Kekek 19:07, 3 July 2022 (UTC)
  I have no problem with this kind of images being on Commons, indeed, they are helpful, I agree with you on that, but does that have to do with a QI stamp? Poco a poco 19:26, 3 July 2022 (UTC)
  The QI stamp just acknowledges that it's a high-quality image and helps people searching for images of this submarine for an article or any other kind of formal or informal research. We can't presume the motives of the researcher. -- Ikan Kekek 22:27, 3 July 2022 (UTC)
  Unappropiate to highlight this content now, as said, and regarding a help for people to search, I recommend you this reading. Poco a poco 06:41, 4 July 2022 (UTC)
   Support 1. I sorrow the victims of the war on both sides. 2. You left the same first comment under BRITISH sub nomination. Is noms of british sub a provocation too? 3. You ask me to present here Russian weaponery. OK. I did it. All three subs are Russian weaponery. Why you designate this as provocation now? 4. Drawing of submarines from different states is my hobby. Why shouldn't I get support for my work? 5. IMHO Requiring nominations for only invasion-related drawings and nominating non-invasion photographs yourself is a double standard. --Mike1979 Russia 13:04, 4 July 2022 (UTC)
   Comment You can't vote to support your own nomination (though no vote is taken when there are only supporting or only opposing votes, anyway), so I crossed out your vote. -- Ikan Kekek 20:18, 4 July 2022 (UTC)
  This looks like a bit of a stretch so let's put it into comment mode. --Q28 04:53, 6 July 2022 (UTC)

 Question I don't understand what you're saying or what you did, but there's no negative vote, so why is this in Consensual Review? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 09:00, 6 July 2022 (UTC)

I agree. The image could be swiftly promoted. --Robert Flogaus-Faust 22:10, 6 July 2022 (UTC)

Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 0 oppose → Promoted   --Robert Flogaus-Faust 09:35, 8 July 2022 (UTC)

File:Palacio_Subercaseaux,_Santiago_20220619.jpg

• Nomination Palacio Subercaseaux, Santiago, Región Metropolitana, Chile --Carlos yo 01:36, 25 June 2022 (UTC)
• Decline
  Perspective distortion perspective distortion, correction is needed --F. Riedelio 09:54, 26 June 2022 (UTC)  Done Thanks for the review. Carlos yo 23:10, 26 June 2022 (UTC)
•  Oppose Image size too small (< 4 Mpx). --F. Riedelio 06:13, 27 June 2022 (UTC)
  The picture is really small. Is there a bigger version? --Q28 04:56, 6 July 2022 (UTC)
• Q28, I think you've made the completely understandable mistake of taking the "Discuss" status as what it literally says it is. I've argued - unsuccessfully! - for changing its misleading name, but what it does is to put the nomination in Consensual Review. Normally, you should not change the status of a nomination to "Discuss" unless there is a disagreement about whether to promote or decline the image. Thanks. -- Ikan Kekek 09:05, 6 July 2022 (UTC)

Total: 0 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Declined   --Robert Flogaus-Faust 09:36, 8 July 2022 (UTC)

File:Закат_в_дюнах.jpg

• Nomination This image was uploaded as part of Wiki Loves Earth 2022. --Ellebedeva 11:10, 21 June 2022 (UTC)
• Decline
•  Oppose Disturbing luminance noise --F. Riedelio 09:51, 26 June 2022 (UTC)
   Comment Really beautiful and the noise is not so bad to me. I'd support promotion, except that the COM:OVERCAT must be corrected. -- Ikan Kekek 22:47, 2 July 2022 (UTC)
  It may still need some minor changes. --Q28 04:53, 6 July 2022 (UTC)
•  Comment Again, there is no reason for this to be in Consensual Review. -- Ikan Kekek 09:06, 6 July 2022 (UTC)
•  Support I fixed COM:OVERCAT. It's OK now. --Mike1979 Russia 13:53, 8 July 2022 (UTC)

Total: 0 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Declined   --Robert Flogaus-Faust 09:38, 8 July 2022 (UTC)

File:Pattachitra artist at work in Odisha, India.jpg

• Nomination Women painting Patachitra artform in Odisha. This image was uploaded as part of Wiki Loves Folklore 2022 photographic contest. By User:Euphoric Captures --Tiven2240 07:35, 3 July 2022 (UTC)
• Promotion
• QI to me, but the file description should be improved to explain what she's making or link relevant Wikipedia articles. Also, please omit the notice that begins with "I, the copyright holder of this work", even more so when you are not the copyright holder, but in any case, descriptions at QIC should be very brief. -- Ikan Kekek 08:17, 3 July 2022 (UTC)
•  Support Good quality. --Yann 16:48, 3 July 2022 (UTC)
• OK, I think I've improved the file description, and I linked w:Pattachitra; however, the filename needs to be edited. It doesn't look like anything will really be discussed unless I send this to CR, and maybe not even then, but this is an artist, not a "Wizard Creating Magic." To be clear, I prefer not to temporarily oppose, but I don't think this file is ready for passage yet. Would you all support "OdishanPainter" as a filename? -- Ikan Kekek 19:04, 3 July 2022 (UTC)
• This is one of the winning image of Wiki Loves Folklore 2022 and it is titled by the author as Wizard creating magic. We have enough information about the image in its description. I oppose immediate changing of name as it is widely used in our social media campaigns and beyond. We can change the name later in future maybe after 3-6 months. Thanks for understanding --Tiven2240 05:40, 4 July 2022 (UTC)
• Strong  Support per Yann. Btw: File names are often overrated. This one somehow seems to have a poetic or traditional background that I don't know and can't judge. But it is well recognizable, actually not misleading either (everybody knows that there are no wizards...), and in this respect it is clearly different from those completely unintuitive image series file names along the lines of "2022-06-16 in $city #123456 by $photographer" behind which anything from street portraits to church interiors to photos of traffic accidents can hide. If the image should be renamed, I would make sure that the name chosen by the uploader remains in it. For example, the desired addition could be added in brackets, or the original name could be kept in brackets. --Smial 08:01, 4 July 2022 (UTC)

 Comment I think we're all aware that there are professional magicians, and that we are not watching a magic show or a ceremony presided over by a medium, etc. I'm OK with the title being changed in 3-6 months. You say "maybe". Do you promise to put this in your calendar and do your best to remember to change it, Tiven2240? -- Ikan Kekek 20:22, 4 July 2022 (UTC)

Also, in case you didn't notice, the reason why we have enough information in the description is that, as I said, I improved it. -- Ikan Kekek 22:43, 4 July 2022 (UTC)

•  Support Good quality; and per Ikan's suggestion I've requested a filename change, the reason being that the current filename is too ambiguous. The file will almost certainly be moved to the new filename. --UnpetitproleX 08:19, 5 July 2022 (UTC)

•  Support now. Thank you. -- Ikan Kekek 08:44, 5 July 2022 (UTC)

Total: 4 support (excluding the nominator), 0 oppose → Promoted   --Robert Flogaus-Faust 09:39, 8 July 2022 (UTC)

File:Jungle Myna bathing, Nagarhole 1 Apr22 D72 24091.jpg

• Nomination: Common myna (Acridotheres tristis) bathing (1 of 3) in Gopaladevaragudi Tank, Nagarhole Tiger Reserve, Karnataka --Tagooty 03:11, 28 June 2022 (UTC)
• Review
   Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:19, 28 June 2022 (UTC)
   Oppose I disagree, the photo is not sharp --MIGORMCZ 09:07, 28 June 2022 (UTC)
•  Support The bird seems pretty sharp to me for an action shot. -- Ikan Kekek 06:58, 29 June 2022 (UTC)
•  Oppose Sorry: blurred, too low sharpness for QI . --F. Riedelio 09:48, 29 June 2022 (UTC)
•  Support per Ikan --UnpetitproleX 08:07, 5 July 2022 (UTC)
•  Oppose small, unsharp. --Kallerna 14:37, 5 July 2022 (UTC)

Total: 3 support (excluding the nominator), 3 oppose → Inconclusive result after 8 consensual review days   --Robert Flogaus-Faust 09:40, 8 July 2022 (UTC)

File:Jungle Myna bathing, Nagarhole 2 Apr22 D72 24092.jpg

• Nomination Common myna (Acridotheres tristis) bathing (2 of 3) in Gopaladevaragudi Tank, Nagarhole Tiger Reserve, Karnataka --Tagooty 03:11, 28 June 2022 (UTC)
• Decline
   Oppose unsharp --MIGORMCZ 09:07, 28 June 2022 (UTC)
  The water drops are sharp. Given the very rapid motion of the bird and the water on its feathers, some lack of detail there is expected. --Tagooty 14:35, 28 June 2022 (UTC)
•  Support Not as sharp as the one above, but still a QI action shot to me. -- Ikan Kekek 06:59, 29 June 2022 (UTC)
•  Oppose unsharp, even for an action shot. Charlesjsharp 15:43, 2 July 2022 (UTC)
•  Oppose small, unsharp. --Kallerna 14:38, 5 July 2022 (UTC)

Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 3 oppose → Declined   --Robert Flogaus-Faust 09:42, 8 July 2022 (UTC)