Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives July 07 2022

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Consensual review[edit]

File:Alfa_Romeo_GTV6_Kulmbach_2022-20220626-RM-151812.jpg[edit]

  • Nomination Alfa Romeo GTV6 --Ermell 07:51, 2 July 2022 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Oppose Looks overprocessed, sorry. --Peulle 11:38, 2 July 2022 (UTC)
     Support. I just can't believe it when I think about what's been hyped as QI of cars lately. The picture presented here is good. Please discuss. -- Spurzem 12:12, 2 July 2022 (UTC)
     Support Good quality.I've re-watched the photo a few times, but don't see the overprocessing.--Famberhorst 15:37, 2 July 2022 (UTC)
     Support Good quality. --Palauenc05 16:45, 2 July 2022 (UTC)
     Support Good quality. --George Chernilevsky 20:40, 2 July 2022 (UTC)
  •  Support Seems like a good photo of a moving car to me. -- Ikan Kekek 08:22, 3 July 2022 (UTC)
    I'm certainly happy to be convinced otherwise, but I was looking especially at the front lights and numberplates and see some artefacts that resemble processing features.--Peulle 21:28, 3 July 2022 (UTC)
  • I see them, too, but they're minor in context, IMO. -- Ikan Kekek 22:29, 3 July 2022 (UTC)
Total: 5 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promoted   --Robert Flogaus-Faust 21:52, 6 July 2022 (UTC)

File:Raalte,_de_basiliek_van_de_Heilige_Kruisverheffing_RM32265_IMG_1319_2022-05-08_15.43.jpg[edit]

  • Nomination Raalte-NL, basilica: basiliek van de Heilige Kruisverheffing --Michielverbeek 20:40, 26 June 2022 (UTC)~
  • Decline
    The subject seems to be blocked by a tree. Is this the effect you want? --Q28 02:53, 30 June 2022 (UTC)
    No, I would prefer without the tree. However this was the best possibilty to take a photo of this composition in this time of the year. The clock of the tower is not covered by leaves and that is the reason why I think it might be a QIphoto --Michielverbeek 05:38, 30 June 2022 (UTC)
  •  Comment Trees are usually beautiful and I love them. But often they get in the way and don't allow a quality picture of a building, especially when they're fully leafy. With the photo presented here, however, there is also the fact that it is not sharp enough and that the perspective would have to be corrected. -- Spurzem 09:21, 30 June 2022 (UTC)
  •  Question Why is this in CR, without any vote? --Robert Flogaus-Faust 16:12, 30 June 2022 (UTC)
  • Agreed, but since it's here, I'll  Oppose per remarks above about the tree. -- Ikan Kekek 22:32, 3 July 2022 (UTC)
Total: 0 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Declined   --Robert Flogaus-Faust 21:53, 6 July 2022 (UTC)

File:Monochamus_sartor_at_Lac_de_Mines_d'Or.jpg[edit]

  • Nomination Monochamus sartor near Lac des Mines d'Or in Morzine, Haute-Savoie, France. --Tournasol7 06:09, 26 June 2022 (UTC)
  • Decline
  •  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 06:12, 26 June 2022 (UTC)
  •  Oppose bug is not in focus --Charlesjsharp 21:36, 26 June 2022 (UTC)
  •  Oppose per Charles. -- Ikan Kekek 08:25, 3 July 2022 (UTC)
Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Declined   --Robert Flogaus-Faust 21:54, 6 July 2022 (UTC)

File:Peacock_Display_Front_Nagarhole_Karnataka_Apr22_D72_24134.jpg[edit]

  • Nomination: Peacock (Pavo cristatus) displaying, front view. Nagarhole Nat'l Park, India --Tagooty 03:45, 24 June 2022 (UTC)
  • Review  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:26, 24 June 2022 (UTC)
     Oppose Would be QI except for foreground clutter. --GRDN711 12:39, 25 June 2022 (UTC)
Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Inconclusive result after 8 consensual review days   --Robert Flogaus-Faust 21:56, 6 July 2022 (UTC)