Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives July 06 2019

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Consensual review

[edit]

File:Valle_di_Sur_a_Gardone_Riviera_Lago_di_Garda.jpg

[edit]

  • Nomination TheValle di Sur valley in Gardone Riviera. --Moroder 07:47, 1 July 2019 (UTC)
  • Promotion
  •  Support Good quality. --Manfred Kuzel 08:14, 1 July 2019 (UTC)
  •  Comment Dustspot. --Tsungam 09:21, 1 July 2019 (UTC)
     Comment @Tsungam: you can not revert a promotion! --Moroder 14:34, 1 July 2019 (UTC)
     Comment I commented. The rest did QICvote. --Tsungam 14:36, 1 July 2019 (UTC)
  •  Support - Certainly good quality. I see one area that looks like a dust spot to the left of the rightmost group of trees, so if so, please fix it. -- Ikan Kekek 07:14, 2 July 2019 (UTC)
  •  Oppose WB looks off, sky tends to purple. --Smial 15:15, 2 July 2019 (UTC)
Total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promoted   --Milseburg (talk) 11:41, 5 July 2019 (UTC)

File:Black_Tusk_viewed_from_the_Panorama_Ridge_Trail_(DSCF1847).jpg

[edit]

  • Nomination Black Tusk viewed from the Panorama Ridge Trail (SE). Garibaldi Provincial Park, BC --Trougnouf 20:40, 30 June 2019 (UTC)
  • Promotion
  •  Support Good quality. --King of Hearts 22:01, 30 June 2019 (UTC)
     Oppose Cool picture, but the whites are blown. --Kallerna 04:48, 1 July 2019 (UTC)
  •  Support Not so bad --Moroder 06:23, 2 July 2019 (UTC)
  •  Support per Moroder. -- Ikan Kekek 07:16, 2 July 2019 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Chromatic aberration and many strange little spots of colour, mainly in bright yellow, but also other colours.--Smial 15:19, 2 July 2019 (UTC)
Total: 3 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Promoted   --Milseburg 11:32, 5 July 2019 (UTC)

File:2018-11-29_Shing_Mun_Redoubt_interior_view(B&W).jpg

[edit]

  • Nomination Shing Mun Redoubt Command interior view. --SCP-2000 17:06, 30 June 2019 (UTC)
  • Decline
  •  Oppose Interesting but blown --Podzemnik 01:36, 1 July 2019 (UTC)
  •  Comment I think blown area did not affect the subject. --SCP-2000 08:39, 1 July 2019 (UTC)
Total: 0 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Declined   --Milseburg 11:31, 5 July 2019 (UTC)

File:Witches_Scale,_Oudewater.jpg

[edit]

  • Nomination Witches scale, Oudewater --Martinvl 21:53, 26 June 2019 (UTC)
  • Promotion
  •  Support Good quality. --Manfred Kuzel 04:56, 1 July 2019 (UTC)
  •  Oppose I disagree. The window is blown, there are red fringes on the ropes and hooks and the platforms are too dark, out-of-focus and very noisy --DeFacto 20:16, 1 July 2019 (UTC)
  •  Support - I don't think we need to pixel-peep this one. OK to me. -- Ikan Kekek 07:18, 2 July 2019 (UTC)
  •  Question No tripod allowed? --Smial 07:48, 2 July 2019 (UTC)
  •  Support A bit noisy but a good image especially the composition -- Spurzem 17:42, 2 July 2019 (UTC)
Total: 3 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promoted   --Milseburg 11:29, 5 July 2019 (UTC)

File:Φορτέτσα,_οικία_συμβούλου_3111.jpg

[edit]

  • Nomination Councillors' residence in Rethymno Fortezza --C messier 16:28, 20 June 2019 (UTC)
  • Promotion
  •  Question Don't you think it's too dark? --Podzemnik 02:21, 26 June 2019 (UTC)
  •  Support Good quality IMO, the image is not dark for me, it was taken the 26th september late in the evening, so I think it is the natural light. --PJDespa 10:06, 30 June 2019 (UTC)
  •  Comment Perhaps you're right. It's tilted though, can you fix it C messier? See the sea level on the left. --Podzemnik 05:36, 1 July 2019 (UTC)
Total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 0 oppose → Promoted   --Milseburg 11:26, 5 July 2019 (UTC)