Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives July 02 2022

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Consensual review[edit]

File:Tusker_Elephant_Bath3_Nagarhole_Kabini_Apr22_D72_23844.jpg[edit]

  •  Comment ~20% of the frame is below the elephant's hooves, sufficient space IMO. To me, the slight imbalance indicates the dynamics of the scene -- the elephant twisting to spray itself and turning away from the lake to head back to the forest. Composition is a matter of taste. --Tagooty 03:30, 30 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Comment Sorry, Tagooty, I didn't see the water as it appears to be just white. I assumed the image stopped with the mud. The framing is fine. But I'm afraid I wiould still oppose becasue of the over-exposed water and lack of detail. Charlesjsharp 08:31, 30 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Running total: 0 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Decline?   --Robert Flogaus-Faust 17:29, 29 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

File:Handorf_Bäckerstraße_09_001_2022_06_03.jpg[edit]

  • Nomination Barn in Handorf (Lower Saxony), view from south--F. Riedelio 09:57, 26 June 2022 (UTC)
  • Promotion
  •  Oppose Sorry! Overall heavy chromatic noise. --Steindy 18:29, 26 June 2022 (UTC)
  •  Support Okay now, good quality. --Steindy 19:35, 28 June 2022 (UTC)
  • New version uploaded. Thanks for the review. --F. Riedelio 06:11, 27 June 2022 (UTC)
  •  Support Still a little noisy in the shadows but much better and acceptable. Good quality. -- Ikan Kekek 07:03, 28 June 2022 (UTC)
Total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 0 oppose → Promoted   --Robert Flogaus-Faust 11:44, 1 July 2022 (UTC)

File:Plain_tiger_(Danaus_chrysippus_chrysippus)_Phi_Phi.jpg[edit]

Running total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Decline?   --Robert Flogaus-Faust 17:25, 29 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

File:Sambar_Doe_Bloodspot_Nagarhole_Apr22_D72_24064.jpg[edit]

  • Nomination Female sambar with blood spot, Rusa unicolor, Nagarhole Nat'l Park, Karnataka --Tagooty 00:59, 26 June 2022 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 02:31, 26 June 2022 (UTC)
     Oppose cropped feet --Charlesjsharp 21:36, 26 June 2022 (UTC)
  •  Comment @Charlesjsharp: The feet are not cropped, they are hidden behind the branch which is part of the scene. --Tagooty 15:45, 27 June 2022 (UTC)
  • If the branch was not there, front foot would be cropped. Not a good composition I'afraid. Charlesjsharp 08:30, 29 June 2022 (UTC)
  •  Support The lens used has an ugly bokeh and maybe the photo was over-sharpened a little bit, but overall the quality is quite sufficient. By the way, "Keine Hufe!" was a running gag in the German-speaking Wikipedia for a long time. --Smial 10:33, 28 June 2022 (UTC)
Total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promoted   --Robert Flogaus-Faust 11:46, 1 July 2022 (UTC)