Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives January 24 2022

• 
  • Nomination Flower of a Cape marguerite -- Alvesgaspar 00:09, 22 January 2022 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 02:53, 22 January 2022 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Philipp Lienhart, player of Austria U21. --Steindy 00:06, 22 January 2022 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 02:54, 22 January 2022 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Anchor in the Plaza Capitán Prat. Santiago.Chile --Rjcastillo 21:55, 21 January 2022 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Steindy 00:20, 22 January 2022 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Praia Grande, Porto Covo, Portugal -- Alvesgaspar 20:09, 21 January 2022 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 21:39, 21 January 2022 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination The beach and sea at Porto Covo near sunset -- Alvesgaspar 20:09, 21 January 2022 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Steindy 00:20, 22 January 2022 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Praia Grande of Porto Covo, with a solitary surfer -- Alvesgaspar 20:09, 21 January 2022 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Steindy 00:20, 22 January 2022 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination The lighthouse of Porto Covo, Portugal -- Alvesgaspar 20:09, 21 January 2022 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 21:39, 21 January 2022 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Bearded fireworm (Hermodice carunculata), Cynthiana, Paphos, Cyprus --Poco a poco 19:27, 21 January 2022 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 21:36, 21 January 2022 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Triton's trumpet (Charonia tritonis), Cynthiana, Paphos, Cyprus --Poco a poco 19:27, 21 January 2022 (UTC)
  • Decline
     Oppose Lacks sharpness. Sorry. --Ermell 23:44, 21 January 2022 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Lovell Telescope, Jodrell Bank Observatory --Mike Peel 18:34, 21 January 2022 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality --Michielverbeek 21:35, 21 January 2022 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination El muñeco de nieve, a snowman statue in Tenerife --Mike Peel 18:34, 21 January 2022 (UTC)
  • Decline
     Oppose Apart from the tilt there is posterization and some sharpening halos/overprocessed --Poco a poco 19:31, 21 January 2022 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Whitby Abbey from across the pond --Mike Peel 18:34, 21 January 2022 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality.--Horst J. Meuter 18:54, 21 January 2022 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Stromleitungsmast Gemarkung Kirrweiler, Rheinlnd-Pfalz, Germany. --Fischer.H 18:17, 21 January 2022 (UTC)
     Support Good quality.--Horst J. Meuter 18:52, 21 January 2022 (UTC)
  • Promotion {{{2}}}
• 
  • Nomination Saint Bartholomew church in Lacroisille, Tarn, France. (By Tournasol7) --Sebring12Hrs 16:48, 21 January 2022 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:32, 21 January 2022 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Bell tower of the Our Lady of the Nativity church in Cadix, commune of Cuq-Toulza, Tarn, France. (By Tournasol7) --Sebring12Hrs 16:48, 21 January 2022 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:32, 21 January 2022 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Saint Peter church in Aguts, Tarn, France. (By Tournasol7) --Sebring12Hrs 16:48, 21 January 2022 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality --Michielverbeek 18:00, 21 January 2022 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Town hall of Montgey, Tarn, France. (By Tournasol7) --Sebring12Hrs 16:48, 21 January 2022 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:32, 21 January 2022 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Moulin de la Salette in Lautrec, Tarn, France. (By Tournasol7) --Sebring12Hrs 16:48, 21 January 2022 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality.--Horst J. Meuter 18:52, 21 January 2022 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination South view of Hof university, Germany. --PantheraLeo1359531 16:34, 21 January 2022 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:33, 21 January 2022 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination South entrance to the Hof university in Germany. --PantheraLeo1359531 15:50, 21 January 2022 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:33, 21 January 2022 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Plain forester (Bebearia lucayensis) --Charlesjsharp 11:36, 21 January 2022 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Hulged 18:24, 21 January 2022 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Lesser blue charaxes (Charaxes numenes) --Charlesjsharp 11:35, 21 January 2022 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Nino Verde 12:07, 21 January 2022 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Grey bush brown (Bicyclus taenias) female --Charlesjsharp 11:35, 21 January 2022 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Nino Verde 12:07, 21 January 2022 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Shining green forester (Bebearia barce barce) male --Charlesjsharp 11:35, 21 January 2022 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Nino Verde 12:07, 21 January 2022 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Common yellow gilder (Cymothoe egesta egesta) female --Charlesjsharp 11:35, 21 January 2022 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Nino Verde 12:07, 21 January 2022 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Street hairdresser in Beijing --Ermell 11:01, 21 January 2022 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Interesting picture, good quality. --DimiTalen 12:52, 21 January 2022 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Wheelbarrows on a construction site in Beijing --Ermell 11:01, 21 January 2022 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality.--Horst J. Meuter 16:31, 21 January 2022 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination View from the Churchillbrug in Leiden at sunset. --DavidJRasp 09:15, 21 January 2022 (UTC)
  • Decline Considering the contre-jour style of photography it should be sharper than this. --MB-one 09:40, 21 January 2022 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination View on the eastern part of the Ludwigsbrücke in Munich. --DavidJRasp 09:15, 21 January 2022 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. Some more categories would be helpful. --Ermell 11:27, 21 January 2022 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination The Immaculée Conception Church, in Don, France --Velvet 07:19, 21 January 2022 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Ermell 11:27, 21 January 2022 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Landscape between Don and Annœullin, France --Velvet 07:17, 21 January 2022 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --MB-one 09:42, 21 January 2022 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Atelier-Galerie54, Vienna --MB-one 07:11, 21 January 2022 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Lion-hearted85 10:15, 21 January 2022 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Karl-Friedrich Scheufele at the Mille Miglia 2018 press announcement --MB-one 07:10, 21 January 2022 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Hulged 18:25, 21 January 2022 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Comandancia Militar. Aranjuez, Spain --Ввласенко 06:59, 21 January 2022 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Ermell 11:30, 21 January 2022 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Western gallery of the Casa de Santiago de los Caballeros. Aranjuez, Spain --Ввласенко 06:59, 21 January 2022 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Ermell 11:30, 21 January 2022 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Shell of a fossil True Whelk, Neptunea angulata --Llez 06:41, 21 January 2022 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --MB-one 06:58, 21 January 2022 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Station 9 ("Jesus falls the third time") in the Assumption of the Virgin Mary church in Bach, Lot, France. --Tournasol7 05:39, 21 January 2022 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality --Llez 06:43, 21 January 2022 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Saints Peter and Paul church in Promilhanes, Lot, France. --Tournasol7 05:39, 21 January 2022 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality --Michielverbeek 06:13, 21 January 2022 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Saint Bartholomew church in Martiel, Aveyron, France. --Tournasol7 05:39, 21 January 2022 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 06:16, 21 January 2022 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Tour des Templiers in Martiel, Aveyron, France. --Tournasol7 05:39, 21 January 2022 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 06:16, 21 January 2022 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Hattem, Windkorenmolen De Fortuin
    --Agnes Monkelbaan 05:19, 21 January 2022 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 05:35, 21 January 2022 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination European oak (quercus robur) at the hiking trail on Quellweg in Winklern, Pörtschach, Carinthia, Austria -- Johann Jaritz 03:49, 21 January 2022 (UTC)
  • Promotion
    As the tree is central, can you identify the species and add a CAT, please? Good quality otherwise. --Tagooty 04:09, 21 January 2022 (UTC)
     Done @Tagooty: Thanks for your reviews. Specification of the tree is quercus robur. —- Johann Jaritz 04:25, 21 January 2022 (UTC)
     Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 05:58, 21 January 2022 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination European oak (quercus robur) on Quellweg in Winklern, Pörtschach, Carinthia, Austria -- Johann Jaritz 03:49, 21 January 2022 (UTC)
  • Promotion
    As the tree is central, can you identify the species and add a CAT, please? Good quality otherwise. --Tagooty 04:09, 21 January 2022 (UTC)
     Done @Tagooty: Thanks for your reviews. Specification of the tree is quercus robur. —- Johann Jaritz 04:25, 21 January 2022 (UTC)
     Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 05:58, 21 January 2022 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Marco Friedl, player of Austia U21. --Steindy 00:12, 21 January 2022 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:22, 21 January 2022 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Manuel Maranda, player of Austia U21. --Steindy 00:12, 21 January 2022 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality.--Horst J. Meuter 16:25, 21 January 2022 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Manuel Maranda, player of Austia U21. --Steindy 00:12, 21 January 2022 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality.--Horst J. Meuter 16:25, 21 January 2022 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Manuel Maranda, player of Austia U21. --Steindy 00:12, 21 January 2022 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Ermell 23:47, 21 January 2022 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination A girl poses with a basketball for training in nigeria in Africa (by Oguchukwu Prosper) --Adoscam 22:46, 20 January 2022 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Velvet 07:44, 21 January 2022 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Royal Arctic settlement ship, Aqqaluk Ittuk, at the dock in Qaqortoq, Greenland. --GRDN711 21:26, 20 January 2022 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Velvet 07:44, 21 January 2022 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Bombylius major on a flower. Depth of field is very shallow. --Dimljacic 18:43, 20 January 2022 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Oppose Yes, too shallow in my view. Nothing much is sharp. -- Ikan Kekek 01:19, 21 January 2022 (UTC)
    The insect is quite sharp, in my opinion. --Dimljacic 09:37, 21 January 2022 (UTC)
     Support On reconsideration, I'll concede the point. w:Bombylius major says "The adult body size varies from 6.3–12 mm in length." I was looking at the photo at full size and paying too much attention to that. -- Ikan Kekek 09:44, 21 January 2022 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination MAN heavy-duty tractor SLT-70 "Mammut" of the German Army --Jacek79 22:01, 19 January 2022 (UTC)
  • Decline
     Oppose Sorry! Overexposed, bad colors and not sharp. --Steindy 00:15, 20 January 2022 (UTC)
    I would like to suggest a less aggressive HDR (or shadow/highlight) processing to obtain a more natural tone. --Lion-hearted85 16:56, 21 January 2022 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Martyred Intellectuals Memorial. By User:Pinu Rahman --RockyMasum 04:23, 18 January 2022 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Hulged 18:32, 21 January 2022 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination The Leiden Central station after sunset. --DavidJRasp 21:16, 17 January 2022 (UTC)
  • Decline Insufficient quality. Random crop. Unfavorable composition. --Milseburg 16:47, 21 January 2022 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: Red mullet (Mullus barbatus), Cynthiana, Paphos, Cyprus --Poco a poco 22:31, 15 January 2022 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination: Real Gabinete Português de Leitura. By User:Donatas Dabravolskas. --Mike Peel 18:48, 15 January 2022 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination: Sthlm 01 building in Södra Hammarbyhamnen, Stockholm. --ArildV 15:19, 15 January 2022 (UTC)
  • Review
     Support Good quality. --Steindy 16:07, 15 January 2022 (UTC) Sorry, PantheraLeo1359531 is right. --Steindy 18:57, 15 January 2022 (UTC)
    Please remove the dust spots on the left and at the top of the image :) --PantheraLeo1359531 17:33, 15 January 2022 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: Partially covered cars after closing hours of Geneva International Motor Show 2018 --MB-one 14:02, 15 January 2022 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination: Eriksberg (Gothenburg). --ArildV 11:32, 15 January 2022 (UTC)
  • Review
    Dust spot to remove. --Steindy 16:29, 15 January 2022 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: Office building Kanalhuset in Lundbyhamnen, Gotenburg. --ArildV 11:32, 15 January 2022 (UTC)
  • Review
    Dust spot to remove. --Steindy 16:29, 15 January 2022 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Werner Gregoritsch, headcoach of Austria U21, --Steindy 00:01, 15 January 2022 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Hulged 18:28, 21 January 2022 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: protected tree Old oak near to Irinovka in Vsevolozhskiy raion--Erzianj jurnalist 17:48, 14 January 2022 (UTC)
  • Review
     Comment With plant images, it would be good to know the species. Even more so when it's a protected natural monument. --Martinus KE 23:18, 14 January 2022 (UTC)
     Comment Added description above.--Erzianj jurnalist 12:29, 15 January 2022 (UTC)
     Comment Uhm ... I had rather been looking for a different piece of information. According to the ru_momuments database, the tree is a Дуб черешчатый (Quercus robur), botanically speaking. – Thanks for sharing this impressive tree. As to image quality, I'll leave it to the experts. --Martinus KE 14:47, 15 January 2022 (UTC)

Consensual review

File:Saubrunnen_P1170288.jpg

• Nomination Saubrunnen, geschaffen von Gernot Rumpf, in Bornheim, Rheinland-Pfalz, Deutschland. --Fischer.H 15:43, 4 January 2022 (UTC)
• Decline
•  Comment Perspective correction is needed (tilt to the right).--Alexander-93 16:12, 4 January 2022 (UTC)

•  Done --Fischer.H 18:20, 4 January 2022 (UTC)

•  Comment It still seems aslant (stairs, gravestones).--Alexander-93 19:49, 4 January 2022 (UTC)

•  Done --Fischer.H 18:29, 12 January 2022 (UTC)

•  Comment This image was nominated in December. --Augustgeyler 23:26, 4 January 2022 (UTC)
•  Support New version acceptable, good quality. --Palauenc05 09:22, 20 January 2022 (UTC)
•  Oppose I am sorry, but this image was nominated twice and did not improve as necessary: 1.) The colours (especially the greens) are oversaturated. 2.) The image is tilted, as it can be easily seen at the stone joints. 3.) The composition is unbalanced and looks more ore less like a snapshot. --Augustgeyler 21:37, 20 January 2022 (UTC)

•  Oppose Dunno about a snapshot, but oppose per August on points 1 and 2. -- Ikan Kekek 09:47, 21 January 2022 (UTC)

Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Declined   --Augustgeyler 11:05, 23 January 2022 (UTC)

File:Barbaros_Monument_in_Istanbul,_Beşiktaş.jpg

• Nomination The monument to Barbaros Hayrettin Pasha, located on the Beşiktaş quay of Istanbul. (by Jelican9) --Jelican9 19:33, 12 January 2022 (UTC)
• Decline
•  Oppose The sculptures are too dark and show a lack of details. --Hillopo2018 13:40, 19 January 2022 (UTC)

•  Oppose Yeah, too dark. -- Ikan Kekek 10:08, 20 January 2022 (UTC)

Total: 0 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Declined   --Augustgeyler 11:01, 23 January 2022 (UTC)

File:Itzgrund_Hochwasser_Luftbild-20220109-RM-153331.jpg

• Nomination Flooded fields between Hemmendorf and Lahm --Ermell 09:11, 17 January 2022 (UTC)
• Promotion
•  Support Good quality. --Velvet 07:46, 18 January 2022 (UTC)
•  Oppose Corners are not sharp, bright areas blown out. --Nino Verde 17:43, 18 January 2022 (UTC)
•  Support While the corners might be a bit blurry, overall qualitiy is good enough for me --Kritzolina 07:44, 20 January 2022 (UTC)
•  Support per Kritzolina. Not long ago most drone photos were really bad, this quality is actually good. And the composition is fine, when you step back it looks like an abstract artwork. --Aristeas 08:55, 20 January 2022 (UTC)

 Comment There are exact guidelines for Quality images and there is no any entry about 'photos from drone may not conform this guidelines in case they were very bad not long time ago". --Nino Verde (talk) 13:33, 20 January 2022 (UTC)

Aristeas wrote "this quality is actually good". I have not taken a pro or con position on this photo, but it is generally understood that drone pics are not as sharp as pics taken on the ground with a good non-drone camera, and some allowances are normally made for that. -- Ikan Kekek 18:31, 20 January 2022 (UTC)

•  Question But if this is the case, why should not we expect non-drone cameras to be attached to bigger drones, capable of taking modern DSLRs? --Augustgeyler 01:34, 21 January 2022 (UTC)

•  Comment Right now this is still a rare case; drones which can take a full-fledged DSRL or DSLM are rather expensive. In addition, to handle them in a good and secure manner it is often suggested you should have two experienced operators, one dedicated drone pilot and one dedicated photographer. I hope we will get more photos taken this way on Commons soon, but right now we cannot expect this and should be happy that people like Ermell use a decent drone and take really good photos with it. --Aristeas 08:09, 21 January 2022 (UTC)

The photo is sharp, see the ripples on the surface of the water. May be it is only a little overprocessed, but this emphasizes its abstract aspect --Velvet 07:28, 21 January 2022 (UTC)

Running total: 3 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promote?   --Augustgeyler 11:01, 23 January 2022 (UTC)

File:Fish_market_in_Nouakchott_-_Mauritania.jpg

• Nomination Women selling fish in front of the fish market in Nouakchott - Mauritania (by Uzabiaga) --Adoscam 12:43, 16 January 2022 (UTC)
• Promotion
•  Support Good quality --PantheraLeo1359531 13:33, 16 January 2022 (UTC)
•  Comment Interesting photo, and I think the quality is good enough, though that's debatable, but the categories need work as neither fish nor beaches are mentioned in the list. -- Ikan Kekek 22:18, 16 January 2022 (UTC)
•  Oppose temporarily for the categories to be improved. -- Ikan Kekek 16:51, 18 January 2022 (UTC)
•  Support I worked a bit on the categories, I think it is good enough to support now --Kritzolina 08:00, 19 January 2022 (UTC)

•  Support Thanks for taking care of that. -- Ikan Kekek 22:18, 19 January 2022 (UTC)

Total: 3 support (excluding the nominator), 0 oppose → Promoted   --Augustgeyler 11:02, 23 January 2022 (UTC)

File:NATO_E3A_AWACS_Paine_Field_WA_Jul15_DSC8405.jpg

• Nomination LX-N90459 - NATO Boeing E-3A Sentry AWACS, over Paine Field, Everett, WA --Tagooty 05:04, 14 January 2022 (UTC)
• Promotion
•  Oppose Too noisy --Nino Verde 07:18, 14 January 2022 (UTC)

•  Comment I don't see excess noise. Request other opinions, please. --Tagooty 08:41, 14 January 2022 (UTC)

•  Support QI for me --Moroder 08:09, 15 January 2022 (UTC)
•  Support Per Moroder. -- Johann Jaritz 08:29, 15 January 2022 (UTC)
•  Comment I think the noise is OK, but borderline. Additionally there is some chromatic aberration --Augustgeyler 20:43, 15 January 2022 (UTC)

•  Done Reduced the chroma noise on undersides of wings. Please see new version. --Tagooty 03:14, 17 January 2022 (UTC)

•  Comment This one is still too noisy for me to support. -- Ikan Kekek 11:54, 17 January 2022 (UTC)

• @Ikan Kekek: Please see the new version with NR. An improvement? --Tagooty 04:17, 20 January 2022 (UTC)

• Much better :) --Nino Verde (talk) 13:35, 20 January 2022 (UTC)
• Thanks.  Support now. -- Ikan Kekek 10:10, 20 January 2022 (UTC)

Total: 3 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promoted   --Augustgeyler 11:03, 23 January 2022 (UTC)