Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives January 13 2022

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Consensual review

[edit]

File:Phare_du_Petit_Minou.jpg

[edit]

  • Nomination Lighthouse of Petit Minou in the Iroise Sea. By User:Mickael Jonas --IamMM 19:32, 8 January 2022 (UTC)
  • Decline
  •  Support Good quality. --Mosbatho 20:28, 8 January 2022 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Overprocessed.--Peulle 21:22, 8 January 2022 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Per Peulle. Striking composition, though. --Tagooty 06:01, 9 January 2022 (UTC)
  •  Comment I'd like to know how long the exposure was. That info isn't included in the EXIF. -- Ikan Kekek 09:55, 9 January 2022 (UTC)
Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Declined   --Peulle 08:04, 12 January 2022 (UTC)

File:Ceiling_of_Aali-Qapu_Palace's_musical_hall.jpg

[edit]

  • Nomination Ceiling of Ali-Qapu Palace's musical hall. By User:Nariman9782 --IamMM 19:32, 8 January 2022 (UTC)
  • Decline
  •  Support Good quality. --Prburley 19:49, 8 January 2022 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Not nearly sharp enough. -- Ikan Kekek 23:34, 8 January 2022 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Per Ikan Kekek --Tagooty 05:59, 9 January 2022 (UTC)
  •  Oppose, a pity. --A.Savin 01:59, 10 January 2022 (UTC)
Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 3 oppose → Declined   --Peulle 08:03, 12 January 2022 (UTC)

File:Santes_eglise_saint_pierre.jpg

[edit]

  • Nomination Saint-Pierre Church, in Santes, France --Velvet 08:43, 25 December 2021 (UTC)
  • Promotion
  •  Oppose IMO disturbing power line, fixable? --F. Riedelio 08:12, 28 December 2021 (UTC)
  •  Comment I would like to know if I am the only one who is bothered by the cable. --F. Riedelio 07:13, 3 January 2022 (UTC)
  •  Support Good quality now for me. --F. Riedelio 19:00, 7 January 2022 (UTC)
  •  Support Good quality and the power line is not an issue imo since it's present in real life and not blocking anything or a major disturbance. @F. Riedelio: feel free to move to discussion. --Trougnouf 12:34, 2 January 2022 (UTC)
  •  Comment I think it could be easily cloned out; it would not be an artificial edit and would be beneficial to the church's depiction. --Lion-hearted85 23:30, 3 January 2022 (UTC)
  •  Support Good quality, and the diagonal doesn't hurt the composition. Don't you folks look at abstract art? -- Ikan Kekek 08:40, 4 January 2022 (UTC)
  •  Comment Actually, I'm a strict opponent of excessive image manipulation, but this line has neither a beginning nor an end and obscures nothing but a piece of blue sky. If this is done cleanly, the line should be retouched away. --Smial 16:17, 4 January 2022 (UTC)
  •  Oppose with Smial. --August Geyler (talk) 20:28, 4 January 2022 (UTC)
  •  Oppose It is easy to remove this cable and it does not add anything to the composition --Michielverbeek 06:45, 5 January 2022 (UTC)
  • It adds a diagonal to the composition. -- Ikan Kekek 08:19, 5 January 2022 (UTC)
  •  Support Without cable --Michielverbeek 07:44, 8 January 2022 (UTC)
  •  Support If this was my photo I would clone out the cable, but IMHO that should be a matter of taste, the photo is also OK with the cable. --Aristeas 09:23, 5 January 2022 (UTC)
  •  Support There would be no photos of some objects under these conditions. Sometimes the conditions are unfavourable.--Ermell 10:32, 6 January 2022 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Cable. Charlesjsharp 14:06, 6 January 2022 (UTC)
  •  Comment Cable cloned out. Both versions are therefore available --Velvet 17:13, 7 January 2022 (UTC)
  •  Support Looks good to me, thank you. --Lion-hearted85 11:24, 9 January 2022 (UTC)
Total: 8 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promoted   --Peulle 08:02, 12 January 2022 (UTC)

File:Austria_national_under-21_football_team_-_Teamcamp_November_2015_(068).jpg

[edit]

  • Nomination: Philipp Endl, physiotherpist of Austria U21. --Steindy 00:04, 28 December 2021 (UTC)
  • Review
  •  Support Good quality. --Sandro Halank 14:46, 30 December 2021 (UTC)
  •  Oppose head not in focus --Charlesjsharp 22:39, 1 January 2022 (UTC)
  •  Support Good enough, IMO. -- Ikan Kekek 10:22, 2 January 2022 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Per Charles --Tagooty 12:39, 2 January 2022 (UTC)
  •  Info Charlesjsharp likes to reject my photos. Today three opposes again. --Steindy 22:15, 2 January 2022 (UTC)
  • Try taking better images then. Charlesjsharp 13:59, 6 January 2022 (UTC)
  •  Support OK 4 me. --Palauenc05 09:49, 3 January 2022 (UTC)
  •  Weak oppose Per Charles. This focus is just a little to much off. --Augustgeyler 10:41, 5 January 2022 (UTC)
  •  Support Eye and ball in focus at 100% on my machine. -- Prburley 14:18, 5 January 2022 (UTC)
  •  Oppose per others, also IMO not very favorable setting. --A.Savin 12:41, 9 January 2022 (UTC)
Total: 4 support (excluding the nominator), 4 oppose → Inconclusive result after 8 consensual review days   --Peulle 08:01, 12 January 2022 (UTC)