Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives January 12 2015

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Consensual review[edit]

File:2013-08-17_Lago_di_Fusine_superiore_-hu-_A_4540.jpg[edit]

  • Nomination The upper Fusine lake, Fusine di Valroma, Tarvisio, Friuli --Hubertl 14:39, 6 January 2015 (UTC)
  • Decline
  •  OpposeUnsharp --Livioandronico2013 18:03, 6 January 2015 (UTC)
    • This looks more like a childish revenge action. This is not a kindergarten.Please other opinions. --Hubertl 21:38, 6 January 2015 (UTC)
      • This isn't a childish revenge action because I'm not you, I have not rejected 10 your photos, only this and just because it is blurred, also categorization is sparse --Livioandronico2013 22:02, 6 January 2015 (UTC)
  •  Support On my display I cannot see that this file unsharp. I can only see a very impressive, atmospheric image! --Dnalor 01 07:55, 7 January 2015 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Impressive composition but definitely blurred at full view. Horizontal edges are more blurred than vertical ones so I suspect camera shake. --Kreuzschnabel 08:19, 7 January 2015 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Very good compostition, but definitely blurred --DKrieger 22:03, 7 January 2015 (UTC)
  •  Weak Pro for the subtile colors and the composition. --Steindy 00:02, 8 January 2015 (UTC)
  •  Support Gorgeous composition, great colours, swell rendition. --Johann Jaritz (talk) 11:42, 09 January 2015 (UTC)
  •  Oppose unsharp, blurred, overexposed areas --Christian Ferrer 17:09, 9 January 2015 (UTC)
Total: 3 support (excluding the nominator), 4 oppose → Declined   --C messier 20:23, 11 January 2015 (UTC)

File:Palais_Herberstein_-_Café_Griensteidl_-_Michaelerplatz_-hu-_6548.jpg[edit]

  • Nomination Detail of the facade of the Palais Herberstein, Michaelerplatz, Vienna. --Hubertl 09:52, 5 January 2015 (UTC)
  • Promotion
  •  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 11:35, 05 January 2015 (UTC)
  •  Oppose What is the subject of this picture ? Furthermore, it needs obviously a serious perspective correction before promotion.--Jebulon 14:07, 5 January 2015 (UTC)
  • ✓ Done also changed the description.--Hubertl 15:13, 5 January 2015 (UTC)
  •  Support Good quality. --Dnalor 01 08:27, 7 January 2015 (UTC)
  •  Support Good quality. Even the cobwebs are shown in the picture... --Steindy 00:14, 8 January 2015 (UTC)
Total: 3 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promoted   --C messier 16:16, 11 January 2015 (UTC)