Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives January 11 2015

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Consensual review[edit]

File:Copy of a Bust of Lucius Iunius Brutus, Museo delle Terme di Diocleziano.jpg[edit]

  • Nomination Bust of a Brute --Livioandronico2013 12:36, 5 January 2015 (UTC) *  Comment which one do you want to withdraw? This one or the next one? --Hubertl 12:47, 5 January 2015 (UTC)
  • Decline Double nomination --Hubertl 16:10, 5 January 2015 (UTC)
    You must wait,i'm not here 24 hours,i had wrong photo. If you wait a answer is better --Livioandronico2013 20:51, 5 January 2015 (UTC)
  •  Oppose No correct file name, no exact information about the subject itself. Its not so difficult in this case (Hint: This bust represents NOT Marcus Iunius Brutus, but someone even more famous for the roman history!). Insufficient categorization --Hubertl 11:02, 6 January 2015 (UTC)
  • ✓ Done the site was sufficiently categorized, what is your problem ??? --Livioandronico2013 11:14, 6 January 2015 (UTC)
    •  Not done This is a bust of a (wellknown) important person, but as I just wrote before, it is NOT Marcus Iunius Brutus! Why don´t you read what I just wrote above? And NO, I have no problems at all. Don´t argue, just do it! Read the sign! --Hubertl 11:34, 6 January 2015 (UTC)
✓ Done Trust me,you have problems if you have it fixed so where no one else loses time, not even myself --Livioandronico2013 17:43, 6 January 2015 (UTC)

 Not doneThe person which is shown is neither categorized nor sufficiently descripted. The filename implies, that this person is a sexual offender, a ruffian, a barbarian or a fornicator. --Hubertl 11:22, 7 January 2015 (UTC)

But you don't ask you why nobody tell me this things? Why nobody think like you? Why? --Livioandronico2013 13:49, 7 January 2015 (UTC)
 Oppose Unsharp, noisy. And Hubertl is right. Why nobody thinks like you ? Why ? --Jebulon 16:35, 8 January 2015 (UTC)
Who think againest me? Who Jebulon? --Livioandronico2013 17:29, 8 January 2015 (UTC)
Total: 0 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Declined   --Livioandronico2013 19:29, 10 January 2015 (UTC)

File:St._Johannes_Mittelschiff.jpg[edit]

  • Nomination Churches in Arnsberg-Neheim, Germany, parishchurch St. Johannes, central nave Optimist4343 12:01, 3 January 2015 (UTC)
  • Decline  Oppose Insufficient quality. Sorry. There are CAs and IMO for this kind of image DoF isn't good enough with f/3.5. --XRay 12:14, 3 January 2015 (UTC)
     Weak Support I'm not sure that this is a CA and if so, then it can be corrected. The photo is just too beautiful that it will be rejected. If something bothers me, it's the little overexposed glass window. Please other votes. --Steindy 22:41, 5 January 2015 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Blown highlights, unsharp, barrel distortion --DXR 13:45, 6 January 2015 (UTC)
Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Declined   --C messier 14:16, 9 January 2015 (UTC)

File:Agriocnemis nana by Vengolis.jpg[edit]

  • Nomination Agriocnemis nana --Vengolis 04:12, 4 January 2015 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Cayambe 09:24, 4 January 2015 (UTC)
     Oppose DOF not enough. --Hockei 11:42, 4 January 2015 (UTC)
  •  Support It's just ok for me. Ram-Man 02:10, 7 January 2015 (UTC)
  •  Support That it is still better, is undisputed. But that does not mean that this is awful. Good quality for me. --Steindy 22:21, 7 January 2015 (UTC)
  •  Support Narrow DOF, but the important parts are sharp. Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 12:02, 09 January 2015 (UTC)
Total: 4 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promoted   --C messier 15:26, 10 January 2015 (UTC)

File:Castalius rosimon 07916.JPG[edit]

  • Nomination Castalius rosimon mating --Vengolis 04:12, 4 January 2015 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support Excellent photograph, nice bokeh, very sharp. --Johann Jaritz 05:38, 04 January 2015 (UTC)
    Wrong white balance. --Kadellar 12:14, 4 January 2015 (UTC)
  •  Comment I've tried to fix. --Joydeep 16:02, 5 January 2015 (UTC)
Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 0 oppose → Promoted   --C messier 14:14, 9 January 2015 (UTC)

File:2014-Cambodge Angkor Wat (21).jpg[edit]

  • Nomination Temple d' Angkor Wat dans la province de Siem_Reap, --PIERRE ANDRE LECLERCQ 22:27, 3 January 2015 (UTC)
  • Promotion Sorry, but too much noise. --Steindy 23:20, 3 January 2015 (UTC)
    ✓ Done import original photo, slightly thinning--PIERRE ANDRE LECLERCQ 10:06, 4 January 2015 (UTC)
    The noise is now acceptable, it is in fact a great motive, but the focus is on the fabrics. Please 4th opinion --Hubertl 12:14, 4 January 2015 (UTC)
  •  Weak Support Now it seems okay. --Steindy 22:57, 5 January 2015 (UTC)
  •  Weak Support--Hubertl 11:24, 6 January 2015 (UTC)
  •  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 11:53, 09 January 2015 (UTC)
Total: 3 support (excluding the nominator), 0 oppose → Promoted   --C messier 15:25, 10 January 2015 (UTC)

File:Physalis minima 03222.jpg[edit]

  • Nomination Physalis minima --Vengolis 06:37, 3 January 2015 (UTC)
  • Decline  Oppose Not a meaningful filename. Please rename the file and nominate it again. --Code 07:39, 3 January 2015 (UTC)
    ✓ Done.Name changed --Vengolis 03:22, 5 January 2015 (UTC)
  •  Oppose unfavorable background, contraindicative for a motive like this. --Hubertl 11:21, 5 January 2015 (UTC)
Total: 0 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Declined   --C messier 14:08, 9 January 2015 (UTC)

File:Recklinghausen,_St.-Peter-Kirche_--_2013_--_4918.jpg[edit]

  • Nomination St.-Peter-Kirche, Recklinghausen, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany --XRay 05:52, 2 January 2015 (UTC)
  • Promotion The photo is indeed fine and sharp, but for me it's too dark. --Steindy 23:59, 3 January 2015 (UTC)
    ✓ Fixed Now the image is brighter.--XRay 06:08, 4 January 2015 (UTC)
  •  Weak support Better now. --Steindy 17:57, 5 January 2015 (UTC)
Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 0 oppose → Promoted   --C messier 14:07, 9 January 2015 (UTC)

File:Rabamurakad 2014.jpg[edit]

  • Nomination Cloudberries (by Ireena). Kruusamägi 10:05, 29 December 2014 (UTC)
  • Promotion
  •  Oppose DoF problems, not a QI to me, sorry --Poco a poco 18:41, 1 January 2015 (UTC)
  •  Support DOF could be better, yes. But the main berry is sharp. All In All the picture is impressiv for me. We should discuss. --Hockei 11:43, 3 January 2015 (UTC)
  •  Support OK for me. Yann 12:10, 4 January 2015 (UTC)
  •  Oppose The subect is out of focus. Alvesgaspar 16:38, 4 January 2015 (UTC)
  •  Support good enough for me. --Iifar 07:27, 5 January 2015 (UTC)
  •  Support --Christian Ferrer 17:17, 8 January 2015 (UTC)
  •  Support --Holleday 19:57, 8 January 2015 (UTC)
Total: 5 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Promoted   --C messier 14:04, 9 January 2015 (UTC)

File:2014_Picunda,_Restauracja_z_rzeźbami_na_ścianie.jpg[edit]

  • Nomination Restaurant with sculptures on the wall. Pitsunda, Gagra District, Abkhazia. --Halavar 00:34, 29 December 2014 (UTC)
  • Decline  SupportGood quality. --Ralf Roletschek 12:05, 2 January 2015 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Tilted CCW and bad crop to the bottom. --C messier 22:46, 2 January 2015 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Tilted, not a good framing Alvesgaspar 16:40, 4 January 2015 (UTC)
Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Declined   --C messier 14:01, 9 January 2015 (UTC)