Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives February 29 2020

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Consensual review[edit]

File:Sídney-Australia16.JPG[edit]

  • Nomination Royal Botanic Gardens, Sydney, Australia --Poco a poco 18:36, 23 February 2020 (UTC)
  • Decline
  •  Oppose Insufficient quality. Chromatic aberration on right building and noise, need more details --Wilfredor 19:00, 23 February 2020 (UTC)
  • ✓ New version Poco a poco 20:57, 23 February 2020 (UTC)
  • No reaction, hopefully you don't mind if I move it to CR --Poco a poco 21:12, 25 February 2020 (UTC)
  •  Support Good quality. Much better. --Wilfredor 22:20, 25 February 2020 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Sorry but it looks like a phone picture. I think the quality is not there. --Podzemnik 22:36, 25 February 2020 (UTC)
  •  Oppose - Park is too blurry. Doesn't seem fixable. -- Ikan Kekek 06:44, 26 February 2020 (UTC)
  •  Oppose This image does indeed struggle with sharpness.--Peulle 09:35, 26 February 2020 (UTC)
  •  Oppose per others. Overprocessed, lots of sharpening artifacts. --Smial 10:26, 26 February 2020 (UTC)
Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 4 oppose → Declined   --Peulle 17:29, 28 February 2020 (UTC)