Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives February 17 2022
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
-
- Nomination View of Rosental and Ferlacher Horn from Plöschenberg, Köttmannsdorf, Carinthia, Austria -- Johann Jaritz 03:24, 15 February 2022 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --XRay 04:38, 15 February 2022 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Gazebo in Wurdach, Köttmannsdorf, Carinthia, Austria -- Johann Jaritz 03:24, 15 February 2022 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality. --XRay 04:38, 15 February 2022 (UTC)
-
- Nomination View of Rosental and Singerberg from Plöschenberg, Köttmannsdorf, Carinthia, Austria -- Johann Jaritz 03:24, 15 February 2022 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality. --XRay 04:40, 15 February 2022 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Freedom Convoy 2022, Ottawa, February 12 (13)--Maksimsokolov 02:28, 15 February 2022 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality. --XRay 04:42, 15 February 2022 (UTC)
-
-
-
-
-
- Nomination Renault Megane E-Tech at IAA Mobility 2021.--Alexander-93 16:59, 14 February 2022 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality. --Granada 18:41, 14 February 2022 (UTC)
-
-
-
-
- Nomination Sea foam in the sea of Baiona, Galicia (Spain). 31 --Lmbuga 10:19, 14 February 2022 (UTC)
- Withdrawn
I withdraw my nomination DoF. --Lmbuga 17:41, 14 February 2022 (UTC)
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
- Nomination Place Stalingrad, in Seclin, France --Velvet 08:32, 14 February 2022 (UTC)
- Promotion
Some CA left at the very right side. --Ermell 09:02, 14 February 2022 (UTC)
Done Thank you for your review --Velvet 12:49, 14 February 2022 (UTC) Support Good quality. --Ermell 19:46, 14 February 2022 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Kampen, Lock at De la Sablonièrekade, IJsselmeer side.
--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:36, 14 February 2022 (UTC) - Promotion Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 05:49, 14 February 2022 (UTC)
- Nomination Kampen, Lock at De la Sablonièrekade, IJsselmeer side.
-
- Nomination Šutna in Kamnik, Upper Carniola, Slovenia. --Tournasol7 05:28, 14 February 2022 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 05:56, 14 February 2022 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Saint Joseph church in Kranj, Upper Carniola, Slovenia. --Tournasol7 05:28, 14 February 2022 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:35, 14 February 2022 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Soča river in the Municipality of Kobarid, Goriška, Slovenia. --Tournasol7 05:28, 14 February 2022 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 05:56, 14 February 2022 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Julian Alps seen from Vršič Pass, Upper Carniola, Slovenia. --Tournasol7 05:28, 14 February 2022 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:32, 14 February 2022 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Bled Island in Bled, Upper Carniola, Slovenia. --Tournasol7 05:28, 14 February 2022 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:34, 14 February 2022 (UTC)
-
- Nomination 1944 German postcard of red flowers (by Thirunavukkarasye-Raveendran) --Adamant1 04:49, 14 February 2022 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 05:29, 14 February 2022 (UTC)
-
- Nomination 1942 postcard of red roses (by Thirunavukkarasye-Raveendran) --Adamant1 04:40, 14 February 2022 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:31, 14 February 2022 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Experiment with lens ball and light stick --XRay 04:37, 14 February 2022 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 05:15, 14 February 2022 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Coat of arms on the gatepost of the outer bailey of Vischering Castle, Lüdinghausen, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany --XRay 04:37, 14 February 2022 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 05:16, 14 February 2022 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Gable on the expansion of Vischering Castle, Lüdinghausen, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany --XRay 04:37, 14 February 2022 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 05:16, 14 February 2022 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Freedom Convoy 2022, Ottawa, February 12 (10)--Maksimsokolov 00:07, 14 February 2022 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality. --Velvet 08:43, 14 February 2022 (UTC)
-
-
- Nomination Marco Sahanek, player of Floridsdorfer AC. --Steindy 00:03, 14 February 2022 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 05:30, 14 February 2022 (UTC)
-
-
-
- Nomination Awesome natural beauty of Dzuluk. By User:Amritenduaditi --Hulged 03:37, 12 February 2022 (UTC)
- Decline
Oppose Very little detail. Also missing coord. --Tomer T 11:51, 14 February 2022 (UTC)
-
-
- Nomination Door of the civil society building with COVID-19 notes in Hof, Germany. --PantheraLeo1359531 14:38, 11 February 2022 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality. --Tomer T 13:14, 14 February 2022 (UTC)
-
-
-
- Nomination Interior of San Galgano abbey. By User:Guglielmo Giambartolomei --IamMM 03:43, 11 February 2022 (UTC)
- Decline Oppose perspective distortion. --Tomer T 14:15, 14 February 2022 (UTC)
-
-
- Nomination Llyn Ogwen. By User:Woyoyboy --IamMM 13:13, 9 February 2022 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good enough quality for a high resolution night shot. --Tomer T 10:33, 14 February 2022 (UTC)
-
- Nomination: Holme Pierrepont Hall, Nottingham, UK. By User:MichaelMaggs --Tomer T 11:02, 8 February 2022 (UTC)
- Review Tilted --Pudelek 14:57, 8 February 2022 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Ein Insektenhotel im Naturerlebnisraum Itzequelle. --Nightflyer 10:33, 8 February 2022 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Imehling 11:52, 14 February 2022 (UTC)
-
- Nomination: Buildings in Salt Lake City, Utah --Another Believer 16:29, 7 February 2022 (UTC)
- Review
Perspective distortion
perspective distortion, correction is needed. --F. Riedelio 08:53, 8 February 2022 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Windows in house in Serpukhov, Moscow region, Russia --Никонико962 12:36, 30 January 2022 (UTC)
- Decline
Posterization effects. Possibly through aggressive denoising --MB-one 13:15, 7 February 2022 (UTC) Oppose per MB-one. --Tomer T 14:18, 14 February 2022 (UTC)
.jpg)
_02.jpg){kind=small}
.jpg)
.jpg)
.jpg){kind=small}
.jpg)
.jpg)
.jpg)
.jpg)
.jpg)
.jpg)
,_Nottingham.jpg)
_-_209.jpg)
Consensual review[edit]
File:Flight_and_Nectaring_of_specimens_of_Troides_helena_(Linnaeus,_1758)_–_Common_Birdwing_WLB_DSC_0132.jpg[edit]
_%E2%80%93_Common_Birdwing_WLB_DSC_0132.jpg)
- Nomination Flight and Nectaring of specimens of Troides helena (Linnaeus, 1758) – Common Birdwing (by Sandipoutsider) --Atudu 12:55, 7 February 2022 (UTC)
- Decline
- Support Good quality. --MB-one 13:03, 7 February 2022 (UTC)
- Support Good quality. --VileGecko 09:59, 9 February 2022 (UTC)
- Oppose undeclared composite --Charlesjsharp 14:45, 9 February 2022 (UTC)
Comment Doubtful assumption about the photo being a composite, pinging @Sandipoutsider: , the photographer to confirm. -- Bodhisattwa (talk) 06:43, 10 February 2022 (UTC)
- Comment As the photographer of the image, I confirm that, this is not a composite image. The specimens where flying high above head. The faster shutter speed, high flash-sync and larger aperture have succeeded in keeping all three specimens relatively sharp and in focus. Thank you--Sandipoutsider 08:00, 10 February 2022 (UTC)
- In that case, I would very much like to hear @Charlesjsharp: 's opinion on the quality in other areas, such as the sharpness. It's not totally crisp, but then the butterflies are moving, so it's not as easy as shooting them when they're sitting still... What do we think?--Peulle (talk) 08:45, 10 February 2022 (UTC)
- @MB-one, VileGecko, and Peulle: See my detailed reply on Featured Picture candidates. Charlesjsharp 15:45, 10 February 2022 (UTC)
_%E2%80%93_Common_Birdwing_WLB_DSC_0132.jpg){kind=link}
*
Oppose per Charles. I don't think his arguments have been effectively rebutted. -- Ikan Kekek 06:15, 12 February 2022 (UTC)
- Oppose Poor quality, it is possible to shoot much better pictures of insects in flight (if they are really in flight) -- Alvesgaspar 08:17, 12 February 2022 (UTC)
- The too insects on the right are, in fact, the same. Check the details. Alvesgaspar 08:21, 12 February 2022 (UTC)
- Comment See my detailed reply on Featured Picture candidates.--Sandipoutsider 03:28, 13 February 2022 (UTC)
- Comment In fact, the three butterflies are the same, as demonstrated by the wing pattern. Even if they were exact clones, which is never the case, the damage to the wings would be different (as noticed before by Charlesjsharp). Please withdraw the nomination, this is becoming uncomfortable. -- Alvesgaspar 06:08, 13 February 2022 (UTC)
- Comment @Charlesjsharp, Ikan Kekek, and Alvesgaspar: , the photographer has replied here. I think, we can assume good faith as there is sincere try from the photographer's end to explain his stand about the photograph. If the community finds the quality of the image not suitable for a QI, then it can always decline the request. There is no need to withdraw the nomination. -- Bodhisattwa 08:28, 13 February 2022 (UTC)
_%E2%80%93_Common_Birdwing_WLB_DSC_0132.jpg){kind=link}
- Oppose Poor quality --Tagooty 14:42, 13 February 2022 (UTC)
Total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 3 oppose → 
Declined --Peulle 07:13, 16 February 2022 (UTC)
Declined --Peulle 07:13, 16 February 2022 (UTC)