Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives February 07 2016
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
-
- Nomination Bạc Liêu offshore windpower farm, Vietnam --Shansov.net 03:58, 5 February 2016 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 04:06, 5 February 2016 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Poplar trees on the Blumeninsel ("Flower Island"), part of the Promenadenbad, Pörtschach, Carinthia, Austria --Johann Jaritz 03:47, 5 February 2016 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Bgag 04:53, 5 February 2016 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Morning on the steps of the basilica of Guadulupe, Mexico City, --Daniel Case 03:31, 5 February 2016 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 03:44, 5 February 2016 (UTC)
-
- Nomination 40 Market Square in Paczków 2 --Jacek Halicki 00:12, 5 February 2016 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 03:43, 5 February 2016 (UTC)
-
- Nomination 40 Market Square in Paczków 3 --Jacek Halicki 00:12, 5 February 2016 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 03:43, 5 February 2016 (UTC)
-
- Nomination 44 Market Square in Paczków --Jacek Halicki 00:12, 5 February 2016 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Bgag 04:53, 5 February 2016 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Farmersmarket on a saturday at the Karmelitermarkt, Vienna. --Hubertl 22:02, 4 February 2016 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 03:45, 5 February 2016 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Edmund von Neusser (1852-1912), bust (marble) in the Arkadenhof of the University of Vienna --Hubertl 22:02, 4 February 2016 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 03:45, 5 February 2016 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Nandina domestica in Oroso, Galicia (Spain). --Lmbuga 16:35, 4 February 2016 (UTC)
- Promotion Background somewhat disturbing, but for me good quality.--Famberhorst 16:41, 4 February 2016 (UTC)
Comment Thanks Famberhorst, you're right, I had not noticed. Now I'm not entirely sure if it's QI--Lmbuga 17:03, 4 February 2016 (UTC)
Done New version. White balace. Is it better now or must I revert the new versión?. Thanks and sorry Famberhorst--Lmbuga 17:17, 4 February 2016 (UTC)
Note: It's good. It is a valuable shrub.--Famberhorst 17:32, 4 February 2016 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Printing of water droplets into ice Jonker Sloot. Location, Natuurterrein The Famberhorst.
--Famberhorst 16:26, 4 February 2016 (UTC) - Promotion Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 03:46, 5 February 2016 (UTC)
- Nomination Printing of water droplets into ice Jonker Sloot. Location, Natuurterrein The Famberhorst.
-
- Nomination Diakonievene. Nature of It Fryske Gea.
--Famberhorst 16:26, 4 February 2016 (UTC) - Promotion Support Good quality--Lmbuga 16:31, 4 February 2016 (UTC)
- Nomination Diakonievene. Nature of It Fryske Gea.
-
- Nomination The Palácio de São Bento (home of Assembleia da República, the Portuguese parliament) in Lisbon. -- Felix Koenig 16:04, 4 February 2016 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 17:35, 4 February 2016 (UTC)--Famberhorst 17:35, 4 February 2016 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Flensburg: St. Mary Church --A.Savin 15:17, 4 February 2016 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 16:34, 4 February 2016 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Tower of the winds, Athens. --C messier 11:25, 4 February 2016 (UTC)
- Promotion I was there too :) Sorry just kidding. Good quality --A.Savin 15:12, 4 February 2016 (UTC)
-
- Nomination St. George's Collegiate Church in Tübingen, Baden-Württemberg. -- Felix Koenig 14:39, 4 February 2016 (UTC)
- Promotion OK. --A.Savin 15:07, 4 February 2016 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Shusha fortress. Shushi/Shusha, Nagorno-Karabakh. --Halavar 12:27, 4 February 2016 (UTC)
- Decline Sky too noisy? Sorry, but I don't understand the need for an ISO value of anything more than 100 given best weather conditions and a wide-angle distance... --A.Savin 15:06, 4 February 2016 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Citroën Traction Avant 11B from 1938 Spurzem 11:21, 4 February 2016 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Livioandronico2013 14:24, 4 February 2016 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Slovenia, Ljubljana, Urbanc House at Prešeren Square --Berthold Werner 09:10, 4 February 2016 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality --Halavar 12:27, 4 February 2016 (UTC)
-
- Nomination 38 Market Square in Paczków 1 --Jacek Halicki 09:09, 4 February 2016 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --A.Savin 14:56, 4 February 2016 (UTC)
-
- Nomination 38 Market Square in Paczków 2 --Jacek Halicki 09:09, 4 February 2016 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Livioandronico2013 14:26, 4 February 2016 (UTC)
-
- Nomination 39 Market Square in Paczków 1 --Jacek Halicki 09:09, 4 February 2016 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 10:13, 4 February 2016 (UTC)
-
- Nomination 39 Market Square in Paczków 2 --Jacek Halicki 09:09, 4 February 2016 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 10:13, 4 February 2016 (UTC)
-
- Nomination 39 Market Square in Paczków 3 --Jacek Halicki 09:09, 4 February 2016 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality --Halavar 12:27, 4 February 2016 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Abside of Duomo di Citta di Castello --Livioandronico2013 08:13, 4 February 2016 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality -- Spurzem 13:19, 4 February 2016 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Statue of St. Wendelin in the Catholic parish church of St. Nicholas (Gunzendorf) --Ermell 07:37, 4 February 2016 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Livioandronico2013 08:16, 4 February 2016 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Cat-ice above flowing water. Location, Natuurterrein The Famberhorst.
--Famberhorst 07:28, 4 February 2016 (UTC) - Promotion Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 10:21, 4 February 2016 (UTC)
- Nomination Cat-ice above flowing water. Location, Natuurterrein The Famberhorst.
-
- Nomination Diakonievene. Nature of It Fryske Gea in the Netherlands.
--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:47, 4 February 2016 (UTC) - Promotion Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 06:51, 4 February 2016 (UTC)
- Nomination Diakonievene. Nature of It Fryske Gea in the Netherlands.
-
- Nomination Homene Dessus, Combellin, Valle d'Aosta.
--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:47, 4 February 2016 (UTC) - Promotion Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 06:51, 4 February 2016 (UTC)
- Nomination Homene Dessus, Combellin, Valle d'Aosta.
-
- Nomination The bridge over the Aude River. Coursan, Aude, France. --Christian Ferrer 05:21, 4 February 2016 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Cccefalon 05:28, 4 February 2016 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Pavilion on Landspitz at the Peninsula Promenade, Pörtschach, Carinthia, Austria --Johann Jaritz 05:24, 4 February 2016 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Cccefalon 05:28, 4 February 2016 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Pavilion on Landspitz at the Peninsula Promenade, Pörtschach, Carinthia, Austria --Johann Jaritz 05:24, 4 February 2016 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:50, 4 February 2016 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Bridge to the Blumeninsel ("Flower Island"), part of the Promenadenbad, Pörtschach, Carinthia, Austria --Johann Jaritz 05:24, 4 February 2016 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Cccefalon 05:30, 4 February 2016 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Willow (salix caprea) by the waterline of Lake Woerth on peninsula promenade, Pörtschach, Carinthia, Austria --Johann Jaritz 05:24, 4 February 2016 (UTC)
- Promotion Q1quality, good focus to the main tree - but not a very interesting photo and you might remove branches in right top corner --Michielverbeek 06:51, 4 February 2016 (UTC) Done Thanks, Michiel, for your promotion. Your thoughts about that image do match 100% with mine. Anyway, I tried to improve the shot by cropping out some of the irrelevant parts. --Johann Jaritz 07:15, 4 February 2016 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Bath of bakery Wienerroither on Wahlissstrasse #19, Pörtschach, Carinthia, Austria --Johann Jaritz 05:24, 4 February 2016 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Cccefalon 05:26, 4 February 2016 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Fengbin, Hualien County, Taiwan: Monument of the Tropics of Cancer --Cccefalon 05:22, 4 February 2016 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 05:37, 4 February 2016 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Donghe Township, Taitung, Taiwan: Old DōngHé Bridge (TungHo in local dialect) --Cccefalon 05:22, 4 February 2016 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 05:25, 4 February 2016 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Taitung County, Taiwan: Sign at Xinchanghong Road Bridge, prohibiting popular fishing methods in Hsiukulan River. --Cccefalon 05:22, 4 February 2016 (UTC)
- Withdrawn too noisy for an easy-to-take object, I'm sorry --A.Savin 14:50, 4 February 2016 (UTC)
you are right, it is below my standards. I withdraw my nomination --Cccefalon 15:03, 4 February 2016 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Zhangyuan, Taiwan: Boat-shaped Presbyterian Church (船型教會). The original church was destroyed by typhoon in 1990. --Cccefalon 05:22, 4 February 2016 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 05:26, 4 February 2016 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Taitung, Taiwan: Radar station of Taitung Air Base (Chih Hang Air Force Base) --Cccefalon 05:22, 4 February 2016 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 05:29, 4 February 2016 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Guard of the Red Queen from Alice in Wonderland at the Disney Magic On Parade in Disneyland Paris. -- Medium69 18:07, 2 February 2016 (UTC)
- Decline Insufficient quality. Unfavourable image composition (object positioning): foot is cut off and too much space above the head. --F. Riedelio 16:12, 4 February 2016 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Leaf van Cyclamen purpurascens.
--Famberhorst 16:07, 2 February 2016 (UTC) - Promotion Good quality. --F. Riedelio 16:02, 4 February 2016 (UTC)
- Nomination Leaf van Cyclamen purpurascens.
-
- Nomination Monument - bench. Shushi/Shusha, Nagorno-Karabakh. --Halavar 13:30, 2 February 2016 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --F. Riedelio 15:39, 4 February 2016 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Artsakh University. Stepanakert/Xankəndi, Nagorno-Karabakh. --Halavar 13:30, 2 February 2016 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --F. Riedelio 15:35, 4 February 2016 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Eiffel Tower in Paris, France --Rijinatwiki 17:55, 1 February 2016 (UTC)
- Promotion Comment Fringes, red and green/blue CAs and clearly tilted to the left (CCW). All fixable. --C messier 22:08, 1 February 2016 (UTC)
Done-Rijinatwiki 17:41, 2 February 2016 (UTC)
Support Not perfect, but good enough. --C messier 11:25, 4 February 2016 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Alishan, Taiwan: Steam locomotive No. 24 of Alishan Forest Railway at Jhaoping Station. By User:Cccefalon --XRay 17:47, 1 February 2016 (UTC)
- Promotion Enough of what needs to be in focus is --Daniel Case 03:25, 5 February 2016 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Yukhari Govhar Agha Mosque. Shushi/Shusha, Nagorno-Karabakh. by Halavar --Ralf Roletschek 15:44, 1 February 2016 (UTC)
- Decline Insufficient quality: blurred and too noisy (sky). --F. Riedelio 15:30, 4 February 2016 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Two pavilion-like kiosk houses with pagoda roofs. --F. Riedelio 13:25, 1 February 2016 (UTC)
- Decline Too unsharp at sides --Daniel Case 03:25, 5 February 2016 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Blossom of the triplet's flower (Bougainvillea 'Torch Glow'). --F. Riedelio 14:03, 28 January 2016 (UTC)
- Decline Posterization and unsharpness --Daniel Case 03:19, 5 February 2016 (UTC)
Consensual review[edit]
File:Metro_MSK_Line5_Novoslobodskaya.jpg[edit]
- Nomination Novoslobodskaya Station of Moscow Subway --Florstein 12:46, 3 February 2016 (UTC)
- Decline
- Oppose An excellent composition, but absolutely not sharp enough, sorry no Q1one --Michielverbeek 15:22, 3 February 2016 (UTC)
- Comment Absolutely not sharp at full resolition at 15MP? And what about 5MP? I'm not sure that you are guided by right criteria. Otherwise, show me the better image taken with similar conditions. --Florstein 18:07, 3 February 2016 (UTC)
- @Florstein: I'm judging QI at 100% scale, as many other reviewers here (otherwise no one would care about CA and sharpness). What is the point of full 15 Mp if it doesn't adds more details ? Please, look at the lightbox near the center of this image. Probably it would be sharp at 5 Mp, but of course it's more useful for Commons to have this full-size image as non-QI than QI with just 5 Mp. --Shansov.net 08:04, 4 February 2016 (UTC)
- @Shansov.net: Depth of field at f4 on my Sigma 10-20 lenses doesn't allow to make sharp lightboxes. Alas. But stained glasses are okay here. :) --Florstein 13:01, 4 February 2016 (UTC)
- @Florstein: I'm judging QI at 100% scale, as many other reviewers here (otherwise no one would care about CA and sharpness). What is the point of full 15 Mp if it doesn't adds more details ? Please, look at the lightbox near the center of this image. Probably it would be sharp at 5 Mp, but of course it's more useful for Commons to have this full-size image as non-QI than QI with just 5 Mp. --Shansov.net 08:04, 4 February 2016 (UTC)
- Oppose Low DOF, noise. Use of a tripod recommended for better results. -- Smial 13:42, 4 February 2016 (UTC)
- Tripod usage costs $200 per hour there and usually not considered. --Shansov.net 14:36, 4 February 2016 (UTC)
- @Shansov.net: is it you who said "it's more useful for Commons to have this full-size image"? when I see the size of this one, I guess @Florstein: should downsample his images to just above 3mpx to have the QI seal, following your exemple...--Christian Ferrer 05:37, 5 February 2016 (UTC)
- @Christian Ferrer: Yes, I did. Full-size image is more useful for Commons, but pixel-level sharp image is needed for QI. Those two are different requirements for different goals. For example, when I uploaded full-size File:Ya_Ly_dam_spillway,_Vietnam.png it was declined, but when I take measures to ensure pixel-level sharpness, pictures are promoted. I learned the lesson :) Also sometimes I'm uploading full-size images too, if they are taken by a non-bayer camera and are naturally sharp. --Shansov.net 22:57, 5 February 2016 (UTC)
- @Christian Ferrer: thanks for a hint, Christian! May be someday I'll upload downsampled to 5mpx version of this photo and nominate it again. I'm sure: this new crystal clear image will gain QI seal with success. :) --Florstein 12:24, 5 February 2016 (UTC)
- To be a harsh reviewer is one thing but some people should apply to themselves what they ask to others.... --Christian Ferrer 12:30, 5 February 2016 (UTC)
- Why do you think that I'm not applying same criteria to myself? I do. --Shansov.net 22:57, 5 February 2016 (UTC)
- Because you said "it's more useful for Commons to have this full-size image as non-QI than QI with just 5 Mp." But I see you don't apply this sentence yourself, see File:Bạc Liêu windpower farm.jpg Christian Ferrer 06:24, 6 February 2016 (UTC)
- Oh, that's just because my goal is different. My main criteria is uploading pictures useful for wikipedia and until 4K becomes mainstream that's more than enough. --Shansov.net 08:12, 6 February 2016 (UTC)
- Because you said "it's more useful for Commons to have this full-size image as non-QI than QI with just 5 Mp." But I see you don't apply this sentence yourself, see File:Bạc Liêu windpower farm.jpg Christian Ferrer 06:24, 6 February 2016 (UTC)
- Why do you think that I'm not applying same criteria to myself? I do. --Shansov.net 22:57, 5 February 2016 (UTC)
Total: 0 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Declined --Hubertl 14:25, 6 February 2016 (UTC)
File:Ba-brynchagi-church-2001-august.jpg[edit]
- Nomination Transfiguration church in Brynchagi village. Maybe the hue is wrong? I may make it less purple... --Бахтиёр Абдуллаев 09:17, 3 February 2016 (UTC)
- Decline
- Oppose good compo and light, but poor sharpness --A.Savin 14:46, 3 February 2016 (UTC)
- Comment This was scanned from film. Changed to discuss so to hear about the hue. --Бахтиёр Абдуллаев 18:23, 3 February 2016 (UTC)
- Comment If you want to discuss about the hue, photography critiques is a better place. --C messier 10:57, 3 February 2016 (UTC)
- Comment I would like to see the image without blurring noise (resp. film grain) reduction. -- Smial 13:56, 4 February 2016 (UTC)
Total: 0 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Declined --Hubertl 10:09, 6 February 2016 (UTC)
File:Manduel_-_Borne_milliaire_d'Antonin-le-Pieux.JPG[edit]
- Nomination milestone of Antoninus Pius, near by Manduel's town hall. --Marianne Casamance 14:16, 2 February 2016 (UTC)
- Decline
- Oppose Interesting and high value, but main subject unsharp, sorry.--Jebulon 14:46, 2 February 2016 (UTC)
- Comment sorry, it's not unsharp, the column is only dirty. it's still has 2000 years! --Marianne Casamance
- Comment Désolé, mon Antonin le Pieux à moi il a aussi 2000 ans, et il n'est pas flou ! Envoie en discussion, on verra l'opinion des autres. Tant mieux s'ils te suivent. Amitiés.--Jebulon 17:03, 2 February 2016 (UTC)
- Comment sorry, it's not unsharp, the column is only dirty. it's still has 2000 years! --Marianne Casamance
- Oppose Main subject out of focus. --C messier 11:26, 3 February 2016 (UTC)
Total: 0 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Declined --Hubertl 10:08, 6 February 2016 (UTC)
File:MosMetro_Aeroport_platform_01-2016.jpg[edit]
- Nomination Moscow Metro, Aeroport station. By A.Savin --Florstein 08:02, 1 February 2016 (UTC)
- Promotion
- Support Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 08:27, 1 February 2016 (UTC)
- Oppose Image is noisy and not sharp enough --Shansov.net 12:13, 2 February 2016 (UTC)
- Support a very little noise but sharp enough --Christian Ferrer 17:43, 3 February 2016 (UTC)
Total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promoted --Hubertl 10:07, 6 February 2016 (UTC)
File:Metro_MSK_Line9_Savyolovskaya_(img2).jpg[edit]
- Nomination Savyolovskaya Station of Moscow Subway --Florstein 07:50, 1 February 2016 (UTC)
- Promotion
- Support good quality. --Ermell 08:31, 1 February 2016 (UTC)
- Oppose Image is too noisy, parts of image are blurred. --Shansov.net 12:19, 2 February 2016 (UTC)
- Support OK for me --A.Savin 14:26, 3 February 2016 (UTC)
- Support --Christian Ferrer 17:41, 3 February 2016 (UTC)
- Support -- Spurzem 18:13, 3 February 2016 (UTC)
- Weak Support, somewhat better than the other images. Still a bit blurry. --Smial 15:29, 4 February 2016 (UTC)
Total: 5 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promoted --Hubertl 14:27, 6 February 2016 (UTC)
File:Metro_MSK_Line9_Timiryazevskaya.jpg[edit]
- Nomination Timiryazevskaya Station of Moscow Subway --Florstein 07:50, 1 February 2016 (UTC)
- Promotion
- Support Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 08:26, 1 February 2016 (UTC)
- Oppose Image is noisy and not sharp. --Shansov.net 12:31, 2 February 2016 (UTC)
- Support -- Spurzem 18:15, 3 February 2016 (UTC)
Total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promoted --Hubertl 10:07, 6 February 2016 (UTC)
File:Cruz de Gorbea 01.jpg[edit]
- Nomination Gorbea mountain, summit cross, Basque Country, Spain --Basotxerri 19:33, 31 January 2016 (UTC)
- Decline
- Oppose Seems to me like the noise suppression has gone too far --A.Savin 15:02, 1 February 2016 (UTC)
- Support IMHO, detailed enough. --C messier 22:00, 1 February 2016 (UTC)
- Support OK for QI --Milseburg 12:37, 3 February 2016 (UTC)
- Oppose Blurred, as for A.Savin, and probably afterwards oversharpened. -- Smial 14:55, 4 February 2016 (UTC)
- Oppose as for Smial and A.Savin --Lmbuga 16:55, 4 February 2016 (UTC)
Total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 3 oppose → Declined --Hubertl 19:40, 6 February 2016 (UTC)
File:Australopithecus_sediba.JPG[edit]
- Nomination The cranium of Malapa hominid 1 (MH1) from South Africa, named "Karabo". The combined fossil remains of this juvenile male is designated as the holotype for Australopithecus sediba. By User:Nicolas Perrault III --Shizhao 01:06, 25 January 2016 (UTC)
- Promotion
- Oppose Whitebalance not convincing - too much orange. Elsewhere good. --Cccefalon 04:54, 25 January 2016 (UTC)
- Comment IMHO, the colours are accurate enough for an object buried in soil for more than a million years. --C messier 14:28, 25 January 2016 (UTC)
- Comment I am not talking about the colour of the object but about the colour that the tungsten light is causing with the skull. --Cccefalon 11:13, 26 January 2016 (UTC)
- Comment I am not talking about the colour of the object but about the colour that the tungsten light is causing with the skull. --Cccefalon 11:13, 26 January 2016 (UTC)
- Comment IMHO, the colours are accurate enough for an object buried in soil for more than a million years. --C messier 14:28, 25 January 2016 (UTC)
- Support IMHO, reasonable colors. --C messier 22:09, 1 February 2016 (UTC)
- Support Colour ont the teeth looks correct. So I assume it's the same for the rest of the skull.--Tobias "ToMar" Maier 13:50, 2 February 2016 (UTC)
- Comment Other version with yellows and oranges less saturated sould be better IMO. It's a good picture--Lmbuga 16:51, 4 February 2016 (UTC)
Total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promoted --Hubertl 19:40, 6 February 2016 (UTC)
File:Iglesia_de_San_Miguel,_Almazán,_Soria,_España,_2015-12-29,_DD_67.JPG[edit]
- Nomination Church of San Miguel, Almazán, Soria, Spain --Poco a poco 14:59, 31 January 2016 (UTC)
- Promotion
- Support Good quality. --Milseburg 16:01, 31 January 2016 (UTC)
- Oppose I disagree. Very nice in matters of composition, sharpness, etc. But rather strong clipping in red colour channel due to the lighting. --Smial 16:06, 31 January 2016 (UTC)
- Support --Jebulon 10:53, 1 February 2016 (UTC)
- Support -- Spurzem 18:17, 3 February 2016 (UTC)
- Support QI --Lmbuga 16:47, 4 February 2016 (UTC)
Total: 4 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promoted --Hubertl 14:30, 6 February 2016 (UTC)