Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives February 06 2023
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
-
- Nomination Southern view of the villa on Wahlißstraße #1, Pörtschach, Carinthia, Austria -- Johann Jaritz 03:05, 4 February 2023 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 04:00, 4 February 2023 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Jetty on Johannaweg, Pörtschach, Carinthia, Austria -- Johann Jaritz 03:05, 4 February 2023 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 04:00, 4 February 2023 (UTC)
-
- Nomination View of the Kopper Bay from the park on Johannaweg, Pörtschach, Carinthia, Austria -- Johann Jaritz 03:05, 4 February 2023 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 04:00, 4 February 2023 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Gazebo at villa Johanna on Wahliss Street #11, Pörtschach, Carinthia, Austria -- Johann Jaritz 03:05, 4 February 2023 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 04:00, 4 February 2023 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Promenade at the park on Johannaweg, Pörtschach, Carinthia, Austria -- Johann Jaritz 03:05, 4 February 2023 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 04:00, 4 February 2023 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Von der Maschinenfabrik Augsburg im Jahr 1897 hergestellter stationärer Dieselmotor, Prototyp 25/40-B, im Deutschen Museum --Frank Schulenburg 02:19, 4 February 2023 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 02:42, 4 February 2023 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Astrology of China --Rjcastillo 01:42, 4 February 2023 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 03:07, 4 February 2023 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Sculpture - Town Los Dominicos. --Rjcastillo 01:42, 4 February 2023 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 03:07, 4 February 2023 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Theater Hall, Town the Dominicos. --Rjcastillo 01:42, 4 February 2023 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 03:07, 4 February 2023 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Lantern in the Family Park. --Rjcastillo 01:42, 4 February 2023 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 03:07, 4 February 2023 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Entrance of University College Roosevelt in Middelburg, Zeeland, Netherlands --XRay 00:13, 4 February 2023 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 03:07, 4 February 2023 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Wooden shoes (Klompen) on a bench at the Oudestraat in Veere, Zeeland, Netherlands --XRay 00:13, 4 February 2023 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 00:17, 4 February 2023 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Oosterscheldekering (between Neltje Jans and Roggenplaat), Vrouwenpolder, Zeeland, Netherlands --XRay 00:13, 4 February 2023 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 00:17, 4 February 2023 (UTC)
-
- Nomination View from the beach to the Western Scheldt, Zoutelande, Zeeland, Netherlands --XRay 00:13, 4 February 2023 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 00:17, 4 February 2023 (UTC)
-
- Nomination New York Stock Exchange in New York City, New York, USA --XRay 00:13, 4 February 2023 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Frank Schulenburg 02:31, 4 February 2023 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Alcazaba de Almería --Mike Peel 22:55, 3 February 2023 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 00:12, 4 February 2023 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Alcazaba de Almería --Mike Peel 22:55, 3 February 2023 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 00:12, 4 February 2023 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Thousand Islands Pier --Fabian Roudra Baroi 22:13, 3 February 2023 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 00:10, 4 February 2023 (UTC)
-
- Nomination The church of the Dormition of the Theotokos in Stamata, Attica. --C messier 20:17, 3 February 2023 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 00:15, 4 February 2023 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Paleochristian basilica of Mygdaleza, Attica. --C messier 20:17, 3 February 2023 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 00:15, 4 February 2023 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Palazzo Doria Pamphilj, Rome, Italy --Poco a poco 18:08, 3 February 2023 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Jmh2o 18:47, 3 February 2023 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Palazzo Farnese, Rome, Italy --Poco a poco 18:08, 3 February 2023 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 18:55, 3 February 2023 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Palazzo del Comune, Arezzo, Italy --Poco a poco 18:08, 3 February 2023 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 18:55, 3 February 2023 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Charleroi (Belgique) - liaison entre la Sambre et le canal Charleroi-Bruxelles --Jmh2o 17:47, 3 February 2023 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:30, 3 February 2023 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Charleroi (Belgique) - light metro vehicule at the Providence station. --Jmh2o 16:07, 3 February 2023 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:30, 3 February 2023 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Mazda2 Hybrid in Stuttgart.--Alexander-93 15:35, 3 February 2023 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:27, 3 February 2023 (UTC)
-
- Nomination View of Loch Lomond and The Trossachs National Park from Ptarmigan Ridge Path (Scotland, UK) --Trougnouf 13:07, 3 February 2023 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:30, 3 February 2023 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Ferrari 512 BB Competizione Stradale at Retro Classics 2022.--Alexander-93 12:43, 3 February 2023 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:27, 3 February 2023 (UTC)
-
- Nomination The stairs which lead up the bridge Westspange from the Bürgerpark Saarbrücken --FlocciNivis 09:50, 3 February 2023 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:27, 3 February 2023 (UTC)
-
- Nomination View from the city park Staden to the Graffiti Hall-of-Fame 4560 --FlocciNivis 09:50, 3 February 2023 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Ermell 14:18, 3 February 2023 (UTC)
-
- Nomination View over the friendship bridge between Grosbliederstroff and Kleinblittersdorf --FlocciNivis 09:50, 3 February 2023 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Ermell 14:18, 3 February 2023 (UTC)
-
- Nomination View from the friendship bridge Klein-/Großblittersdorf to the South on the Saar with a weir --FlocciNivis 09:50, 3 February 2023 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:29, 3 February 2023 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Woman with Corona protective mask --Ermell 09:43, 3 February 2023 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:29, 3 February 2023 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Man with Corona protective mask --Ermell 09:43, 3 February 2023 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:29, 3 February 2023 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Prinses Margrietkanaal direction Groote Brekken
--Famberhorst 07:17, 3 February 2023 (UTC) - Decline Sorry, insufficient quality. Too noisy and unsharp. --Milseburg 12:33, 3 February 2023 (UTC)
- Nomination Prinses Margrietkanaal direction Groote Brekken
-
- Nomination Shell of an Olive snail, Oliva tricolor --Llez 07:09, 3 February 2023 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 07:18, 3 February 2023 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Inland vessel FIDES EU nummer 02331392 on the Prinses Margriet Canal
--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:32, 3 February 2023 (UTC) - Promotion Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 07:10, 3 February 2023 (UTC)
- Nomination Inland vessel FIDES EU nummer 02331392 on the Prinses Margriet Canal
-
- Nomination ZEUS 02336169 Werkvaartuig - Binnenvaart.eu. on the Prinses Margriet Canal
--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:32, 3 February 2023 (UTC) - Promotion Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 07:10, 3 February 2023 (UTC)
- Nomination ZEUS 02336169 Werkvaartuig - Binnenvaart.eu. on the Prinses Margriet Canal
-
- Nomination Muiden, Muiderslot.
--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:34, 3 February 2023 (UTC) - Promotion Good quality --Llez 07:11, 3 February 2023 (UTC)
- Nomination Muiden, Muiderslot.
-
- Nomination Cloister of the Cathedral of La Seu d'Urgell, Catalonia, Spain. --Tournasol7 05:13, 3 February 2023 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 05:31, 3 February 2023 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Bell tower of the St Michael church in La Seu d'Urgell, Catalonia, Spain. --Tournasol7 05:13, 3 February 2023 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:29, 3 February 2023 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Urgellensis Ecclesiae Archivia in La Seu d'Urgell, Catalonia, Spain. --Tournasol7 05:13, 3 February 2023 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 05:31, 3 February 2023 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Episcopal Palace in La Seu d'Urgell, Catalonia, Spain. --Tournasol7 05:13, 3 February 2023 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:28, 3 February 2023 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Carrer de Sant Agustí in La Seu d'Urgell, Catalonia, Spain. --Tournasol7 05:13, 3 February 2023 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:27, 3 February 2023 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Miners Landing, Seattle --Another Believer 04:41, 3 February 2023 (UTC)
- Decline
Oppose The detail of the miners landing is very low and seems to be washed-out due to excessive denoising --FlocciNivis 09:46, 3 February 2023 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Walkways in the former arsenal in the Dernekamp hamlet, Kirchspiel, Dülmen, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany --XRay 04:25, 3 February 2023 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:24, 3 February 2023 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Trees with lights at night. --Rjcastillo 04:16, 3 February 2023 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 05:16, 3 February 2023 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Tupahue Pool, Santiago Metropolitan Park. --Rjcastillo 04:16, 3 February 2023 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:26, 3 February 2023 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Walking path in Parc naturel de Gaume (Lacuisine, Florenville, Belgium) --Trougnouf 22:51, 2 February 2023 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 07:24, 3 February 2023 (UTC)
-
- Nomination GR16 walking path in Bellefontaine (Virton, Parc naturel de Gaume, Belgium) --Trougnouf 22:47, 2 February 2023 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality and beautiful natural colors.--Famberhorst 07:27, 3 February 2023 (UTC)
-
- Nomination The church of the Dormition of the Theotokos in Stamata, Attica. --C messier 20:08, 2 February 2023 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --FlocciNivis 09:46, 3 February 2023 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Airview of Kifissia. --C messier 20:08, 2 February 2023 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --FlocciNivis 09:47, 3 February 2023 (UTC)
-
- Nomination The headframe shaft IV of the mine Camphausen as seen from the side --FlocciNivis 08:51, 2 February 2023 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Aristeas 11:21, 3 February 2023 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Door panels featuring symbols of Ashtamangala on a streen in Lalitpur Patan --Chainwit. 17:44, 31 January 2023 (UTC)
- Promotion
It needs at least one category about the subject (gates?) --Poco a poco 19:16, 31 January 2023 (UTC)
Yep --Chainwit. 02:44, 2 February 2023 (UTC)
In this case, please, add those categories to the description page accordingly --Poco a poco 20:03, 2 February 2023 (UTC)
Done Thank you! --Chainwit. 15:20, 3 February 2023 (UTC)
Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:34, 3 February 2023 (UTC)
-
- Nomination View across the Saar on the quarry Taben with a cargo ship in front --FlocciNivis 07:47, 31 January 2023 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Ermell 14:22, 3 February 2023 (UTC)
-
- Nomination A wayside cross in Inning am Ammersee --FlocciNivis 07:47, 31 January 2023 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Ermell 14:22, 3 February 2023 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Close wing Nectaring of Castalius rosimon (Fabricius, 1775) - Common Pierrot (Female). (by Sandipoutsider) --Atudu 05:51, 29 January 2023 (UTC)
- Decline
Oppose Not focused. --RockyMasum 05:28, 3 February 2023 (UTC)
-
- Nomination: Panels of Hanuman Dhoka, Kathmandu, Nepal --Chainwit. 20:14, 28 January 2023 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination: Plaque Elena Cornaro Piscopia à Venise (décembre 2022). --Benoît Prieur 18:44, 28 January 2023 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination: Lantern - Festival of Lights, Chile 2023. --Rjcastillo 17:01, 28 January 2023 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination: Large tree of lights - Festival of Lights, Chile 2023. --Rjcastillo 17:01, 28 January 2023 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination: Roman Arena in the Carol Park of Bucharest --Neoclassicism Enthusiast 11:21, 28 January 2023 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination: Interior of Strada Arthur Verona no. 15, Bucharest --Neoclassicism Enthusiast 11:21, 28 January 2023 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination: Interior of Strada Arthur Verona no. 15, Bucharest --Neoclassicism Enthusiast 11:21, 28 January 2023 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination: Footprints in sand at Playa del Castillo, Lanzarote --Mike Peel 09:18, 28 January 2023 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination: Mercedes-AMG Project One at IAA 2017.--Alexander-93 08:50, 28 January 2023 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination Seagull eating a crab --Explodingcreepsr 07:20, 27 January 2023 (UTC)
- Decline
Oppose Unfortunate bottom and right crop. --C messier 20:12, 3 February 2023 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Juvenile house sparrow --Explodingcreepsr 07:20, 27 January 2023 (UTC)
- Decline
Oppose Cropped tail. --C messier 20:12, 3 February 2023 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Citrine Wagtail --Fabian Roudra Baroi 22:30, 26 January 2023 (UTC)
- Decline
Oppose Too unsharp --C messier 20:10, 3 February 2023 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Enterprise 2000 and Dash 8-400 in the same frame --Fabian Roudra Baroi 22:29, 26 January 2023 (UTC)
- Decline
Oppose Too unsharp. --C messier 20:10, 3 February 2023 (UTC)
Consensual review[edit]
File:20230129_FIS_Nordic_Combined_Triple_Seefeld_2023_Ryota_Yamamoto_850_6593.jpg[edit]
- Nomination FIS Nordic Combined Triple Seefeld 2023 - Competition Round Ski Jumping HS109 Men, Picture shows: --Granada 16:32, 3 February 2023 (UTC)
- Withdrawn
Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 18:55, 3 February 2023 (UTC)
Good quality, but categorisation needs work --Mike Peel 18:54, 4 February 2023 (UTC) - I withdraw my nomination --Granada 19:44, 5 February 2023 (UTC)
File:20230129_FIS_Nordic_Combined_Triple_Seefeld_2023_Laurent_Muhlethaler_850_6581.jpg[edit]
- Nomination FIS Nordic Combined Triple Seefeld 2023 - Competition Round Ski Jumping HS109 Men, Picture shows: Laurent Muhlethaler (FRA) --Granada 16:32, 3 February 2023 (UTC)
- Withdrawn
Support Nice panning --Poco a poco 19:27, 3 February 2023 (UTC)
Good quality, but categorisation needs work (location/event?) --Mike Peel 18:54, 4 February 2023 (UTC) - Good point, Mike, but I guess that in cases like this a reset to nom (blue frame) should do it. Easy fix from Granada I guess, not need for a big discussion on CR. --Poco a poco 11:36, 5 February 2023 (UTC)
- Good to know, I didn't realise that was OK here. Will remember for the future. Thanks. Mike Peel 19:42, 5 February 2023 (UTC)
- I wouldn't do that unless you are really sure that the necessary changes will be done very quickly. This is obviously not the case here. --Robert Flogaus-Faust (talk) 21:12, 5 February 2023 (UTC)
- Good to know, I didn't realise that was OK here. Will remember for the future. Thanks. Mike Peel 19:42, 5 February 2023 (UTC)
- I withdraw my nomination --Granada 19:44, 5 February 2023 (UTC)
File:Havlickuv_Brod_2021_16.jpg[edit]
- Nomination: Havlíčkův Brod Base Sculptures of Plague Column in Main Square --Scotch Mist 12:34, 13 January 2023 (UTC)
- Review
Unfortunate crop. In the lower left parts of the image are missing (probably after horizontal alligning). The top of the sculpture is dropped. Portrait format would have been more favorable. --Zinnmann 14:28, 18 January 2023 (UTC)
Done Thanks for review - restored lower left part of image - crop of tall column was deliberate so as to focus on base sculptures and surround! --Scotch Mist 23:04, 18 January 2023 (UTC)
Other views? --Scotch Mist 08:32, 25 January 2023 (UTC) - Comment Please change the description, so that it describes what is on the image, not just the town where this image is from. --Robert Flogaus-Faust 12:36, 27 January 2023 (UTC)
- Done @Robert Flogaus-Faust: Thank you for your view - description edited. --Scotch Mist 14:04, 27 January 2023 (UTC)
- Comment The Polish description should be improved as well. --Robert Flogaus-Faust 16:12, 27 January 2023 (UTC)
- Done @Robert Flogaus-Faust: Unsure of promotion significance of this detail but Polish description appended --Scotch Mist 18:58, 3 February 2023 (UTC)
- Question Why is this here with no votes? -- Ikan Kekek 23:14, 27 January 2023 (UTC) @Ikan Kekek: "If no-one evaluates this photo in a few days, it would be reasonable to move it to consensual review. -- Ikan Kekek 27 January 2023" --Scotch Mist 07:59, 29 January 2023 (UTC)
- OK. I think that a move here with no votes should be exceptional, though. -- Ikan Kekek 10:24, 29 January 2023 (UTC)
- Comment The general rule is in [1], which might be a bit difficult to find: "Please only send things to consensual review that have been reviewed as promoted/declined." --Robert Flogaus-Faust 13:26, 29 January 2023 (UTC)
Total: 0 support (excluding the nominator), 0 oppose → Inconclusive result after 8 consensual review days --Robert Flogaus-Faust 11:39, 5 February 2023 (UTC)
File:Bunten Kronwicke (Securigera varia) Blüte-20200626-RM-173640.jpg[edit]
- Nomination: Close-up of a red clover flower in a garden in Bamberg. Size ca 3 cm. --Ermell 09:49, 23 January 2023 (UTC)
- Review Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 13:48, 23 January 2023 (UTC)
Oppose for now; this is a great photo, but a photo of a misidentified plant. This is something from the Fabaceae, but clearly not Trifolium pratense, probably not even a Trifolium species. Sorry. --Robert Flogaus-Faust 23:34, 24 January 2023 (UTC) - Comment Never mind Robert, you're right, this is not red clover. Grows wild in my garden but unfortunately I can not name it. I have changed it to undefined. Maybe someone knows exactly what kind of flower it is. Thanks for your review.--Ermell 13:43, 25 January 2023 (UTC)
- Support Good quality. --Argenberg 12:10, 26 January 2023 (UTC)
- Oppose My best guess is that may be an asiatic lily in glorious decline at the end of season but I am not a botany expert. Reluctantly opposed because, while this is a good image, without meaningful identification and categorization, I am not sure how much QI value this image has in Commons. --GRDN711 19:43, 26 January 2023 (UTC)
- Support Good quality - while 'GRDN711' has a valid point surely identification\catgeorization is a secondary issue that in all likelihood will be resolved, sooner or later for the benefit of all, with promotion, while in the meantime a 'good quality image' will be viewed by a larger audience generating further interest in resolving this 'puzzle' (Unidentified Fabaceae in Germany)? --Scotch Mist 08:37, 28 January 2023 (UTC)
- This is an interesting and rather unusual opinion. So far, most voters have agreed that at least the genus must be identified. I do not know why you believe that someone will find the correct ID in the future. THere are few people who can do that. I doubt that this issue is fixable without more information, such as a habitus image and an image of the leaves and I know quite a lot of the wildflowers in Germany. If possibly fixable problems are irrelevant for your vote, then why bother about missing categories, dust spots or CAs, which could be fixable as well? Of course, I still prefer a reason why my opinion is considered irrelevant to being simply ignored as by User:Argenberg. By the way, the closest common German wildflower I can think of is Securigera varia. The almost white wings and the dark red tips of the keel might be o.k., but the form of the calyx teeth looks atypical for the species and the bright red of the standards is highly unusual for the species, which has usually pink or purplish standards. If this is Securigera varia, then the image should be probably declined because of unnatural colors. In addition, the inflorescences of the species are supposed to have inflorescences of 12 or more flowers according to Hegi's flora. So finding the correct ID might be a difficult task. --Robert Flogaus-Faust (talk) 16:33, 28 January 2023 (UTC)
- Oppose per Flogaus-Faust and GRDN711. I've done some work trying to find useful categories for photos that have lacked categories since 2015 and earlier. It is unreasonable to assume that people will take care of the problem even years later. -- Ikan Kekek 19:33, 28 January 2023 (UTC)
- @Ikan Kekek: Understand and respect your point of view but conversely IMHO those who are not even ‘amateur botanists’ should not be discouraged from taking photographs and nominating images for QI simply because they are not familiar with the huge number of established categories of flowers – in fact the more images of an “unidentified” flower promoted (in this instance under three separate categories) the more likely a definitive category may be found or, perhaps, created. --SM:!) (talk) 11:12, 1 February 2023 (UTC)
- IMHO it is not too much to ask from a photographer to obtain an ID of a depicted organism. The photograph becomes much more useful with an ID. There are many sites, where you can get your images identified. E.g., German wildflowers can be identified either on an identification page of the German Wikipedia, https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Redaktion_Biologie/Bestimmung, or on one of the following German pages: https://pflanzenbestimmung.flora-germanica.de/viewforum.php?f=3 or https://nafoku.de/forum/. I don't know so much about pages in English language, but the Canadian page https://forums.botanicalgarden.ubc.ca/forums/plants-identification.38/ might be a forum where plants from all over the world may be identified. Some people even use mobile phone apps for identification, but this may be tricky. Unfortunately, in this case, identification might be impossible because the photograph does not show enough of the plant. I can just advise the author to take some additional photographs of the plants for identification when they are in bloom again. --Robert Flogaus-Faust 18:20, 1 February 2023 (UTC)
Total: 3 support (excluding the nominator), 3 oppose → Inconclusive result after 8 consensual review days --Robert Flogaus-Faust 11:40, 5 February 2023 (UTC)