Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives December 31 2014

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Consensual review[edit]

File:Tamula järv 2013 09.jpg[edit]

  • Nomination Lake Tamula in Võru (by Vaido Otsar). Kruusamägi 13:32, 23 December 2014 (UTC)
  • Promotion
  •  Support Good quality and pretty. I linke this warm colors. --Steindy 18:19, 23 December 2014 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Possibly the jpg artefacts escaped your attention. You can see them especially in the sky. --Cccefalon 20:09, 23 December 2014 (UTC)
    • Sag, bist jetzt am Pixelzählen und beim Steindy-Nachstellen? Es fällt langsam auf! (verärgert und kopfschüttelnd)--Hubertl 23:27, 23 December 2014 (UTC)
      • Kein Grund, meine Reviews auf eine persönliche Ebene zu stellen. Sind da Artefakte oder nicht? --Cccefalon 05:27, 24 December 2014 (UTC)
        • Lasse ihn doch, Hubertl. Manchen Gutmenschen verschafft das Bashing anderer Benutzer eben Spass und Befriedigung. Das zieht sich schon seit Wochen wie ein roter Faden durch QI. Diese Freude sollst Du ihnen doch nicht verderben ;-) --Steindy 13:20, 25 December 2014 (UTC) PS: Im Zweiten darunter siehst Du gleich den nächsten, dem dies persönliche Freude bereitet.
          • Vorsicht mit solchen Kommentaren, als linkslinke Zecke gehöre ich zu den Gutmenschen...--Hubertl 19:48, 26 December 2014 (UTC)
  •  Comment The JPEG quality is low indeed. This should be easily fixable IMO. --Code 08:55, 24 December 2014 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Sorry per Cccefalon --Livioandronico2013 11:01, 25 December 2014 (UTC)
  •  Support artefacts and noise in the sky eliminated, new file uploaded by me.--Hubertl 00:10, 27 December 2014 (UTC)
  •  Support Good quality now. --Code 22:40, 27 December 2014 (UTC)
Total: 3 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promoted   --Steindy 01:00, 29 December 2014 (UTC)

File:Kuiper_belt_-_Oort_cloud_numbered.svg[edit]

  • Nomination: Kuiper Belt and Oort Cloud. --Medium69 21:30, 22 December 2014 (UTC)
  • Review Technically interesting, if you used it to construct the Arab JPEG. But 26,000 lines in the data URL for an embedded PNG is gross. The validator and Chrome barely managed it, one picture extension crashed (first time ever). The source JPG containing the Oort cloud cutaway is 60KB, why embed this as huge PNG? –Be..anyone 13:41, 23 December 2014 (UTC)
    PNG is automatically created by Adobe Illustrator. For the rest, I hesitated for vector and matrix. I am aware that the picture is complicated.--Medium69 16:07, 23 December 2014 (UTC)
    Suggestion, upload the used (crop of the) source JPG, it should be anyway free; and I'll try to get a shorter data JPG data URL, the quality in the Arab JPG is actually better than the AI PNG. The huge SVG is certainly an interesting test case for librsvg etc. –Be..anyone 00:18, 24 December 2014 (UTC)
    @Be..anyone: ✓ Done Finally, I took the original JPG and I extracted the Oort cloud into a transparent PNG. I have included it in PNG image, and I admit it's much prettier.
Total: 0 support (excluding the nominator), 0 oppose → Inconclusive result after 8 consensual review days   --LivioAndronico 11:47, 30 December 2014 (UTC)

File:AT-13765_Michaelertrakt_-_Figuren_-_hu_-_6524.jpg[edit]

  • Nomination Figures at the facade of the Michaelertrakt, seen from Michaeler square --Hubertl 00:26, 22 December 2014 (UTC)
  • Promotion
  •  Support Perfect. --Steindy 01:14, 22 December 2014 (UTC)
  •  Oppose for now. Not perfectly perfect, could benefit of a better categorization: identification of coats of arms is necessary !--Jebulon 19:52, 23 December 2014 (UTC)
    •  Comment the topic of this is not the coat of arms, the topic is the figure group on the facade of the Michaelertrakt. But I´m waiting right now for two historical-scientific books (the only ones) about the Hofburg, each for 90 US-$. I hope, I will get the answer from there. --Hubertl 09:38, 24 December 2014 (UTC)
  •  Support OK for me. Yann 11:50, 24 December 2014 (UTC).
  •  Support good quality...anyway Jebulon included two categories and identified the CoA --Livioandronico2013 10:19, 26 December 2014 (UTC)
Total: 3 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promoted   --LivioAndronico 11:47, 30 December 2014 (UTC)

File:Barbaros Koyu - Palaiapolis 02.jpg[edit]

  • Nomination Valley to Barbaros Bay (Palaiapolis ancient city), Mersin - Turkey --Zeynel Cebeci 21:35, 22 December 2014 (UTC)
  • Decline  Support Good quality --Halavar 22:10, 22 December 2014 (UTC)
  •  Oppose I disagree, its oversaturated (yellow/green) seems unnatural to me --Hubertl 02:26, 23 December 2014 (UTC)
  •  Oppose I get that most people like oversaturated colors and most cameras are intentionally inaccurate for this reason, but this is just too much. Ram-Man 04:01, 30 December 2014 (UTC)
Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Declined   --LivioAndronico 11:47, 30 December 2014 (UTC)

File:Malaysia_Traffic-signs_Warning-sign-24a.jpg[edit]

  • Nomination: Traffic signs in Malaysia: Warning sign "Merging traffic / Intersection with a minor crossroad" in Kuala Lumpur) --Cccefalon 06:27, 22 December 2014 (UTC)
  • Review  Oppose The traffic sign is well made and sharp, but the background is the most part of the photo and this looks grainy and muddy. --Steindy 09:55, 22 December 2014 (UTC)
 Comment Thank you fo reviewing. I know, that there are different opinions about the right choice of DoF, so I would love to hear another opinion. For this photo, I would say, the background is not grainy and muddy, but it is just the bokeh of the lense. In my series of malaysian road signs, I often used this shallow DoF to expose the main object. --Cccefalon 10:23, 22 December 2014 (UTC)
Okay, but something in the trees is odd. –Be..anyone 06:10, 23 December 2014 (UTC)
What exactly do you mean with "something"? Sure, that you dont mean the Bokeh? --Cccefalon 06:15, 23 December 2014 (UTC)
Exactly, I didn't know that this effect has a name—BG-1. :-)Be..anyone 06:21, 23 December 2014 (UTC)
Good :) It is not a quality issue, it is a quality feature. --Cccefalon 07:59, 23 December 2014 (UTC)
  •  Support OK for me. Yann 10:57, 23 December 2014 (UTC)
  •  Support Absolutely --Livioandronico2013 18:00, 23 December 2014 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Some parts of the sky and some further details burnt. Ugly, disturbing bokeh. Longitudal CA (yellow type) all over the background. -- Smial 15:24, 26 December 2014 (UTC)
Total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Inconclusive result after 8 consensual review days   --LivioAndronico 11:47, 30 December 2014 (UTC)