Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives December 30 2014

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Consensual review[edit]

File:Ötscherbach_04.JPG[edit]

  • Nomination The Ötscherbach in the Ötschergräben, nature park Ötscher-Tormäuer, Lower Austria --Uoaei1 07:04, 18 December 2014 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Oppose blurred areas and overexposed --Christian Ferrer 22:51, 24 December 2014 (UTC)
    More opinions, please! --Uoaei1 10:30, 26 December 2014 (UTC)
  •  Comment I would support if overexposition is corrected. Probably possible if you have the RAW image. Regards, Yann 09:22, 27 December 2014 (UTC)
  •  Info I have uploaded a new version with reduced brightness, based on the RAW file. --Uoaei1 14:49, 27 December 2014 (UTC)
  •  Support for me ok now.--Hubertl 21:20, 27 December 2014 (UTC)
  •  Support --Steindy 20:52, 28 December 2014 (UTC)
  •  Support Ram-Man 03:08, 29 December 2014 (UTC)
Total: 3 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promoted   --LivioAndronico 11:29, 29 December 2014 (UTC)

File:14-08-13-helsinki-RalfR-17.jpg[edit]

  • Nomination: Helsinki, Ravintola Vltava --Ralf Roletschek 18:31, 17 December 2014 (UTC)
  • Review
  • Please add a correct categorization. "Helsinki/unsortiert" is not complying with commons category system. --Cccefalon 20:25, 17 December 2014 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Dark, perspective issues. Mattbuck 10:27, 23 December 2014 (UTC)
  •  Support I do not see what it is supposed to be dark. The perspective corresponds well to the natural perspective. I do not understand why does everything always have to be ironed. --Steindy 22:53, 25 December 2014 (UTC)
  •  Support Ok for me. --Code 22:26, 26 December 2014 (UTC)
  •  Oppose shadows are too dark --Christian Ferrer 09:43, 28 December 2014 (UTC)
  •  Support Exposure is fine. Ram-Man 03:53, 30 December 2014 (UTC)
Running total: 3 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Promote? Ram-Man 03:53, 30 December 2014 (UTC)

File:Suomenlinna II ferry in August 2014.jpg[edit]

  • Nomination: Helsinki, Suomenlinna Ferry --Ralf Roletschek 06:31, 16 December 2014 (UTC)
    Needs sharpening and brightening of low levels. Mattbuck 07:45, 16 December 2014 (UTC)
    Please add a correct categorization. "Helsinki/unsortiert" is not complying with commons category system. --Cccefalon 20:25, 17 December 2014 (UTC)
  • Review ✓ Done --Ralf Roletschek 19:59, 19 December 2014 (UTC)
    Photo issues not corrected. Mattbuck 10:23, 23 December 2014 (UTC)
     SupportFor me, the quality is quite sufficient in comparison to other photos. --Steindy 13:10, 25 December 2014 (UTC)
  •  Oppose shadows too dark --Christian Ferrer 09:40, 28 December 2014 (UTC)
  •  Support I very much disagree. The contrast on this image is excellent. Ram-Man 03:54, 30 December 2014 (UTC)
Running total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promote? Ram-Man 03:54, 30 December 2014 (UTC)

File:14-08-13-helsinki-RalfR-18.jpg[edit]

  • Nomination Helsinki, main post building --Ralf Roletschek 06:31, 16 December 2014 (UTC)
  • Decline
  •  CommentPlease add a correct categorization. "Helsinki/unsortiert" is not complying with commons category system. --Cccefalon 20:25, 17 December 2014 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Perspective correction not done, a lot of empty space at the bottom, cropped thing at the top. Mattbuck 10:23, 23 December 2014 (UTC)
  •  Support The slightly converging lines correspond perfectly to the natural vision. Not all photos are straightened. Otherwise, good quality. --Steindy 13:10, 25 December 2014 (UTC)
  •  Oppose per Mattbuck – even if PD is acceptable, the framing is still very unfavourable. --Kreuzschnabel 12:18, 26 December 2014 (UTC)
Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Declined   --LivioAndronico 11:29, 29 December 2014 (UTC)

File:Cascade de Aïn Legradj à Bordj Bou Arreredj.jpg[edit]

  • Nomination 10th place in Wiki Loves Earth 2014 (by Chettouh Nabil) –Be..anyone 02:30, 16 December 2014 (UTC)
  • Promotion Please use an appropriate description of the file content. --Cccefalon 06:07, 16 December 2014 (UTC)
     OpposeBad CA, bit oversharpened. Mattbuck 10:23, 23 December 2014 (UTC)
     Support I see no disturbing CA, but a wonderful photo that speaks to me of the design. Especially nice that the water is not frozen. For me, of course QI. Tastes and views are just different. --Steindy 13:10, 25 December 2014 (UTC)
  •  Support OK for me. Yann 11:41, 26 December 2014 (UTC)
  •  Comment IMHO, it's quite yellow. --C messier 18:57, 26 December 2014 (UTC)
Total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promoted   --LivioAndronico 11:29, 29 December 2014 (UTC)

File:Manifestación_contra_la_Ley_Mordaza_en_Madrid_20-12-2014_-_06.jpg[edit]

  • Nomination Demonstration against the "Gag Law" in Madrid, 20th December 2014. --Kadellar 14:07, 21 December 2014 (UTC)
  • Promotion  OpposeInsufficient quality.Very parts blurred,some overexposed area --Livioandronico2013 22:48, 22 December 2014 (UTC)
    Focus is where it has to be, on the man with the gag. --Kadellar 10:17, 23 December 2014 (UTC)
    Yes, but the majority of the total picture is blurred --Livioandronico2013 11:25, 23 December 2014 (UTC)
    This picture, for example, is mostly out of focus, and it's great. It's called attracting your eye and attention to the part on focus. Composition is not only about rule of thirds. --Kadellar 16:47, 23 December 2014 (UTC)
    For you is a great for me is the oppose --Livioandronico2013 17:57, 23 December 2014 (UTC)
  •  SupportFor me a well done reportagephoto. --Steindy 18:38, 23 December 2014 (UTC)
  •  Support OK for me. Yann 11:51, 24 December 2014 (UTC)
  • Weak  Support. Sharpness not 100% on the eyes, but good enough for street shot in the crowd. --Smial 15:12, 26 December 2014 (UTC)
Total: 3 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promoted   --Livioandronico2013 11:28, 29 December 2014 (UTC)

File:Udo Jürgens - Der Soloabend 2010 (09).jpg[edit]

  • Nomination On the occasion of the death of the great Austrian composer and singer Udo Jürgens on December 21, 2014 some pictures from the Open Air Concert 2010 in the Roman Quarry in St. Margarethen (Austria) --Steindy 22:58, 21 December 2014 (UTC)
  • Promotion
  •  Support Good quality. --Dnalor 01 16:34, 22 December 2014 (UTC)

 Oppose Unsharp, unfortunate facial expression, resolution just slightly above 2MP.Just had a short look at the show; Steindy is right: He is looking all the time in this way. --P e z i 20:27, 25 December 2014 (UTC) --P e z i 22:02, 22 December 2014 (UTC)

  •  Comment I'm just too tired to fight against the „so well-intentioned“ comments. I especially Christmas and not feel like it. I wish all my colleagues a Merry Christmas and that under the Christmas tree a package with AGF is. By the way, some above (2014-12-21) are two photos more, you can deselect. --Steindy 13:45, 23 December 2014 (UTC) – @ P e z i: I can not do anything for that typical facial expression that Udo Jürgens always wore while singing in his concerts. --Steindy 13:52, 23 December 2014 (UTC)
  •  Support despite the difficult situation (especially light) during any concerts, its QI for me. You cannot compare it with normal shootings. And the facial expression? This was in fact Udo Jürgens, at this time a 76 year old man. --Hubertl 21:42, 23 December 2014 (UTC)
    •  Comment Udo war Vorbild im Ausdruck für Viele, manche haben es aber übertrieben!! Siehe hier und hier... --Hubertl 22:09, 24 December 2014 (UTC)
  • Weak  Support. Somewhat too blurred regarding the image size, but very good composition and nice colors. -- Smial 15:37, 26 December 2014 (UTC)
Total: 3 support (excluding the nominator), 0 oppose → Promoted   --Livioandronico2013 11:27, 29 December 2014 (UTC)

File:Udo Jürgens - Der Soloabend 2010 (14).jpg[edit]

  • Nomination On the occasion of the death of the great Austrian composer and singer Udo Jürgens on December 21, 2014 some pictures from the Open Air Concert 2010 in the Roman Quarry in St. Margarethen (Austria) --Steindy 22:58, 21 December 2014 (UTC)
  • Promotion
  •  Support Good quality. --Hubertl 01:06, 22 December 2014 (UTC)

*  Oppose Unsharp, very unfortunate facial expression, resolution just slightly above 2MP.Just had a short look at the show; Steindy is right: He is looking all the time in this way. --P e z i 20:24, 25 December 2014 (UTC) --P e z i 22:00, 22 December 2014 (UTC)

  • weak  Support – the only sharp one of this set. Expression is not unbearably bad for an old man singing. --Kreuzschnabel 09:59, 23 December 2014 (UTC)Withdrawn since the nominator obviously did not want me to support. Merry Christmas. --Kreuzschnabel 07:10, 24 December 2014 (UTC)
  •  Comment I'm just too tired to fight against the „so well-intentioned“ comments. I especially Christmas and not feel like it. I wish all my colleagues a Merry Christmas and that under the Christmas tree a package with AGF is. By the way, some above (2014-12-21) are two photos more, you can deselect. --Steindy 13:46, 23 December 2014 (UTC) – @ P e z i: I can not do anything for that typical facial expression that Udo Jürgens always wore while singing in his concerts. --Steindy 13:50, 23 December 2014 (UTC)
    •  Question Do I get it right that you don’t want me to support? Okay, withdrawn. And don’t forget to buy a large AGF packet for yourself. Not everyone opposing your nominations is nothing but a bad guy wanting to hurt you. --Kreuzschnabel 07:10, 24 December 2014 (UTC)
Answer: Do so as you like. If you do not understand it, then re-read who was meant. By the way, my photos are the only images that show him in his typical bathrobe. Finally, I think that the photo used in many articles is copyright infringement since no release is here and the management of Udo Jürgens basically no images have been released. --Steindy 13:39, 25 December 2014 (UTC)
  • Weak  Support. Slight overexposure with clipping on his "bathrobe", sharpness not overwhelming, but acceptable. Again very good composition.-- Smial 15:39, 26 December 2014 (UTC)
Total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 0 oppose → Promoted   --Livioandronico2013 11:26, 29 December 2014 (UTC)

File:Steenvoorde - la maison du COQ (1664).JPG[edit]

  • Nomination Immeuble Au Coq Steenvoorde.- 59114 Nord (département français)--PIERRE ANDRE LECLERCQ 14:20, 20 December 2014 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Comment crop too tight at top Ezarate 14:25, 20 December 2014 (UTC)
  • Thank you. I corrected the photo--PIERRE ANDRE LECLERCQ 20:27, 20 December 2014 (UTC)
  • Crop is ok now but it's the picture is tilted --Ezarate 12:26, 21 December 2014 (UTC)
  • Thank you. I've corrected the inclinaison of picture--PIERRE ANDRE LECLERCQ 10:41, 22 December 2014 (UTC)
  •  Weak support it isn't too sharp but is acceptable Ezarate 14:19, 22 December 2014 (UTC)
     Oppose Insufficient quality of the sky. --Iifar 19:28, 22 December 2014 (UTC)
  •  Info Sorry, northern France the sky is not blue often, I added a little cyan ----PIERRE ANDRE LECLERCQ 21:59, 25 December 2014 (UTC)
  •  Info 'Insufficient quality of the sky' doesn't mean 'Not a blue sky' but rather that the sky is overexposed. The sky could be correct even with clouds (ex). It is even worse by adding cyan IMO, you should rather try to lower high lights. Gyrostat (talk) 18:32, 26 December 2014 (UTC)
  • ✓ Done,thank you for your information, I corrected the original photo's prospects and exposure on the sky--PIERRE ANDRE LECLERCQ 22:43, 26 December 2014 (UTC)
  •  Support OK now. Yann 09:29, 27 December 2014 (UTC)
Total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promoted   --Livioandronico2013 11:25, 29 December 2014 (UTC)

File:Anas December 2014-2.jpg[edit]

  • Nomination Female Mallard Duck. Gulbenkian Garden, Lisboa -- Alvesgaspar 22:40, 20 December 2014 (UTC)
  • Promotion
  •  Support Good quality. --Jkadavoor 06:50, 21 December 2014 (UTC)
  • There is an existing category for this place, please use it before a promotion --Christian Ferrer 16:00, 21 December 2014 (UTC)
  • Sorry, but a duck is a duck is a duck. This is not a depiction of the Gulbenkian Garden -- Alvesgaspar 17:13, 21 December 2014 (UTC)
  • Yes it is and if you think not thus follow your logic and do not write it in your descriptions (file and nomination!), you know the place so you categorize. --Christian Ferrer 17:30, 21 December 2014 (UTC)
  •  Oppose until it’s fixed.
  • To put photos of plants or animals in the category of the garden where you took these photos is very relevant and essential if you know it. A garden or a park contains plants, a category for this garden contains images of these plants. Logic, isn’t it? I have even been kind enough to you to find this category. It's one of the rules here for all of us, when a file has the adequate information so it must be correctly categorized accordingly. (final comments from me for this nomination, maybe see you later on your next nominations…) --Christian Ferrer 20:14, 21 December 2014 (UTC)
  • I added a category and used this image at Gulbenkian_Park#Features. A duck is a duck is a duck; but we need a duck from that garden to use there. Jkadavoor 04:10, 22 December 2014 (UTC)
  •  Neutral ok for me --Christian Ferrer 05:47, 22 December 2014 (UTC)
  •  Support OK for me. Yann 10:59, 23 December 2014 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Unsufficiant lighting, hard shadows, lots of overexposed reflections. Unsuccessful direct flash snapshot with way too high contrast. -- Smial 20:31, 25 December 2014 (UTC)
Total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promoted   --Livioandronico2013 11:24, 29 December 2014 (UTC)