Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives December 06 2015

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Consensual review[edit]

File:Gangolfsplatz_297413N.jpg[edit]

  • Nomination Chapter house Gangolf Place --Ermell 11:37, 2 December 2015 (UTC)
  • Decline
  •  Support Good quality. --Medium69 12:09, 2 December 2015 (UTC)
  •  Oppose I wish a discussion please. I find the crop too tight at top (composition), and I see a too large (sharpening, desaturation ?) white line all along the roof (technical). Correctible. Thank you.--Jebulon 17:01, 2 December 2015 (UTC)
     CommentTried to fix the problems and hope it works. Thank you for the reviews.--Ermell 20:28, 2 December 2015 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Poor framing, too tight crop. -- Alvesgaspar 19:00, 3 December 2015 (UTC)
Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Declined   --Hubertl 17:17, 5 December 2015 (UTC)

File:Marmashen Monastere2.jpg[edit]

  • Nomination Marmashen Monastery --Armenak Margarian 20:48, 29 November 2015 (UTC)
  • Decline
  •  Support Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 15:05, 1 December 2015 (UTC)
  •  Oppose I disagree: Tilted clockwise and lack of fine details. --Cccefalon 21:29, 2 December 2015 (UTC)
  •  Oppose as Cccefalon. I am not sure about the tilt - I guess the building itself is leaning - but details are lacking for sure. --Uoaei1 08:32, 3 December 2015 (UTC)
  •  Oppose As above. Alvesgaspar 19:01, 3 December 2015 (UTC)
Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 3 oppose → Declined   --Hubertl 17:19, 5 December 2015 (UTC)

File:FiatIdea-CABA-nov2015.jpg[edit]

  • Nomination Fiat Idea parked in Buenos Aires, Argentina --Ezarate 23:32, 28 November 2015 (UTC)
  • Decline
  •  Support Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 08:07, 1 December 2015 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Yet tilted clockwise. --Cccefalon 21:14, 2 December 2015 (UTC) ✓ Done Ezarate 22:29, 2 December 2015 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Poor lighting, posterized and unsharp. Alvesgaspar 19:02, 3 December 2015 (UTC)
Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Declined   --Hubertl 17:20, 5 December 2015 (UTC)

File:2014_Prowincja_Wajoc_Dzor,_Gladzor,_Widok_wsi_z_drogi_H47_(01).jpg[edit]

  • Nomination A view of the village from the road H47. Gladzor, Vayots Dzor Province, Armenia. --Halavar 12:44, 28 November 2015 (UTC)
  • Decline
  •  Support Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 08:07, 1 December 2015 (UTC)
  •  Oppose I disagree: The perspective has to be done; the buildings are leaning in. --Cccefalon 21:17, 2 December 2015 (UTC)
    ✓ Done New, fixed version uploaded. Please take a look again. --Halavar 10:22, 3 December 2015 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Unsharp overall. Alvesgaspar 19:03, 3 December 2015 (UTC)
Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Declined   --Hubertl 17:21, 5 December 2015 (UTC)

File:Mühlrad-Heiligenstadt-1020517.jpg[edit]

  • Nomination Millwheel at the mill in Heiligenstadt --Ermell 15:51, 27 November 2015 (UTC)
  • Decline
  •  Support Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 08:09, 1 December 2015 (UTC)
  •  Oppose I disagree: The image is not sharp. --Cccefalon 21:18, 2 December 2015 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Not sharp. --Jebulon 18:01, 3 December 2015 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Unsharp (unsufficient dof?) -- Alvesgaspar 19:05, 3 December 2015 (UTC)
Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 3 oppose → Declined   --Hubertl 17:23, 5 December 2015 (UTC)

File:Heidelstein (Kreuzberg).jpg[edit]

  • Nomination Heidelstein in the Rhön Mountains, seen from south. --Milseburg 18:15, 26 November 2015 (UTC)
  • Decline
  •  Support Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 08:11, 1 December 2015 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Not sharp enough and lacking fine details. I think, the camera setting to "Auto" (f2.8 and 1/1280s) was not a good choice. --Cccefalon 21:25, 2 December 2015 (UTC)
  •  Oppose As above plus lack of contrast. Alvesgaspar 19:08, 3 December 2015 (UTC)
Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Declined   --Hubertl 23:17, 5 December 2015 (UTC)

File:Lemur_catta_(Lémur_catta)_-_354.jpg[edit]

  • Nomination Lemur catta (Ring-tailed lemur) in the ZooParc de Beauval in Saint-Aignan-sur-Cher, France. -- Medium69 00:47, 26 November 2015 (UTC)
  • Decline
  •  Support Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 08:11, 1 December 2015 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Poor composition and the animals are not in focus. Charlesjsharp 15:41, 2 December 2015 (UTC)
    *:  Comment Your comment has no value to me because it's a revenge... --Medium69 01:16, 3 December 2015 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Random composition, subject unsharp, blown parts. Way below QI par. Alvesgaspar 19:10, 3 December 2015 (UTC)
Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Declined   --Hubertl 23:17, 5 December 2015 (UTC)

File:2014_Prowincja_Wajoc_Dzor,_Krajobrazy_widziane_z_drogi_M2,_widoki_okolic_Jeghegnadzor_(14).jpg[edit]

  • Nomination Landscapes seen from the road M2 - views of the surrounding areas. Yeghegnadzor, Vayots Dzor Province, Armenia. --Halavar 10:36, 24 November 2015 (UTC)
  • Decline
  •  Oppose Noisy. --Medium69 20:26, 1 December 2015 (UTC)
  •  Support I think, there is no noise. Its hazy, but this is normal for a panorama like this --Hubertl 10:17, 2 December 2015 (UTC)
     Info Nice landscape, but low contrast. I uploaded new version. Please revert, if it's not better. --Iifar 08:06, 3 December 2015 (UTC)
  •  Oppose -- Subject (the mountain) unsharp. In my opinion the picture should be cropped below: there is noneed for such a foreground. Alvesgaspar 19:12, 3 December 2015 (UTC)
Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Declined   --Hubertl 23:16, 5 December 2015 (UTC)

File:2014_Prowincja_Wajoc_Dzor,_Krajobrazy_widziane_z_drogi_M2,_Widoki_okolic_Arpi_(03).jpg[edit]

  • Nomination Landscapes seen from the road M2 - views of the surrounding areas of Arpi village. Vayots Dzor Province, Armenia. --Halavar 10:36, 24 November 2015 (UTC)
  • Decline
  •  Oppose Noisy. --Medium69 20:26, 1 December 2015 (UTC)
  •  Support I think, there is no noise. Its hazy, but this is normal for a panorama like this --Hubertl 10:17, 2 December 2015 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Too unsharp in my opinion. Alvesgaspar 19:13, 3 December 2015 (UTC)
Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Declined   --Hubertl 23:15, 5 December 2015 (UTC)

File:Bengal_-_20150316_19h59_(10019).jpg[edit]

  • Nomination Young bengal cat three years in Lyon. -- Medium69 02:06, 1 December 2015 (UTC)
  • Decline
  •  Support Good quality. --Thibaut120094 03:14, 1 December 2015 (UTC)
  •  Oppose I disagree, not sharp and blurred. --Rolf H. 05:14, 1 December 2015 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Overexposed, unsharp, random composition (the camera in the foreground is unfortunate). Alvesgaspar 19:19, 3 December 2015 (UTC)
Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Declined   --Hubertl 23:14, 5 December 2015 (UTC)

File:Bengal_-_20150316_19h59_(10018).jpg[edit]

  • Nomination Young bengal cat three years in Lyon. -- Medium69 01:45, 30 November 2015 (UTC)
  • Decline
  •  Support Good quality. --Thibaut120094 22:36, 30 November 2015 (UTC)
  •  Oppose I disagree, not sharp and blurred. --Rolf H. 05:19, 1 December 2015 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Overexposed, unsharp, random composition (the camera in the foreground is unfortunate. Alvesgaspar 19:20, 3 December 2015 (UTC)
Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Declined   --Hubertl 23:14, 5 December 2015 (UTC)

File:DeliaGiovanola1.jpg[edit]

  • Nomination Delia Giovanola, Grandmother of Plaza de Mayo, participating in Editaton Abuelas de Plaza de Mayo, view of left profile --Ezarate 22:21, 25 November 2015 (UTC)
  • Decline
  •  Oppose Jpeg artefacts --Medium69 22:03, 1 December 2015 (UTC)
  •  Comment ídem another picture, it was process from a RAW file Ezarate 22:06, 1 December 2015 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Artifacts, loss of fine details. --Tsungam 08:06, 2 December 2015 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Poor framing, lack of detail, insharp. Alvesgaspar 19:21, 3 December 2015 (UTC)
Total: 0 support (excluding the nominator), 3 oppose → Declined   --Hubertl 23:13, 5 December 2015 (UTC)

File:DeliaGiovanola.jpg[edit]

  • Nomination Delia Giovanola, in the editaton "Abuelas de Plaza de Mayo" --Ezarate 22:35, 23 November 2015 (UTC)
  • Decline
  •  Oppose Jpeg artefacts. --Medium69 19:32, 1 December 2015 (UTC)
  •  Comment I can't see the artifacts, it was processed from a RAW file --Ezarate 19:52, 1 December 2015 (UTC)
     Comment Artifacts are very obvious in the green coat. --Tsungam 08:03, 2 December 2015 (UTC)
  •  Oppose As above. Alvesgaspar 19:22, 3 December 2015 (UTC)
Total: 0 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Declined   --Hubertl 23:12, 5 December 2015 (UTC)