Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives August 30 2023

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Consensual review[edit]

File:2023_Sernik_polski_(1).jpg[edit]

  • Nomination Polish cheesecake 1 --Jacek Halicki 07:49, 26 August 2023 (UTC)
  • Decline
     Oppose Out of focus. --多多123 17:17, 26 August 2023 (UTC)
    Other opinions please --Jacek Halicki 23:21, 26 August 2023 (UTC)
  •  Support I would have photographed the cake from a slightly different perspective, not so exactly frontal, and perhaps placed the lighting a little to the side, but there is nothing to complain about the sharpness. --Smial 07:13, 27 August 2023 (UTC)
  •  Oppose. The front of the cake is not in focus and the composition is not the best. -- Spurzem 08:34, 27 August 2023 (UTC)
 Comment The bottom (lower edge) of the cake is sharp enough, the front upper edge of the cake is sharp enough. Why should the area between be unsharp? There is low contrast, yes, but this is not surprising due to a rather homogenous material, and soft lighting. --Smial 13:28, 28 August 2023 (UTC)
  •  Comment There are little dust spots diagonally up to the right and below and just slightly to the left of the plate. Please edit those out, and then I will support. The focus is fine, considering how much of a closeup this is. -- Ikan Kekek 07:42, 29 August 2023 (UTC)
@Ikan Kekek: Fixed--Jacek Halicki 11:20, 29 August 2023 (UTC)
Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Declined   --Peulle 09:50, 29 August 2023 (UTC)

File:Gradinsko_jezero_(See),_Plitvicer_Seen_(Kroatien)_-_0193-4.jpg[edit]

  • Nomination Gradinsko jezero, Croatia --Аныл Озташ 22:14, 17 August 2023 (UTC)
  • Decline
     Oppose Strange artefacts on the rock --Grunpfnul 19:20, 21 August 2023 (UTC)
     Support Good quality. --多多123 12:30, 25 August 2023 (UTC)
     Oppose Thank you 多多123 for your many reviews ! But this one needs to be discussed. I agree with Grunpfnul. --Sebring12Hrs 12:48, 25 August 2023 (UTC)
  •  Oppose I don't see artifacts, but I do see inexplicably unsharp areas on the rock. -- Ikan Kekek 07:11, 26 August 2023 (UTC)
  •  Oppose overprocessed. Do not try to compensate for excessive noise reduction by over-sharpening. --Smial 08:53, 26 August 2023 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Oversharpend, overprocessed, unsharp areas at the rock. Sorry. --XRay 08:40, 27 August 2023 (UTC)
Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 5 oppose → Declined   --Peulle 09:50, 29 August 2023 (UTC)

File:War_memorial_for_World_war_I+II_near_Moosbrunn,_Lower_Austria,_Austria-memorial_PNr°0935.jpg[edit]

  • Nomination A memorial for fallen soliders of the first and second world war east of Moosbrunn, Lower Austria, Austria --D-Kuru 07:00, 15 August 2023 (UTC)
  • Decline
  •  Oppose Low level of details, sorry. --Sebring12Hrs 16:20, 23 August 2023 (UTC)
  • What you mean with "Low level of details"? Even the wiriting on the plate is readable --D-Kuru 05:40, 24 August 2023 (UTC)
@D-Kuru: "Low level of details" seems to be a standard rating. The picture was apparently taken under unfavorable conditions, which makes it appear dark and pale with too little contrast. Furthermore there are CAs in the branches. That's why I also think this photo shouldn't be labeled as a quality image. Best regards -- Spurzem 13:28, 25 August 2023 (UTC)
  • Yeah, the details are fine but the COM:CA should be corrected. Some viewers might require perspective correction, too, though not I. -- Ikan Kekek 19:31, 25 August 2023 (UTC)
Total: 0 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Declined   --Peulle 06:40, 29 August 2023 (UTC)