Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives August 29 2019

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Consensual review[edit]

File:Salzburg_Altstadt_13.jpg[edit]

  • Nomination Festung Hohensalzburg and Cathedral seen from the north (Kapuzinerberg) --Clemens Stockner 19:05, 24 August 2019 (UTC)
  • Promotion
    The roof should be cropped out. --Ermell 19:29, 24 August 2019 (UTC)
  •  Support Good quality for me. Due to the foreground it gains in perspective--Horst J. Meuter 21:53, 24 August 2019 (UTC)
 Info The Roof is exactly what I was aiming for with this shot. It's what makes it special. --Clemens Stockner 08:01, 25 August 2019 (UTC)
  •  Support as per Horst.--Tobias ToMar Maier 19:16, 25 August 2019 (UTC)
  •  Support The roof makes it special. --GT1976 20:02, 26 August 2019 (UTC)
Total: 3 support (excluding the nominator), 0 oppose → Promoted   --Seven Pandas 22:24, 28 August 2019 (UTC)

File:Adliswil_and_Lake_Zurich.jpg[edit]

  • Nomination Adliswil and Lake Zurich from the Planetenweg Uetliberg-Felsenegg --Domob 12:09, 18 August 2019 (UTC)
  • Decline Focus is at foreground, too hazy, looks tilted. --Dirtsc 07:50, 21 August 2019 (UTC)
     Comment Thanks for the review! I've straightened the horizon. I think the background (e.g. the houses in the valley) is certainly sharp enough for QI. Let's discuss this, thanks. --Domob 17:26, 21 August 2019 (UTC)
  •  Neutral Suggest to clean the branches on the right --Moroder 17:38, 24 August 2019 (UTC)
  •  Oppose per Moroder. Also IMO too dark and muddy in foreground. --GRDN711 10:39, 25 August 2019 (UTC)
Total: 0 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Declined   --Milseburg 12:55, 28 August 2019 (UTC)

File:EBACE_2018,_Le_Grand-Saconnex_(BL7C0452).jpg[edit]

  • Nomination: Aircraft tug at EBACE 2018, Le Grand-Saconnex --MB-one 09:00, 13 August 2019 (UTC)
  • Review
     Oppose Sorry, too high ISO and the front of the tug (facing away from the photographer) is already too much out of focus for me. --Domob 12:20, 18 August 2019 (UTC)
    I disagree, noise levels and DoF are well within reason. --MB-one 20:24, 20 August 2019 (UTC)
  •  Support Noise seems Ok for me. Charlesjsharp 17:19, 21 August 2019 (UTC)
  •  Support Looking to the main subject okay. --Milseburg 11:30, 26 August 2019 (UTC)
  •  Oppose I found it too noisy --Cvmontuy 18:13, 28 August 2019 (UTC)
Total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Inconclusive result after 8 consensual review days   --Peulle 11:52, 28 August 2019 (UTC)

File:Tuning_World_Bodensee_2018,_Friedrichshafen_(OW1A1310).jpg[edit]

  • Nomination APR modified VW Up! GTI at Tuning World Bodensee 2018 --MB-one 08:31, 11 August 2019 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support The front part of the car is quite soft (with the part towards the photographer in focus), but it is good for QI. --Domob 12:15, 18 August 2019 (UTC)
     OpposeThe image is very sharp. But the car looks a bit too dark and distorted. Please discuss. -- Spurzem 20:37, 20 August 2019 (UTC) – O. K. now -- Spurzem 22:37, 24 August 2019 (UTC)
@Spurzem: Adressed both issues. Thanks for the review. --MB-one 11:51, 24 August 2019 (UTC)
 Support looks fine to me now. --Cayambe 14:25, 24 August 2019 (UTC)
 Oppose Understand that the lighting situation is poor but IMO still too dark and tones are muddy. --GRDN711 10:26, 25 August 2019 (UTC)
Total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promoted   --Peulle 11:52, 28 August 2019 (UTC)