Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives August 28 2019

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Consensual review[edit]

File:Austrian_500_US-CAR_DAYS_2019_41.jpg[edit]

  • Nomination Pop up headlights turned approximately 135° along the lateral axis on a Chevrolet Corvette C2. Image taken at Austrian 500 US-CAR DAYS 2019. --Tobias ToMar Maier 11:42, 24 August 2019 (UTC)
  • Decline
     Support Very specific description ;-) --MB-one 13:08, 24 August 2019 (UTC)
     Oppose ... but no exciting photo. The background is extremely disturbing and the reflection on the hood as well. Please discuss. -- Spurzem 22:20, 24 August 2019 (UTC)
  •  Oppose per Spurzem. --Smial 10:42, 25 August 2019 (UTC)
  •  Oppose per Spurzem. --GRDN711 10:47, 25 August 2019 (UTC)
Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 3 oppose → Declined   --Seven Pandas 00:10, 28 August 2019 (UTC)

File:Hervé_Yvars,_entraîneur_d'Ain_Sud_Foot_à_la_fin_d'un_entraînement_le_23_août_2019_sur_le_Stade_du_Forum.jpg[edit]

  • Nomination Hervé Yvars, entraîneur d'Ain Sud Foot, à la fin d'un entraînement le 23 août 2019 sur le Stade du Forum. --Benoît Prieur 19:54, 23 August 2019 (UTC)
  • Decline
  •  Support Good quality. --Ermell 20:41, 23 August 2019 (UTC)
  •  Oppose I'd like to hear more opinions on this. It's not bad, but still suffers from noise / pixelation etc. like other phone pictures --Podzemnik 21:33, 24 August 2019 (UTC)
  •  Support Noise is mainly on the sweater, the main motif / portrait is OK IMO. --Palauenc05 (talk) 08:31, 25 August 2019 (UTC)
  •  Oppose per Podzemnik. --Basotxerri 14:49, 25 August 2019 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Even if the loss of detail wasn't there, the eyes are too much in the dark.--Tobias ToMar Maier 19:14, 25 August 2019 (UTC)
Total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 3 oppose → Declined   --Seven Pandas 00:10, 28 August 2019 (UTC)

File:Préparation_des_teintures_au_Guédelon_en_août_2019.jpg[edit]

  • Nomination Préparation des teintures au Guédelon en août 2019. --Benoît Prieur 12:04, 22 August 2019 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Oppose Nice composition but unfortunately strong posterization effects --MB-one 12:53, 22 August 2019 (UTC)
     Support Very good photo. It may be that a small technical issue can be determined, but that does not change the overall quality of the recording for me. Please discuss. -- Spurzem 13:01, 22 August 2019 (UTC)
  • Weak  Support. Per Spurzem. Some problems with noise resp. noise reduction, but great lighting, great composition, nice colours and overall good enough to be printed to letter size or even bigger. --Smial 08:19, 23 August 2019 (UTC)
  • Weak  Support per Smial. (It’s a pity that espec. the hairs of the woman are affected by denosing/compression (?) issues; here the iPhone did not do well.) --Aristeas 09:09, 23 August 2019 (UTC)
  •  Oppose I'm on the other side; QIZ is all about the technical issues and here the image is simply not rendered well. --Peulle 06:44, 24 August 2019 (UTC)
  •  Comment I just can not understand how many "photographic scrap" is praised here and on the other hand, excellent pictures like this are declared useless. -- Spurzem 22:31, 24 August 2019 (UTC)
  •  Support OK 4 me. --Palauenc05 14:18, 25 August 2019 (UTC)
Total: 4 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Promoted   --Seven Pandas 00:09, 28 August 2019 (UTC)

File:Wolfsberg_Reisberg_Filialkirche_hl._Kunigund_26082015_7042.jpg[edit]

  • Nomination Subsidiary church Saint Cunigunde in Reisberg, Wolfsberg, Carinthia, Austria -- Johann Jaritz 03:18, 22 August 2019 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 03:22, 22 August 2019 (UTC)
  •  Support {{weak oppose}} Vertical lines not vertical. OK if straightened. --Vivo 08:33, 22 August 2019 (UTC)
  •  Comment Perspective probably slightly overcorrected. The building seems to have some sloping or crooked walls or corners. They cannot all be displayed vertically at the same time. --Smial 08:25, 23 August 2019 (UTC)
  • ✓ Done @Smial: @Vivo: Hopefully the image will please your eyes after some corrections. —- Johann Jaritz 06:53, 24 August 2019 (UTC)
  •  Support I think you've found a very good compromise. The composition, lighting etc. were already good before. --Smial 07:55, 24 August 2019 (UTC)
  •  Support Man kann es mit den vertikalen Linien auch übertreiben. -- Spurzem 22:33, 24 August 2019 (UTC)
  •  Oppose ist mir zu stark verzerrt. --Ralf Roletschek 08:46, 25 August 2019 (UTC)
  •  Support OK 4 me. --Palauenc05 14:19, 25 August 2019 (UTC)
Total: 5 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promoted   --Seven Pandas 00:09, 28 August 2019 (UTC)

File:Bachstelze_IMG_3840.jpg[edit]

  • Nomination Bachstelzen-Nestlinge (ca. eine Woche alt) um Futter bettelnd.--Fischer.H 15:07, 20 August 2019 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support
    Very nice and good quality. --Manfred Kuzel 15:57, 20 August 2019 (UTC)
     Oppose I disagree about the quality. Please discuss --Podzemnik 01:28, 21 August 2019 (UTC)
  • Nice colours, great composition and appealing lighting. Rather noisy and somewhat low DOF, but I believe, this is not an "easy to take" image, so weak  Support. --Smial 09:33, 21 August 2019 (UTC)
  •  Support Auch von mir ein „Pro“ für ein ebenso nettes wie eindrucksvolles Foto, obwohl man spitzfindig sein und Kleinigkeiten bemängeln könnte. -- Spurzem 15:32, 21 August 2019 (UTC)
  •  Support per Smial. --Aristeas 09:04, 23 August 2019 (UTC)
  •  Neutral Image could be stronger if white area at top and a little on the left were cropped. --GRDN711 10:37, 25 August 2019 (UTC)
Total: 4 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promoted   --Seven Pandas 00:08, 28 August 2019 (UTC)

File:Cosmos bipinnatus Germany.jpg[edit]

  • Nomination Schmuckkörbchen oder Kosmee, aus der Familie der Korbblütler.--Fischer.H 09:46, 16 August 2019 (UTC)
  • Decline  Support Good quality. --Manfred Kuzel 10:24, 16 August 2019 (UTC)
     Oppose I disagree. Oversaturated / overprocessed --Podzemnik 02:02, 19 August 2019 (UTC)
    Weak  Support. I agree that the image is oversaturated, but I know that many people out there would regard this high saturation as quite nice. @Fischer.H: Could you try to upload a version with a bit less saturated, more realistic colours? This could be the best compromise. --Aristeas 09:25, 20 August 2019 (UTC)
  •  Oppose If it's oversaturated, it must be corrected. Charlesjsharp 17:24, 21 August 2019 (UTC)
  •  Oppose per Podzemnik and Charles. --GRDN711 10:22, 25 August 2019 (UTC)
Total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 3 oppose → Declined   --Peulle 10:25, 27 August 2019 (UTC)