Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives August 17 2015

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Consensual review[edit]

File:Schloss Bürresheim - Innenhof (2012-06-24 Sp).jpg[edit]

  • Nomination Courtyard of Bürresheim Castle -- Spurzem 19:00, 6 August 2015 (UTC)
  • Promotion
  •  Oppose Too much CA on finial; flowers at left are pretty but distracting, and upper story seems to be leaning in a bit --Daniel Case 05:58, 12 August 2015 (UTC)
  •  Support Sorry, I don't agree with criticism (esp. flowers!), would appreciate a 3rd opinion. --Palauenc05 14:51, 13 August 2015 (UTC)
  •  Support --Ralf Roletschek 16:28, 14 August 2015 (UTC)
Total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promoted   --Hubertl 09:38, 16 August 2015 (UTC)

File:Morris_J._Wosk_Centre_for_Dialogue_02.JPG[edit]

  • Nomination Morris J. Wosk Centre for Dialogue, Simon Fraser University, Vancouver, Canada --Xicotencatl 17:37, 7 August 2015 (UTC)
  •  Comment Needs a correction of vertical lines, I'm not sure about the colours --Moroder 09:52, 12 August 2015 (UTC)
  • Decline
  •  Support Good perspective, lighting and detail --Daniel Case 17:00, 12 August 2015 (UTC)
  •  Oppose I disagree --Moroder 18:25, 12 August 2015 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Per Moroder - the verticals are leaning out; this is optically not possible. Can be fixed of course, and if done, I revoke my oppose. --Cccefalon 05:34, 13 August 2015 (UTC)
  •  Comment I can't fix this without cropping out the top of the building. --Xicotencatl 06:54, 13 August 2015 (UTC)
 Comment of course you can do that: If you correct an outleaning vertical, the top of the building is not growing up but growing down. --Cccefalon 08:05, 13 August 2015 (UTC)
Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Declined   --Hubertl 09:37, 16 August 2015 (UTC)

File:MS Asbach (2007-09-06).JPG[edit]

  • Nomination Passenger ship “Asbach” of Köln-Düsseldorfer, built in 1996, on Rhine near Andernach -- Spurzem 17:13, 8 August 2015 (UTC)
  • Promotion
  •  Support Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 20:19, 8 August 2015 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Very noisy sky. Btw, also lacking information on author, source, and date. --A.Savin 20:54, 8 August 2015 (UTC)
     Comment It is not my mistake. I don't know why author, source and date are not displayed. -- Spurzem 22:01, 8 August 2015 (UTC)
     Comment I see. }} was missing. -- Spurzem 22:07, 8 August 2015 (UTC)
  •  Support --Ralf Roletschek 19:57, 11 August 2015 (UTC)
Total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promoted   --Hubertl 09:35, 16 August 2015 (UTC)

File:Tournai_belfry.JPG[edit]

  • Nomination Belfry in Tournai, Belgium --KL KL 11:28, 7 August 2015 (UTC)
  • Decline
  •  Support Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 12:06, 7 August 2015 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Sorry but need adjustment perspective for me--Livioandronico2013 12:09, 7 August 2015 (UTC)
     Comment In this case in my opinion not necessary -- Spurzem 12:14, 7 August 2015 (UTC)
     Comment It looks like the Leaning Tower of Pisa--Livioandronico2013 12:38, 7 August 2015 (UTC)
  • ✓ Done Slight perspective correction as a total correction would look weird. --KL KL 13:14, 7 August 2015 (UTC)
  • Weak  Support. It is the impression which I have when being near by the tower and looking above. -- Spurzem 07:34, 8 August 2015 (UTC)
  •  Oppose the crop at the top is an absolute no-go for me.--Jebulon 20:11, 13 August 2015 (UTC)
    •  Comment I didn't even notice I cropped the top. By looking at other pictures of the belfry I realise it is an important lack and I agree with your opinion. --KL KL 19:59, 16 August 2015 (UTC)
  •  Oppose per Jebulon, something looks also very wrong to me with the perspective and I dont ask straight vertical lines --Moroder 07:48, 14 August 2015 (UTC)
Total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 3 oppose → Declined   --Hubertl 09:36, 16 August 2015 (UTC)