Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives August 11 2019

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Consensual review[edit]

File:Passenger_Experience_Week_2018,_Hamburg_(1X7A3796).jpg[edit]

  • Nomination Recaro CL3710 passenger seat at Passenger Experience Week 2018, Hamburg --MB-one 08:13, 29 July 2019 (UTC)
  • Decline
     Oppose I think this photo is too simple, sorry. --SH6188 03:26, 7 August 2019 (UTC)
    @SH6188: please elaborate, what is meant by "too simple". --MB-one 03:25, 8 August 2019 (UTC)
     Support A photo is never “too simple”, it can only be “good” or “bad” and for me is it a QI. -- Manfred Kuzel 05:39, 8 August 2019 (UTC)
     Oppose I found the poeple in the background distracting, and the composition unbalanced --Cvmontuy 18:06, 8 August 2019 (UTC)
  •  Oppose per Cvmontuy.--Peulle 20:52, 8 August 2019 (UTC)
Running total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 3 oppose → Decline?   --Seven Pandas 18:36, 10 August 2019 (UTC)

File:Phlox_(70856).jpg[edit]

  • Nomination Phlox at Brooklyn Botanic Garden --Rhododendrites 02:51, 29 July 2019 (UTC)
  • Promotion
  • needs description – e.g. is it a concrete cultivar? --Nefronus 21:45, 29 July 2019 (UTC)
  • @Nefronus: I'm not sure. I know it's Phlox, so that's all I included. As far as I know, we only require identification to the genus for QIC. Rhododendrites 22:03, 29 July 2019 (UTC)
  • Note: Nefronus originally declined per above. I responded and later moved to discuss. Don't know if I'm supposed to manually add an "oppose" for clarification. Rhododendrites 13:55, 31 July 2019 (UTC)
  •  Support Phlox sows itself. The category is good for me.--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 17:01, 31 July 2019 (UTC)
  •  Oppose overexposed and washed out. Seven Pandas 22:26, 31 July 2019 (UTC)
  •  Support Good quality for me. --Manfred Kuzel 03:29, 3 August 2019 (UTC)
  •  Oppose I'm not excited. The petals are too bright and there is not enough structure recognizable. -- Spurzem 12:21, 3 August 2019 (UTC)
  •  Support Quite good. --Aristeas 19:13, 3 August 2019 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Not sharp. --Bgag 02:49, 5 August 2019 (UTC)
  • Weak  Support. Exposure is on the high side, and DOF probably somewhat low. But colours look still natural, and the middle flower is sharp enough. --Smial 09:35, 7 August 2019 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Many issues described above. --GRDN711 19:04, 8 August 2019 (UTC)
  •  Support per Smial.--Ermell 06:21, 10 August 2019 (UTC)
Running total: 5 support (excluding the nominator), 4 oppose → Promote?   --Seven Pandas 00:17, 9 August 2019 (UTC)