Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives August 08 2022
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
-
- Nomination Muiden, house on Herengracht (sculpture)
--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:22, 6 August 2022 (UTC) - Promotion
Support Good quality. --JoachimKohler-HB 04:29, 6 August 2022 (UTC)
- Nomination Muiden, house on Herengracht (sculpture)
-
- Nomination Muiden, Grote of Sint-Nicolaaskerk (Church tower)
--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:22, 6 August 2022 (UTC) - Promotion
Support Good quality. --JoachimKohler-HB 04:30, 6 August 2022 (UTC)
- Nomination Muiden, Grote of Sint-Nicolaaskerk (Church tower)
-
- Nomination Kirchstrasse 17 (Church street) in Leer (East Frisia) --JoachimKohler-HB 04:17, 6 August 2022 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:23, 6 August 2022 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Lower Geyser Basin in the Yellowstone National Park, Wyoming, USA --XRay 03:51, 6 August 2022 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:02, 6 August 2022 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Canada Place in Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada --XRay 03:51, 6 August 2022 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:02, 6 August 2022 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Ship “Echo Sentinel” in Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada --XRay 03:51, 6 August 2022 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:02, 6 August 2022 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Art Gallery in Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada --XRay 03:51, 6 August 2022 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:16, 6 August 2022 (UTC)
-
- Nomination St Andrew’s Wesley United Church in Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada --XRay 03:51, 6 August 2022 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:17, 6 August 2022 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Park bench on Koschatpromenade in Viktring, 13th borough Viktring, Klagenfurt, Carinthia, Austria -- Johann Jaritz 02:17, 6 August 2022 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --XRay 03:53, 6 August 2022 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Footbridge over the park pond at the monastery Viktring, 13th borough Viktring, Klagenfurt, Carinthia, Austria -- Johann Jaritz 02:17, 6 August 2022 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Tagooty 02:44, 6 August 2022 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Collegiate and parish church Our Lady of Victories at the cistercian monastery, 13th borough Viktring, Klagenfurt, Carinthia, Austria -- Johann Jaritz 02:17, 6 August 2022 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Tagooty 02:44, 6 August 2022 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Western portal of the parish and abbey church at the cistercian monastery Viktring, 13th borough Viktring, Klagenfurt, Carinthia, Austria -- Johann Jaritz 02:17, 6 August 2022 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --XRay 03:53, 6 August 2022 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Volkmannsreuth in Franconian Switzerland, aerial view. --Ermell 20:06, 5 August 2022 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --JoachimKohler-HB 04:36, 6 August 2022 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Aerial view of the castle in Gößweinstein --Ermell 20:06, 5 August 2022 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --JoachimKohler-HB 04:31, 6 August 2022 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Rosenborg Palace, Copenhagen --Jakubhal 18:22, 5 August 2022 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 19:20, 5 August 2022 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Spring snowflake (Leucojum vernum) --Robert Flogaus-Faust 11:49, 5 August 2022 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 18:24, 5 August 2022 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Fountain at the Plaça del Mercat in Sant Feliu de Guíxols --Kritzolina 10:59, 5 August 2022 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 12:17, 5 August 2022 (UTC)
-
- Nomination The Peel Monument in Ramsbottom in August 2022. --Espandero 10:53, 5 August 2022 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 12:18, 5 August 2022 (UTC)
-
- Nomination re:publica 2022: Paulita Pappel (porn producer). By --Stepro 09:54, 5 August 2022 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 12:18, 5 August 2022 (UTC)
-
- Nomination FLONA - Floresta Nacional de Brasília de nível Federal By User:Benijunior2 --Rodrigo.Argenton 09:47, 5 August 2022 (UTC)
- Promotion Very pretty. The time in the EXIF looks wrong. This is presumably a sunset and should include a category for sunsets (or else it's a sunrise). -- Ikan Kekek 04:17, 6 August 2022 (UTC)
-
- Nomination parque nacional By User:Robsondig --Rodrigo.Argenton 09:47, 5 August 2022 (UTC)
- Decline
Oppose Sorry, nice, but strong noise and chromatic aberration. Also tilted a little bit --Jakubhal 18:29, 5 August 2022 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Coral grouper (Cephalopholis miniata), Ras Muhammad National Park, Egypt --Poco a poco 07:16, 5 August 2022 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality. --IamMM 22:09, 5 August 2022 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Coral reef (Pocillopora verrucosa, Xenia umbellata), Ras Muhammad National Park, Egypt --Poco a poco 07:16, 5 August 2022 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Isiwal 07:23, 5 August 2022 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Coral reef (Acropora hemprichii, Xenia umbellata, Siderastrea savignyana), Ras Muhammad National Park, Egypt --Poco a poco 07:16, 5 August 2022 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Isiwal 07:23, 5 August 2022 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Lunar-tailed bigeye (Priacanthus hamrur), Ras Muhammad National Park, Egypt --Poco a poco 07:16, 5 August 2022 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Isiwal 07:23, 5 August 2022 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Coral (Acropora hemprichii), Ras Muhammad National Park, Egypt --Poco a poco 07:16, 5 August 2022 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality. --IamMM 22:09, 5 August 2022 (UTC)
-
- Nomination RhB 4/4 II 635 "Küblis" with Alpine Classic Pullman Express in the streets of Chur, Switzerland. --JoachimKohler-HB 05:05, 5 August 2022 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality --Llez 05:16, 5 August 2022 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Flower bud of a Dipsacus (teasel). Focus stack of 14 photos.
--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:33, 5 August 2022 (UTC) - Promotion
Support Good quality. --XRay 04:36, 5 August 2022 (UTC)
Comment Nice photo, but there are no visible flower buds. This looks like an infrutescence, turning brown already (other versions). Description and categorization must be improved accordingly. Category:Dipsacus should be replaced by Category:Unidentified Dipsacus; Category:Black and white photographs of flowers is wrong, of course. --Robert Flogaus-Faust 11:45, 5 August 2022 (UTC)
Comment In addition, there should be at least an approximete location where the plant is from. --Robert Flogaus-Faust 13:39, 5 August 2022 (UTC)
CommentThank you for your comment. I have changed the categories. I put the flower buds of the photograph in a vase with water. some time later the bud bloomed lilac-purple.--Agnes Monkelbaan 15:42, 5 August 2022 (UTC)
Thanks! --Robert Flogaus-Faust 17:09, 5 August 2022 (UTC)
- Nomination Flower bud of a Dipsacus (teasel). Focus stack of 14 photos.
-
- Nomination Detail of the Masini fountain (Daemon's Mask) --Terragio67 22:11, 4 August 2022 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --JoachimKohler-HB 05:06, 5 August 2022 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Palace of Culture and Science in Warsaw --A,Ocram 13:47, 4 August 2022 (UTC)
- Promotion
Looks great until you see the bottom crop, not a QI to me like this --Poco a poco 17:48, 4 August 2022 (UTC)
Support Partly blocked by a bus but still good to me. Feel free to oppose and change the status to Discuss. -- Ikan Kekek 08:18, 5 August 2022 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Langenlois, Lower Austria, hut for a vineyard keeper. --Isiwal 07:27, 4 August 2022 (UTC)
- Promotion
Can you reduce the chroma noise? --Poco a poco 08:14, 4 August 2022 (UTC)
Done thanks for review--Isiwal 05:34, 5 August 2022 (UTC)
Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 12:28, 5 August 2022 (UTC)
-
- Nomination GMS Main above the Bamberg lock --Ermell 06:59, 4 August 2022 (UTC)
- Promotion
Isn't it tilted in cw direction? --Poco a poco 08:13, 4 August 2022 (UTC) Done Question Better?--Ermell 20:05, 4 August 2022 (UTC)
Support Better, I'd have gone further but ok --Poco a poco 12:28, 5 August 2022 (UTC)
-
- Nomination canker at a beech tree in nature park Spessart --KaiBorgeest 21:10, 3 August 2022 (UTC)
- Promotion
Suggest raising the level of the shadows to show more detail of the canker. --Tagooty 02:55, 4 August 2022 (UTC) Done--KaiBorgeest 21:05, 4 August 2022 (UTC)
Support Good quality. --Tagooty 05:01, 5 August 2022 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Perch Rock Lighthouse --Mike Peel 20:07, 2 August 2022 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Kritzolina 11:02, 5 August 2022 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Kentish plover (Charadrius alexandrinus) --Charlesjsharp 16:47, 2 August 2022 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Drow male 21:11, 5 August 2022 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Arch of Eglise Saint-Aubin in Toulouse --Jsamwrites 10:30, 2 August 2022 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Kritzolina 11:02, 5 August 2022 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Sluice gates in irrigation canal, close-up view, Paschimavahini, Srirangapatna --Tagooty 05:21, 2 August 2022 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Kritzolina 11:02, 5 August 2022 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Red-footed falcon (Falco vespertinus) male --Charlesjsharp 11:07, 1 August 2022 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Drow male 21:11, 5 August 2022 (UTC)
-
- Nomination: Ear Fungus, Auricularia cornea --Snowmanstudios 18:44, 30 July 2022 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination: Arachnid, no ID so far --Snowmanstudios 18:44, 30 July 2022 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination: Emeraldine, Ceroctena amynta --Snowmanstudios 18:44, 30 July 2022 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination: Shahi Eidgah, Sylhet. --RockyMasum 18:09, 30 July 2022 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination: Audi Quattro (Group 4) from 1983 at Solitude Revival 2022.--Alexander-93 13:27, 30 July 2022 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination: Porsche 356 Roadster from 1963 at Solitude Revival 2022.--Alexander-93 13:27, 30 July 2022 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination: Tram-train near Lyon, in France --Billy69150 12:47, 30 July 2022 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination: Coral banded shrimp (Stenopus hispidus), Ras Muhammad National Park, Egypt --Poco a poco 10:51, 30 July 2022 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination: Scopitone-Filmrolle, ohne Film, mit Schachtel. Aufschrift „Les soeurs Kessler – Quando Quando – Toni Renis. Aus der Sammlung von Bernd Brehmer. By User:Kaethe17 --Kritzolina 07:21, 30 July 2022 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination: Sin título (Andreu Alfaro), Tenerife --Mike Peel 07:04, 30 July 2022 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination Móvil, Tenerife --Mike Peel 07:04, 30 July 2022 (UTC)
- Promotion The mobile is nice but the buildings are distracting. Is a perspective correction possible? -- Ikan Kekek 05:57, 3 August 2022 (UTC)
@Ikan Kekek: Perspective tweaked, does that look better? Thanks. Mike Peel 21:31, 5 August 2022 (UTC)
Support Yes, it's OK for me. Thanks. -- Ikan Kekek 04:22, 6 August 2022 (UTC)
-
- Nomination: Móvil, Tenerife --Mike Peel 07:04, 30 July 2022 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination: Saint Clair churches in Liourdres, Correze, France. --Tournasol7 06:37, 30 July 2022 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination: Large flying fox, Pteropus vampyrus, Wilhelma, Stuttgart --Llez 06:31, 30 July 2022 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination German parliamentary elections and formed coalition governments, a versatile SVG, which is structured for easy updating with ever changing voting results as well as other languages. So, among the simple a clear diagram, please consider the practical aspects of maintenance of this chart. (Please consider, it was nominated twice already, thanks.) --Aeroid 16:24, 28 July 2022 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support In my opinion this is a good job with the possibility of modifications for different languages and the addition of election results in the future. The information is presented in a clear and accessible way. --Mike1979 Russia 11:33, 5 August 2022 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Houses at the marketplace in Warsaw --A,Ocram 11:54, 28 July 2022 (UTC)
- Promotion
This is really good quality, except the lower crop. Do you think you could crop the tops of those umbrellas? --Kritzolina 16:32, 28 July 2022 (UTC)
Done sure; i tried to change it!--A,Ocram 13:31, 4 August 2022 (UTC)
Support Good quality now, thank you! --Kritzolina 11:04, 5 August 2022 (UTC)
-
- Nomination: Škoda Kodiaq at Tuning World Bodensee 2018 --MB-one 10:21, 22 July 2022 (UTC)
- Review
I would clone out the metal bar at the bottom --Poco a poco 18:46, 22 July 2022 (UTC)
Done Thanks for the review --MB-one 10:59, 30 July 2022 (UTC)
That was too quick, now you have a cloning issue, I cannot let it pass like this, sorrz --Poco a poco 21:27, 30 July 2022 (UTC)
Consensual review[edit]
File:Camel_at_Puri_Beach.jpg[edit]
- Nomination A man with a camel at Puri Beach, India --Ganesh Mohan T 06:40, 3 August 2022 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality. Regards to Puri beach! --Kritzolina 06:45, 3 August 2022 (UTC)
Oppose The horizon should be aligned--Ermell 07:38, 3 August 2022 (UTC)- Support --Ermell 20:24, 4 August 2022 (UTC)
Fixed alignment now --Ganesh Mohan T 10:43, 3 August 2022 (UTC)
- Support Good quality and nice motif. -- Ikan Kekek 05:58, 4 August 2022 (UTC)
- Support Good quality. --Tagooty 16:08, 4 August 2022 (UTC)
- Support QI for me --Jakubhal 18:56, 4 August 2022 (UTC)
Total: 5 support (excluding the nominator), 0 oppose → Promoted --Robert Flogaus-Faust 11:58, 7 August 2022 (UTC)
File:Seattle_(WA,_USA),_Broad_Street,_Bahnübergang_--_2022_--_1690.jpg[edit]
- Nomination Train at the railroad crossing at Broad Street in Seattle, Washington, USA --XRay 00:57, 1 August 2022 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Frank Schulenburg 02:11, 1 August 2022 (UTC)
Oppose Oppose with regret. 1/60 is too slow to provide a sharp image of this speeding train, even with panning. Locomotive is also cut off on right. --GRDN711 13:10, 1 August 2022 (UTC)
- I'm sorry, but I can't relate to that. The locomotive is sharp, the effect is clear, perhaps the exposure time could have been even longer. The essential parts of the locomotive are clearly visible, especially the front part of the locomotive. Moreover, it is not even covered. The right, cropped part is insignificant. IMO the image is a good example for motion blur. --XRay 06:13, 3 August 2022 (UTC)
- I find motioin blur to be most effective against a sharp, in-focus background. This one I think the shutter speed was just a little too slow to work well. Just my opinion. --GRDN711 20:43, 4 August 2022 (UTC)
- Support Regarding the high resolution the moving object is by far sharp enough. I would have even wished for a slightly longer exposure time. Composition, lighting, etc. are nice, crop doesn't bother. --Smial 09:30, 2 August 2022 (UTC)
- Support I don't understand the criticism and the contra. In my opinion, there is nothing to complain about in the picture. -- Spurzem 09:53, 3 August 2022 (UTC)
- Support Per others. --Sebring12Hrs 08:08, 4 August 2022 (UTC)
Total: 4 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promoted --Robert Flogaus-Faust 12:00, 7 August 2022 (UTC)