Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives August 08 2017

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Consensual review[edit]

File:Indian_Peacock_in_Tholpetty_Wildlife_Sanctuary_02.JPG[edit]

  • Nomination Indian peacock (Pavo cristatus) in Tholpetty Wildlife Sanctuary, Wayanad. --Praveenp 16:26, 3 August 2017 (UTC)
  • Decline
  •  Support Good quality. PumpkinSky 17:25, 3 August 2017 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Sorry to disagree. Not sharp enough --Vengolis 02:52, 5 August 2017 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Per Vengolis. --Basotxerri 07:16, 5 August 2017 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Per Vengolis. Same sharpness as mine, which was also declined.--Peulle 11:59, 5 August 2017 (UTC)
Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 3 oppose → Declined   --Peulle 17:40, 7 August 2017 (UTC)

File:Villnöß_Weg_zum_Flitzewasserfall.jpg[edit]

  • Nomination Trail to the Flitz creek in Villnöß, South Tyrol. --Moroder 17:29, 3 August 2017 (UTC)
  • Promotion
  •  Support Good quality -- Spurzem 18:39, 3 August 2017 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Sorry, but I disagree. There are some white artifacts on the highlighted area on the branches, this area should be corrected if possible. --Basotxerri 18:54, 3 August 2017 (UTC)
    • ✓ Done Thanks for the hint --Moroder 11:54, 4 August 2017 (UTC)
@Moroder: OK that's better but could you please check again? There is a tiny rest left. Thank you! --Basotxerri 15:05, 4 August 2017 (UTC)
✓ Done should be better now. Cheers --Moroder 15:43, 6 August 2017 (UTC)
 Support OK now, the fix is quite good. --Basotxerri 16:21, 6 August 2017 (UTC)
Running total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 0 oppose → Promote?   --PumpkinSky 00:52, 8 August 2017 (UTC)