Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives August 02 2016

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Consensual review[edit]

File:Old_international_bridge_Tuy-Valenca.jpg[edit]

  • Nomination Old international bridge Tuy-Valença --Harpagornis 18:15, 30 July 2016 (UTC)
  • Promotion
  •  Support Good quality. --Hubertl 18:55, 30 July 2016 (UTC)
  •  Oppose  Support Super cool pic! :) But please provide a geo tag for it and fix that strange blue thing/shadow (CA?) near one of the lights. The description could also be improved with things like material, year built, better description of location. W.carter 20:47, 30 July 2016 (UTC)
  •  Comment Don't get me wrong, I think it is a fantastic pic, and as soon as the little glitches are fixed I will support it wholeheartedly. I even think this has a shot at Featured. W.carter 07:46, 31 July 2016 (UTC)
  •  Comment Possible errors fixed --Harpagornis 12:02, 31 July 2016 (UTC)
  • Many thanks for the text. The blue shadow or whatever it is, is still visible on my screen (see notation). Have you fixed this and the system is just slow to update the picture, or? W.carter 12:58, 31 July 2016 (UTC)
  •  Comment Once at full size the blue shadow is gone now, through some weird thing the Wikimedia software still displays it in the previev version of the file. I've seem similar disturbing created by that code before. Anyway, pic looks nice and I'll change my vote. Please go nominate it for FP. :) Good luck! W.carter 17:46, 31 July 2016 (UTC)
Total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 0 oppose → Promoted   --Hubertl 22:32, 1 August 2016 (UTC)

File:Schlosspark Fulda (03).jpg[edit]

  • Nomination Sculpture in the park by the castle in Fulda --Verum 10:16, 25 July 2016 (UTC)
  • Decline
  •  Oppose Wrong WB. --Smial 12:43, 25 July 2016 (UTC)
  •  Comment it´s good practice, not immediately decline pictures with improveable faults. --Hubertl 19:43, 25 July 2016 (UTC)
  • ✓ Done (please reload page to see) I used the statue itself for WB, using the lightbulb behind it made it too blue as it is a warm afternoon (17:08) photo. W.carter 11:39, 26 July 2016 (UTC)
  •  Support Crop could be better but o.k.--Ermell (talk) 14:47, 27 July 2016 (UTC)
  •  Support Per Ermell. --Basotxerri 18:40, 28 July 2016 (UTC)
  •  Oppose I´m really sorry, but the top crop makes it a non-QI. --Hubertl 03:05, 29 July 2016 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Wrong WB and too tight crop--Lmbuga 00:02, 31 July 2016 (UTC)
Total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 3 oppose → Declined   --Hubertl 22:36, 1 August 2016 (UTC)

File:BasílicaLujan-jul2016.jpg[edit]

  • Nomination Front view of Nuestra Señora de Luján Basílica --Ezarate 22:19, 22 July 2016 (UTC)
  • Decline
  •  Comment Stitching error left side, retouching leftover at the lamp right side, too magentaish, too dark. --Cccefalon 06:40, 23 July 2016 (UTC)
  • ✓ Done redone --Ezarate 13:26, 23 July 2016 (UTC)
  •  Oppose CA. -- Smial 10:49, 25 July 2016 (UTC)
  •  Comment @Smial: Could you please add notes on the picture over the CAs, thanks!! --Ezarate 13:56, 25 July 2016 (UTC)
  •  Comment reworked Ezarate 00:27, 27 July 2016 (UTC)
  •  Neutral I'm not really convinced, but I'm also not really sure if the shortcomings are large enough to still reject the image. Someone else may decide. -- Smial 07:32, 29 July 2016 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Too noisy and sky with stitching errors.--Ermell 08:57, 30 July 2016 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Perspective issues; the ground isn't that round. Image looks tilted.--Peulle 13:20, 30 July 2016 (UTC)
Total: 0 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Declined   --Hubertl 22:35, 1 August 2016 (UTC)