Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives April 27 2020

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Consensual review[edit]

File:Península_de_Paraguaná.svg[edit]

  • Nomination Map of Paraguaná Peninsula.I --Wilfredor 17:16, 21 April 2020 (UTC)
  • Decline
  •  Support Good quality --PantheraLeo1359531 18:26, 21 April 2020 (UTC)
  •  Oppose I disagree. Too small. --Tournasol7 21:27, 21 April 2020 (UTC)
  •  Support Well, it's an svg so unlike for many other things in life size doesn't matter here since it's infinitely scalable by default --D-Kuru 23:28, 21 April 2020 (UTC)
  •  Oppose The labels are often not free of other graphic elements and is therefore sometimes difficult to read. --Milseburg 07:10, 22 April 2020 (UTC)
  •  Oppose per Milseburg - The overlapping of many of the names with roads or coastline is messy. I do agree that the size is not a problem. -- Ikan Kekek 10:49, 22 April 2020 (UTC)
  •  Oppose names labels are sloppy Seven Pandas 19:12, 24 April 2020 (UTC)
Total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 4 oppose → Declined   --Seven Pandas 13:27, 26 April 2020 (UTC)

File:La_Tambres_ww_Urtijëi.jpg[edit]

  • Nomination West view of the farmhouse La Tambres in Urtijëi. --Moroder 14:06, 21 April 2020 (UTC)
  • Decline
  •  Comment Pls reupload the picture because there is a problem on the top left corner --Zcebeci 17:14, 21 April 2020 (UTC)
  •  Support Good now. --Zcebeci 19:27, 21 April 2020 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Very harsh light. Overprocessed (shadows/highlights adjusted too much, looks unnatural). --Kallerna 06:31, 22 April 2020 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Too much shadow recovery making it look unnatural. There is an abrupt transition in the middle, suggesting your left frame is unsharp. -- King of Hearts 19:50, 22 April 2020 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Per King of Hearts: stitching error and extreme pushing of the shadows. --MB-one 14:28, 23 April 2020 (UTC)
  •  Question @MB-one: Just out of curiosity, could you please put a note on the stitching error --Moroder 15:01, 23 April 2020 (UTC)
  • ✓ Done marked the area. You can see a sheerline and a sudden drop in sharpness between two source images. --MB-one 06:15, 24 April 2020 (UTC)
Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 3 oppose → Declined   --Seven Pandas 13:26, 26 April 2020 (UTC)

File:Weg_in_Park_Theresienstein_20200406_04.jpg[edit]

  • Nomination A path in park Theresienstein. --PantheraLeo1359531 13:40, 19 April 2020 (UTC)
  • Promotion
  •  Support Good quality -- Spurzem 14:26, 19 April 2020 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Strong CA, washed out colours. --Kallerna 04:58, 22 April 2020 (UTC)
@Kallerna: Where do you see strong CAs and washed out colors? I don't understand your arguments for negative evaluations less and less. -- Spurzem 16:59, 22 April 2020 (UTC)
  •  Support don't see any CA and colors seem fine to me. --MB-one 14:33, 23 April 2020 (UTC)
  •  Support The branch on the right is annoying but QI for sure. I cannot see the justification for Kallerna's oppose vote. Charlesjsharp 08:47, 25 April 2020 (UTC)
Running total: 3 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promote?   --Seven Pandas 13:25, 26 April 2020 (UTC)

File:Odeo_di_Erode_Attico.jpg[edit]

  • Nomination: Odeo di Erode Attico, Acropoli di Atene--GattoCeliaco 13:24, 17 April 2020 (UTC)
  • Review
  •  Support Good quality. --Zcebeci 15:14, 17 April 2020 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Distorted, JPG aartifacts --Podzemnik 02:21, 18 April 2020 (UTC)
Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Inconclusive result after 8 consensual review days   --Peulle 12:22, 26 April 2020 (UTC)